Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Undercover Video: AZ Sen Candidate Kyrsten Sinema Claims Arizonians Will ‘Actually Shoot You’ if You Mention Gun Bans

Undercover Video: AZ Sen Candidate Kyrsten Sinema Claims Arizonians Will ‘Actually Shoot You’ if You Mention Gun Bans

Donor: “Its gotta be all Martha McSally is a C**t and I’m good.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6eH6ZSLvsak

Project Veritas has released a few undercover videos to show us what Democrat candidates really think and how they lie in order to receive votes from moderates or Republicans.

Arizona Democrat Senate candidate Kyrsten Sinema became the latest target. An undercover Project Veritas journalist caught staff members saying that Sinema has to appear moderate, which means no talking about gun bans. When the journalist mentions that, Sinema says, “They’ll actually shoot you.”

Sinema is running against Republican Rep. Martha McSally for retiring Republican Sen. Jeff Flake. Sinema had an advantage in earlier polls, but as Election Day draws near, McSally has taken the lead.

Videos from Sinema’s past where she trashes Arizona and Arizonians haven’t done much to help her along with a few other videos.

I doubt this one will help her out.

Weapons Ban

The undercover journalist spoke with campaign manager Michelle Davidson about “assault” weapons bans. She explained that Sinema cannot flat out say she wants to ban certain guns due to political pressures.

The journalist then told Sinema that California is so nice because when anyone says “ban guns” others enthusiastically agree. Sinema is then asked, “You say ‘ban guns’ out here?”

She said: “They’ll actually shoot you.”

So instead of talking about weapons bans, Sinema has to use the left’s treasured talking points: background checks, mental illness, or violent crimes.

DAVIDSON: “So we can’t talk about that [assault weapon bans] right? So what Kyrsten… the conversation that she can lead is how do we get to a place where we can, background checks… We’ve got to fix the gun show loophole, we have to fix the background check system. We’ve got to make it harder for people who have been convicted of domestic violence and other violent crimes to get guns—I mean those are the conversations we can have.”

Steve Andrews, a big time donor for Sinema, admitted on camera that a weapons ban cannot be a platform issue. However, he believes that if the issue ever came up to vote, then Sinema “will be okay” and won’t vote against banning “assault” weapons.

Need Independent and Moderate Voters

The video then cuts to Sinema explaining to people that she needs independents, moderate, and even conservative Republicans to vote for her in order to win the elections.

Field organizer Lauren Fromm told the undercover journalist that Sinema is “very liberal” and a progressive. She cannot “alienate the conservative or moderate conservative voters by” showing the fact that she’s pro-choice.

Fromm said that Sinema “took so much democratic help” because she cannot show her progressive side to the people of Arizona.

Another field organizer, Madison Snarr, wasn’t as eloquent in her explanation as to why Sinema hides her liberal views:

SNARR: “She’s going to vote for the interests of Arizonans. She’s going to stand up and protect Arizonan values. Whatever the f**k that means.”

(That means doing her job. People forget that politics isn’t about party. These representatives and senators have to vote how the people they represent want them to.)

Snarr also said that Sinema became a centrist in order to move up the chain and gain power. Snarr told Arizona votes that if “you f**k with Trump” then don’t vote for Sinema.

Field organizer Michael Smyser thinks Sinema will embrace her progressive views if elected as senator because that term is six years. She has a moderate Democrat voting record in the House since it’s only a two year term limit, which doesn’t give the public enough time to get “on board with a lot of like more swinging left type things.”

In other words, shorter term limits forced Sinema to actually do her job and vote according to the views of her constituents.

The undercover journalist talks with big donor Andrews again, who reiterates that Sinema will vote progressive in the Senate, but for right now she has to “be all Martha McSally is a C** and I’m good.”

The Border, Citizenship

The border is the last topic on the video. It makes sense this is a big issue since Arizona lies on the border and there’s a migrant caravan headed towards the US.

Sinema boasted to the journalist that America “should offer Citizenship to every person who’s in this country, who isn’t bad.”

That answer I don’t mind too much. While citizenship shouldn’t be a cake walk, the process should be easier and run smoother.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Sinema will almost surely lose now. She’s just too kooky.
Which will leave us with the RINO McSally. When she betrays us in the future, it won’t be a surprise.

    UnCivilServant in reply to Matt_SE. | October 30, 2018 at 11:39 am

    RINO squishes can sometimes be whipped to the vote.

    Progs you know are always against good policy.

    gwsjr425 in reply to Matt_SE. | October 30, 2018 at 12:22 pm

    Rush Rule: always choose the most conservative candidate.

    When she betrays us in the future,… we won’t care as much because there is so much power in being the majority party.

    In fact, we might even want to thank her for being such a ridiculous candidate that the seat went to R instead of D. Only a clown like her could pull off the loss.

      elle in reply to elle. | October 30, 2018 at 1:02 pm

      I meant we might want to thank Sensimilla…oh…I mean Sinema.

      Same Same in reply to elle. | October 30, 2018 at 1:03 pm

      These are the same kinds of arguments that have been used over and over to support people like the execrable McCain. Sorry. Just not buying it anymore.

    cgray451 in reply to Matt_SE. | October 30, 2018 at 2:24 pm

    Sinema is going to win.

    henrybowman in reply to Matt_SE. | October 31, 2018 at 3:46 pm

    Just think of McSally as McCain’s gift to you from beyond the grave. A final finger in the face of Arizona’s genuine conservative Republicans.

She almost makes me ashamed of our shared ancestry (Friesland in the northeastern Netherland.)

That’s kinda the point of the 2A

Bitterlyclinging | October 30, 2018 at 12:22 pm

And the polls have this idiot 6 points ahead of Martha McSalley?

Voice_of_Reason | October 30, 2018 at 12:23 pm

A RINO who sometimes votes with ya and sometimes against is better than a progtard who lies about being a moderate and yet always votes against ya.

I’m an Arizonan, and people have told me they’d like to ban guns, and I’ve never shot a single one of them. Never even aimed my gun at them.

Sinema is a liar.

    henrybowman in reply to Observer. | November 1, 2018 at 4:40 pm

    I suspect she’s harking back to the legend of Mary Rose Wilcox, a Maricopa County supervisor who was shot in the butt at a public meeting over a political disagreement. Except the disagreement had nothing to do with guns — a homeless drifter shot her in anger after she voted to impose a tax to build a stadium.

Sarah Brady, currently rotting in Hell, stated that concealed carry would turn our streets into the Wild West. The only thing consistent about Dems is that reality is opposite of what they want or predict.

Looking at the “They’ll actually shoot you photo” of her above, I can’t help laughing because it looks like LIPSTICK ON A PIG. haha.

I usually don’t like comments about a candidate’s appearance, but to anyone who has a problem with me saying that, what say you about them calling McSally a c**t?

    elle in reply to elle. | October 30, 2018 at 5:10 pm

    Funny, you actually down-voted with no self-awareness that my comment was a set up intended for someone just like you. Thanks for making my point.

Where do Leftists find these nutjobs, like Sinema?

Oh, that’s right, in the pit of Isengard where orcs are grown. Silly me.

Gob bless Project Veritas!

Unbloody likely. Americans believe in rights and responsibilities. The Constitution does not recognize the taking of life without justification… Well, perhaps in the Twilight Amendment.

What I think most of you do not realize is that the left has now gone tribal. Just like in my home state of FL, the snowbirds and leftists retirees are too stupid to realize why they left their old states and why they moved to FL! They do not care that both Sinema and Gillum are both morons and would subvert the Constitution in a heartbeat. The present political climate is so hostile that reason is not ion the picture. It is only political identification and if they have a “D” behind their name they will get the left’s vote. In a normal world, both Sinema and Gillum would have not even been nominated. The old joke about one of them being in an 8×10 glossy picture in bed with a dead child would not harm either one of them in the Demorat mindset!

As an Arizonan who has put up with Sinema’s communist machinations for almost 20 years now, let me provide this assurance: Kyrsten, if we were going to shoot you, you would already be shot.

Instead, you should be watching your “fan base” for disillusioned nutbags like the one who shot Giffords.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend