Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Michelle Obama floated as savior of Democrats from radical left general election disaster

Michelle Obama floated as savior of Democrats from radical left general election disaster

We’ve been predicting this for over two years. It could happen as late as the convention if it looked like Warren or Bernie could get the nomination.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqrBK9wmHl8

Do you believe in coincidences?

Today. TODAY. Both the New York Times and The New Yorker have articles about how centrist and establishment Democrats are apoplectic over what is happening in the Democratic Primaries.

Biden is fading, mentally and politically. He’s hanging on for dear life to a presumption coming into the primaries that he had what it takes, but he doesn’t. Bernie and Warren are viewed as gateway drugs to general election disaster. (For a brutal takedown of Warren’s electoral chances from a progressive view, read Why Criticize Warren? in Current Affairs.)

The others in the race all have problems, from stone cold boring to non-starters. Kamala Harris is the biggest disappointment, there’s no there there.

And there’s one person they both note who could walk away with the nomination, but doesn’t appear to want it.

http://archive.is/y9PLV

From Jonathan Martin in the NY Times, Anxious Democratic Establishment Asks, ‘Is There Anybody Else?’ (emphasis added):

When a half-dozen Democratic donors gathered at the Whitby Hotel in Manhattan last week, the dinner began with a discussion of which presidential candidates the contributors liked. But as conversations among influential Democrats often go these days, the meeting quickly evolved into a discussion of who was not in the race — but could be lured in.

Would Hillary Clinton get in, the contributors wondered, and how about Michael R. Bloomberg, the former New York mayor? One person even mused whether Michelle Obama would consider a late entry, according to two people who attended the event, which was hosted by the progressive group American Bridge….

With doubts rising about former Vice President Joseph R. Biden’s ability to finance a multistate primary campaign, persistent questions about Senator Elizabeth Warren’s viability in the general election and skepticism that Mayor Pete Buttigieg, of South Bend, Ind., can broaden his appeal beyond white voters, Democratic leaders are engaging in a familiar rite: fretting about who is in the race and longing for a white knight to enter the contest at the last minute….

“With Trump looming, there is genuine concern that the horse many have bet on may be pulling up lame and the horse who has sprinted out front may not be able to win,” said David Axelrod, a former adviser to President Barack Obama.

Eric Levitz in The New Yorker writes, How Centrist Democrats Botched the 2020 Primary: (emphasis added):

A specter is haunting “pro-business Democrats” — the specter of change they can’t believe in.

With just over three months until Iowa gets caucusing, Elizabeth Warren is their party’s front-runner. She’s running neck and neck with Joe Biden in the polls — and Biden’s campaign is living hand-to-mouth. The former “senator from MBNA” is losing to a democratic socialist at the fundraising game. And time seems to be depleting Biden’s (always limited) verbal skills even faster than it’s draining his campaign coffers. Meanwhile, the most viable alternative for “Leave Billionaires Alone” Democrats seems to be a college-town mayor with fewer black supporters than Donald Trump. As of this writing, betting markets now put the odds of blue America nominating either Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders in 2020 at over 50 percent….

Bloomberg is reportedly mulling a run, but could never win. Michelle Obama could win, but would never run. Hillary Clinton is almost certainly not delusional enough to throw her hat in the ring. And none of the other names floated by the Whitby diners — Deval Patrick, Eric Holder, John Kerry, and Sherrod Brown — have any obvious advantage over the standard-issue Dems already in the race….

… the Whitby Democrats’ fantasies of a Michelle Obama candidacy may be delusional, but this delusion is an understandable response to a grim reality. Their faction has unintentionally placed all of its bets on an old, increasingly lame horse who was infamous for mounting lousy presidential runs when he was in his prime….

Michelle Obama’s name being floated in mainstream Democrat house organs is not surprising. At least not to us.

We’ve been predicting it for over two years:

Michelle says she doesn’t want it. But just wait until Bernie or Warren or Bernie/Warren or Warren/Bernie looks likely to get the nomination.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Nightmare on Pennsylvania Avenue.

of course, she’s a variation of Hillary

    MattMusson in reply to ronk. | October 23, 2019 at 6:16 am

    The funny thing is that Hillary might do her best to sabotage Michelle. Just out of spite.

