Media discussion of Justice Scalia's death and its implications for the public unions case
Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association overstates the impact and misses the larger issue.
Before Justice Scalia died, it was
very likely the Court would hold that it is unconstitutional for state law to require, or even simply allow, "agency shop" agreements compelling non-union members to nevertheless contribute to the union's collective bargaining and related expenses. Now, the Court will probably affirm the Ninth Circuit's decision upholding agency shop agreements, but without setting precedent.
That is obviously a better outcome for the Union, but how long will it last? The New York Times
says "a major threat to public unions has evaporated." Reuters writes more temperately that "a 4-4 split is a likely outcome, which would hand a win to the unions as that would leave the lower court's ruling in their favor in place."