Image 01 Image 03

Leftist Twitter Uses Waukesha Parade Killings To Mock Rittenhouse Self-Defense Verdict

Leftist Twitter Uses Waukesha Parade Killings To Mock Rittenhouse Self-Defense Verdict

“The driver from the incident in Waukesha will claim self defense. It’s the new normal.”

To the shock of no one, the left immediately jumped on the Waukesha, WI, tragedy to push out their stupid takes on Kyle Rittenhouse.

I will write up the Waukesha incident once we have more concrete details. But from what we know the police have Darrell E. Brooks Jr. in custody for allegedly plowing into a crowd at the annual Christmas parade, killing five people and injuring 40 others.

Brooks has a long rap sheet dating back to 1999. It includes many felonies.

Reports indicate Brooks was fleeing a knife fight right before the SUV drove through the crowd. Fox News’s David Spunt said the police did not find a fight when they arrived on the scene, “but they saw a red SUV speeding off.”

But let’s go ahead and make snide remarks as people mourn family and friends. I will use some screenshots because the cowards will likely delete the tweets. I’ll add more as I see them.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Leftists are evil. You people need to stop giving them the benefit of the doubt.

    Wicked, certainly, as in the wicked solution a.k.a. planned parent/hood for social progress, medical progress, and climate mitigation. Also, diversity [dogma], including racism, sexism, and other class-based bigotry. They need to lose their Pro-Choice, relativistic (“ethical”), opportunistic (“=”) religion.

      gibbie in reply to n.n. | November 22, 2021 at 6:21 pm

      n.n, It seems you, like me, are reluctant to use “evil” to describe people, and prefer “wicked”. I think this is an important distinction.

      “Evil” is a thing – the complete absence of good (not a person, except when applied to Satan), and “wickedness” is aligning ones self with that thing.

      So many are degrading the meaning of words. Accuracy is important.

        Evil is a character summation. Wicked refers to principles and
        practices as in “wicked solution… to an ostensibly hard problem.”

    MattMusson in reply to chrisboltssr. | November 22, 2021 at 1:14 pm

    He is a black Dylann Roof.

    Now I understand how black Americans felt when Roof walked into the Prayer Meeting in Charleston and shot everyone. So, like Roof, Brooks deserves the Death Penalty.

    I wouldn’t attribute to evil what can be more readily explained by malevolent ignorance.

Andrzejr2 (właso) | November 22, 2021 at 11:49 am

$ 750 deposit and she’ll be on the loose.

As a reminder, Rittenhouse with no criminal record of $ 2,000,000.

Some, Select [Black] Lives Matter

So many things to unpack from this attack. But, what has really stood out for me is the question about HOW this idiot was not in jail. He was arrested earlier in the month (his SECOND of two pending criminal cases in WI alone) and in that case filed November 5th, ‘he is charged with resisting or obstructing an officer, reckless homicide, disorderly conduct, bail jumping and battery.’ According to reporting from Fox 13 News, court records show $500 cash bond was posted Nov. 19.

How does a guy with a lengthy criminal history including an open case of ‘bail jumping’ get a $500 bond in a RECKLESS HOMICIDE case?

    Milhouse in reply to TargaGTS. | November 22, 2021 at 3:10 pm

    Where are you getting this crap? He had no homicide charges until now. Th charges against him were: resisting an officer (misdemeanor), felony bail jumping, second degree recklessly endangering safety (felony) with domestic abuse assessments, disorderly conduct and battery (both misdemeanors, also with domestic abuse assessments.) Your own link doesn’t say one word about homicide, so where did you get it?

    And his bail was $1000, not $500. Not that that makes a difference, but if you’re going to condemn something you have a duty to get it right.

      stevewhitemd in reply to Milhouse. | November 22, 2021 at 3:31 pm

      How does someone with a charge pending for ‘bail jumping’ get bail in any amount? I think that’s the question being asked.

        Milhouse in reply to stevewhitemd. | November 22, 2021 at 3:53 pm

        And it’s a very good question. But we still need to get the facts right. There was no homicide charge, and the bail was $1000. That’s all.

          fogflyer in reply to Milhouse. | November 22, 2021 at 9:59 pm

          I’ve never understood why people downvote you for saying the truth.
          I know you were pretty anti-Trump, but I’ve always found you to be a stickler for the truth, which I admire.

Were any of those celebrating goes attaching this POS with a skateboard or pull a gun on him? Liberalism once again falls on its face.

The unhinged leftists in the media have blood on their hands. They lied about Rittenhouse for a year, and then doubled down after the verdict. One really has to wonder if this guy wasn’t incited to commit this heinous act by their lies.

“Mocks Rittenhouse self-defense verdict”

What an outrageous insult to the victims, the little children and old ladies.

Furthermore, there is no comparison between the two. Rittenhouse was white and so were the criminals who were shot.

On the other hand, the black racist Brooks killed innocent white people. He was probably motivated by the lies put out by the news media. And comments such as this will motivate more of the same.

    gonzotx in reply to UserPeabody. | November 22, 2021 at 1:55 pm

    He’s a monster that didn’t need any motivation
    He’s been a murderer for a long time

    henrybowman in reply to UserPeabody. | November 22, 2021 at 7:26 pm

    But the people Kyle shot were honorary blacks.
    I can’t stress this enough.
    They were “there to honor Jacob Blake.” This allowed them to “share” black privilege.
    Like a “servant,” who can ride the carriage only when he is engaged in accompanying his “master.”

      UserPeabody in reply to henrybowman. | November 22, 2021 at 9:55 pm

      Honorary black lives must matter far more than regular black lives because the number of white people killed and injured in retaliation far exceeds one for one.

Perhaps these leftists are hoping people will focus on their utterly stupid comments rather than the corrupt people who enabled this POS to be on the street. They want us in the reactive mode rather than the proactive mode which they operate in as it is the proactive mode that makes things happen.

I mean, these people realize there is a legal standard for “self defense”, right?

    henrybowman in reply to Paul. | November 22, 2021 at 7:29 pm

    These same people who scream “your speech is violence,” and “your silence is violence?”
    Why would you expect that?

The beauty of the American legal system is that each case is decided and won and lost on facts and evidence, not conspiracy theories. Let’s see what the facts and evidence are in Waukesha

Compare the current coverup coverage of this by the Regime media with what the coverage would be if the races were reversed.

That should tell you all you need to know.

Think Facebook and YouTube would have been quickly scrubbed overnight?

The Feds got involved very quickly last night because they knew the truth very quickly. And the Regime has ordered them to cover it up and run interference. Garland’s DOJ is in control and cranking out propaganda. They are diverting and covering this up as much as possible.

    JHogan in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 12:22 pm

    Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec

    The same people who told you for 14 months that Kyle Rittenhouse intentionally murdered BLM protesters are now telling you that a career criminal unintentionally ran over a Christmas parade

      henrybowman in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 4:59 pm

      I’m not a religious person… but from 30,000 feet, the Democrats’ clear pattern of canonizing thugs and criminals with free bail, “mutual combat” exceptions, and angel-wing funerals; while demonizing clean-record kids like Rittenhouse and Sandmann, and soccer parents at school board meetings… that pattern can be described only as expressly and calculatedly Satanic.

    JHogan in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 12:23 pm


    Notice how race, criminal past, social media posts supporting Democrats/BLM, bail reform, George Soros DA, name of killer are all left out of the headline when they DO NOT fit the narrative?

Well, ok then. Though, considering the disparity of forces, the probable order of battle, the fact the red team is better armed and trained and the red team controls the oil and NG fields, the agricultural headland and consists of largely self reliant people while the blue team consists largely of ‘knowledge workers’ and the dependent and are primarily confined to Cities in the interior while the majority of the blue team is located in narrow areas along the coasts which could easily be isolated and defeated in detail…..

These self appointed spokesman for the blue team might want to rethink their apparent call for violent conflict in the streets of our Nation. Maybe the DoJ domestic terrorism TF can make further inquiries of these keyboard warriors but I doubt they will bother.

Reports indicate Brooks was fleeing a knife fight right before the SUV drove through the crowd.

That’s the cover story Garland’s DOJ concocted overnight.

Any reports of anyone in hot pursuit? Videos show nothing.

Any reports or videos showing the driver was honking his horn, swerving to avoid people, and hitting the brakes to avoid running over children and grandmothers? Instead of accelerating to get through the bodies under his wheels that were interfering with his progress.

I guess if he was fleeing a knife fight he thought honking his horn might attract more attention than running over children and grandmothers.

    TargaGTS in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 12:39 pm

    I’ve watched a dozen or more videos and haven’t heard a single ‘honk’ nor have I heard any sirens whatsoever, the things police use when they’re chasing a suspect vehicle.

    Instead, the only cop seen chasing the car was a cop who was on foot and sprinting behind the SUV. He was (presumably) stationed at the start of the parade route and ran after the the SUV as it sped by him.

    JHogan in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 12:39 pm

    Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

    They’ve settled on the narrative. They’re really going to try to convince us that Waukesha was unintentional. He was “fleeing the scene of another crime.”

    Bullshit. Don’t let them insult your intelligence. We’ve seen the video. It was intentional. Now ask yourself why they’d lie

      henrybowman in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 7:34 pm

      Expecting a “disadvantaged person’s” car to have brakes is like expecting him to know where to get a Voter ID — rayciss.

      I think this guy finally found the elusive answer to the age-old “unsolvable” trolley problem:
      “First, tell me, who am I, and what is my motivation?”

        UserPeabody in reply to henrybowman. | November 22, 2021 at 10:14 pm

        According to critical race thinking you cannot solve the unsolvable trolley problem unless you know the races of the people involved. The ones who are white should get their asses run over. If they’re not tied up you need to tie them up and put them on the track.

    JHogan in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 1:14 pm

    Catturd ™@catturd2

    Like Kyle Rittenhouse, the Christmas parade massacre is all on video.

    And exactly like that case – fake news is out in full force trying to tell you you’re not seeing what you’re seeing on video.

    Only suckers and fools listen to these clowns.

Well joining a Christmas Parade is not the best way to avoid the Police when on the run from a crime as the left is claiming. They just came up with a quick narrative to try to mitigate the damage. Obviously a stall and way to buy time. This will become a taboo topic in the MSM soon.

    JHogan in reply to Elzorro. | November 22, 2021 at 12:41 pm

    Suggesting anything other than the Regime approved narrative will become grounds for banning and suspension from Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter.

Leave it to the lefties to say that it is perfectly acceptable for a crazy, deranged leftist to plow down innocent kids and adults in a Christmas parade with a car for no reason at all other than he is crazy……….. but it is not acceptable for someone trying to keep a community from being destroyed to defend themselves when attacked by three felons……. what a screwed up world inhabits these people’s minds.

Let me get this straight.

Facts unknown but the narrative is already set…that’s really the hot take they want to try and play this with?

“Ain’tnoCoon” was even dumb enough to basically point out that they know nothing, but either way they have a built-in excuse for why it was caused by wypipo, directly or indirectly.

They want teenagers with AR’s playing cop at protests and civilians running over people they disagree with in the street

As long as we’re all playing by the same rules, I don’t actually have any major problem with this.

Obviously, that “same rules” caveat is a hypothetical. There’s no danger of it ever happening here in the Liberal wasteland.

“According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Darrell Brooks Jr was out on bail after he was charged with purposely running over a woman with his vehicle

Are you paying attention yet?”

The vile Dhimmi-crats are such morally bankrupt reprobates, and, are so manifestly stupid, besides. They are truly the dumbest members of American society. Infantile fools, all of them.

From the almost useless PC…

…Intentional but not terrorist act….Repeat, not a terrorist act.

And that’s about it. Further info will be by press release. No further PCs scheduled. The Regime media won’t have much to report, will they? Other than ‘not a terrorist attack’. Not a terrorist attack. Not a terrorist attack. Not a terrorist attack.

OK. Now let’s flip the race of everyone. Dead all black. White perp. With equivalent YouTube videos and Facebook posts. Think they’d have more to report?

Garland’s DOJ propogandists are having a lot of trouble creating an alternative narrative.

    JHogan in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 2:42 pm

    Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog

    Police say the Waukesha killer was not running from cops when he plowed into the parade. Yet they’re sure it wasn’t a terror attack. So he intentionally ran down 50 people but we know within 12 hours that he had no political or racial motive? Bullshit

      Milhouse in reply to JHogan. | November 22, 2021 at 3:16 pm

      They simply mean that he doesn’t seem to be a jihadi. Which I’m sure was everyone’s first guess.

        Arminius in reply to Milhouse. | November 22, 2021 at 4:57 pm

        Islamic terrorists are simply one brand of terrorist. Most of his social media accounts have been taken down but he still has a twitter account up under his rapper name MathBoi Fly and his tweets show he’s PO’d about the Rittenhouse verdict, is anti-police (natch; he’s a felon and registered sex offender), and pro-Malcolm X. The city of Waukesha Chief of Police has stated this act was intentional. Depending on his motivation it may well be an act of political terrorism along the lines of Ted Kaczynski’s bombings. Kaczynski wasn’t charged with domestic terrorism as there is no such crime even now. But we do have a legal definition of domestic terrorism, and if fits use it.

        On the other hand I don’t want to come close to appearing like the whiny leftists who for some twisted reason think it’s “white privilege” that killers like the Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock aren’t labeled terrorists but the ISIS supporting Muslim Sayfullo Habibullaevich Saipov who ran people down on a popular footpath in lower Manhattan are.