      Tom Servo in reply to MattMusson. | October 23, 2019 at 10:11 am

      And if anyone has actually paid attention to Michelle, she makes Louis Farrakhan look relaxed and reasonable by comparison.

        notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Tom Servo. | October 23, 2019 at 3:55 pm

        At least those public school children Michelle tried to “starve” to death with her meal make-overs are now all old enough to VOTE!

Two prominent leftist publications, by sheer coincidence, floated the idea of Michelle as the nominee, along with the unproven assertion that she doesn’t seem to want it.

What an amazingly coincidental coincidence. No one would ever have expected it!

    alaskabob in reply to irv. | October 22, 2019 at 10:17 pm

    Michelle O is waiting in the wings… with the promise of return to 1600 of The One to guide her successfully as President. What Bill and Hillary wanted will be possible with the O’s. This is TOO BIG for her not to go for. It is absolutely going to happen..at least the campaign… but with Oprah and the fawning media she could plant a true “victory garden” at the White House. This is historic for the Dems.

      alaskabob in reply to alaskabob. | October 22, 2019 at 10:19 pm

      I’ll up it with Mayor Pete for VP. Punches every ticket for the Left.

      oldgoat36 in reply to alaskabob. | October 22, 2019 at 10:47 pm

      After the treatment of Trump through these years, and the very real threat that the Republicans could (depending on how angry the Representatives are by pressure from their constituents) of impeachment as the new normal for any opposition party becoming president, I’m not so sure M. O. would take the chance.
      She is enjoying life as a potential billionaire which would be put on hold. She might “punch the ticket” but I don’t think the Obama’s legacy is all that endearing to the swing voters compared to Trump’s economy. Would people be satisfied going backward economically?
      Should Republicans enjoy the majority in Congress, a real potential given anger rising from how the leftist National Socialists have been with power in their hands in the House, I see endless investigations of everything Obama did during his terms in office, the special deals given the Obamas once leaving office, and the taint that will come out when Pelosi pushes articles of impeachment.
      Obama would rather keep his lazy lifestyle going as he had in the WH, only with less chance of the scandals becoming the narrative from every Republican to a point where the propagandists couldn’t keep ignoring it, despite their spin.
      Trump out of office might be the worst thing that could ever happen to the leftists if they push him out.

        artichoke in reply to oldgoat36. | October 23, 2019 at 12:40 am

        Maybe this is the deal. If MO doesn’t run, Trump/Barr won’t put Barack in prison.

        Anna Ronelle Lee in reply to oldgoat36. | October 23, 2019 at 5:07 am

        One can only hope that is the case. Unfotunately, these vile Democrats suffer the delusion that the American voting public does not see them for what they truly are.

    PrincetonAl in reply to irv. | October 23, 2019 at 5:04 am

    Inconceivable!

    Maybe it’s not so much that she doesn’t want the nomination but that she doesn’t want to run. But she’ll accept a coronation.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to irv. | October 23, 2019 at 3:57 pm

    Methinks Michelle will have to Jello Pudding wrestle Oprah for it though…….

Much has been said about how even BHO would be considered too moderate for today’s crop of Dem candidates. However, I think BHO was not moderate at all, he just hid his radicalism well. I think Michelle would feel free to remove the mask and be just as radical as Warren or Bernie. I could be wrong, but if so, how would a moderate attract the Bernie and Warren voters? If I’m right, then she’s no better against Trump than any other lefty. All she could do is attract Biden voters, and that probably wouldn’t be enough, assuming that if either Warren or Bernie drops out, their supporters move to the other socialist.

    Tom Servo in reply to Cornfed. | October 23, 2019 at 10:14 am

    Have you ever listened to Michelle? Her extremism is different, it’s not really economic. I don’t think she even cares about economic theory at all. What Michelle can’t resist going back to is “I HATES WHITEY!!! I HATES WHITEY!!! I HATES WHITEY!!!”

    That’ll be her campaign slogan.

    zennyfan in reply to Cornfed. | October 23, 2019 at 6:23 pm

    She would bring black voters to the polls in droves, and as 2016 showed, Democrats need those 90-95% turnouts to win.

Morning Sunshine | October 22, 2019 at 10:31 pm

Crazy thing- I think they have a candidate who COULD win against Trump. I think Tulsi Gabbard is a sane-enough-sounding candidate that she could win the general against Trump. She could easily pull off enough of the “Trump is too unpresidential” Repubs and those Dems and independents who may not want to vote for Trump but would do so cuz Warren-Sanders-Biden-etc are too extreme

But Gabbard is not crazy enough to win the primary voters she would need. And she is enough of an anti-establishment candidate that the PTB of the Dems don’t want to risk giving her that power. She might even be Trump-like enough to continue draining the swamp- after all, she took on Hillary. And that cannot be allowed to continue

    Gabbard is far left, if you really listen to her views and ideas, but she does come off less wild eyed socialist.
    She is an outsider to the party to a degree, and her whining has not endeared her to the power brokers. I don’t see the fraud machine going to work for her in the primaries to give her a shot.

      Morning Sunshine in reply to oldgoat36. | October 22, 2019 at 10:58 pm

      Exactly. But she could pull off the “no-quite-as-crazy-left” to the general public

      She is also a major in the USNG- which would help bolster her not-crazy image in purpleish states

        American voters are not looking for “no-quite-as-crazy-left”. Gabbard has found a tactic for separating herself from the muddled fools she is running against but she is as radical as any of them. Do a little homework and you will find plenty of nutty statements and positions. She is just having her moment. It will pass.

    Let me say it more strongly. Gabbard is not essentially different from a 5th member of the Squad, in terms of her positions. She’s shown a lack of backbone, coming out against impeachment, then flipping to support. Then saying she wanted to get us out of the wars, then when Trump gets us out of one, saying “oh the Kurds!!”. She’s not an honest person, just an aggressive one. And that’s been exposed.

    She doesn’t answer questions directly. When asked if she’s a Russian bot by Tucker Carlson, all she had to say was “No”. But she never said no. She gave a blathering, evasive answer. She doesn’t answer the questions asked in the debates either.

    She’s just getting a pass because she’s at 2%. If she started to rise, there’s plenty of (figurative) ammunition to use to take her down.

    Will the Real Tulsi please stand up!

    ~ NSFW ~
    Kyle
    @HNIJohnMiller

    What the flying f*ck is up with all of you Tulsi worshippers? Seriously, what the f*ck? You see a Democrat who hasn’t gone full Mussolini and you think she just walks on water? Do a bit of f*cking research on her before you… you know what, no, f*ck this. It’s time. THREAD TIME.
    2:48 PM · Oct 16, 2019·Twitter Web App”

    Lessee, did comrade Gabbard endorse Bernie last time around?

    Yes.

    Did comrade Gabbard endorse Clinton in the 2016 general?

    Yes.

    You confuse “moderation” with “I’ll say/do anything to get my support and donations up”.

    Gabbards usefulness is as a destroyer of other democrats, nothing further.

IMHO we will not see Michelle in 2020, if Trump is in the race.

Here is the problem that the Dems face. Economy, economy, economy. This is the Trump economy. No matter how much the Obamaistas might try to spin it, it will never be seen as the Obama economy. Just as Obama was saddled with blame for the stagnant economy of the Obama years, even though they tried to blame it all on the Bush administration, Trump will get credit for the booming economy on his watch.

So, Michelle can only run on name recognition. She may well have to explain what she knew and when she knew it with regard to her husband’s involvement in Spygate and other improper and illegal actions. This might well bring more attention to Barack’s involvement in all of this. So, I do not see Michelle getting involved in a run for POTUS in 2020. 2024 might be another story altogether.

    alaskabob in reply to Mac45. | October 23, 2019 at 11:06 am

    The alphabet swamp in DC may (are) cooking up an economic crisis as we speak. The present liquidity issues of banks may signal a vulnerability of the economy. Crashing the economy has the power to hammer Trump and capitalism is a two-fer for the Left. Add the possibility of discovery of FBI and CIA corruption and diversion through economic crisis increases.

God forbid!
Personally, I think the woman is too darn lazy to want the job. She’s living the high life. Why work? Of course if she is pushed into it, we know it will not be her running the show. There will be a master puppeteer at work behind the curtains.
Please no! I never want to see another 0 in office or anywhere else.

    oldgoat36 in reply to lc. | October 22, 2019 at 10:52 pm

    Agreed, it would be Jarrett’s third term as the real President.

    Barry and the Wookie are only interested in being power brokers these days, not diving into the trenches. There may be a movement to draft her but I don’t see her biting. I think the Os will work to steer events so as to survive these clowns and lay the groundwork for 2024. I don’t see her ever running for office. Nobody wants to be the Democratic Romney but they could draft him as the sacrificial lamb. Would Romney be dumb enough to bite?

She would be nothing but a tool for the left. She was in charge of one thing as FLOTUS: school lunches.
That turned out to be unpalatable to all Americans except for a few loons. Want her to do that to the entire country?

Interestingly enough the school systems in Hawaii, Obama’s birth state, totally ignored the school lunch mandate all the while nodding approvingly and praising it. It was beef stew and rice before the Michelle mandate for a carrot stick and raw broccoli, it was beef stew and rice afterwords.
Growing kids need proper meals for strength in their pursuits.

She’s not going to run against Trump.

If she’s going to run at all it will be 2024.

She KNOWS that Trump would pull no punches against her and would do exactly what the RINO cowards like Romney were terrified to do – attack Obama’s record.

Trump would slaughter her and she knows it.

So she’ll wait until 2024 and she can run against a Failure Theatre RINO that would stumble for his fainting couch rather than attack the Sainted Obama.

    MarkJ in reply to Olinser. | October 23, 2019 at 1:53 pm

    “So she’ll wait until 2024 and she can run against a Failure Theatre RINO that would stumble for his fainting couch rather than attack the Sainted Obama.”

    My take: If Mooch really assumes Mike Pence will be a pushover…she’s assuming wrong.

Isn’t Manchelle culturally appropriating straight hair?

Hey Dems,

Let’s hear Michelle debate Tulsi Gabbard, first, before making any predictions. Topics could include Fast and Furious gun running, black unemployment, and school lunches.

Might as well see if she can slug it out in the trenches or not before anointing her, eh guys? It’d be a blast.

    artichoke in reply to hopp singg. | October 23, 2019 at 12:50 am

    She’d beat Gabbard, because any of them would beat Gabbard one on one. Gabbard has three canned answers (an improvement, used to be one) and whatever you ask her, she selects one and pivots to it. Gabbard’s looking good because she’s tall and now well-dressed and has a deep serious voice. That isn’t enough to win.

      guinspen in reply to artichoke. | October 23, 2019 at 5:20 am

      “Gabbard’s looking good because she’s tall and now well-dressed and has a deep serious voice. That isn’t enough to win.”

      It worked for President Razor-sharp Crease In The Pants.

Comanche Voter | October 23, 2019 at 12:31 am

Well Moochie is tan–and she’s rested. But is she ready?

mooochelle/kamala: the fat and furious ticket.

moooochelle obama is a grifter who is one debate away from being exposed as the affirmative action bozo she/he is. She’s as deep as beto o’rorouk, ten times as fat, and just as toxic.

Then again, beto/moooochelle coupling could be the new laurel and hardy.

Btw: must we suffer through that comical ‘glamour’ photo, that is about as real as news coming out of the ny times?

The only reason the Dems would turn to Mooch as a savior would be to get Barack his third term in the WH. Does anyone believe Mooch would be anything more than Barack’s ventriloquist dummy?

She couldn’t beat Tulsi Gabbard in a debate. And neither one can beat Trump.

