Image 01 Image 03

Left Eats Left: Al Sharpton Triggers Leftists by Equating Anti-Israel Campus Mobs to J6

Left Eats Left: Al Sharpton Triggers Leftists by Equating Anti-Israel Campus Mobs to J6

“How do the Democrats, how do all of us on that side, say January 6th was wrong if you can have the same pictures going on on college campuses? You lose the moral high ground.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wDYNVH0U3cs

It’s been a wild week across the nation between the NYPD clearing the violent anti-Israel occupiers from Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall and the LAPD and CHP taking care of business at the militarized UCLA anti-Israel compound encampment.

As the warzone-like video clips and images flashed across the screen Thursday morning, the crew on MSNBC‘s “Morning Joe” program were seemingly in agreement that campus agitators were making Democrats look bad ahead of the November elections.

Rev. Al Sharpton was particularly unamused at what he was seeing and noted that he agreed with co-host Joe Scarborough’s assessment of the optics. Sharpton went even further, though, equating the anti-Israel agitators to the January 6th defendants:

MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” showed footage of police moving in on UCLA’s anti-Israel encampment, as host Joe Scarborough demanded Democrats speak out against these demonstrations.

“The politics of that, what is being robbed by them not doing that, Joe, where you and I agree. How do the Democrats, how do all of us on that side say Jan. 6th was wrong if you can have the same pictures going on on college campuses, you lose the moral high ground,” Sharpton said.

“Good Lord, don’t make a parallel to Jan. 6th,” co-host Mika Brzezinski said in response. “For some reason that’s not allowed.”

Watch:

Brzezinski, as it turns out, made a similar statement a couple of days prior, which presumably did not please their small audience:

But it was Sharpton’s observation in particular that had the Very Online Left fuming:

The day after Sharpton made the comparison, he walked it back:

“…The right will wrongly try to act like see they’re violent and they talk about January 6th. First of all, January 6th and the violence here is not the same thing

They try… some right wing to say I’m comparing it, not comparing it, what I’m saying is they will compare it”

First things first, Al Sharpton of all people pretending he’s some arbiter of what’s right and wrong as it relates to riots is hilarious considering his sordid history, but I digress.

Sharpton’s comparison of the anti-Israel campus mobs to the January 6th defendants was interesting when one takes into account that, unlike the J6 defendants who have had the book thrown at them in addition to many being held without bond for long periods, the pro-Hamas demonstrators likely will not spend much if any time in jail.

In fact, the UCLA protesters who were arrested reportedly never even saw the inside of a jail cell and were given free breakfasts before they were released in what amounted to little more than a field trip:

And, not surprisingly, there was already talk about the protesters who were released coming back to rebuild the encampment:

And in the aftermath of the Columbia University encampment and occupation debacles, the “punishment” for some students by their professors was to announce that they don’t have to take final exams, that they’ll be getting As for their courses – a policy that campus administrators greenlighted Wednesday.

Wash, rinse, repeat. Far-left activists keep doing what they do because there are rarely if ever any consequences.

And that brings me to my next point, Sharpton’s claim about Democrats “losing the moral high ground.” When exactly did they ever have the moral high ground? Was it before or after the Antifa/Black Lives Matter-led riots in 2020? Before or after the crime-riddled Occupy Wall Street encampments from 2011? Before or after the stalking of conservative Supreme Court Justices in the spring and summer of 2022?

As unfortunate as it was, the Capitol riot was a one-time thing. But we could go back 20, 30, 40, 50 years or more to see how the activist left led by professional agitators have used violent protest as a tool to manipulate public sentiment in order to get what they want.

Will they be successful this time around? It’s unlikely, considering an overwhelming majority of those recently polled indicated they supported Israel over Hamas in the war. Relatedly, only three percent said the Israel-Hamas war was the most important issue to them personally, which is further evidence that the anti-Israel left’s attempts at raising awareness of their “cause” and turning public sentiment against Israel aren’t working.

With any luck, the pro-Hamas movement here in the U.S. will be a miserable failure on par with the Defund the Police movement’s epic crashing and burning. But even if it does, it won’t be long before the next violent left-wing call to action begins, because as history has shown us, it’s just who – and what – they are.

— Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 1 
 
 4
Whitewall | May 4, 2024 at 6:36 pm

Al Sharpton making sense. What is this world coming too.?!


 
 0 
 
 0
BierceAmbrose | May 4, 2024 at 6:52 pm

How does this stack up? Who gets to call who what, here, because of who they are?

There are some echos—for instance, at Kent State they were protesting in support of the mass murdering Khmer Rouge regime and today’s protests are in support of the mass murdering Hamas regime!


     
     1 
     
     0
    diver64 in reply to Neo. | May 5, 2024 at 6:36 am

    Sort of. At Kent State they were not actively protesting in support of the Khmer Rouge but rather overseas involvement of the US in what most saw as a war the US had no business being in as well as the draft. The numbnuts “protesting” now are not saying much about US involvement in a war, they are calling for the genocide of Jews, the destruction of a sovereign nation and the total withdrawal of support for that country.


       
       2 
       
       1
      Milhouse in reply to diver64. | May 5, 2024 at 9:43 am

      At Kent State they were not actively protesting in support of the Khmer Rouge but rather overseas involvement of the US in what most saw as a war the US had no business being in as well as the draft.

      No, they weren’t against the war, or the draft; they were on the other side. If the USA had decided to intervene in support of the communists instead of against them, they’d all have cheered.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Zachriel in reply to Neo. | May 5, 2024 at 9:45 am

    Neo: Khmer Rouge regime

    There was no Khmer Rouge regime in 1970. The U.S. incursion in Cambodia is often cited by historians as helping bring about the collapse of the Cambodian government leading the way for the Khmer Rouge to take control in 1975. The Vietnamese communists brought about the end of the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979.


 
 0 
 
 1
The Gentle Grizzly | May 4, 2024 at 7:06 pm

If he’s not careful, they’re going to revoke his victim card.


 
 0 
 
 1
puhiawa | May 4, 2024 at 7:18 pm

Obviously Sharpton was chosen to cool down the rhetoric before the election.


 
 0 
 
 0
CommoChief | May 4, 2024 at 7:20 pm

Al Sharpton is grifting huckster who has a finely tuned sense about whether certain actions are playing well or playing poorly among the gullible public. He is pointing out that these pro Hamas mobs using intimidation, physically preventing movement of Students/Faculty to classes, occupying buildings and public spaces, disrupting campus life to in life graduation ceremonies …ain’t being well received by the general public. Not by leftists who haven’t yet drunk the antisemitic kool aid and certainly not by the majority center right taxpayers.

IOW this is PO folks and undermining the ability to divide and manipulate threatening the left’s ability to politically profit from that artificial division. When a gifted grifter like Sharpton says to his team, in essence, ‘knock it off’ folks should listen.


 
 0 
 
 4
rhhardin | May 4, 2024 at 7:51 pm

J6 protestors were right, these protestors are wrong.


     
     2 
     
     1
    Milhouse in reply to rhhardin. | May 5, 2024 at 9:47 am

    Sharpton doesn’t even understand the concept of right and wrong. (To be fair, neither do a lot of the commenters here on LI. Like Sharpton they see only whether something is useful to them.)


 
 0 
 
 7
smooth | May 4, 2024 at 7:56 pm

But al sharpton is all good with BLM burning and looting american cities, right? Such a fraud.


 
 0 
 
 8
henrybowman | May 4, 2024 at 7:58 pm

You can’t equate these riots with J6. These riots inconvenience only the little people. The J6 riots inconvenienced Our Masters, and so were tres insurrectiony.

“We’re comparing students who are peacefully protesting a genocide to white supremacists who tried to overturn an election and had murder as the end goal?”

Holy Jeebus, where you buying THAT kool aid? The MK Ultra kiosk?


