New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani used his first veto to kill a bipartisan bill that would have required the NYPD to develop protest buffer zone plans around schools and educational institutions. The decision is hard to read as anything other than a statement about whose safety this mayor prioritizes.
The legislation, Int. 175-B, passed the Council 30 to 19, and was part of the Council’s Five-Point Action Plan to Combat Antisemitism. The context matters: according to the NYPD, antisemitic incidents accounted for 57% of all reported hate crimes in 2025, despite Jewish residents making up only about 10% of the city’s population. Council Speaker Julie Menin, the first Jewish speaker in the Council’s history, framed the bill as a measured response to that reality. The bill did not establish buffer zones. It asked the NYPD to plan for them.
Mamdani vetoed it anyway. His stated reason was that the bill defined “educational institution” too broadly, potentially covering museums, libraries, and teaching hospitals. That is a real drafting concern, but it is also a fixable one, yet the mayor made no offer to fix it.
“This could impact workers protesting ICE or college students demanding their school divest from fossil fuels or demonstrating in support of Palestinian rights,” Mamdani said in a statement. “It is a piece of legislation that has alarmed much of the labor movement, reproductive rights groups and immigration advocates, among others, across this city.”
Notably absent from that list: Jewish students and families. The bill’s actual opponents were not students fearing a crackdown on climate protests. They were Jewish New Yorkers who watched demonstrations turn threatening outside their schools and synagogues. Menin made that distinction plainly.
“Basically both bills require NYPD to set up safe access perimeter only if there are instances of intimidation, harassment or injury,” she said. “So these are also police accountability and transparency bills.”
Former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who challenged Mamdani in last year’s mayoral race, put it more bluntly: “Instead of governing for all NYers, Mamdani has repealed the very definition of antisemitism from the city’s books, changed how antisemitic crimes are counted and now vetoed these commonsense security measures when they are needed most.”
The UJA-Federation of New York, the Orthodox Union, and the Union for Reform Judaism issued a joint statement calling the veto “a profound failure of City Hall to demonstrate to all New Yorkers that our safety is a priority.”
Notably, Mamdani did sign a companion bill requiring the NYPD to plan security perimeters around houses of worship. The distinction he drew between the two bills is not obviously coherent: if broad definitions were the problem, both bills had them. What the vetoed bill had that the other did not was a clearer connection to the protests that have most visibly threatened Jewish New Yorkers.
The City Council can override the veto with a two-thirds vote. With 30 members already on record in support, just three more would be needed. Whether they have the will to use that power is now the more important question.
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY