Image 01 Image 03

Liberals Pounce on Andy Ngo for Posting Inconvenient Facts on Suspect in Waukesha Car Plowing Massacre

Liberals Pounce on Andy Ngo for Posting Inconvenient Facts on Suspect in Waukesha Car Plowing Massacre

“Sorry, not sorry for reporting on who Darrell Brooks is,” Ngo tweeted in response to liberal attacks including one from Daily Beast reporter Robert Silverman.

Independent journalist Andy Ngo is routinely subjected to harassment, hate, and sometimes even brutality from the radical left because he’s unafraid to report on the inconvenient truths about violent Antifa and Black Lives Matter mobs that frequently go unreported by the mainstream media. The MSM views both groups as selfless heroes committed to advancing democracy or whatever despite the reality of the situation being just the opposite.

As per the norm, the left has once again shown their true colors in the aftermath of the deadly Waukesha, Wisconsin, car plowing attack on Sunday that left six dead and at least 48 injured. They used the horrific attack to mock the Kyle Rittenhouse “not guilty” verdict and used it to attack Ngo for having the audacity to give people the disturbing background on the suspect in the case, Darrell E. Brooks Jr.

Before we get to the latest round of attacks on Ngo, let’s look at what he reported about Brooks, courtesy of this Twitter thread:

Ngo’s Twitter thread triggered Daily Beast “reporter” Robert Silverman, who has me blocked for some reason but whose tweets I’m still able to view from another account. This was the start of a multi-tweet thread yesterday of Silverman condemning Ngo for alerting readers as to possible racist motivations behind Brooks’ alleged actions:

And then, after a fauxfended Silverman accused Ngo of being an opportunistically dishonest reporter (a characteristic that is rumored to be a requirement to work at certain supposedly “respectable” MSM outlets, so I hear), he contacted Ngo to try and get him to answer questions about the Twitter thread he wrote on Brooks. Ngo smartly declined, while also noting Silverman has a history of targeting him:

Regardless, Silverman’s article went up anyway. The headline laughably described Ngo and fellow independent journalist Tim Pool as “big-time right-wing trolls,” which is sort of the equivalent to declaring Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams role models for how to accept defeat gracefully:

In addition to that, Twitter mobs, including disgraced former MSNBC anchor Keith Olbermann went all ragey on Ngo, with some reporting Ngo’s tweets to the Twitter Powers That Be. Surprisingly, they declined to take action:

Ngo had his share of defenders as well, including those who turned around and mocked the Daily Beast’s skewed priorities:

To his credit, Ngo isn’t backing down, alerting readers on his “Locals” page about Silverman’s “report” as well as his reporting about Brooks:

Good on Andy Ngo for giving a textbook example of how not to bend the knee when the outrage mobs come for you. This is how it’s done.

— Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Yes, putting those 2 obama turds in the White House is paying dividends,

Ngo just has to say “I think he is white” to really drive them nuts.

Andy has turned into quite a capable journalist and I respect his work. He has paid some heavy dues while refining his craft in dangerous places, doing things that J-school college kids only read about.

Andy is a true journalist

read a book on ed murrow years ago–one quote from a speech he gave has stayed with me: “the truth needs no embellishment. the truth just is.”

believe andy is from the same tribe

    MaggotAtBroadAndWall in reply to texansamurai. | November 24, 2021 at 8:05 am

    Well, sorta. Consider the phrases “she is firm” and “he is pigheaded”.

    Both convey the same general idea: the person being described holds strong convictions. So using either “firm” or “pigheaded” to describe someone is generally truthful.

    In general, however, we don’t like pigheaded people. We like people who are firm in their convictions.

    So if we describe someone as “pigheaded” it will often generate a negative emotional response in the reader/receiver of the message compared to the emotional response if we day they are “firm”.

    The Left is masterful at using language in this way to manipulate emotions.

      Ohio Historian in reply to MaggotAtBroadAndWall. | November 24, 2021 at 9:27 am

      When I took journalism, neither word would have been allowed, since both are judgements, not facts.

      A poem I remember from long ago that exactly mirrors what you say:

      Stubbornness we condemn
      Firmness we condone
      The former is our neighbors’
      The latter is our own.

The Black Nationalist BLM supporting whitey hating racist can add another notch to his belt — an 8 year kid died today from his injuries.

Bet his defense will be temporary insanity. Is any other defense possible?

Maybe his attorneys will claim it was brought on by a lifetime of dealing with systemic racism and white privilege.

It would be nice if the trial starts a couple of months before the midterms. But I bet the Dems funding his defense will make sure it is scheduled after the midterms.

That is, if they don’t Jeffrey Epstein him.

    What ever happened to the good old days 150 years ago, when a guy doing something like this could have been tried, convicted and hung by now ….. and all the “Christmas Shoppers”, aka Looters, in San Francisco and elsewhere would have been shot if they tried to rob the General Store?

    Joey Williams in reply to JHogan. | November 23, 2021 at 10:25 pm

    I would think that Brooks’ lawyer would go for the “Twinkie defense”, claiming that he was forced to eat junk food because of White Privilege, and he thought he was actually driving into a hate-filled racist mob that was going to make him go to a Starbucks and drink a mocha latte.

    henrybowman in reply to JHogan. | November 24, 2021 at 8:17 pm

    “Bet his defense will be temporary insanity. Is any other defense possible?”

    Judging from his CV on social media, I’d try for permanent insanity.

Andy NGO is a fearless and courageous real journalist whose work deserves to be studied in journalism schools and who deserves a Pulitzer Prize for exposing BLM and Antifa as Communist thugs

“He also has a post about how to get away with running people over on the street.”

I heard from a friend that Brooks is planning to sue Ford, because the Ford Escape that he bought… couldn’t.

And, while we’ve got all this blame to spread around:

Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, who was elected to the position in 2007, has spent his career supporting cash-bail system reform because he argues it criminalizes poverty.
In an interview with the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel the year he was elected, Chisholm said: “Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?”
“You bet. Guaranteed. It’s guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”

So who deactivated his accounts? Can they be charged with obstructing justice by destroying evidence?

Brooks is an example of what the Molly coddling d/prog wanted in their vision of the criminal justice system. Having gotten exactly what they demanded they don’t want the normal folks to realize it; at least not yet. Why? Because the vast majority of people still don’t support their ideology and it’s results.

That’s r and d, male and female, black, white, asian, latino, caribbean, native born or immigrant. The majority do not support releasing career criminals with lenient sentences and low or no bail. Frankly I am astounded that Brooks was offered bail at $5 million after his latest acts of violence.

a) liberal MSM criticism is a mark of honor. Kudos to Andy.

b) liberal don’t “pounce”. They slink and slither…

And the fact that a lawyer I respect, Walter Olson, actually retweeted Silverman’s thread led me to rethink that respect.

Example #54327 for the 2021/2022 Season of this:

“To anger a non-Democrat, tell him/her/zher lies.

To anger a Democrat/leftist, tell him/her/zher the Truth.”

“Liberals”? More accurately, “Progressives” or “Leftist Totalitarians” or “Commie Sympathizers”!

Antifundamentalist | November 24, 2021 at 10:38 pm

Ngo reports the facts. The left narrative insists that the facts are not facts at all and that Ngo is telling lies. Isn’t that libel? They’re accusing him of lying.
If he can prove that he isn’t, is that actionable?