The Dems know they have no one whose hat is in the ring who can beat Trump, and no alternatives waiting in the wings. That’s why they are all in on impeachment. Which so far is backfiring on them.

https://babylonbee.com/news/dems-worried-if-impeachment-fails-theyll-have-to-nominate-electable-candidate

https://babylonbee.com/news/study-finds-more-people-would-support-impeachment-if-anyone-had-the-slightest-idea-what-crime-trump-is-supposed-to-have-committed

All depends on whether the Obama’s can resist the urge to be themselves.

Michelle was put where she was to be Obam’s handler, to overcome his diffuse laziness. And, perhaps because in practice she turned out to be none too sharp, they added ValJar as backup. MJ was never intended to be the actual figurehead for the Left/totalitarian revolution, and it’s not obvious that any malevolent plotters would want to make her that now.

What she personally might want is, of course, of no concern to the Borg.

PLEASE run the wookie.

Al Gore

Take a hike, Big Mike!

Very doubtful. At this late stage in the game the Democrat candidates aren’t going to sit back and just let her cut in line. The followers of Bernie in particular are still under the illusion that their candidate could have beaten Trump in the general election, and they want the crazy old socialist to get the chance. Warren can see the nomination in sight as well, since Bernie isn’t actually going to make it and will likely endorse her. Biden is sinking and I think even he knows it. The rest don’t matter.

My guess is that she’ll jump in in 2024.

If she’s serious about being POTUS she will run for a Congressional seat first, like Cankles did.

“With doubts rising about former Vice President Joseph R. Biden’s ability to finance a multistate primary campaign, persistent questions about Senator Elizabeth Warren’s viability in the general election and skepticism that Mayor Pete Buttigieg, of South Bend, Ind., can broaden his appeal beyond white voters, Democratic leaders are engaging in a familiar rite: fretting about who is in the race and longing for a white knight to enter the contest at the last minute….”

Seems that this paragraph has been removed at the current NYT

Perhaps even they saw it as opinion and conjecture, and they can’t allow that negativity to stand against Democrats

Big Mike won’t run because he knows the country is not ready to support a closeted transsexual.

The problem, if she does step up, is the media fawning will be turned up to 11. There will be zero objective analysis, let alone discussion about her. Any critique will bey raaaaaycist. The GOPe will curl up like pill bugs and do nothing. The dogpiling on Trump, which is vicious and mindless enough already, will also be turned up to 11.

The cult-like following the Obamas have among leftards and ‘independents’ who should know better will be a factor. Dem cheating in the general election will be amped up–all those “missing ballots” that are suddenly found, along with illegal voters.

All that is the wild card, in what would otherwise be just another case of an unqualified radical trying to run for office.

Mike said that she is ashamed of her country. She also said that her husband is a Kenyan, from Kenya. Mike is a strident racist but seems to really like white-girl hair styles.

Ah well, maybe she would make David Letterman her Sec of Stash and she wear her nipple-rings when they appear together.

So… Hillary was likened as Presidential material because her philandering husband slithered into office. Mike, similarly is well qualified to hold high office because her Kenyan husband, from Kenya, slithered into high office.

Democrat potential is nasty and ugly. Maxine Waters would make a fine VP to Mike’s administration. Hell, they might even share wig hats with each other.

2smartforlibs | October 23, 2019 at 8:45 am

SHe sees herself above all you plebs. Clinton however doesn’t

I can’t believe she would put herself on the rack like that.

This is a woman who’s gotten sinecure after sinecure her entire professional life. Either due to who she know or the color of her skin. They even invented a job just for her and when she left they got rid of the job.

They would either have to threaten her with some kind of exposure OR offer a lot of money under the table just to run let alone work the office if elected.

And you can guarantee it would not be easy going like it was for her hubby. We’re way beyond that and most of us would start taking action once they started their nonsense.

No I cannot see her running she just is not a political person. I would guess she’s been unlikable for a long time so she’s not used to trying to make things work between folks she’s the kind of person who demands respect without deserving it and any deviation is thoroughly punished. You can’t be Pres. even with this compliant media with that atttitude.

