Image 01 Image 03

California Approves Rules for Converting Sewage Into Drinking Water

California Approves Rules for Converting Sewage Into Drinking Water

This approval provides a talking point “success” for politicos… who can say the approved plans to solve a “climate change” problem that will get enacted years down the road.

The last time we checked on California, the legislature issued rules for gender-neutral toy sections for stores. Tedious, trivial, and costly rules are among the top reasons Americans flee the state in record numbers.

Now comes news about new plans for the state to convert sewage into drinking water, all in the name of “climate change.”

California regulators on Tuesday cleared the way for widespread use of advanced filtration and treatment facilities designed to convert sewage waste into pure drinking water that can be pumped directly into systems feeding millions of household taps.

Proven technologies capable of recycling wastewater for human consumption, a concept once derided by critics as “toilet to tap,” have gained greater credence in recent years as water-conscious California faces worsening drought cycles from climate change.

More than a decade in the making, the regulations adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board represent a landmark in the quest to reclaim some of the hundreds of millions of gallons of waste discharge that flows out to sea unused each year, supporters say.

“Today heralds a new era of water reuse,” Patricia Sinicropi, executive director of the recycling trade group WateReuse California, said in a statement.

I am skeptical of anything done under the banner of “climate change.” Earth’s climate is constantly changing, and it has simply become a convenient excuse to implement eco-activist ideas.

How safe is it? The rules require treatment for “all pathogens and viruses.” Subsequently, that means using disinfecting treatments and replacing mineral elements that make drinking water taste good.

California’s new rules require the wastewater be treated for all pathogens and viruses, even if the pathogens and viruses aren’t in the wastewater. That’s different from regular water treatment rules, which only require treatment for known pathogens, said Darrin Polhemus, deputy director of the division of drinking water for the California Water Resources Control Board.

In fact, the treatment is so stringent it removes all of the minerals that make fresh drinking water taste good — meaning they have to be added back at the end of the process.

“It’s at the same drinking water quality, and probably better in many instances,” Polhemus said.

It’s expensive and time-consuming to build these treatment facilities, so Polhemus said it will only be an option for bigger, well-funded cities — at least initially.

And speaking of expense, the expense is associated with constructing these treatment plants. These facilities will take many years to build as well.

Even if the board does approve the rules Tuesday, [direct potable reuse”] DPR systems won’t be popping up overnight — and when they do, the wastewater won’t really be flowing right from a toilet to a tap.

The regulations first would have to be accepted by the state’s Office of Administrative Law — which [Darrin Polhemus of the California State Water Resources Control Board] said would likely occur by summer or fall of next year. Only after that could utilities begin to build these large and complex projects, most of which would take about six or seven years to complete, he said.

“So no one will be drinking direct potable reuse in the immediate future,” Polhemus added.

The plans to expand this type of water recycling are grand, indeed.

As for how much purified water might be used, if some coastal communities are able to get 10%-15% of their supply from treated wastewater during a drought, that would represent a significant improvement in diversifying supplies, Polhemus said.

“Someday, it could be 25% to 40% of some communities’ water supply,” Polhemus said. “At some point, we could recycle the majority of wastewater that now flows to the ocean just as treated wastewater.”

While this all sounds nice, I might be more inclined to accept this type of plan if California’s dams were not being removed or millions of water diverted away from agriculture to protect smelt.

I would like to note that Texas opened up a DPR facility in 2013, and Colorado approved similar plans ahead of California. Some California areas already have some experience in the reuse of recycled wastewater.

California has been using recycled wastewater for decades. The Ontario Reign minor league hockey team has used it to make ice for its rink in Southern California. Soda Springs Ski Resort near Lake Tahoe has used it to make snow. And farmers in the Central Valley, where much of the nation’s vegetables, fruits and nuts are grown, use it to water their crops.

But it hasn’t been used directly for drinking water. Orange County operates a large water purification system that recycles wastewater and then uses it to refill underground aquifers. The water mingles with the groundwater for months before being pumped up and used for drinking water again.

Ultimately, their plans will drive up the state’s water cost, make bottled water even more popular (adding more plastic bottles into the waste system) and may inspire even more Californians to leave.

But, this approval provides a talking point of “success” for politicos… who can say the approved plans to solve a “climate change” problem will get enacted years later. And years down the road, the unintended consequences will become evident.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“They” want YOU to drink poop water and eat bugs while THEY sip chardonnay and dine on Kobe steak.

Yum. So I guess desalinization tech is just too hard for them?

Hmm. Nature does a fine job of filtering and recycling water; it’s called the water cycle.

Wanna bet this is more about control than clean water?

    JohnSmith100 in reply to Dimsdale. | December 21, 2023 at 11:02 am

    I make my own laundry soap, formulated to be liquid fertilizer. Then send it to my garden, you would not believe my tomato crop.

    At one point in my career I designed a mobile bathroom and sewage processing system. It was energy intensive. What came out of it was sterile water and a small amount of sterile sludge. All that would have been needed to make it potable was removal of salt from the water,

    Ghostrider in reply to Dimsdale. | December 21, 2023 at 11:48 am

    You bet it is! First, they came for our automobiles, our gas stoves, gasoline-powered lawn equipment, washers and dryers, beef, chicken, and lamb products, and now our drinking water.

    Why? Because dependency on the government solidifies the government’s belief that it controls the citizenry. I cannot see how these continued progressive intrusions into daily American lives end well for the politicians. Vote them the hell out.

      AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to Ghostrider. | December 21, 2023 at 12:47 pm

      Are we just limited to “vote them the hell out?” or are there any other options?

