Image 01 Image 03

Mamdani’s Judicial Advisory Panel Has One Glaring Omission: Jewish Members

Mamdani’s Judicial Advisory Panel Has One Glaring Omission: Jewish Members

“The odds of selecting 18 NYC lawyers at random and ending up with a panel containing no Jews are 0.55 to the 18th power — or roughly one chance in 47,149.”

During his inaugural address, New York City Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani promised to be a mayor to all New Yorkers. Not many people believed him, but the words sounded nice.

That’s why few were surprised last week when Mamdani announced the 18 members of the Mayor’s Advisory Committee on the Judiciary. In a city where Jewish lawyers are represented in the legal profession at rates far exceeding their share of the population, not a single member of the committee was Jewish.

One X user likened the omission to “having no black people on an NBA team.”

He was right. It’s hard to believe the boy mayor’s exclusion of Jewish attorneys was anything but intentional.

Another X user put it even more bluntly:

Don’t be surprised that Mamdani—a man for whom a Judenrein Middle East is his political lodestar—also wants a Judenrein NYC. About 45% of NYC lawyers are Jewish. The odds of selecting 18 NYC lawyers at random and ending up with a panel containing no Jews are 0.55 to the 18th power—or roughly one chance in 47,149.

And it’s not about “Zionism.” There are plenty of anti-Zionist Jewish lawyers he could have picked, including thousands who, to their shame, voted for him. It’s about Jews. He hates Jews. It’s not complex.

Professional groups quickly condemned the decision.

On Monday, Elizabeth Forspan, the president of the Brandeis Association of Queens, a group of Jewish legal professionals, addressed the glaring omission in a letter to Mamdani, co-signed by leaders of the Jewish Lawyers Guild of Manhattan, the Brooklyn Brandeis Society, and the Bronx County Jewish Bar Association.

Citing the announcement of the committee from the mayor’s office, they wrote:

Not a single Jewish attorney, former judge, or legal professional was appointed to a committee your administration described as one that would be “truly reflective of New York City.”

…

Excluding Jewish representation from this committee is neither reflective nor inclusive. It follows a troubling pattern that has left many Jewish New Yorkers feeling increasingly marginalized, especially following your rejection of the IHRA [International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance] definition of antisemitism and the omission of Jewish neighborhoods from a map highlighting immigrant enclaves.

…

At a time when antisemitism is reaching historic levels in our city, leadership matters. Last week’s attack on a visibly Jewish man on the Upper West Side is yet another painful reminder that antisemitic violence is real and growing.

Asked about the letter, Mamdani’s spokesman Joe Calvello responded by noting, “To date, Mayor Mamdani has had the privilege of appointing a dozen qualified judges from a range of backgrounds, including Jewish judges.” He further claimed the idea that “decision making about the committee was motivated by religion is false.”

But Mamdani’s antipathy toward Jews was a major concern during his campaign and has become increasingly evident since his inauguration.

Calvello’s remarks rang hollow given that Mamdani — who inexplicably seems to feel his office qualifies him to opine on U.S. foreign policy — spent several weeks earlier this month insisting that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested if he sets foot in New York City for the United Nations General Assembly in September.

The International Criminal Court, which the U.S. does not recognize, issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu in 2024 on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity stemming from Israel’s military campaign in Gaza.

After concluding he could not arrest Netanyahu, Mamdani released a video in which he called him a war criminal and condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Two days later, a man stabbed an Asian man and a Jewish man in New York City as he reportedly shouted “Allahu akbar.”

The New York Times reported that the following day, a group of Jewish leaders “gathered … to denounce rising antisemitism and to beseech the mayor to tone down his anti-Israel rhetoric, which they believed was feeding antisemitic sentiment in New York City.”

Mamdani and his minions can insist all they’d like that religion played no role in his appointments, but the complete absence of Jewish attorneys from an 18-member committee in a city with one of the nation’s largest and most prominent Jewish legal communities is difficult to dismiss as a coincidence.

Given his history of antisemitic remarks, his repeated attacks on Israel, and his willingness to inject himself into international affairs while Jewish New Yorkers warn that his rhetoric is fueling antisemitism, the message many in the community have received is unmistakable.

Suffice it to say, he is not a mayor to all New Yorkers. Only to the ones he likes.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

I would bet NYC Jews voted for him at least 2:1.
As a non Jew, I find it beyond puzzling.

    Milhouse in reply to lichau. | July 29, 2026 at 12:26 pm

    No, they didn’t. A majority of Jews voted against him. That’s probably the first time that a majority of NYC Jews voted against the Democrat Party’s officially endorsed candidate.

      Paula in reply to Milhouse. | July 29, 2026 at 1:16 pm

      It was one out three.
      33% is nothing to sneeze at.

        avi natan in reply to Paula. | July 29, 2026 at 2:21 pm

        Since 66% voted against him that means goyim voted for him at a higher rate.
        And many of those 33% aren’t actually Jewish. J-Street considers those who have a Jewish sounding name or Gentile mother Jewish

You jest

It was not an omission, it is purely evil and on purpose

Yes Mamdopey is a stupid bigot who hides behind Islamophobia to avoid any and all scrutiny and accountability.

Just remember, that during the Mandami genocide of India 400 million Hindu Buddhist Zoroastrians and Jews were exterminated by Mandami types. You could see the blood coming out of his mouth when he sees Jews .:

He further claimed the idea that “decision making about the committee was motivated by religion is false.”

Red herring. It’s got nothing to do with religion. Antisemitism is about race, not religion. That’s the whole point of the word, the reason it was coined in the first place.

The percentage of NY lawyers who believe in the Jewish religion is probably quite low. Certainly not anywhere near 45%. That figure is the percentage of NYC lawyers who are of the Jewish “race”, and that’s whom he’s deliberately excluded.

    healthguyfsu in reply to Milhouse. | July 29, 2026 at 10:25 pm

    You beat me to it. The clever eye will quickly recognize the attempt to steer the conversation away from ethnic discrimination and LI definitely should not let him off the hook on that so easily.

I’ll bet there isn’t a single constitutionalist/originalist, either.

What Jew would serve in any capacity in the turd’s administration,

wtf I love dei and proportional representation now

The mayor knows what kind of judges he wants and Jews will never recommend such lawyers for those positions. So why bother; it’s just ruthless Nazi efficiency.

Heh. Didn’t commie Mamdani state that the Advisory Board “was totally representative”? He did and it’s an example of his disavowal of the Jewish population; they don’t exist for him in any meaningful way, except to exclude from society.

I was going to post that Mamdani couldn’t get much more brazen than this particular action to reveal his motivations …but then I remembered his publishing a separate by name/address list of property ownership for second homes in NYC.

Whatever else we can say about Mamdani his actions are definitely speaking far louder and faster than the denials and attempts to downplay them by his surrogates, advocates and sycophants including the lapdog corporate media. Watching what this guy does v what he says is definitely in order.

This is Islamofascism at its core. Convert/submit (give up your property) or be taxed to death. (Jizya)

George_Kaplan | July 31, 2026 at 1:05 am

The stats on this are interesting:
9 male, 9 female appointees – equal split
9+ Black lawyers in a city where less than 1:4 residents are Black (4 would be more proportional)
Maximum of 6 White (includes 3 race unknowns) yet proportionally …
And of course no Jews tolerated!

Seems like racism motivating Mamdani, but that’s nothing new!

Raw data based on an ultra-quick Duck:
Acquie – female, Black, Latino, Harvard
Baylor – female, Black, New York University
Elijah – female, Black, social justice activist, Cornell
Paul – female, Black, New York Law School
Hernandez – female, Brown?, Latino, anti-deportation, Associate Professor @ CUNY
Malik – female, Brown?, teaching faculty @ Harvard
Glen – female, White, Columbia
Popin – female, ?, Brooklyn Law School
Jones – female, ?, Howard University

Fan – male, Asian, Columbia, Director of Columbia Law School’s Appellate Litigation Clinic, former Judge James E. Boasberg clerk!
Drayton – male, Black, University of Pennsylvania
Hopkins – male, Black, University of Buffalo
Luciano – male, Black, University at Buffalo
Tingling – male, Black, North Carolina Central University
Trujillo – male, Black, LGTP activist, Associate Professor of Law at CUNY
LaFalce – male, White?, adjunct professor at St. John’s
Principe – male, White?, St. John’s University
Mastro – male, ?, New York Law School