Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Biden Attempts to Hide Court Packing Stance With Gaslighting Lies

Biden Attempts to Hide Court Packing Stance With Gaslighting Lies

“The only court packing going on right now is going on with the Republicans,” Biden falsely claims.

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1315004473337495552

During the first presidential debate, Joe Biden refused to answer whether or not he supports packing the Supreme Court, and during the vice presidential debate, Kamala Harris also refused to answer this question.

The question has become a thorn in Biden’s side, and although he attempted to remove it by saying we’ll find out where he stands on court packing “when the election is over,” it didn’t work. Predictably.  While the media is willing to run cover for Biden on his racist comments and many flip-flops, even they can’t ignore something as significant as court packing.

Adding additional seats to the Supreme Court in order to ensure a Democrat advantage is an enormous issue, and one that Biden will not be able to dodge . . . as he is quickly finding out.

On Saturday, a reporter asked Biden if voters deserved to know where he stands on court packing, and he responded, “No, they don’t.”

Notice he starts out by saying that the only people asking about this issue must be Republicans.  He seems to be assuming that no Democrats anywhere would be against his packing the Supreme Court.  Obviously, that’s not the case, though, given that many on the left, including socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), reject court packing.

Buried in this rejection of the American voters’ right to know where he stands on the issue of adding seats to the Supreme Court to ensure a Democrat majority, Biden also attempts to turn the discussion to President Trump, whom he falsely accuses of “packing” the court by lawfully nominating Amy Coney Barrett to fill the Supreme Court seat left vacant upon the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Biden also claims, utterly falsely, that it’s “not constitutional” for a sitting president to fill a Supreme court vacancy during an election year. An argument even Democrat leaders aren’t making (because it’s untrue).

Biden is playing word games and attempting to gaslight the American people (whom he believes don’t deserve to know where he stands on court packing) that court packing is actually nominating and/or confirming a judge to the Supreme Court during an election year in which both the White House and the Senate are held by the same party.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

.
Those voting Democrat are incapable of telling you who (or what) exactly they are voting for.

The Joe Biden Show — pathetic!

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Rab. | October 10, 2020 at 7:58 pm

    Tampon Packing Joe

    And Man Splaining Kamala

    What a freak show.

    4fun in reply to Rab. | October 10, 2020 at 8:23 pm

    His base is all for it, whether he comes out and says it publicly or not.
    The few independents might actually know he’s wanting to do it, but being an independent usually means they’re not into politics and will vote for the prettiest face.

Jackass Joe sez: Voters ‘Don’t’ Deserve To Know If I’m Going To Pack Supreme Court.

Talk about arrogance!!

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrat-joe-biden-voters-dont-deserve-to-know-if-im-going-to-pack-supreme-court

We all know the Dems will attempt to pack the court if they can, so the answer is “Yes’. Denying that is an insult to voters.

Sundowner Joe is just to get the Socialists through the door, If they can pull the wool over Americans eyes long enough they win.

We’ve seen this “We have to pass it to see what’s in it” attitude from Democrats before and haven’t been too happy with the results. Gropey Joe saying that voters don’t deserve to know how he stands on the topic is emblematic of the disdain in which Democrats hold voters. That is exactly the kind of information the voters should have before deciding how to cast their vote.

I can’t speak for anyone else, but the mere fact that neither of them will actually answer the question tells me that it is their intent to try to get the number of Justices increased through legislation (28 U.S.C. §1) and to ideologically ‘pack’ the court. Perhaps not Biden’s intent, but certainly the intention of his handlers/controllers.

Maybe he doesn’t want the press distracted from his push for a $15,000,000.00-an-hour minimum wage.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/10/oh-boy-joe-biden-misreads-teleprompter-calls-15-million-minimum-wage-video/

Nobody asks why I call him Flatline. Nobody needs to ask.

Understandably, this stance has not been going over very well with focus groups.

Anyone who denies that a future President Harris won’t pack the Supreme Court: you’re a moron. An actual, bona fide moron.

It is actually un-Constitutional for Trump not to have nominated a replacement for RBG; and it is not emphasized nearly enough. The Constitution says he “shall” nominate people, not “may” nominate them. Ironically, Pelosi might make a case for impeachment if he nominated no one. (The body with the choice is the Senate.)

My son is 18 ,very unconcerned about politics, but he thinks Joe is a joke.He couldn’t believe this one when he heard it.

    That’s one hopeful thing about this election year. It may be true that “political jokes get elected,” but the less-engaged rarely vote for ab actual walking, talking punchline.

If you don’t want me to pack,

then you ain’t black.

Let’s hope the GOP succeeds in “packing” Barret onto the Supreme Court. It’s a slam dunk if they don’t screw this up too.

archer, heinz, biden, kerry, rosemont seneca, burisma, Ukraine, nrglab, viscoil, pelosi, xprise, judge ronnie abrams…

https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/three-convicted-manhattan-federal-court-fraudulent-issuance-and-sale-more-60-million

https://legalnewsline.com/stories/557006801-second-circuit-reinstates-jury-s-fraud-verdict-against-hunter-biden-s-former-business-partner

These people are criminals. Why there is even a discussion on what they will do with/to the courts is an abomination. The fact the American people tolerate a guy like joe biden is sickening.

What an imperially arrogant, obnoxious and self-entitled ass is dim-witted, dotard-marionette, Biden.

Biden evinces the unaccountable arrogance and contempt for popular will of every caudillo and dictator in history. And, he’s obviously nonplussed about showing it.

It used to be that the Dhimmi-crat apparatchiks who were aspiring to high office would at least engage in a pretense of respecting constitutional strictures and the electorate. No longer. The Dhimmi-crats’ totalitarian ethos and agenda have been uncovered, because these twits know that their water-carrying media lackey-propagandists will cover for them.

This is only the gazillionth disqualifying count against Biden and his miserable Dhimmi-crat Party.

This is weirder than it looks.

All the questions Slow Joe will get are bloody obvious. Green New Deal? Fracking? Taxes? Gun confiscation? SCOTUS nominees? SCOTUS destruction packing?

But the minds pulling Brain-Dead Puppet Joe’s strings are dodging the last two. Why? They’re all imaginary answers; it’s not like Joe has a long history of fulfilling promises in office. The “right” answers should be easy. But they’re avoiding them.

They must think that any answers to those two will kill them with a large chunk of voters. Even Dem voters, who will reliably swallow just about any crap sandwich.

I’d love to see some conservative gadfly reporter stand up and ask either Biden or Commie-lah: “Will you now condemn packing the Supreme Court?”

The following link describes that a vacancy has occurred in the final year of a Presidential term 29 times. The U.S. Constitution has been in effect since 1789, so that is 58 ends of term since then. So, a vacancy has occurred at least half of the time (29 out of 58). Read the link to learn of the outcomes during those 29 events as presented by U.S. Senator Cruz from Texas:

https://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com/2020/09/the-slogans-are-replaced-by-bye.html

SCOTUS nomination confirmed by Senate Yes No
— —
Senate and President same party 17 2
Senate and President not same party 2 8

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend