Three Questions All Democrats Must Answer
Joe Biden touching women, Elizabeth Warren being Native American and Bill Clinton hanging out with a pedophile
If you think the mainstream media is not out to elect Hillary Clinton in 2016 every bit as much as it was for Obama in 2008 and 2012, then you need your head examined.
The multi-day and ongoing demand that Scott Walker verify that Obama is Christian and loves America is a good example.
Why is it that Republican candidates and politicians are required to verify the bona fides of Democrats?
Here are three questions I have yet to hear Obama or any Democrat asked:
1. Should Joe Biden stop touching women without consent?
Our current VP is a serial groper, and the 2016 frontrunner takes Al Jazeera’s funny money under the table. No question material there!
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) February 21, 2015
2. Is Elizabeth Warren Native American?
Every Democrat must express an opinion on whether @SenWarren is Cherokee http://t.co/H1V24MqQAc cc: @seanmdav — Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) February 22, 2015
3. Is it okay that Bill Clinton participated in vacations with a pedophile?
Convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein flew Bill Clinton to his private sex island b/c he owed Bill “a favor.” Nobody asks Hillary about that.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) February 21, 2015
Hillary Clinton will get something similar to the Elizabeth Edwards treatment from the media for the next two years. Just watch. — Sean Davis (@seanmdav) February 21, 2015
More from Sean Davis at Twitchy
(added) And This:
Unseemly whiff of media Islamophobia in demand @ScottWalker verify Obama's Christianity http://t.co/bY2WWRkGmO
— Legal Insurrection (@LegInsurrection) February 22, 2015
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
C’mon! Somebody ought to ask them about lifting wallets too.
Someone should also ask them how you tell them apart?
RE: “Joe Biden touching women, Elizabeth Warren being Native American and Bill Clinton hanging out with a pedophile”
Personally, I find it fascinating that the elite media was trying to pin Scott Walker down on Guiliani’s recent comment about Obama, but I see no evidence of them trying to get a Democrat on the record about these 3 — and Clinton’s association is extremely troublesome.
Scratch the veneer on any Dem, Lib, Prog and you’ll find the perv underneath. Right now, the quandary within the Dems is how to re establish their formerly firm connection with white working class voter. Apparently endlessly extolling the blessings and virtues of unlimited sodomy, fellatio and cunnilingus only goes so far when their cadres of ballot box stuffers in the off year biennial congressional elections are more limited than when a Democratic presidential candidate is heading the ticket.
I don’t know if about the fellatio and cunnilingus part, but I do know that politicians of BOTH parties engage in sodomy all the time: on the US public; and on each other.
Question for Debbie Wasser-name Schultz: “Do you really think that Pres. Obama is a misogynist and anti-Semite?”
Its’s not under the table, it’s quite open and aboveboard, although nobody was looking at the Clinton Foundation’s website, since they didn’t expect to find anything there. (The difference between the government of Qatar and Al Jazeera is a distinction without a difference.)
It’s people currently working for the U.S. government who are taking money from Al Jazeera under the table.
If I could prove it, as can be done in the case of Hillary Clinton, it wouldn’t be under the table.
Senator McCain just said on Face the Nation he’s ashamed of the country – and ashamed of himself as well. I think this might be on purpose.
Good luck even getting anyone to ask these questions.
They are definitely questions the press would ask if the parties were reversed, but they are also definitely not questions that our eventual candidate can personally raise.
Of course, Rudy Giuliani seems ready, willing, and able to ask uncomfortable questions and seems able to con the media into putting them out there. For all the glee the press is displaying, it’s hard to imagine that President Obama welcomes a big public debate over how much he loves America. Maybe Giuliani would be willing to keep up the job for the next couple of years? If not, we know the MSM can’t help themselves when Sarah Palin says something they deem “controversial”.
Question the media should be demanded to ask of Hillary:
Mrs. Clinton, do you think Brian Williams’ lying about coming under fire in a war zone reflects on his honesty?
+100
The “Mark Steyn Question” that EVERY Deemocrat should have to answer…
If he [Obama] were working for the other side, what exactly would he be doing differently?
Dave Weigel has a good column on the MSM’s reaction to Rudy.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-02-21/why-conservatives-are-fed-up-with-the-rudy-giuliani-story
The key question here is, will you be able to get republican politicians engaged in this mission to counter-confront the media on these issues?
