Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Is Rachel Maddow’s anti-Trump grift finally over, now that Mueller debunked Russia collusion?

Is Rachel Maddow’s anti-Trump grift finally over, now that Mueller debunked Russia collusion?

Maddow and others in the “Resistance Media” will find something else to peddle. Grifters gonna grift.

On March 14, 2017, less than two months after Donald Trump’s inauguration, Rachel Maddow and MSNBC hyped a big get.

Maddow obtained Trump’s tax returns.

Before the tax returns were rolled out, Maddow and MSNBC began to walk it back. She had one tax return, from 2005.

When the 9 p.m. show started, Maddow filibustered and stalled, with a 14-minute monologue, with the big reveal coming only after a commercial break. It turned out she didn’t even have the full tax return, just the first two pages of the Form 1040.  In the time period she was stalling, The Daily Beast published the return results which already had been posted at another website. The results helped Trump, by showing he paid $38 million in taxes on $150 million of income.

Maddow was roundly mocked:

I thought for sure this would be the end of Maddow. She had embarrassed herself and her network to a huge audience stoked by the hype regarding her big scoop.

I wrote, Rachel Maddow’s career committed suicide live on national TV tonight:

Rachel Maddow has a history of claiming big scoops which then flop.

There was the debunked 2012 big scoop about supposed GOP wrongdoing in Michigan. And the 2014 big scoop that the Koch Brothers were behind Florida groups pushing drug testing for welfare recipients, which was not true. We covered the Florida non-scoop big scoop, Rachel Maddow’s come undone with Koch Derangement Syndrome….

[The tax return scoop was] Just another embarrassing performance.

I was wrong about Maddow’s career committing suicide because I underestimated the willingness of the anti-Trump MSNBC audience to continue to buy into anything anti-Trump, despite having been burned.

Maddow became the center of the Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy theory universe. Ross Barkan at The Guardian notes:

With Trump has come Russia: two years of conspiracy-mongering about whether the president, a failed real estate mogul and reality TV star consumed with dubious deal-making, conspired with the Russian government to influence the outcome of the 2016 election. Robert Mueller’s determination that no evidence exists to prove Trump and Russian colluded to fix the election has exposed, once again, the venality of A-list political punditry. At the top of the heap is none other than MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow….

And Maddow, MSNBC’s ratings juggernaut of the Trump era, is the embodiment of this overzealousness. The Mueller investigation was covered more on MSBNC than any other television network, and was mentioned virtually every day in 2018. No twist was too minuscule or outlandish for Maddow; every night, seemingly, brought another nail in the coffin of the soon-to-be-dead Trump presidency.

There was the time Maddow theorized that Trump was “curiously well-versed” in “specific Russian talking points”, strongly implying press briefings were dictated from the Kremlin. An American missile attack on Syria, Maddow concurred, could have been orchestrated by Putin himself. During a cold snap, the Russian government could shut down our power supply. Putin could blackmail Trump into pulling troops from Russia’s border.

Maddow was not only certain that Russians had rigged the election. On air, she would talk about the “continuing operation” – the idea that the Kremlin was controlling the Trump presidency itself. In more sober times, this brand of analysis would barely cut it on a far-right podcast. In the Trump era, it was ratings gold.

Maddow is much smarter than this. But the siren song of ratings is too difficult for a TV personality ignore, especially when a television network is transformed from an also-ran into a top contender.

Maddow’s ratings soared, along with other MSNBC Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy shows:

The Rachel Maddow Show was the No. 1 cable news program for the month of January [2019] across all relevant categories. TRMS averaged 3.29 million total viewers for the month, which is the largest total viewer delivery for a 9 p.m. show in the history of the network.

The Last Word and The 11th Hour also set total audience records for a month, with the former averaging 2.57 million during the 10 p.m. hour, and the latter averaging 1.85 million during the 11 p.m. hour.

MSNBC also seems to have found something with Deadline: White House. Hosted by Nicolle Wallace, the show ranked No. 1 in total viewers during the 4 p.m. hour this month.

Despite broadcasting from remote locales, Morning Joe delivered the show’s best month ever when it came to total viewers (1.2 million) and beat CNN across the board in January. Compared to January 2018, Morning Joe was +14 percent in total viewers, whereas Fox & Friends was -10 percent and New Day was +4 percent.

No cable news program posted more year-over-year total audience growth this month than Morning Joe.

Then conspiracy theory met reality, with the release of the summary of the Mueller report, including this direct quote from Mueller:

“[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

In the days after the Sunday release, the viewership for Maddow’s show collapsed:

Rachel Maddow isn’t backing away from her coverage of President Donald Trump and any connection to Russia’s involvement in trying to influence the 2016 presidential campaign. The question is how much her fans want to listen.

Maddow’s audience has dipped on her two days back on the air since Attorney General William Barr reported that special counsel Robert Mueller had found no collusion between Trump and Russia’s efforts. Her audience of 2.5 million on Monday was 19 percent below her average this year, and it went down further to 2.3 million on Tuesday, the Nielsen company said.

So did the rest of MSNBC Trump-Russia conspiracy programs and CNN.

Even liberal publications are noting how this may signal the end of the spectacular rise of “Resistance Media.” The Atlantic notes:

These are turbulent times for Resistance Inc.

The Robert Mueller fetishization cottage industry is collapsing. Russia conspiracy theorists are frantically tweet-storming as though their life—or livelihood—depends on it. And across liberal America, cable-news obsessives and keyboard warriors who have spent years waiting for investigators to produce a presidency-ending bombshell are in a state of open mourning.

Like thieves caught with their hands in the cookie jar who loudly proclaim their innocence, MSNBC is in attack mode. I noted how Joe Scarborough whatabouts media malfeasance in Trump-Russia collusion debacle:

I took one for the team.

Monday morning, the first morning after the summary of the Mueller report was released, I watched CNN and Morning Joe on MSNBC. I did it again on Tuesday morning.

It was rough, like walking into an alternative universe where the inhabitants created their own narrative in which the media coverage of supposed Trump-Russia collusion was worthy of praise, or at least not criticism. I could only watch for a short time each morning. It was that unbearable….

If you thought the perpetrators of this media crime would be contrite, self-reflective, or sorry, you would be wrong. They have learned nothing. To the contrary, many of them have learned the wrong lesson.

Joe Pompeo at Vanity Fair notes that there is a corporate-level decision to defend the network’s coverage, and the hosts are carrying out that policy:

In the face of this near-catastrophic setback, the MSNBC resistance bravely soldiered on. On the air that night, Ari Melber engaged in a spirited grilling of Trump attorney Jay Sekulow. Legal analyst Neal Katyal cautioned Chris Hayes not to view Barr as the final word on whether Donald Trump obstructed justice. Lawrence O’Donnell emphasized that “no one in the news media . . . has read a single sentence of the Mueller report.” Rachel Maddow, hands down one of the Mueller saga’s most voracious and detail-oriented chroniclers, kicked off her show with a monologue diving into 15 questions the Barr report left her with. “You knew it was gonna be this kind of night, didn’t you?” she began.

Is the drop in ratings the past few days the end of the road for Maddow and MSNBC conspiracy theorists? I thought that would be the case after the tax return debacle, and I was wrong. It’s risky to bet against the anti-Trump grifters. They will switch gears and find a new line of attack, some new conspiracy theory to get gullible liberals to watch.

Grifters gonna grift.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


You can’t fix stuck on stupid. They will double down, triple down and keep riding that horse until they explode in 2020

    n.n in reply to dystopia. | March 28, 2019 at 7:59 pm

    There is a progressive risk that the ball of yarns they have spun will unwind with catastrophic force that will inflict collateral damage not limited to America.

She and the rest of her grifter tribe are seized with some form of mental illness that requires group think, group deprivation and then fantastical fixation. It is short hand for ‘progressivism’ I know, but this is going deeper. Is their any real estate in Guyana large enough to hold many thousands of like minded double and triple down followers I wonder?

bobinreverse | March 28, 2019 at 4:32 pm

They think the changing US demographic has finally reached the tipping point. And who knows they may be right.

I think he should just do what any other man would do , pick himself up and move on.

    Tom Servo in reply to dmi60ex. | March 29, 2019 at 7:40 am

    I flipped on that channel for a minute yesterday evening, to see what they were going to do next. I think it was Chris Hayes, and he had someone on preaching about how we HAD to support the Green New Deal, because so many people were dying in the Bronx each day because of Climate Change. Oh, and that Climate Change was Racist.

    Seriously, that’s the line he was pitching. I thought “that’s nice, you go with that one, MSNBC.”

Well, they could advance to anti-Trump visuals that don’t require actual facts.

Burning/hanging/cutting an effigy would provoke too much backlash, as would performance art showing Trump commiting “rape.”

but, a big nightly Trump-piñata bash? A Two Minutes Hate?

Colonel Travis | March 28, 2019 at 5:17 pm

I don’t know where Prof. Jacobson got the accompanying photo, but when he found it I bet he had to chuckle.

I know I did.

notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | March 28, 2019 at 5:37 pm

I did a quick double check.

Nope it is not April 1.

He is a never ending charlatan making a fortune.

Well, if the loony left, led by the likes of Adam “Schifferbrains” and Eric “Newcomb” Swalwell can keep up their insane windmill jousting, maybe they won’t have time to meddle in our lives.

One can only hope.

She’s a propagandist, Professor – and an effective one. Millions of people hang on her every lie five nights a week in prime time. We can laugh at her efforts, but it’s a mistake to underestimate her and the damage she’s doing to the national discourse.

She’s dangerous. And no, the grift’s not over.

    Humphrey's Executor in reply to Rabel. | March 28, 2019 at 10:14 pm

    I never watch her but I tuned tonight in to see how’s she dealing with the disaster. She spent the first 20 minutes ranting and raving over how the Mueller report is no be instantly released like the Starr report and some other Independent Counsel reports.

    She can’t possibly be so uninformed to know that the Starr report was governed by the Independent Counsel Law (which expired and was not renewed) and the Mueller report is governed by a different set of laws and regulations preventing its full release. To compare the two situations without explaining that difference is a deliberate deception.

Half the country still believes collusion. The left has successfully legitimized feelz as a weapon for hate. Facts don’t matter a bit if your feelz are hurt by the real truth.

    Tom Servo in reply to 4fun. | March 29, 2019 at 7:37 am

    I think that only about 10% of the country was actually paying attention to this “collusion” stuff – most everyone I know got bored with the idea and just checked out of watching cable news long ago.

    Now the reason that doesn’t show up in polls is because we’ve still got about 40% – 45% of the voters, democrats, who are going to say “ORANGEMAN BAD!!!” automatically, no matter what question they’re asked.

She (is it still ‘she?’) is disgusting. And an ignoramus of amazing proportions.

Anyone ever read her book? Dumbest thing you’ll ever read this side of hillary clinton or mooooooochelle obama.

Maddow’s participation in Russia conspiracy is irrefutable. About the only thing we don’t know: Men’s or women’s prison.

Just to clarify (and I think we must):

Mueller and his report debunked nothing. Mueller knew before he commenced that there was no “Russia collusion” and Mueller and team did their damnedest to keep the charade going as long as they could, hoping against hope that while it served to coverup Obama/Clinton crimes, maybe something would crop up that could harm Trump.

And most of the media, including Rachel Maddow, also knew the “Russia collusion” thing was a hoax, but perpetuated it for, yes, ratings, but also I suspect for ideological purposes, keeping it going even now, in the hopes that maybe something will crop up that will harm Trump.

    thalesofmiletus in reply to janitor. | March 29, 2019 at 12:16 pm

    Agree about Mueller.

    As for the press, at some point they just start to believe their own propaganda.

Orwellington | March 29, 2019 at 4:41 pm

Dear Rachel. This is your life now.

reminds me of what a friend used to say: Some people suffer from mental illness. Others really enjoy it.