Image 01 Image 03

Rep. Rashida Tlaib Keynotes ‘American Muslims for Palestine’ Conference Devoted to Destroying Israel

Rep. Rashida Tlaib Keynotes ‘American Muslims for Palestine’ Conference Devoted to Destroying Israel

Tlaib: “I’m incredibly proud to be here. The incredible work that all of you have done have opened doors for myself, somebody like me to serve in the United States Congress.”

In a recent post, I documented how American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) ejected me from its annual conference Thanksgiving weekend because it was afraid I would provide negative coverage. For background on the harassing treatment I received, see Fearing Negative Coverage, ‘American Muslims for Palestine’ Conference Ejects Legal Insurrection Reporter.

Now we know why AMP wanted to cleanse the audience of media who could report accurately on what was going on: The AMP conference was an anti-Israel, anti-Semitic hatefest, and the keynote speaker was Democratic Representative Rashida Tlaib, who has worked with the group on many occasions.

AMP – Key Anti-Israel Connector

American Muslims for Palestine is a key connector of anti-Israel Islamist and radical leftist groups, including fringe anti-Zionist Jews who provide cover.

Though it has a long history of opaque funding, staff overlap with now-shuttered ‘charities’ found to be connected to terrorist groups, and persistently disseminating classic anti-Semitism, AMP managed to maintain its connections with ‘intersectional’ social justice activists by hijacking the language of human rights and claiming to fight for “oppressed peoples everywhere” (in the words of AMP speaker Linda Sarsour).

[Screenshot from AMPs Palestine Convention Facebook page, November 2019.]

You can read more about AMP and the groups it works with in some of my earlier posts:

AMP’s Annual Anti-Israel Hatefest

As in the past, AMP’s 2019 Palestine Conference was chock full of historical falsehoods and thinly veiled anti-Semitism. This is shocking to precisely nobody; this year’s speakers’ roster featured some of the most noxious anti-Israel agitators active today, including ‘intersectional’ activists:

Despite the behavior of her fellow AMP speakers, when Rep Tlaib took the stage at the annual Palestine Conference, she gushed about her pride in being invited to keynote, saying:

I’m incredibly proud to be here. The incredible work that all of you have done have opened doors for myself, somebody like me to serve in the United States Congress.

As Rep. Tlaib continued, she demonstrated a favorite rhetorical trick of the ‘intersectional’ far-left: “movement hijacking“—the appropriation and exploitation of unrelated social justice causes (frequently by BDS supporters) in order to subsume those causes within a broader left-wing movement in which anti-Israel activists are then revered as leaders.

I would remember the history here in this country…still, the oppression of our black brothers and sisters. Every time I saw the different color license plates, the dehumanization at the checkpoints, everything. So interconnected…So when you think about the border, you gotta understand how interconnected it is with the oppression, of what’s happening in Falastine, the oppression that’s happening to our people. When I see…like, the police going after, killing innocent people, innocent, treating African American brothers and sisters like they’re disposable, I think of Filastine and what happens to our brothers and sisters in the occupation.

Tlaib’s remarks echoed longstanding efforts by anti-Israel activists to stoke racial tension against Israel by falsely accusing it of being responsible for local police shootings of blacks in the U.S. As we documented, that campaign went into overdrive during the Ferguson riots, after the Michael Brown shooting in the summer of 2014.

You can watch Rep Tlaib’s entire AMP speech here and below.

Conspiracy Theories

Anti-Semitism often manifests through conspiracy theories about Jewish power, money, and malevolent motivations. The AMP’s Palestine Convention recycled these themes, especially in the rousing speech given by Linda Sarsour.

The notoriously anti-Israel ‘intersectional’ activist and AMP event regular held forth on Friday November 29. Her remarks, delivered to raucous applause from the AMP audience, seemed to be inspired by David Duke; in her lecture, she asserted forcefully that “Jewish supremacy” was the underlying motivation for creating a Jewish state in the land of Israel:

Ask them [Zionists] this! How can you be against white supremacy in the United States of America, and the idea of living in a supremacist state based on race and class, but then support a state like Israel that is built on supremacy, that is built on the idea that Jews are supreme to everybody else?

You can see some of her speech here and below:

Linda Sarsour at AMP 2019 from Samantha Mandeles on Vimeo.

Sarsour’s soliloquy attracted enough backlash that a video of it, posted on Facebook by AMP national board member Salah Sarsour, was later removed without comment. Blogger David Lange documented that

a look at his Facebook wall shows he has left up another video, so it is not a blanket removal of all conference videos.

Later, Sarsour posted a justification for her words, clearly attempting some damage control.

Historical Revisionism

Reinterpreting historical events to prove the uniform evil of Zionists and fit an anti-Israel narrative is key for AMP. Unsurprisingly, I saw dozens of historical distortions during my short time at the conference. They are too numerous to list here, but I will recount a few of them.

I noticed several falsehoods in the few minutes of the one conference lecture I was able to watch before the organization demanded I leave. The session was called “Palestine 102: Post-Nakba to Oslo” and presented by former Al Jazeera producer Rawan Damen.

Picture by Samantha Mandeles for LIF November 2019

For example, Damen presented the audience with a photo showing a family of Yemenite Jews journeying to Israel from Yemen. According to Damen, the photo was dated from 1882. At that time, motivated by centuries of Muslim persecution and a strong belief that the Messiah was finally on his way, a group of approximately 5,000 Yemenite Jews left Yemen to live in the land of Israel.

But instead of mentioning these motivations, or the relatively small size of emigrating group, Damen asserted that these Jews represented the first “settler-colonialist Zionists.”

Minutes later, Daman claimed (without offering any proof or citations) that the first Zionist land purchases in Ottoman Palestine occurred in 1911, and that these purchases somehow necessitated the eviction of 60,000 Palestinian farmers from those lands.

But multiple historians have shown that the first Zionist land purchases in the area began in the 1800s. And, as the historian Yehoshua Porath notes in his 1977 volume “The Palestinian Arab National Movement: From Riots to Rebellion”, until the 1930s, most of these purchases were in sparsely populated areas; poor immigrating Jews needed inexpensive land, so they put down roots in places where the soil was unsuitable for growing the area’s agricultural staple, corn.

Moreover, it’s estimated that only approximately 30,000 Jews came to Israel during this period (half of whom left after only a few years), so for Damen’s Palestinian exile figure to be correct, every single Jewish immigrant (including children) would have had to (without the benefit of any military assistance) physically remove two Palestinians from their homes and prevent them from returning.

[Rawan Damen’s tweets about her time at the AMP conference. Screenshot from Twitter, November 29 2019.]

In another glaring falsification, an AMP pamphlet I collected called “A Synopsis of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict” promoted a previously-debunked claim that often appears on 9/11 Truther websites such as GlobalResearch: that Israel purposefully attacked the American naval vessel USS Liberty.

Photo taken by Samantha Mandeles for LIF November 2019

[The AMP pamphlet purporting to summarize the conflict.]

Amazingly, the very memo AMP quoted in its pamphlet concluded the exact opposite of AMP’s implication; AMP deliberately included only half of quoted sentence. The first part of the quoted sentence reads, “The attack was not made in malice toward the U.S. and was by mistake…” And as documented by the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis, reports by the U.S. Navy Court of Inquiry, presidential advisor Clark Clifford, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the National Security Agency, and the House Armed Services Committee all concluded that the attack was a case of mistaken identity.

Anti-Semitic Tropes

Many elements of the AMP convention seemed to causally harken to negative stereotypes about Jews and Zionists. Even the convention’s official spokesman and legal affairs officer (an AMP-Wisconsin chapter official called Munjed Ahmad) who led the charge to expel me from the event, himself alluded to the old ‘scheming Jew” canard when he huffed to me in anger that he and AMP are not “sneaky and underhanded, unlike some others.” When I asked him if he was talking about Jews, he declined to answer.

[Munjed Ahmad at the 2014 AMP conference with speaker Mads Gilbert. Ahmad is on the right. Screenshot from Facebook, December 2019.]

Similarly, the ‘sneaky’ trope apparently appeared as part of conference programming. One participant described learning about Zionists’ “dirty tricks.”

Other recognizable tropes were printed in the conference materials.

Speakers echoed the classic canard of Jewish control and influence. Speaker and assistant professor at Lafayette University Hafsa Kanjwal claimed that the American pro-India Hindu lobby “learned from the best, they learned from the Zionists” in thwarting “Kashmiri activists”.


There are dozens more examples of AMP’s use or endorsement of falsehoods, distortions, conspiracies, and anti-Semitic stereotypes—too many to list or explain here.

Not a single conference panel focused on the horrors the Hamas and Palestinian Authority governments have inflicted upon Palestinians; anti-Palestinian legislation in Jordan; on statecraft and strategizing about building a successful Palestinian government; or on even substantive critique of Israeli policies.

Instead, the entire conference focused on motivating its attendees to work for the destruction of the Jewish state—on the basis that Israel and Zionists uniquely practice all of the greatest evil systems known to mankind (Nazism, fascism, Apartheid).

Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s “proud” presence at AMP is an endorsement of the falsehoods and bigotry AMP fosters.


Samantha Mandeles is Senior Researcher and Outreach Director at the Legal Insurrection Foundation.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


The Friendly Grizzly | December 5, 2019 at 7:50 pm

She will be re-elected in a landslide.

    True. She has a Muslim district. They’ve got a few congressional districts now, which is sort of unfortunate. But we do need to keep them off sensitive congressional committees or yank their security clearances if they get on them.

For example, Damen presented the audience with a photo showing a family of Yemenite Jews journeying to Israel from Yemen. According to Damen, the photo was dated from 1882. […] Damen asserted that these Jews represented the first “settler-colonialist Zionists.”

