SPLC Thinks ‘Factual Feminist’ Christina Hoff Sommers Legitimizes ‘Male Supremacy’ Movement
Sommers: “I’m a facts and logic supremacist.”
The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), known for targeting right-leaning thinkers and organizations, included Factual Feminist Christina Hoff Sommers in its report on male supremacy, which the group describes as “a hateful ideology advocating for the subjugation of women.”
They contend Hoff Sommers legitimizes “male supremacy.”
The SPLC wrote (emphasis mine):
The men’s rights movement has a dedicated international following, including in the United Kingdom and in Australia. Women, too, have helped give the men’s rights movement a veneer of even-handedness. Prominent MRAs [Men’s Right Activists] also include anti-feminist female voices, such as popular Canadian YouTube personality Karen Straughan, American psychologist Helen Smith, and the former head of a domestic-violence shelter for women, the British Erin Pizzey. Men’s rights issues also overlap with the rhetoric of equity feminists like Christina Hoff Sommers, who give a mainstream and respectable face to some MRA concerns.
Sommers has a PhD in philosophy, is a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and hosts the video blog, The Factual Feminist. Yes, Sommers is a feminist, but I guess the left hates her so much because she takes an unbiased approach to issues radical feminists think exist here in America.
The Factual Feminist has been denounced by the Southern Poverty Law Center as enabler of male supremacy. Oy vey. Last year leader of MRA group denounced me for being a female supremacist https://t.co/tZyxr8ak8q
Both wrong. I’m a facts & logic supremacist. https://t.co/5U5RCKNmL4
— Christina Sommers (@CHSommers) February 26, 2018
She spoke to The Weekly Standard about her inclusion in the report:
“I completely reject that,” Sommers said. “This is a group I used to admire. They once went after Klan members and Nazis and now… [they go after] people like Ben Carson and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. It’s absurd.” She adds that the SPLC has no evidence for the suggestion that she “gives mainstream and respectable face” to “male supremacy”:. “They’re blacklisting in place of engaging with arguments. They blacklist you, rather than try to refute you.”
Sommers thinks that “they’re talking about … some of the work that I’ve done on ‘boys.’ I wrote an article for the New York Times a few years ago called The Boys at the Back—and it won an award from a feminist organization.”
The AEI scholar finds herself in a precarious position: “There’s a men’s rights activist group, A Voice for Men, and they’ve made videos attacking me, calling me a ‘crypto-misandrist,’ or something of the sort. So I’m attacked by this MRA group for being a female supremacist, and then I’m attacked by the Southern Poverty Law Center for being a Male Supremacist. I don’t take either seriously.”
Sommers has extensively debunked the supposed gender wage gap. She also argues men have struggles we shouldn’t ignore. From PJMedia:
In this, she has not neglected the struggles of men. She noted that 78 percent of those who commit suicide are male, that 93 percent of federal inmates are male, that 60 percent of the homeless are male and that men receive 63 percent longer prison sentences for the same crime. Men live five years less than women, on average.
“Men have to be the only oppressor class in history who are less educated, more victimized and have shorter lives than those they oppress,” Hoff Sommers quipped.
Sommers uses her Twitter account to bring attention to countries like Iran and China that treat women like second-class citizens.
Today, Ian Bremmer tweeted out that China has many companies that have women on the founding team and board of directors. Sommers wasted no time reminding him that one should not use China as a shining example of gender equality:
China may not be an exemplar of gender equality. There is a lot of evidence that women in the world’s freest & most prosperous nations have more choices & opportunities to enter fields they most prefer. https://t.co/Q8g2DtojKf
— Christina Sommers (@CHSommers) February 28, 2018
SPLC’s crazy theories can damage a person’s career or organization. Essentially, making the SPLC list is a death sentence. Back in July, Professor Jacobson blogged about how the mainstream media uses SPLC lists to smear organizations. It happened to the successful religious liberty law group Alliance Defending Freedom (SDF).
Here are a few more posts by Professor Jacobson on the tyranny of the SPLC:
- Southern Poverty Law Center Completes Its Descent Into Madness (regarding SPLC attack on Sarah Palin)
- Confirmed – SPLC Exaggerated About Klan In Rhode Island
- Neo-Nazis in Rhode Island? SPLC exaggerates again
- SPLC’s hatewatch gives cover to hate
- SPLC Demonizes Supporters of Traditional Marriage
- Southern Poverty Law Center Still Peddling Lie That Giffords Shooter Was Right-Winger
As if that weren’t bad enough, YouTube has secretly used the SPLC to police videos on the website.
It’s only a matter of time before they target Sommers’ series. Here is one of my favorite videos:
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
It was mentioned today that Youtube was using the SPLC (among others) to help them decide which online videos were “abusive” and needed to be banned.
Oh now there’s a fair judge.
Still less stupid than Twitter using Anita Sarkeesian on their so-called ‘trust and safety’ council.
Not less stupid. Equally stupid. Sarkeesian is evil, but not more so than Mo Dees and Mark Potok.
Leftists like the SPLC are all about Equal Stupidity for all, even if they have to force it by their government guns’ points.
“which the group describes as ‘a hateful ideology advocating for the subjugation of women’”
They were talking about Islam,right?
The SPLC? What is that? Does anybody even listen to those partisan crackpots anymore?
Somebody does. That’s the only reason the SPLC is a problem. If nobody paid any attention and they were regarded like the flying saucer fans, they could make all the noise they want without doing any damage.
Give them time … they dead flesh that they wear always starts to smell when it rots, until no one can be around it anymore.
But how much public funding do they receive? I think all NGOs should be banned from receiving public funds.
Like any known “hate group,” the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) needs to make their presence known from time to time.
The overwhelming majority will recognize this for the absolute hogwash that it is. SPLC isn’t even a joke anymore, simply a pathetic idiocracy.
What happened to “All women must be believed”?
The lady is the hawtness…!!!
The SPLC is just a fund-raising racket. Nothing more. They hate. They’re a hate group for hire. I look forward to the day when they finally step over a defamation line, and are literally sued for all they’re worth.
Definite description. Never heard of her but I look forward to her giving her piece of mind again 🙂
The SPLC is to poverty and law what George Soros is to freedom, what hillary klinton is to honesty in government, what obama is to loyalty to country, what the cnn and the ny times is to news, what msnbc is to mental health, etc etc etc
We tolerate this bunch of crooks at our peril.
Making the SPCL’s list is more like a badge of honor these days, really. They’re so corrupt and.
SPLC, I mean. Whatever. 😛