    Agreed. And further, there are many millions who voted for Jugears thinking they were helping to “heal” the nation from the sin of slavery. Then he turned around, rubbed their noses in it and became the most racially divisive political leader in the history of this country. So now those voters understand: “Burn me once, shame on you, burn me twice, shame on me.” We simply don’t need another black racist, Marxist wanna-be right now.

Hillary Clinton is almost certainly not delusional enough to throw her hat in the ring.

What a strange statement. She’ll certainly want to try again. The question is, are the D’rats delusional enough to let her torpedo them again?

If she does in fact run, Trump’s first campaign ad should be of her sporting her junk.

There were two major misstatements in this article. The first is from Jonathan Martin in the NY Times:
Democratic leaders…longing for a white knight to enter the contest at the last minute….

How is that not incredibly racist? And from the Times, no less! How dare they!

The second one is fromEric Levitz in The New Yorker:
Hillary Clinton is almost certainly not delusional enough to throw her hat in the ring.

Oh yes she is. Count on it. In fact, I’m looking forward to the Democrat primary coming down to a battle between Michelle and Hillary. Popcorn stocks will go through the roof.

    elle in reply to ss396. | October 23, 2019 at 1:43 pm

    I agree. She has made it VERY clear she intends to ride up the middle. The Biden corruption story initially came from Politico and was pure Hillary Clinton. Ya’ll may not like Hillary and think she’s BS crazy, but she’s crazy like a fox. I can’t believe how people keep underestimating the power of her machine. The corrupt globalists like her and will be happy for her to win.

    She never intended to eat corn dogs at county fairs and have to demean herself at the debates. Nope The Democrats play chess and she eliminated all candidates except a bunch of clowns who never had a chance in the general but were great at getting the base to send in their money

    Now she’s going to ride up the middle and the press is going to shape it as inevitable. Think they can’t do that? Give me a break. Of course they can just like they have all of their base fired up about impeaching Trump for looking into Biden’s corruption and outraged that Trump is pulling our troops home. Who would have thought the self-righteous liberals would stoop to throwing their anti-war glory days into the trash out of sheer Trump hatred?

    No, ya’ll have seriously underestimated the Clinton machine.

Joan Rivers unavailable to comment . . .

If ‘he’ runs it will be time to bring out the true story about Michael. Our country could not survive this tranny.

Wouldn’t Michelle Obama be the first trans President if elected?

Michelle Obama as the nominee? Possible, but she also faces some vexing problems:

1. Trump will go after her like a pit bull on a poodle if they ever debate.
2. She’s never run for public office before…and it’s gonna quickly show.
3. She and Jug Ears are simply making too much money right now.
4. She’s going to open herself to all kinds of very inconvenient questions.
5. Given #4, it’s gonna be kind of hard to explain why she believes in “climate change” when she’s just bought a $15 million dollar property on Martha’s Vineyard that’ll supposedly be underwater in a few years.
6. Moochelle will unify the GOP like gangbusters–hey, who wouldn’t give up the chance to vote against Obama a third time?

I can think of more reasons why Moochelle won’t run, but feel free to share your own.

    Eskyman in reply to MarkJ. | October 23, 2019 at 8:29 pm

    That’s a good list! I’d add “anger.”

    Big Mike is just too angry; s/he hates this country, always has, and it shows.

    How many women did Michelle give the side-eye to? How many people, places & things (like our Flag) did s/he sneer at, captured on video but unmentioned by our um, “journalists?”

    These days being a “nasty woman” is supposed to be a good thing, God knows why, but s/he’s far beyond that. S/he’s a burning cauldron of hatred, and s/he couldn’t keep it hidden under the pressure of running for president!

    RNJD in reply to MarkJ. | October 23, 2019 at 8:55 pm

    1. “Trump will go after her like a pit bull on a poodle if they ever debate.” – And lose the women vote by 95%, the black vote by 100%, not counting millennials, progressive men & RINOs who will vote for her 100%.

    2. “She’s never run for public office before…and it’s gonna quickly show.” – yeah, like the current POTUS. He seemed to do okay.

    3. “She and Jug Ears are simply making too much money right now.” – They have way more than they need. Plus, being the First Woman POTUS; power is priceless. Besides, what they’re making now is peanuts compared to what they could draw as the first Husband/Wife POTUS.