Of color! Yemeni Jews tend to be about as dark as Indians (from India). So much for the idea of Israel as a white European colony.

Sarsour’s “walkback” consists of asserting that her comment wasn’t against Jews but against Israel; she didn’t say Jews think they’re superior to everyone else but that Israel thinks Jews are superior to everyone else, and was founded on that basis, so she doesn’t understand why non-zionist Jews (which are the only ones she cares about) would feel offended.

    artichoke in reply to Milhouse. | December 5, 2019 at 9:07 pm

    Yeah, but she said what she said very clearly. She said Jews. It wasn’t a slip of the tongue. But we knew she thinks this way already.

    Muslims have had Jerusalem and the Temple as their main targets ever since their beginnings. The Dome of the Rock is older than the Kaaba.

      Milhouse in reply to artichoke. | December 5, 2019 at 11:11 pm

      No, she didn’t say Jews were Jewish supremacists. And that’s what she thinks she’s being accused of, so she’s all “hey, I didn’t say that, why are you all offended”.

      But her claim, that Israel was founded on the notion of Jewish supremacy, and so anyone who supports Israel can’t condemn white supremacists, is simply not true. And that’s why so many people were offended. But she either doesn’t get that, or pretends not to get it.

I’m consistent too. Muslims don’t belong in the promised land of the Jews, for obvious reasons. And they probably don’t belong in the United States either. They pretty screwed that pooch when the Muslim Barbary pirates took Americans as slaves, and Jefferson had to create and send the Marines to defeat them.

Isn’t it curious that the millennials who claim free speech is hate speech but have no problem at all with islam? Islam is a violation of every right enumerated in our Constitution. The msm has no issues with a violent religious/authoritarian cult but hate Christianity or Judaism. Why? Islam hates all LGBTQ’s but the Dems love them anyway. Every Western country allows muslims to have unfettered access to any and all services even though they are against the very people that supply the resources. They are a hate-filled group that offers nothing to their host country except trouble and sedition. It would seem fair to me that a bill could be introduced that prohibits any organized sect/group that opposes our Constitution except through the ballot box.

“The incredible work that all of you have done have opened doors for … somebody like me to serve in the United States Congress.”

Can we try them for treason yet? (j/k)

She is awful. A traitorous, evil woman.
Not only that, she has terrible grammar.
“The incredible work that all of you have done have opened doors for myself, …”
Really? MYSELF? How about ME instead?

I’d like to say something about “antisemitic tropes”. At the beginning of the year we had unedifying experience of Ilhan Omar confessing to having unwittingly used an antisemitic trope, while being completely innocent of any antisemitic intent. I’m not entirely clear on what a “trope” is, but if I understand this correctly it means that since there is a long and ugly history of Jews being falsely accused of poisoning wells, if there happened to be a Jew involved in the Flint MI disaster it would be offensive and unacceptable to accuse him of it, even if it were true, while it is fine to make the same accusation of gentiles. Omar, therefore, wanted us to accept that she had made a true statement about Jews, but she shouldn’t have done so because it resembled false statements that had been made about them in the past.

To which I say, bollocks. If a Jew happens to be poisoning wells, it’s perfectly fine to say so. And if anyone, Jew or gentile, isn’t poisoning wells then it’s not OK to accuse him of it. But if he happens to be Jewish, then such a false accusation immediately brands the accuser as following in the rich and horrible tradition of those who’ve made the same accusation over the centuries.

What Omar said at the time was wrong not because it was an antisemitic “trope” but because it was a false accusation, motivated by her hatred of Jews. And the same is true of these AMP people. It’s not the “tropes”, it’s the lies.

notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | December 7, 2019 at 5:48 pm

Interesting side note to this.

Is this true?

Muhammad Makes List Of Top 10 Baby Names In The U.S. For First Time

    Not really. It’s true that it made the list, but the list is not a representative sample of the US population. On the official list compiled by the government from actual registrations, each of Mohammed’s various spellings is down in the 300s or lower. No information is available on where it would be if all the spellings were combined.

    Also note that being in the top 10 doesn’t indicate what percentage of kids are actually getting the name. As the linked article points out, almost every Moslem family has a Mohammed, whereas not that many non-Moslem families have a Liam — but enough do to make it the most popular individual boy’s name.

    A minor wrinkle to be aware of in the official lists: This comes out in two versions; one at the beginning of the next year, and one a bit later, when amendments to birth certificates have been recorded. Popular Jewish boys’ names tend to get a significant boost in the second list over the first one, because Jewish boys are not named until they’re a week old, and sometimes older; their birth certificates are usually issued with the name blank, and it’s then added later, so it’s reflected in the second list but not in the first. There aren’t enough Jews in the US for this to be a really significant factor, but it’s something to be aware of.

Such a thoroughly wicked person. Beast belongs in North Korea where she can serve another master. Even Satan has no use for women of such disgrace.