Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Damage Already Done: Media and Big Tech Ease Suppression Of Hunter Biden Influence Peddling Scandal

Damage Already Done: Media and Big Tech Ease Suppression Of Hunter Biden Influence Peddling Scandal

”It would have seriously hurt Joe Biden’s campaign enough to make a difference in key swing states”

https://nypost.com/2020/10/14/email-reveals-how-hunter-biden-introduced-ukrainian-biz-man-to-dad/

The Democrat/Media/Big Tech axis has decided that it is safe—now that the election is over—to inform the American people about the shady Ukrainian and ChiCom connections and influence-peddling scandal surrounding Hunter Biden and implicating ‘the big guy,’ then Vice President and now Democrat presidential candidate Joe Biden.

The current rollout of the months-old story, first broken by the New York Post, is a study in gaslighting.  Just look at this story. They gasp. It’s huge. Why oh why, they seemingly gloat, did it go “largely unnoticed“?

The answer, of course, is that a coordinated effort was instantly launched to discredit, distract from, and suppress the Post scoop and to demonize, belittle, ridicule, ban, bully, and silence anyone who wrote about it, up to and including the Post itself whose Twitter account was locked in retaliation for their breaking a story that didn’t favor the Democrat candidate for president.

The New York Post is vindicated, as are all among the right, center-right, and conservatives who valiantly attempted to inform American voters of the unethical dealings—linked to Hunter Biden—between prominent Democrats, including Kamala Harris, and the Chinese, among other unsavory foreign ‘partnerships.’

The reason for the bombshell’s suppression is crystal clear, as Professor Jacobson notes, “It would have seriously hurt Joe Biden’s campaign enough to make a difference in key swing states.”

Fox News reports:

Cornell Law School professor and media critic William A. Jacobson told Fox News that mainstream media appears to have “snuffed out the Hunter Biden scandal” in order to help the former vice president’s election chances.

”It would have seriously hurt Joe Biden’s campaign enough to make a difference in key swing states,” Jacobson said. “Now that the election is over, and the media mission appears to be accomplished, there are no such constraints. Rather than regretting this journalistic malfeasance, the perpetrators likely are quite proud of themselves.”

Conservative strategist Chris Barron agrees that CNN and MSNBC essentially helped Biden win the election.

“Hunter Biden’s business dealings would have cost Joe Biden any shot at the White House, which is exactly why outlets like CNN and MSNBC refused to cover the issue before the election,” Barron told Fox News.

The Democrat/Media/Big Tech suppression collusion was reportedly effective in that Biden would not have won (legitimately or otherwise) swing states still embroiled in election-related legal challenges.

“We took a survey after the elections, on the night of the elections, and asked Democrats if they knew about the Hunter Biden story. A full 36% of Democrats knew nothing about the Hunter Biden story,” [Media Research Center Founder and President Brent] Bozell said. “Further, 4.6% of Democrats said they would not have voted for Joe Biden had they known this story. We then took that 4.6% and we spread it across the electoral landscape.”

“Guess what? Had they known this story, Joe Biden would not have carried Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and the Trump lead would have been definitive in North Carolina. Meaning what? Meaning that Donald Trump would have won 289 electoral votes and would be the re-elect president of the United States. “

A large swath of American voters, those who still rely on major news outlets and social media for information, are the losers here.  Too many of them will be surprised to hear belatedly about this story because they still think that the legacy media is unbiased, that it actually reports important election-related news as it breaks regardless of partisan considerations.

Perhaps this example of journalistic and Big Tech malfeasance in purposefully suppressing Biden family influence-peddling prior to a presidential election will open a few more eyes and minds to the role these activist industries play in propping up, covering for, and advocating for the Democratic Party.

It’s probably too much to hope that they will also wonder if they’ve been told the truth about the 2020 Presidential Election irregularities.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Propaganda doesn’t just mean what they say it encludes what they don’t.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to 2smartforlibs. | December 11, 2020 at 11:46 am

    LOL

    RE: “”It would have seriously hurt Joe Biden’s campaign enough to make a difference in key swing states”

    Goebbels big lie.

    Little Girl Man-handling Biden and the Democrats lost in the biggest National Landslide ever seen in our history with President Trump’s winning.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to 2smartforlibs. | December 11, 2020 at 11:53 am

    This will put spine in your back.

    Must see.

    Check the News with Jonathan Shuttlesworth

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GJA6wlIGVZk

    JusticeDelivered in reply to 2smartforlibs. | December 11, 2020 at 2:08 pm

    So most of American media did its best to support a criminal syndicate, the Biden clan. Harris most certainly has earned her place by their side.

    Imagine a group of criminals running America.

    This is real bad news for –Joe Biden. When the NY Times and other deep swamp reporters start publishing these stories, it means that Harris- and Obama et al are getting rid of Joe.

    We all knew they would dump Joe – but we thought they would have the courtesy to wait until after the inauguration.

Election is over…time to be honest

Not one single thing would have changed. Democrats had the illegal votes they needed for the steal sorted ready to go on election night. All they needed to know was the margin required to over turn, which they started to get that evening and in to the morning.

    randian in reply to mailman. | December 11, 2020 at 8:28 pm

    Yep, and even if their fraud needed to be even more blatant to win we’d still have the judges in those states ignoring it and the media claiming that you can’t believe your lying eyes when it comes to election fraud.

Greenwald also emphasized — strongly! — the role of the Deep State in suppressing this story. By lying through their teeth in saying that the story had “hallmarks of a Russian disinformation operation”, the “former intelligence officials” gave the media/Dems/Tech-Tyrants an excuse to bury this scandal.

It’s not “Damage already done.” It’s “Mission accomplished.”

Master Plan: knife Pedo-Joe, the Criminal Potato, and pave the way for Kamala Obama .

New WaPo motto:

“Democracy Dies In Darkness – And We Supply The Darkness”

And yet, after this, the “news” media will continue along, acting as if they think they still have endless credibility, not to mention moral authority, and most of the world will accept that they do.

Corruption loves company.

To all Democrat voters who maybe reading this and are disgusted with their party, re-register to unaffiliated independent today. Help save our country.

I don’t think this is a sudden outbreak of ethics and honesty by the Joseph Goebbels media. They never succeeded in completely suppressing the story (Soviet style) so that no one heard about it. The British press, which is not “conservative” at all but nevertheless loves to poke the dumb cowboy colonials in the eye, has covered the story surprisingly well.

So the Joseph Goebbels media is doing the next best thing. Long after the election is over they are doing a pitiful few stories on it. But in a few days or weeks they will drop it as “old news about vague technicalities that were probably not illegal”. They will then say: we thoroughly and completely covered the story without a shred of bias or partisanship and found nothing to it, so the complaints of the RethugiKKKan Deplorables are without merit.

Needless to say the FBI will play its role and squash the “investigation” saying there was no credible evidence, no intent to break the law, no reasonable prosecutor blah blah blah.,,

    The BBC,ITV, Skynews did not cover the Hunter Biden story at all. They were exactly in lock step with their Democrat brothers in America in banning the story from the airwaves…but by fuck did they carry EVERY fucking Democrat created Russian hoax story breathlessly these last 4 years!

    It’s simpler than that. This dance is a two-step.
    They suppressed the story before the election to get Joe into the White House.
    Now they’re hyping the story to get Kamala into the White House.

They are never honest the Democrats Propaganda ministry, its on to plan 2, get rid of [s]Hindenburg[/s] Sundowner

All of that is a sideshow. The left think they are in the preparatory stage of throwing joe biden overboard for kamala IF they prevail (they will not).

The Texas case is everything. It kills so many birds with one stone.

Election fraud.
Political corruption.
Foreign influence.
main stream media corruption…

The United States Supreme Court is going to give us a reset, but not the kind of reset the left was hoping for. It will be a reset for We, the People. We’re taking back our country.

President Donald J. Trump promised to return the power of our government back to us, The People.

He and his team worked on all of this for a long time. A lot of events came together, were put into place or “fell” into place to bring us to where we are now.

We’re almost there.

    Dathurtz in reply to CKYoung. | December 11, 2020 at 1:53 pm

    Let’s hope so. We may want to hope for the best, but plan for the worst, though.

      JusticeDelivered in reply to Dathurtz. | December 11, 2020 at 2:16 pm

      Ammo is hard to find, and the price is up more than double.

        Man, do I know it. I shoot a lot. It is probably my primary hobby, much to the chagrin of my bank account. I took up reloading a while ago and it really cuts down the expense and increases the availability of bullets.

        I recently put together a .243 to play with (thinking it would be rare to have a .243 shortage), but those things are gone with everything else. Even the reloading materials are scarce.

        henrybowman in reply to JusticeDelivered. | December 11, 2020 at 6:25 pm

        More proof that it’s better to be an ant than a grasshopper.

    lichau in reply to CKYoung. | December 11, 2020 at 2:32 pm

    I have two bets on offer:

    1) (A small Starbucks). Supremes simply refuse to hear the Texas case. Without comment. There is no way to force them to hear it.

    2) (A large Starbucks). 5-4 decision, with Roberts in the majority, ruling against Texas. Lots of weaselly legal words.

    Courage in human beings is rare. In politicians, even ones in black robes for life, essentially unheard of. There is no way those black robed politicians are going to rule for Trump. They and their families would need security for life. They would never be able to eat out in DC. Not to mention never getting invited to the cool cocktail parties.

    MarkS in reply to CKYoung. | December 11, 2020 at 5:53 pm

    I hate to be contrary, but SCOTUS will give us nothing but the shaft!

    henrybowman in reply to CKYoung. | December 11, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    There’s only one reset that’s going to solve this problem. It’s been in the Bill of Rights since day one. Way up near the top.
    When the problem is us v. them, only an idiot thinks that the way to solve it is to elect another one of “them” to handle it.

    txvet2 in reply to CKYoung. | December 11, 2020 at 7:24 pm

    “”The United States Supreme Court is going to give us a reset””

    Sorry. OBE. No reset here. Election fraud has just been legalized by order of pretty much every relevant court in the country.

thalesofmiletus | December 11, 2020 at 1:06 pm

The primary difference it would have made is that the Democrats would have needed to print more phony ballots. “Margin of fraud” is not an achievable goal — they can always make up the difference.

Why is no one mentioning Sullivan’s overreach in this mess? This guy needs to be thrown out of the country, not just his bench.

“The rules are simple: they lie to us, we know they’re lying, they know we know they’re lying, but they keep lying to us, and we keep pretending to believe them.”

So, we have learned that the various governments do not care about their constituents at all. Wr have learned that the courts are wholly political animals and decide cases based solely upon political considerations, regardless of the law, including black-letter law. We have learned that the public’s watchdog on the government, the press, is wholly political and little more than the propaganda arm of the Establishment and Democrat party. We have learned that vote fraud is so wide spread that elections are now meaningless. We have learned that we have no one to depend upon, but ourselves. So, what happens now? Get ready for a wild ride, folks.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Mac45. | December 11, 2020 at 4:47 pm

    RE: “So, we have learned that the various governments do not care about their constituents at all.”

    Yes, you said it right.

    They all adopted Ernestine the Telephone Operator’s line as their motto.

    “We don’t care. We don’t have to.”

It’s almost as if Joe Biden was a placeholder candidate./s

    henrybowman in reply to Demonized. | December 11, 2020 at 6:30 pm

    “Be Kamala’s beard for the election, and when you step down, she’ll make sure no one in your family ever gets fined or imprisoned for their crimes.”
    So easy, an intern TV scriptwriter could finish the rest.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend