Image 01 Image 03

Intersectionality: Lies about Israel, lies about Jews

Intersectionality: Lies about Israel, lies about Jews

Historian Benny Morris: “demonisation of Israel is largely based on lies – much as the demonisation of the Jews during the past 2,000 years”

The trend for the BDS movement is to make demonization of Israel the center of the progressive universe through the theory of “intersectionality.”

Israel is placed at the center of all evil in the world, the unifying focus regardless of the issue:

Every real or perceived problem is either blamed on or connected to Israel.

The concerted effort to turn the Black Lives Matter movement into an anti-Israel movement has at its core the claim that Israel is the root of problems of non-whites in the United States. Thus, if a police chief somewhere attended a one-week anti-terrorism seminar in Israel years ago, every act of brutality by a cop on the beat is blamed on Israel. So too, Students for Justice in Palestine protesters in New York City even blamed high tuition on Zionists, leading to rebukes by administrators against such thinly-veiled anti-Semitism.

The Jew once again is made the source of all evil, the conspiratorial puppet-master controlling all and responsible for all. And Israel alone receives such treatment and is used as the link to connect all injustices in the world.

This anti-Semitic use of “intersectionality” theory flourishes because a generation of students — many of whom now are faculty — have been schooled based on lies about the creation of Israel and the Arab refugees created in the civil war and invasion by Arab armies. In that false narrative, the Jews are wholly evil and the Arabs are wholly innocent.

Historian Benny Morris, who rose to fame by debunking some of the pro-Israel myths about the War of Independence, has also noted that the Arab rejection of Israel primarily was a religious rejection.

In this 2008 letter to the Irish Times, which I just saw when someone tweeted the link, Morris succinctly addresses not just the Arab responsibility for the Arab failure, but also how the lies about Israel are connected to the lies about Jews that have been spread for Millennia.

Read it. It’s a good 600-word rebuttal to the haters (emphasis added):

Israel and the Palestinians

Madam, – Israel-haters are fond of citing – and more often, mis-citing – my work in support of their arguments. Let me offer some corrections.

The Palestinian Arabs were not responsible “in some bizarre way” (David Norris, January 31st) for what befell them in 1948. Their responsibility was very direct and simple.

In defiance of the will of the international community, as embodied in the UN General Assembly Resolution of November 29th, 1947 (No. 181), they launched hostilities against the Jewish community in Palestine in the hope of aborting the emergence of the Jewish state and perhaps destroying that community. But they lost; and one of the results was the displacement of 700,000 of them from their homes.

It is true, as Erskine Childers pointed out long ago, that there were no Arab radio broadcasts urging the Arabs to flee en masse; indeed, there were broadcasts by several Arab radio stations urging them to stay put. But, on the local level, in dozens of localities around Palestine, Arab leaders advised or ordered the evacuation of women and children or whole communities, as occurred in Haifa in late April, 1948. And Haifa’s Jewish mayor, Shabtai Levy, did, on April 22nd, plead with them to stay, to no avail.

Most of Palestine’s 700,000 “refugees” fled their homes because of the flail of war (and in the expectation that they would shortly return to their homes on the backs of victorious Arab invaders). But it is also true that there were several dozen sites, including Lydda and Ramla, from which Arab communities were expelled by Jewish troops.

The displacement of the 700,000 Arabs who became “refugees” – and I put the term in inverted commas, as two-thirds of them were displaced from one part of Palestine to another and not from their country (which is the usual definition of a refugee) – was not a “racist crime” (David Landy, January 24th) but the result of a national conflict and a war, with religious overtones, from the Muslim perspective, launched by the Arabs themselves.

There was no Zionist “plan” or blanket policy of evicting the Arab population, or of “ethnic cleansing”. Plan Dalet (Plan D), of March 10th, 1948 (it is open and available for all to read in the IDF Archive and in various publications), was the master plan of the Haganah – the Jewish military force that became the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) – to counter the expected pan-Arab assault on the emergent Jewish state. That’s what it explicitly states and that’s what it was. And the invasion of the armies of Egypt, Jordan, Syria and Iraq duly occurred, on May 15th.