     
     0 
     
     3
    CommoChief in reply to henrybowman. | May 5, 2024 at 6:21 am

    Yep. When our elite/establishment leadership class is inconvenienced that is a ‘problem’. When it is average folks trying to get to work, drop off children at school, go to the airport…meh it is a ‘peaceful protest’. The average folks have become more and more aware of this bifurcation. Widespread understanding came in the residential real estate bubble in ’06, amplified by Tea Party era, pushed again in the Trump era. Covid policies left no doubt about bifurcation as big box stores, liquor stores and other high tax revenue and/or politically connected businesses were allowed to operate, gyms, schools, Churches and small mom/pop businesses… not so much. Today we have the entitled leftist students forming anti Semitic mobs on/around campus using intimidation to cause chaos while demanding taxpayers pay off their student loan debt. Average folks are paying attention.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Concise in reply to henrybowman. | May 5, 2024 at 10:31 am

    Well there certainly seem to be professional agitators in this crowd of Hamas terrorist supporters but are they government sponsored like the lowlife scunge inciting problems on Jan 6?


 
 0 
 
 2
George_Kaplan | May 4, 2024 at 8:20 pm

Whether you consider the J6-Campus mobs comparison to be reasonable depends on whether you’re a Leftist or not.

The Left hold the mob to be righteous, non-violent, and defensible, despite the fact they’ve engaged in violence, criminal conduct, openly support Hamas and terrorism, refuse to condemn the murder, rape, and other atrocities of October 7, and whose ultimate goal is the absolute destruction of the Jewish state i.e. genocide.

The Left also hold that J6, the fiery but mostly peaceful march on Congress, and then through parts by some, was a violent, dangerous effort to overturn the Democrat’s natural right to rule, and occurred at the direction of He Whose Name Shall Not Be Spoken.

The question is, how does the part of America that votes, but doesn’t mindlessly opt Democrat, interpret it?


 
 1 
 
 4
gonzotx | May 4, 2024 at 11:00 pm

“As unfortunate as it was, the Capitol riot was a one-time thing. But we could go back 20, 30, 40, 50 years or more to see how the activist left led by professional agitators have used violent protest as a tool to manipulate public sentiment in order to get what they want.”

There is so much wrong with this statement.

Jan 6 was a peaceful protest of a stolen election until the paid for agitators, FBI, CIA insighted the crowd after the police shot protestors with rubber bullets, tear gassed them , and murdered 2 women

Clearly NOT a comparison.

And please, stop giving print to the View and Morning Joe

They are ignorant , paid for dumbasses…


     
     1 
     
     1
    Obie1 in reply to gonzotx. | May 5, 2024 at 9:37 am

    I am only aware of one woman murdered during the “insurrection” and one who died of natural causes. Perhaps you can enlighten me.
    Before we call people ignorant, we should exercise care in differentiating between insight and incite.


       
       0 
       
       1
      wendybar in reply to Obie1. | May 5, 2024 at 10:39 am

      Getting beat on by the Capitol police isn’t natural causes.


       
       0 
       
       0
      henrybowman in reply to Obie1. | May 5, 2024 at 2:14 pm

      Ashli Babbitt was shot by a police officer.
      Rosanne Boyland was beaten unconscious by Capitol Police, then crushed as police forcibly herded protesters out of the tunnel.
      The Swamp disputes this claim… the same Swamp that claims demonstrators killed Officer Sicknick, a man who walked away from the demonstration and had dinner with his family that night.

      It’s amazing to think that they claimed George Floyd died of police brutality, not drug overdose.

      They claimed Rosanne Boyland died of drug overdose, not police brutality.

      Protesters killed nobody. Police killed at least two. The government and the media lied about both… then gave a commendation to the murderer they couldn’t hide.


 
 0 
 
 2
FOAF | May 5, 2024 at 5:32 am

It’s official now.

The Democrat Party is more antisemitic than Al Sharpton.


     
     0 
     
     1
    henrybowman in reply to FOAF. | May 5, 2024 at 2:16 pm

    Remember when antisemitism was merely calling people “Hymies?” Good times. Now you have to threaten to exterminate an entire country just to get onto the scoreboard.


 
 0 
 
 0
healthguyfsu | May 5, 2024 at 5:51 pm

Of course, he would never work out this equation with the BLM riots included despite much more property damage and loss of life.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.