Something tells me you will not, but I would of course love to be proved wrong.
The information about Bill Clinton posted above is shocking! Thank goodness we have a righteous newspaper like Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post exposing Clinton’s debauched exploits and associations! Without the New York Post’s fair and honest full page tabloid headlines alerting us each day, we would never have heard about the DECAPITATED BODY FOUND IN TOPLESS BAR, or have learned Tiger Woods, the F*UCKMASTER was BACK TO F*UCK MASTERS, or in its honest and impartial coverage of democrats hear that: KERRY’S GAY – Dem’s Secret Lover Gephardt Revealed.
It’s comforting to know our knowledge of the world is based on unbiased news sources like the NY Post.
What are you trolling about today?
See, this fallacy is called ad hominem. It takes the form of attacking a source rather than dealing with the allegation/argument.
You don’t make arguments. You just fart fallacies.
He fancies himself a chef in the kitchen of ideas, but he’s only a cockroach.
I’m sorry, you have mistaken this blog for Daily Kos.
Please post links from the New York Post to…
1. any Tiger Woods story using the terms you quote
2. any story on John Kerry being gay
Then explain how a gruesome murder and its criminal law aftermath is not a valid news story, please.
Like all Junior Jackasses of the communist party brigade, they just make shit up. The chief jackass, obama, makes it all up as well.
Crickets, I hear crickets…
I like your shoes, Gramps. Snazzy!
xxoo
Obama is head of the Democrat Party. He adheres to a pro-choice or selective moral philosophy as a matter of principle. He is Abortionist in Chief. He is not Christian. Unfortunately, the number of apostates is progressive.
How about asking them if they believe a video was the cause of the Benghazi attacks? Or here is an easy one, is it constitutional for obama to change the affordable care act on his own?
The expression on Mrs. Carters face is priceless and a ,lot like the Mona Lisa. She could be thinking anything.
Like: Your mildly amusing, Joe.
Or, I am gonna kick your ass if you don’t take your mitts off me.
Or, My husband is gonna kick your ass if you ever touch me again.
or, What a perv.
or, I see a restraining order in your future, Joe.
or, Does your wife take you seriously anymore?
Possibilities are endless.
Number 3. Mrs. Clinton’s husband with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his binders full of underaged girls… what was that all about?
That’s the question I’m voting for.
Hillary more than enabled Bill Clinton’s personal war on women. For a time in the White House she was in charge of investigating and harassing the women who said they were abused by her husband. She knew the women were telling the truth. The same way she knew the truth when on the Today Show she blamed the Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy for the rumors about Monica Lewinsky.
Christopher Hitchens, who was a hard leftist on everything except the Iraq war, concluded that Bill Clinton was guilty of raping Juanita Broaddrick.
A chapter in Hitchens’ book NO ONE LEFT TO LIE TO http://tinyurl.com/n658qx2 is titled IS THERE A RAPIST IN THE OVAL OFFICE?
Hitchens concludes the chapter this way:
“What are the chances that three socially and personally respectable women, all three of them political supporters of Mr. Clinton and none of them known to each other, would confect or invent almost identical experience which they did not desire to make public. And how possible would it be for a network of anti-Clinton rumor-mongers to create, let alone ventilate, such a coincidence? The odds that any of these ladies is lying seem to me to approach zero; their reasons for reticence are all perfectly intelligible.”
After covering up for her husband, harassing the women he abused, Hillary is just as guilty as he is.
Maybe more guilty. I’ve always thought that anyone who knows what someone is doing and enables that behavior is the more guilty party. The person doing the deed is usually acting out some bizarre moment from their past – the one enabling the behavior is acting out of self-preservation.
When is the media going to do its job?
And vet Walker’s views on the Crusades?
“When is the media going to do its job?”
They’re doing it. Their “job” is to enable / cover up for any communist / fascist in office or running for election. 🙂
So we don’t need to care about IRS corruption, abuse of power, or crony subsidies and regulation any more, right?
Is it wrong that I am really starting to enjoy this?
Two more that should be asked:
Do you think that the Westboro Baptists are a Christian group?
Is it OK for Hillary to laugh about rape victims when representing their rapist?