      Asking for a friend.

        nordic prince in reply to AF_Chief_Master_Sgt. | December 21, 2023 at 11:18 pm

        Well, there’s this gem… if anyone actually still believes it anymore….

        “…to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”

    henrybowman in reply to Dimsdale. | December 21, 2023 at 3:51 pm

    Exactly. California should “go green” and continue to let Gaia do this job exactly as she has been doing it perfectly for billions of years.

    But no, suddenly state technocrats know better than Gaia. And after a couple of “revenue shortfalls” it will be healthier to drink your own piss than what the state reclamation facilities will be serving up.

What could possibly go wrong?

    JohnSmith100 in reply to rebelgirl. | December 21, 2023 at 11:05 am

    To find out, look at Flint Mi water fiasco, which was due to their incompetent water treatment employees. Like everything else, they spun a tail of being victims. Another black city of leaches.

      AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to JohnSmith100. | December 21, 2023 at 12:49 pm

      Ohhhhhhhjj, JR gonna call you racissssssssssss!

      Cue Thad in 4, 3, 2, …

        Well, I don’t dislike people because of race, lack of good character, morals, ethics, failure to earn their way or be productive citizens. Some people fail in every way that matters. What bugs me is that I cannot see any way to fix them.

          “What bugs me is that I cannot see any way to fix them.”

          Well we could trade them to Mexico for more illegals but the people they’re sending here are exactly the same except for names and faces.

        Concerning JR and Thad, I think they are the same person using 2 or maybe more aliases. Notice that 2 downvotes occurs in a short time frame.

I bet the E. Coli adds a nice tangy flavor. And the fentanyl just helps wash it all down.

As long as their sh*twater stays in commiefornia, I don’t really care. Not that I would ever expect anything better from them

Put the depoopization plant on the California High Speed Rail Train and it will be able to depoop water from LA to Frisco,

Dolce Far Niente | December 21, 2023 at 9:55 am

I have a thought; why doesn’t Cali use sewage water to flush the endangered snail darter downstream in the Delta, and save the accumulated rainwater for humans?

Or why not build more reservoirs to hold the not-infrequent winter rain excess? Or desalinization plants, which do well in other desert countries?

I know eco-maniacs oppose inexpensive and well-tested methods because they don’t hurt people enough, but its interesting how they would embrace complex tech like toilet-to-tap as long as its disgusting.

Its all part of the idiocracy that state of CA has become over the last 25 years. CA used to elect republican governors, to act as braking system, to control the leftie state legislature. But CA is locked down now under dem one party super majority. CA is doubling down on stupid, and facing lost decade under dems.

News story in breitbart about CA so called drought. Does LI allow links?

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/01/20/strongly-worded-letters-fly-as-95-of-rainwater-washes-to-ocean-in-california/?

This could backfire and result in surge in bottle water sales in CA, resulting in more plastic waste.

Homeless junkies living on the sidewalks of CA cities have proved the feasibility of the idea. They live in their human waste and it doesn’t seem to bother them, right?

They have a pretty good track record. So far, the CA woke legislature has converted sidewalks and streets into sewage. If they can now complete this process by converting the sewage into drinking water, then they will have shown us all the woke path to Utopia.

Lead on, CA!

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to Q. | December 21, 2023 at 12:53 pm

    They can just put a fountain down the hill from the encampments, and voila, captured water for public drinking.

The progressive Democrat 2024 campaign lexicon:

Abortion
Addictive drug legalization
Climate change
Fossil fuels elimination
Saving the Democracy

I think it only fair that the consumer be made aware if recycled water is being provided. I suggest such water be dyed yellow.

You all know the water cycle is closed, right?

Every drop of water you’ve ever tasted has been, at one point or another, in something else’s colon.

Or someone else’s.

In fairness this isn’t ‘poop water’; it is clean and safe for drinking. The more important point of this is why not build more storage and direct surface run off to it instead? Answer is twofold. First the environmental whackos have successfully opposed all efforts to do so in CA for decades. Secondly someone needs to make an ongoing profit of some sort to feed back some of the grift to the political class who created the necessity and then issued the permits to ‘fix’ the problem they themselves created.

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to CommoChief. | December 21, 2023 at 4:12 pm

    I am dubious about the “clean and safe for drinking”, not necessarily because of the organics, but because it takes special efforts that I am pretty sure that California will not take to remove certain drugs and chemical compounds. Which do not disappear just because Leftists want them to.

    While I am pretty sure I have no intent to ever go to California ever again, this confirms me in that resolution.

    Subotai Bahadur

Government profits handsomely by inserting themselves and taxing niceties of life. The more you can get around this the more you get to keep your money.

Many people are moving off grid, they often collect and process rain water, they have solar electric and solar heat. wood stove as a backup.

Anyway, processing one’s own sewage is common. Septic tanks are one form of this, using composting diverting toilets are another,

I am hoping Israel is recycling Pale sewage to tunnels, mixing it with their sewage would be kind of funny. Gotta get keep keep needling.

This subject brings back memories of Richard Nixon when he visited a water treatment plant that did what this CA law does. They showed him the raw sewage and followed the process to a spigot where the manager poured a glass of water and offered it to Nixon, who replied, “No thanks, I’m not thirsty”! If one little part of the process fails, guess what you will be drinking?

    Subotai Bahadur in reply to inspectorudy. | December 21, 2023 at 4:14 pm

    This being California you can bet that parts of the process will fail. And that the government will conceal the fact that it has.

    Subotai Bahadur

To go with your bug burger, the Dhimmi-crats offer you a glass of vintage Chateau Grand Piss.

Flush twice. It’s a long way to the cafeteria…