Ideological Power Plays Week in Education
Your weekly report on education news.
In some instances, the left is embedding their ideology in education programs just because they can.
- Professor Jacobson on CRT in Veterinary Schools: ‘It’s Just an Ideological Power Play’
- Florida State University Handout Teaches Students About ‘Transgender Etiquette’
- Missouri School District Adds ‘They/Them’ Pronouns to Math Curriculum
Are you getting a sense that some college students don’t want to hear the truth about communism?
- Student Government at Whitworth University Rejects Campus Speaker Who Survived Mao’s China
- Syracuse U. Students Object to Talk by North Korea Defector Yeonmi Park, Calling Her a Liar
The campus left sure seems to care about abortion.
- Princeton Students Perform Musical Called ‘To All the Babies I’ve Killed Before’
- Seminary Prof in Louisiana Fired for Allegedly Offering to Fly Women to Abortion States
Free speech and the constitution? Not so much.
- Hundreds of UNC-Chapel Hill Profs Sign Letter Opposing Required Courses on U.S. Constitution
- University of Utah Scrubs ‘Anti-Racist Code of Conduct’ After FIRE Sends Them a Letter
Nice work if you can get it.
This is just sad.
The new normal?
The left is taking us backwards.
Of course she does.
The system is not sustainable.
- Students at Oregon’s Public Universities are Paying Record Tuition and the Schools Want More Money From the State
- St. Cloud State University Cutting Majors and Faculty Positions Amid $18 Million Deficit
Hilarious.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Alito is getting fed up and is strongly suggesting, that since nobody else will properly defend the court, it is a justified breach of supposed judicial decorum for him to start speaking out. I propose that he name the suspected leaker and see what happens. If that person sues (assuming no immunity exists) a proper investigation will be forced. If that person does not initiate legal action, it will indicate guilt.
Did not someone hereabouts claim that the “protests” before The Supremes’ recent Roe decision were not attempts to influence the court (tho that’s what the “protesters” said), nor threats (tho there were plenty), nor illegal (tho threats and intimidation are), nor outside of “persuasion” (tho about as far from amicus briefs as one can get short of shots fired) nor the DoJ’s job to protect from (tho there’s that pesky wording in that pesky law — darn that Congress.)
Alito’s quotes in this week’s article describe these “protests” as attempting to influence the court outside pleading and proceedings, *and* creating fear of, and increased risk of “assassination.” Maybe if the protesters had worn robes, he’d have thought it more like briefs and pleadings. Black robes, of coruse, to go with the rest of their uniform colors.
“Alito is getting fed up and is strongly suggesting”
“Alito’s quotes in this week’s article”
What are we talking about here? I haven’t seen Alito quoted in this article, any linked article that looks like it would have Alito in it, or in fact anywhere else on LI this week. Where is all the stuff you’re talking about?