On Thursday night, UCLA's student government judicial board
heard Students for Justice in Palestine v. Singh and
Students for Justice in Palestine v. Rogers, both alleging that members of UCLA's student government (USAC) who are against the Boycott Sanction and Divest (BDS) movement took inappropriate gifts from pro-Israel organizations and should have recused themselves from the anti-Israel Divestment vote,
which lost 7-5.
While on its face, this hearing concerned ethics rules, this case is the start of a national movement to make support for Israel costly or prohibited on college campuses,
UCLA testing ground for next generation of anti-Israel campus tactics.
Jared Sichel, a reporter for the
Jewish Journal, Los Angeles' local Jewish newspaper, comments (as both
Professor Jacobson and
I have also noted in the past) that however the board rules, SJP has succeeded in "making it costly to be pro-Israel at UCLA."

Now, everyone seeking office who goes on a trip to Israel or is associated with a pro-Israel organization may be accused of having a conflict of interest boxing them out of key positions that vote on divestment matters.
SJP is building a chilling effect, showing that those who stand in their way will be subject to long hours of debate, protest, and even "legal" hearings. Some may not agree with SJP, but consider it not worth the trouble to stand in their way.