It is true that Plan D gave the regional commanders carte blanche to occupy and garrison or expel and destroy the Arab villages along and behind the front lines and the anticipated Arab armies’ invasion routes. And it is also true that mid-way in the 1948 war the Israeli leaders decided to bar the return of the “refugees” (those “refugees” who had just assaulted the Jewish community), viewing them as a potential fifth column and threat to the Jewish state’s existence. I for one cannot fault their fears or logic.

The demonisation of Israel is largely based on lies – much as the demonisation of the Jews during the past 2,000 years has been based on lies. And there is a connection between the two.

I would recommend that the likes of Norris and Landy read some history books and become acquainted with the facts, not recycle shopworn Arab propaganda. They might then learn, for example, that the “Palestine War” of 1948 (the “War of Independence,” as Israelis call it) began in November 1947, not in May 1948. By May 14th close to 2,000 Israelis had died – of the 5,800 dead suffered by Israel in the whole war (ie almost 1 per cent of the Jewish population of Palestine/Israel, which was about 650,000). – Yours, etc,

Prof BENNY MORRIS, Li-On, Israel.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Sammy Finkelman | January 14, 2016 at 12:34 pm

“demonisation of Israel is largely based on lies – much as the demonisation of the Jews during the past 2,000 years”

This is the very definition of anti-semitism, because anti-semitism is, as it has always been understood and practiced, accusations of evil against Jews and not some other kind of prejudice about Jews. It’s slander. Except that this time it’s got all kinds of support from “good people” and even supposed documentary evidence.

And since anti-semitism is a form of racism, the following syllogism inexorably follows:

1. Non Jewish Anti-Zionism is a form of antisemitism
2. Anti-semitism is a form of racism


3. Non Jewish Anti-Zionism is a form of racism.

Although that’s not really important. It is not wrong because it could be considered something else. It’s wrong because it’s wrong.

Any time the subject is the “Palestinians” the historical lies come out. It is worth it to keep correcting the historical record, because the lies have a purpose: to bring about eternal war and the end of the world.

The Israelis have not given anybody a caucus belli, and the Hamas have decided that, in the absence of a caucus belli, they will simply lie.

This worked better in the past, when people did not have the means to cross-check them, but there is still a huge amount of detritus.

Thank you.

    impeach obama in reply to Valerie. | January 14, 2016 at 12:58 pm

    it is important when making a point to use correct language.

    noun: caucus; plural noun: caucuses

    a meeting of the members of a legislative body who are members of a particular political party, to select candidates or decide policy.
    synonyms: meeting, assembly, gathering, congress, conference, convention, rally, convocation
    “caucuses will be held in eleven states”
    the members of a caucus.
    a group of people with shared concerns within a political party or larger organization.
    synonyms: members, party, faction, camp, bloc, group, set, band, ring, cabal, coterie, pressure group
    “the conservative caucus”

    verbNorth American
    verb: caucus; 3rd person present: caucuses; past tense: caucused; past participle: caucused; gerund or present participle: caucusing

    hold or form a caucus.

    Casus belli is a Latin expression meaning “An act or event that provokes or is used to justify war”

      Yes, and it would be nice if the *&^% word processor would not rewrite my words for me after I type them.

        Milhouse in reply to Valerie. | January 14, 2016 at 2:58 pm

        Then turn that option off. I never allow a machine to rewrite my words; I sometimes allow it to suggest changes, but not to make them sua sponte. Any misspellings or malapropisms in my writing are my own, I’m afraid.

Midwest Rhino | January 14, 2016 at 1:06 pm

Yeah, that 1948 Arab welcoming committee had no interest in any UN decisions, and instead intended to drive the Jews into the sea, as I read it. Not much has changed, except Israel has developed while Palestine still promotes terror.

That subway ad for Israel said it well, support the civilized man over the savage. Israel produces and develops and creates. Most of the Muslim world still supports savagery. Ace of Spades had a link on their overnight thread related to this.

Not one of the labor-saving, wealth-creating, suffering-destroying, and life-enriching technologies you will use today, whoever you are, was conceived and brought to market in that part of the world under any of the flags of mohammedanism.

As savage elements of Islam run amok in Europe, I would think the left would reconsider their hate. But CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood still have friends in high places.

Thanks for shining the light.

    Midwest Rhino in reply to Midwest Rhino. | January 14, 2016 at 1:17 pm

    btw “Above and Beyond” is a good Netflix streaming movie about some Americans that took planes over to fight for Israel around 1948.