    4. “She’s going to open herself to all kinds of very inconvenient questions.” From who? The mainstream media? She’ll be media-managed to a degree never before seen. What? You think any conservative news person will ever be permitted to ask her a question?

    5. “Given #4, it’s gonna be kind of hard to explain why she believes in “climate change” when she’s just bought a $15 million dollar property on Martha’s Vineyard that’ll supposedly be underwater in a few years.” – Nobody will ever be allowed to ask such an “inconvenient” question.

    6. “Moochelle will unify the GOP like gangbusters–hey, who wouldn’t give up the chance to vote against Obama a third time? “ – Most women. All progressives (they hate Trump worse than anyone else). And every millennial and black.

    I’m with Professor J on this. She’ll be the consensus nominee by early next summer. I don’t like it, but the facts are there.

Mooshell still wouldn’t be the first female president. But we have already had our first gay president.

Mooshell still wouldn’t be the first female president. But we have already had our first gay president.

The grocery store tabloid said that the Obamas are getting divorced. I assume that’s an exaggeration, but who knows?

Michelle won’t pursue it, too much work.

Agree with most of the comments above. I just don’t see a convention savior for the d as a viable option. The Bernie folks and the Warren folks will go ballistic. They ain’t going to vote for an imposed ‘wall street’ approved substitute that didn’t bother to get into the d primary and actually do the hard work of campaigning. Michelle would be better off taking the Colin Powell route, staying out of the mud of campaigning and not loosing. She is young enough to wait and mount a future campaign assuming she can find backing. Hillary and her ego might not be able to resist a 2020 role as a savior, but I can’t see her winning for the same reasons, the d party machine imposing a candidate won’t go over well.

What’s the deal with Dem pols pointing at people in crowds and then just grimacing? Nothing more, just point and grimace. I get the idea that they’re just pretending to pay attention to who is in the crowd. Maybe the desperate, needy people who vote Dem will and were in the general direction of where their Precious were pointing will go home thinking “Michelle Obama (or Hillary Clinton) SAW ME in the crowd!!!”

https://obbop.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/hillary-point-and-laugh.jpg?w=640

https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/usa-election_clinton2.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=300&strip=all

DJT doesn’t do that. He’ll notice someone in a crowd but he won’t just point and grimace. If it’s someone who is heckling him he’ll say something like, “Is that a he or a she? That guy needs a haircut more than I do.”

Or, like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79R3foqlGHA

“What a baby. It’s like from an advertisement. Perfect.”

DJT actually connects with the people who show up at his rallies. The Dems just fake it.

The Obamas are a “billion dollar brand” and they won’t be “doing administration” any time in the future

The candidate to beat Trump would be Gimmy Impeachment. With the big winner out the playing field goes to the Dummocrats.

She’s a bitter gal. Not sure how that will resonate with the American electorate. We’ve seen too much ‘tude from this chick.

Look, Michelle is not really bright and has done nothing of consequence in her life. She, like hillary, has ridden her husband’s coattails to get where she is today. She is smart enough to know that she isn’t smart enough to pull off the big fake like obama did. He was a con man and a liar but she is too honest and doesn’t have that con artist’s personality. She is a dyed in the wool white hater and if she got the same kind of treatment that Trump has gotten from day one, she would drop out.

don’t see her beating trump or hillary beating trump for that matter–the risk of losing is significant, even with the fraud, the vote harvesting, gerrymandering, etc. for ANY dem candidate–don’t believe they could risk the mooch losing and then coming into ’24 as a once-defeated has-been–better to let clinton take the chance–an even bet for the dems–if clinton wins, they’re ecstatic(and we’re sunk)or should hillary lose(please, lord), the dems are shed of the clintons forever

How about a Michelle/Barack ticket? The Constitution only says he can’t be elected as President again. If the ticket wins and she resigns and takes a seat on the Supremes, Barack is in there again. And next time we can elect the Holder/Obama ticket and pull the same stunt again. Voila! President for life.

MooseHell can float? I bet she can’t tread water!

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend