The “Luxury Beliefs” of the Globalist Left

The “Luxury Beliefs” of the Globalist Left

Mamdani’s recent initiatives—such as the proposed $30 million city‑owned grocery store in New York City—revive memories that, for left‑leaning Western intellectuals, remain politely ignored realities or abstract inconveniences. 

For those of us who grew up under communism, praise for state‑run enterprises and centralized provision does not sound bold or compassionate. It sounds eerily familiar. And worse: cynical.

I remember waking before dawn and standing in line for hours before stores opened, hoping simply to buy something. Milk, bread, sausage—three modest items that appeared unpredictably, if at all.

In the 1980s, my father once brought home a colleague visiting from the Soviet Union. We gathered what little we had and produced a surprisingly decent casserole, given the available ingredients: scrawny soy sausages and something unrecognizable, withered onions, and melted processed cheese as a sauce. We apologized for the absence of real meat. Fortunately, our guest was delighted. He had not seen sausages in Soviet stores in years.

This was everyday life under socialism—flat, improvisational, quietly humiliating—before one even reckons with its far more brutal political repression. It bears little resemblance to the romantic language with which socialism is discussed in contemporary Western culture, where state control is treated as an aesthetic preference and scarcity as an abstraction.

Few cultural artifacts capture this disconnect as clearly as East-West (Est‑Ouest), the 1999 Franco‑Russian film by Régis Wargnier. It tells the story of Westernized Russian émigrés who return to the Soviet Union after World War II, lured by visions of renewal and justice, only to encounter repression, deprivation, and misery.

Yet in the contemporary West, “champagne socialism,” or gauche caviar, is alive and well. Today, it often appears in the form of what Rob Henderson has aptly termed “luxury beliefs”: ideas that confer moral prestige on those who hold them while imposing tangible costs on those forced to experience their consequences.

Such beliefs include calls to defund or dismantle policing, assertions that family stability is largely irrelevant to children’s outcomes, or confidence in sweeping state control—ideas most often promoted by those insulated from their effects—living in gated neighborhoods, sending their children to private schools, and relying on private security when public systems fail.

Luxury beliefs persist not because history has failed to test them, but because the people who promote them are protected from their results. This asymmetry allows repeatedly failed ideas to be recycled and celebrated anew, so long as the costs remain someone else’s burden. As Margaret Thatcher famously observed, the problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.

Nor can these failures be explained away as mere errors of execution. Systems that suppress political, economic, and associational freedom collapse with striking regularity precisely because their flaws are embedded in the theory itself, not simply in its implementation.

The endurance of these ideas reflects less historical ignorance than deliberate amnesia. Luxury beliefs flourish wherever belief and burden are separated—where advocates of sweeping social and economic experiments retain private exits from public failure. For those without such exits, ideology is not a posture. It is a condition.

Having lived the difference between economies debated in ivory‑tower classrooms and economies endured in kitchens and queues, I recognize a dangerous truth: history does not need to be reinvented in order to be repeated. The tragedy is not only that these ideas persist, but that they continually expand their reach, capturing ever larger areas of cultural and political life.

More troubling still is that such luxury beliefs are once again celebrated as moral virtues by those who do not bear their consequences, yet wield disproportionate influence over millions of young minds. Reinforcing the American founding principles of individual liberty, responsibility, and equal justice remains our most effective antidote to their siren song.

Nora D. Clinton is a Research Scholar at the Legal Insurrection Foundation. She was born and raised in Sofia, Bulgaria. She holds a PhD in Classics and has published extensively on ancient documents on stone. In 2020, she authored the popular memoir Quarantine Reflections Across Two Worlds. Nora is a co-founder of two partner charities dedicated to academic cooperation and American values. She lives in Northern Virginia with her husband and son.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.