Buttigieg Senior Advisor hits Elizabeth Warren secrecy over $millions earned as corporate hired gun
Lis Smith calls on Warren to open “up the doors to the decades of tax returns she’s hiding from her work as a corporate lawyer – often defending the types of corporate bad actors she now denounces”
Since 2012, we have covered Elizabeth Warren’s years representing large corporations against the interests of employees and others Warren now claims to champion. Warren likely earned millions of dollars in compensation, but never has disclosed those amounts.
Indeed, our research led the way, with even The Washington Post recently crediting us for unearthing Warren’s legal representation of Dow Chemical against women claiming damages for breast implants.
See these posts at Legal Insurrection from October and early November 2012, and more recently:
- Elizabeth Warren issues incomplete list of cases (2012)
- Elizabeth Warren helped protect Dow Chemical against breast implant claims (2012)
- Elizabeth Warren’s implausible Dow Chemical claim (2012)
- Elizabeth Warren represented large utility seeking to liquidate rural electric cooperative (2012)
- Elizabeth Warren’s implausible Dow Chemical claim (2012)
- Elizabeth Warren held asbestos workers hostage to inter-corporate fight (2012)
- Documenting another Elizabeth Warren fib — Fairchild Aircraft case (2012)
- Elizabeth Warren tries to get ahead of her law practice problems with pre-holiday weekend info dump (2019)
- WaPo confirms: As lawyer, Elizabeth Warren worked to limit Dow Chemical’s liability to breast implant victims (2019)
- Legal Representation of Major Corporations (ElizabethWarrenWiki)
I appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight last July to talk about Warren’s corporate law practice:
Yet not a single Democratic candidate has raised the issue, much as they inexplicably have ignored Warren’s Native American deception.
I thought Tulsi Gabbard would take down Warren over these issues much as Gabbard eviscerated Kamala Harris’ campaign hopes. But alas, Tulsi hasn’t risen to the challenge, at least not yet.
But Pete Buttigieg may be willing to go there. Warren has been attacking him for not disclosing the clients he worked for when he was at McKinsey & Co. consulting firm, and for private fund-raisers.
Buttigieg’s Senior Advisor for Communications, Lis Smith, has hit back, pointing out Warren’s secrecy over her corporate legal practice and the money she made.
If @ewarren wants to have a debate about transparency, she can start by opening up the doors to the decades of tax returns she’s hiding from her work as a corporate lawyer- often defending the types of corporate bad actors she now denounces.
Warren has been dropping in the polls, after gaining momentum through the summer and fall. Her Medicare for All plan, and the ludicrous tax plan she proposed to pay for it, have damaged her tremendously.
Warren’s corporate legal practice, Native American deception, and other dubious personal narratives could be a death blow to her campaign if raised on the debate stage before a national audience.
But someone needs the guts to do it.
[Featured Image: YouTube]
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Shrieking Crow keeps scouts on Samoan Warrior, stealthy Quiet Gay knifes her in back.
You get the feeling that Barrack’s behind Peter Paul’s back stabbing?
BREAKING:
Obama’s Body Man Riche Love Endorses Buttigieg
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/12/05/pete-buttigieg-endorsements-obama-officials-076231
Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook (Peter Paul’s college buddy buddy) isn’t the only Globalist who’s got Peter’s back with BIG BUCKS it seems……….
“Warren Admits She Shouldn’t Have Claimed To Be Native American: ‘I Shouldn’t Have Done It, I’m Not A Person Of Color’
Oh. Can you give back your Harvard job now?…”
https://www.weaselzippers.us/439136-warren-admits-she-shouldnt-have-claimed-to-be-native-american-i-shouldnt-have-done-it-im-not-a-person-of-color/
Is this true?????
Check the 2012 Boston Globe articles. She denies making the money now.
Cat fight?
This could induce me to watch the next Dem debate.
Not.
Sneaky Pete strikes back. Hope they take each other out.
??
They care about that but they don’t care a bit about the fact that she’s demonstrably a liar, a charlatan, and a fraud.
Lawyers do law. Politicians do virtue signalling.
My take is she’s not bright enough to defend Dow, unless she was useful because of connections. And if that’s the case, her political career should be over.
Actually defending Dow Chemicals against ( most false ) charges of faulty breast implants makes me like a little.
Only a little.
A teeny tiny bit.
Butthead belabors the obvious.
Just to demonstrate how weak Fauxcahontas is in an utterly weak Democratic field:
#National @Reuters/@Ipsos Poll (12/4-5):
Biden 19%
Sanders 14%
Warren 9%
Buttigieg 6%
Bloomberg 4%
Yang 3%
Booker 1%
Castro 1%
Klobuchar 1%
Delaney 1%
Williamson 1%
Steyer 1%
Patrick 1%
Gabbard 0%
Bennet 0%
— Political Polls (@Politics_Polls) December 6, 2019
Ten of the 14 candidates polled are at or below the margin of error of 4%. She is only 5% ahead of Bloomberg 4%. In other words, statistically speaking, sinking Fauxcahontas and rising Bloomberg are in a virtual tie.
It’s not like anyone is scooping up any votes either as candidates drop out while others gain a little. Undecideds are now 31% which is the highest since April. In other words, the more voters polled learn about the candidates, the less they like ALL of them. And where is that supposed outcry for Hillary or the Wookie?
The ways it’s going, that brokered convention will end up with the Democrats closing shop. It is so hard and expensive to sell cancer.
“Warren’s corporate legal practice, Native American deception, and other dubious personal narratives could be a death blow to her campaign if raised on the debate stage before a national audience.”
In the Democrat primary I doubt if those things would cost her a single vote. William Jefferson Clinton raped and/or harassed any woman he could get his paws on, and the Party women luuuuuved him (still do) and would crawl over broken glass sans knee pads to vote for him.
But in the sewer of toxic identity politics that is the Democrat Party the fact that she is straight and white is a gigantic hurdle for many of the Party’s genocidal voters.
This the the dilemma for Democrat Party voters: the top candidates are all white. On the other hand none of the “persons of color” running has much national name recognition or appeal.
The gripping hand is that ultimately the Democrat Party voters do not matter. If needed the Party leaders will hand pick a nominee and then rely on a combination of widespread voting fraud and terrorism (Antifa, BLM) designed to suppress non-Democrat voter turnout in order to install their nominee in the White House.
The faster black voters wake up to how misrepresented they have been by their current black leaders, the faster they will realize that it isn’t white racism standing in their way. They need to find black leaders who offer more compensation as payback for black victimhood. The reported 34% black support for Trump signals that black people are finally getting it. So maybe they will now stop huddling in the corners making excuses and whining and finally join the rest of society. We all have the same problems.
Correction:
They need to find black leaders who only offer compensation as payback for black victimhood.
They are going to have trouble holding the black vote. Getting them to the polls could backfire.
Democrats never have any trouble, in certain areas, of getting their votes counted, regardless of whether those people actually voted
….or whether their “voters” were dead or not…….
It’s beginning to look like a Dukakis year. Except the candidate will combine all the worst features.
Lack of accomplishment, lack of charisma, unpleasant personality, dirty history, and unpopular personality.
That, and the press has been thoroughly discredited. Along with financial experts and foreign policy experts.
Trump has his opponents wishing for war, wishing for recession. They say these things out loud, which will make some awesome sound bites.
I just saw the headline on this article, and it looks like it said blitzkrieg!
Ironically this was a good thing Warren did. She defended a company that had done absolutely nothing wrong, and tried to reduce the amount of extortion money it had to pay to a class of lying customers who falsely claimed to have been damaged by a perfectly good and useful product, which as a result was driven from the market.