Image 01 Image 03

Ex-CIA Worker Indicted for Leaking Classified Information About the Agency’s Hacking Tools

Ex-CIA Worker Indicted for Leaking Classified Information About the Agency’s Hacking Tools

DOJ did not identify the organization, but some outlets said the former employee gave the documents to Wikileaks.

https://www.cia.gov/about-cia/headquarters-tour/headquarters-photo-tour

A grand jury indicted ex-CIA employee Joshua Schulte for stealing and leaking classified information to an organization.

The indictment does not name the organization, but Politico and The New York Times reported the organization is Wikileaks.

In May 2018, reports revealed that U.S. officials identified Schulte as the potential leaker during “a January federal hearing in New York related to child pornography charges brought against” him. From The Washington Post:

A former federal prosecutor who is not connected to the case said that it is not unusual to hold a suspect in one crime on unrelated charges and that the months Schulte has spent in jail do not necessarily mean the government’s case has hit a wall. The former prosecutor, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an open investigation, also said that if government lawyers acknowledged in a public hearing that Schulte was a target, they probably suspect he acted alone.

In documents, prosecutors allege that they found a large cache of child pornography on a server that was maintained by Schulte. But he has argued that anywhere from 50 to 100 people had access to that server, which Schulte, now 29, designed several years ago to share movies and other digital files.

In a press release, the DOJ stated that this indictment charges Schulte “with the receipt, possession, and transportation of child pornography, as well as criminal copyright infringement” and also accuses Schulte of violating the Espionage Act. From The New York Times:

According to federal court documents, prosecutors said Mr. Schulte illegally obtained classified information in 2016 and then provided it to an organization, WikiLeaks, that posted it online.

Prosecutors also charged him with transmitting malicious computer code and improperly gaining access to a delicate government computer system. The authorities said he granted himself access to the system and tried to conceal his activities. Prosecutors also accused him of copyright infringement.

Prosecutors said the crimes occurred in Virginia, where the C.I.A. is based.

According to The Washington Post, Schulte worked at the NSA before he joined the CIA. He took a job “in the CIA’s Engineering Development Group, which produced the computer code, according to people with knowledge of his employment history as well as the group’s role in developing cyberweapons.”

In March 2017, Wikileaks published almost 9,000 documents from the CIA about the agency’s own malware used to hack into anyone’s electronics and spy on them.

It didn’t take long for the FBI and CIA to launch an investigation for the person who released this information. The FBI searched Schulte’s home in New York. From the DOJ:

In March 2017, members of the FBI had searched SCHULTE’s residence in New York, New York, pursuant to a search warrant and recovered, among other things, multiple computers, servers, and other portable electronic storage devices, including Schulte’s personal desktop computer (the “Personal Computer”). On the Personal Computer, FBI agents found an encrypted container (the “Encrypted Container”), which held over 10,000 images and videos of child pornography. The Encrypted Container with the child pornography files was identified by FBI computer scientists beneath three layers of password protection on the Personal Computer. Each layer, including the Encrypted Container, was unlocked using passwords previously used by SCHULTE on one of his cellphones. Moreover, FBI agents identified Internet chat logs in which SCHULTE and others discussed their receipt and distribution of child pornography. FBI agents also identified a series of Google searches conducted by SCHULTE in which he searched the Internet for child pornography.

In March, the DOJ charged FBI agent Terry Albury under the Espionage Act for leaking information about how the FBI handles informants to The Intercept and for keeping classified information with him at his home.

In June 2017, the DOJ charged NSA contractor Reality Winner for mailing The Intercept documents that showed “Russian military intelligence executed a cyberattack on at least one U.S. voting software supplier and sent spear-phishing emails to more than 100 local election officials just days before” the November 2016 presidential election.

[Featured image via CIA]

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:
, ,

Comments

This is what happens because they didn’t put BRADLEY Manning up against a wall and execute him by firing squad.

This doesn’t sound too promising. Espionage … oh, and copyright infringement (that fiend!) … and child pornography (sorry, all out of shits to give). And the Times will bust its balls trying to plant a Wikileaks link in the public unconscious.

Sounds like a setup, and a rather unconvincing one at that … a fruit salad with ambitions to be a dog-and-pony show.

He was speedily investigated and charged… He’s obviously less equal than others.

daniel_ream | June 19, 2018 at 2:30 pm

the receipt, possession, and transportation of child pornography, as well as criminal copyright infringement

Murder, arson and jaywalking.

It’s possible he was actually downloading kiddie porn, but given how hard corrupt police authorities have latched on to it as the charge guaranteed to make people’s brains fall out the back of their head and bay for execution sans trial, I’d be extremely skeptical.

Certainly anyone capable of writing hacking tools for the CIA is capable of creating plausibly deniable storage containers and/or encrypting them with self-destruct switches.

healthguyfsu | June 19, 2018 at 3:44 pm

Not to make light of genuinely disgusting child pornography behavior, but it is a bit odd how it’s always tacked on whenever someone gets taken down that the state wants to see hushed up quickly.

I am in a “not believing the government” as easily as I used to mode right now. When I saw this article, I thought of prosecutionary discretion. I still believe in that concept, but now, through my new glasses, I find myself wondering if the prosecution is maybe going “full Trump” here as opposed to “full Hillary” and the possible back stories that accompany the alternate mode.

I wonder if they also found a handkerchief, with something related to a map to pizza, with or without walnut sauce.

Is anybody surprised with just how much of the #RESIST movement shared a huge VEN diagram with pedophiles and rapists. There is a shockingly huge network of perverts who support eachother in positions of power and influence for the simple goal of maintaining their perverted lifestyles, and to continue exploiting children. It’s like the UN, and tied in with all sorts of “humanitarian” organizations.

It seems like a paranoid Ira Levin book, but it needs to be exposed as the horrible truth it is.