Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Trump Admin Grants Religious Exemption from Obamacare Contraceptive Mandate

Trump Admin Grants Religious Exemption from Obamacare Contraceptive Mandate

“Application of the mandate to entities with sincerely held religious objections to it does not serve a compelling governmental interest.”

President Donald Trump’s administration has decided to roll back a portion of Obamacare that mandates a private company must include birth control coverage in health insurance plans.

From The Washington Examiner:

The new rules allow any employer to be exempt from the mandate “based on its sincerely held religious beliefs” or on “moral convictions.” Employers who decide not to provide coverage do not need to inform the federal government but would need to tell their employees about their decision.

The rule change was intended to provide “relief to those who have been under the thumb of the federal government and had their religious freedom violated” and end “attacks on religious liberty and protects religious freedom for everyone,” Roger Severino, director for the Office of Civil Rights at HHS, said in a phone call.

The new rule says, “Application of the mandate to entities with sincerely held religious objections to it does not serve a compelling governmental interest.”

Publicly traded companies may also “claim an exemption if they state religious objections.” But Health and Human Services explained that if the companies do this, then it “would still have to let a third party cover contraception.”

From Fox News:

“Of the 165 million women in the U.S., HHS estimates these rules affect at most 120,000, leaving more than 99.9 percent of women without any impact,” an HHS official told Fox News.

An official noted the administration anticipates the groups taking advantage of the change would be those involved in legal battles pertaining to the mandate.

“There are about 200 entities that have participated in lawsuits because of the contraceptive rule, and those entities will benefit from this rule,” a senior HHS official said.

A senior HHS official said there have been more than 50 lawsuits filed against the mandate, and the new rule would provide “relief.”

Little Sisters of the Poor have been one group that has received a lot of attention since the start of the mandate. The Supreme Court gave the nuns a victory in May 2016 after the justices unanimously vacated “the lower court cases and required them to reconsider the claims brought by the Little Sisters of the Poor and others that the regulations promulgated pursuant to Obamacare violate their religious exercise in light of the government’s admission that it could indeed provide contraceptive coverage without the Little Sisters’ collaboration.”

In March 2016, justices voiced their belief that Obamacare forcing companies to cover birth control or drugs that cause abortions “violated the Religious Freedom Restoration Act because it allowed the government to ‘hijack’ the insurance plans of the religious groups that are the petitioners in the case.”

The attorney for Little Sisters of the Poor praised the new rule. From LifeSite:

“HHS has issued a balanced rule that respects all sides– it keeps the contraceptive mandate in place for most employers and now provides a religious exemption,” said Mark Rienzi, senior counsel at Becket and lead attorney for the Little Sisters of the Poor. “The Little Sisters still need to get final relief in court, which should be easy now that the government admits it broke the law.”

The new rules, which are nearly 300 pages in total, prevent the Little Sisters of the Poor and other conscientious objectors from litigation.

Father Frank Pavone, the National Director of Priests for Life, released a statement that expressed happiness that Trump is keeping his promises on religious freedom:

“Priests for Life has been informed by senior administration officials that Attorney General Jeff Sessions will be issuing guidance today that will grant Priests for Life and other faith-based employers the same exemption to the HHS contraception mandate that is given to churches. This is what we have sought all along, and is the outcome we were hoping for when we took our case, Zubik vs. Burwell, to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“The attorney general also will be issuing guidance on the Johnson Amendment, specifying that it shall not be used against churches and pastors in a discriminatory way to silence them on political matters.

“This is a great day for religious liberty. The attorney general’s guidance reinforces President Trump’s commitment to religious freedom. The president has made promises in this regard, and today he is delivering on those promises.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Well done. The very idea that contraception and abortifacients (not to mention abortions) are “healthcare” is ridiculous on its face. That’s like saying that helmets are healthcare because you can use one to avoid injury, or that a drink in the morning is healthcare as a hair of the dog. It is immoral to ask me to pay for another’s lack of impulse control.

    Sanddog in reply to Immolate. | October 7, 2017 at 3:01 am

    There are some legitimate medical complaints that are treated with birth control but in those cases, they’re being prescribed to treat an underlying condition… not to prevent pregnancy.

    If a woman isn’t capable of budgeting to buy her own birth control, she isn’t responsible enough to have sex… or vote.

The winning just keeps on coming!!!!!

Oh, boy!
Are lefties losing their minds right now. Time to stock up on Liberal Tears.

President Trump has just shown more morality and caring in this one decision than our ex-president did in 8 long years.

This was good. And about time.

    VaGentleman in reply to Ragspierre. | October 7, 2017 at 2:29 pm

    Yes it was – a very good thing!

    It was brought to you by the election of Donald Trump. AKA, Der Donald, T-rump, the Cheeto God, the collectivist thug, …
    Thank You for your support! /sarc

    He was a better choice than Hillary, wasn’t he?

So, the dems way overreach and finally get shot down by the new administration and it seems like a win. In the meantime, birth control is now mandated to be covered by insurance and nobody is complaining. Still seems like a loss to me.

Publicly traded companies may also “claim an exemption if they state religious objections.”

Hmm, that goes well beyond Hobby Lobby. It might be difficult for a publicly traded company to show that it holds any sort of belief or opinion, but I suppose if it’s in the company charter that would do it.

But Health and Human Services explained that if the companies do this, then it “would still have to let a third party cover contraception.”

Well, how could they prevent it? Even the Little Sisters have no objection to a third party providing their employees with such coverage, they just don’t want to have anything to do with arranging for this to happen.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend