Twitter lackeys know more about heart health than the American Heart Association. Wrap your mind around that one.
Twitter is at it again. Apparently, they “science” better than actual scientists who study heart health and the possible heart-related risks associated with the WuFlu vaccines.
Self-inflated Twitter brats are now censoring reports on an as yet not peer-reviewed paper presented at the recent American Heart Association (AHA) meeting.
— Angela Ramirez (@coangelaramirez) December 4, 2021
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Warnings and concerns about thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other heart issues seemingly linked to the vaccines came to prominence when mountain biker Kyle Warner shared his career-ending experience with post-vaccine pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
But Twitter gate-keepers of all things sciencey know better than victims, the FDA, and the CDC.
— Marina Medvin 🇺🇸 (@MarinaMedvin) December 3, 2021
Twitter Bans the American Heart Association folks. pic.twitter.com/PvqMp2Sy2G
— Kevin Alan Leversee ContentDragons (@contentdragons1) December 3, 2021
On Thursday, Twitter applied a warning label to a post of a study abstract from the American Heart Association website AHA Journals that expresses concern over mRNA vaccines and heart disease.
. . . . A link to the abstract was posted on Twitter on Thursday by Marina Medvin, a trial attorney and opinion columnist. The post was flagged by Twitter’s system for screening and disclaiming content perceived as harmful.
When attempting to open the link, one is redirected to another Twitter page with the warning: “this link may be unsafe.”
Previously, this warning system was only used in the case of spam, malware risks, and other deceptive means of soliciting clicks or information. However, its scope has been expanded to include “violent and misleading content that could lead to real world harm” and “certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter rules.”
Needless to say, people have thoughts:
Twitter is warning users that the website of the American Heart Association may be “unsafe.” Twitter versus the American Heart Association on the subject of heart disease? What a joke!
— Susan St. James (@SusanStJames3_) December 4, 2021
I guess Twitter thinks one of the journals of the American Heart Association is dangerous.
Remember, trust the science… unless it's science that works against your story.
(Yes, I know this is only an abstract. But is Twitter qualified to peer review papers on mRNA now?) pic.twitter.com/4yqli5I39K
— Nick Uva (@nickuva) December 3, 2021
I’m still reeling over the American Heart Association being censored by Twitter for warning of the heart issues associated with the Jab.
Unelected corporate oligarchs now override American institutions & seek to control what we can & can’t see. Fascism is not coming, it’s here
— Melissa Tate (@TheRightMelissa) December 4, 2021
The American Heart Association is being censored for mentioning possible heart damage with vaccines. Clearly, some misinforming, cultist, science denying going on here.
— Coop (@ClownPopper) December 4, 2021
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.