        It’s like lawful self defense; they just can’t grasp that there are legal standards in play. One either meets the legal standard, or one doesn’t. And it isn’t like “mass murderer” somehow is a step up morally from “terrorist.”

          henrybowman in reply to Arminius. | November 22, 2021 at 7:40 pm

          To be fair, many of these same people think that “racist” and “fascist” are totally appropriate monikers for anyone who disagrees with them, no matter over what issue or what side of the issue they take; so expecting them to apply robust legal standards is probably over-optimistic.

Better comparison would be Charlottesville, woman was killed by some going through a mob.

    n.n in reply to ronk. | November 22, 2021 at 4:50 pm

    Nothing like Charlottesville. That event included Antifa protestors who mobbed a vehicle, and prevented its exit. The driver responded to a clear threat, and given that organization’s nationwide activities, had reason to believe that the risk was not plausible, not imminent, not probable, but immediate and progressive.

Some of the twitter jack asses asserting this are lawyers, they should volunteer to mount this as a defense pro-bono. I want to see it.

The suspect, who was charged with five counts of intentional murder was out on a warrant from running over a woman who was the mother of his child. Note and compare Biden’s call for restraint re lack of knowledge of the facts with his calling Rittenhouse a white supremacist.

Witnesses were quoted as saying that the now identified driver was driving from side to side and hitting people . That at this early stage is very inconsistent with a claim of fleeing a knife fight . That, and a prior arrest for striking a woman who was the mother of his child, with a car may have very well been the basis for the defendant being charged with five counts of intentional homicide, as opposed to reckless homicide

Nobody “needs” an SUV.
It’s an “assault vehicle,” good for one thing and one thing only: crushing the greatest number of the people in the shortest amount of time.
All you need is a trusty pennyfarthing bicycle. If you are threatened, you can just pedal it right through the front door. Or off your balcony.
Have I missed any Democrat talking points?

    Good job, but don’t forget the rape-defying defense/offense genius plan of urinating on oneself. An actual “defense” championed by the left against rape. Also, let’s not forget separate “rape tents” where one can seek refuge from leftist rapists preying on stupid women who “occupy” and demand a socialist revolution against imaginary victimization that somehow is worse than their actual subjugation, oppression, and rape by their own comrades. It’s not rape-rape if you pee’d yourself and then protected the identity of your rapist for political reasons. Or something.

      henrybowman in reply to Fuzzy Slippers. | November 22, 2021 at 7:43 pm

      “don’t forget the rape-defying defense/offense genius plan of urinating on oneself.”
      What a sexist suggestion. It doesn’t work at all for guys. They just roll you over anyway.

Milwaukee County Case Number 2021CF004596 State of Wisconsin vs. Darrell Edward Brooks Jr

Domestic abuse, battery, skipped on a $1000 bail, and NOW multiple counts of planned paraders where diversity (e.g. racism, sexism, ageism) may have been a motive.

one of the reasons they make 00 buck–prefer a rifle outside the casa(and have one that far exceeds the power of a shotgun)but a schmuck like this deserves to expire in a hail of 00

condolences and prayers for the victims safe recovery

Leftists and progressives are garbage humans whose extermination would benefit the entire world.

Hopefully when this vermin gets sent to prison, where even hardened violent criminals have a problem with the notion of killing kids at a Christmas parade, they will register their displeasure with him.

The right-wing is libertarian, which acknowledges the dignity and agency of women and men who are capable of self-moderation. The far-right is anarchist, and the left-right nexus is leftist. The center (i.e. Pro-Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness) does not condone children and adults wielding scalpels and other weapons of mass abortion for social progress, medical progress, and climate mitigation. That said, unlike the Capitol Hill “hero”, the justification of self-defense was neither plausible, imminent, or even probable cause, but an immediate threat to viability.

fleeing a knife fight?–come on–am reasonably proficient with edged weapons and can state from direct personal experience that, with a couple of exceptions, knives/swords & the like are CONTACT weapons–if you can reach(and maintain or increase)a distance of two to three metres, you are relatively safe–if you can manage a retreat in a motor vehicle you will definitely survive–did this guy sustain any wounds whatsoever?–where’s his assailant?–was he actually being pursued?–come on–he’s just another typical thug with a proven history of violence who screwed-up and killed/injured a bunch of innocent people and is now trying to lie his way out of it–what an utter pos–is a shame he wasn’t put down at the scene

The only way self defense could figure into this even is if a parade goer had a 12 gauge shotgun and killed the SOB when he ran the barricade, going after the parade.