Elizabeth Warren figures her false claim of Cherokee ancestry and heritage will go away. She has raised tens of millions of dollars from Hollywood stars and the progressive movement, she’s tied in the polls, and she just was booked to give the warm up speech for Bill Clinton at the Democratic National Convention.
Sometimes readers wonder if continuing to “hammer” this issue is worth it. I can’t tell you what the end result will be, but I assure you it is worth it.
Warren has built her political persona and become the darling of the Democratic Party by attacking those who supposedly gamed the system and took unfair advantage of others in order to become successful. Yet Warren is someone who did just that when she claimed Native American, minority and “woman of color” status for professional purposes.
Regardless of the outcome, it is worth telling people over and over that the Progressive Empress has no clothes.
Yesterday, Howie Carr at WRKO in Boston read my post New video testimonial series: “I’m A Proud Native American, And Elizabeth Warren Does Not Represent Me”. Carr made some great points, as he usually does, including that he and others have not forgotten Warren’s fakery.
Carr also read several of the comments to the post, including those by TrooperJohnSmith, Cassie, and GrumpyOne.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Hammer away, good Professor. But umm..
“Regardless of the outcome, it is worth telling people over and over that the Progressive Empress has no clothes.”
..No Pictures, Please.
Please, gawd…!!!!
shucks no mentions for the Dmac … 🙂
ah well, still a very pertinent subject.
This is the essences of “being Breitbart”.
Ferret out the truth.
Expose it as often, and in as many creative ways, as it takes to be effective.
Keep your balance and maintain your integrity.
I will admit I wondered why you keep hammering on this but then again this woman is asking for people’s votes saying that she will be a good representative for them but she is not an honest person. What a whopper she has told over the years! She has lied about herself. What won’t she lie about?
Remember how Obama “came out of nowhere”? What’d he serve: two years as a Senator before running for President? Obama was annointed by the Grand Puppetmaster, and so is Elizabeth Warren. Stop her now or meet the first female President of the United States.
Someone on FOX mentioned a reason for Warren doing the warm up act for Bill Clinton at their convention, is that she is in such a liberal state, that her “you didn’t build that” diatribe doesn’t hurt her.
But in a stalled economy where only big government is thriving, does it really work to blame the highly taxed businesses, for “taking” half of their own profits, and only “giving” half to government?
Of course much of the country “subsidizes” Boston by using brokerages like Fidelity Investments. The high finance world that gets bailouts is certainly not representative of the average sole proprietor. (Many conglomerates suck funds from fly over country into their HQ’s in the big cities, where liberal mayors bequeath much of it to their cronies.)
But after sending her Native American persona back to the reservation, Lizzy is now boasting of the glories of China’s centralized planning miracle. Ignoring the ghost towns and closed factories, and the reality that U.S. infrastructure is still far superior; does Elizabeth realize that China’s funding came from US.
We can thank unions and government over-regulation, over-taxation for sending more jobs overseas. China didn’t build those skyscrapers and new ports and sweat shops, Americans did.
I didn’t mean to suggest Fidelity got a bailout, but some major “banks” did. One reason I’m still with Fidelity is I believe they do little of the sort of gambling that got Corzine and MF Global in trouble.
1. Sometimes readers wonder if continuing to “hammer” this issue is worth it. I can’t tell you what the end result will be, but I assure you it is worth it.
…
Regardless of the outcome, it is worth telling people over and over that the Progressive Empress has no clothes.
As I commented a couple of months ago:
2. Warren would not be the worst scoundrel that MA has sent to Washington. Not even close.
3. Therefore, as I’ve said, something in addition to the Cherokee matter is needed to tilt the race away from a Warren-leaning toss-up. IMO a pocketbook issue would be much better than another character issue.
(I’m not deprecating what you and Anne have achieved with the Cherokee topic. You have changed the race from a Warren cakewalk to a toss-up—but my point in the previous paragraph remains.)
4. Irrespective of what happens in November, you have done more damage to Warren as a national candidate than as a MA candidate. That’s great, but I’d rather scotch the snake before it has any chance to slither onto a national ticker.
5. Before it’s too late to make a difference, if only someone could persuade Scott Brown to get his head out of…the sand…and mend fences with the Tea Party.
6. People here in central MA are starting to notice the election. For the first time I saw yard signs yesterday: three for Brown and one for Ron Paul.
…slither onto a national
tickerticket.As an avocational herpetologist, and in response to your analogizing Warren to a snake, I demand an apology on the behalf of snakes everywhere.
No, sir.—
IMHO that describes Elizabeth Warren and Barack & Michelle Obama to a tee.
From Abe Lincoln I demand a similar apology.
Thomas Sowell put it very eloquently, liberals love to have mascots for moral preening. But in the end mascots are just mascots and can be easily discarded and trampled on when it suits the liberal. An example in point would be Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel lambasting the Chick A Fil because the CEO is against gay “marriage.”
Right now homosexuals are mascots of the Democratic party. But radical Islam is also a mascot. Hence, Mayor Emanuel literally embraces Louis Frarrakhan. Radical Islam calls for the death penalty for gays. How is this possible? Isn’t the Mayor being inconsistent?
The answer is that both groups are mere mascots. The Democrats can preen in front of the fawning media about how morally superior they are. But one mascot group wants to kill the other? What difference does it make! They’re just mascots.
I fear liberalism and Islamism are more akin to partners in crime – rather than Islam as a mascot for liberals.
Rush said Tues:
“My friend, Andrew McCarthy, wrote a book called The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America. And it’s McCarthy’s theory that liberalism and Islam are very closely related. Now, I’ve mentioned this to people. Get the book if you really want to get down and dirty, ’cause it’s excellent, but stop and think of it this way. Have you noticed that liberals are nonplussed by Islamic terrorism. It’s something they want to cover up. It’s something that they really don’t want to focus on, and NBC cutting it out was sort of an indication.
It’s just a theory, ladies and gentlemen, but one of the reasons that leftists are nonplussed by militant Islam may be the idea — I mean look at what it is, especially if you go all the way to Sharia. It’s an all-encompassing, intrusive, uniform, mandatory instruction manual detailing how everybody should dress, how everybody should eat, how everybody should live, how everybody should work, how everybody should play, and what to worship.”
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/07/30/collectivist_gift_to_obama_olympic_opening_ceremony_honors_national_health_care
I forgot to make my main point. American Indians are definitely mascots to the Democrats. But these mascots are trying to interfere with an important Democratic politician. So screw the mascots! After all, the Democrats have many more mascots.
All of these interest groups who join the Democrats will at some point realize that they are expendable and just mascots.
Keep pounding the rock, Professor. It’s working.
“…she just was booked to give the warm up speech for Bill Clinton at the Democratic National Convention.”
1. to support her faux-cherokee heritage, every 32nd word of lying-sacaja-sh^t’s speech will be in the Cherokee language – if she can find a good English-Cherokee dictionary.
2. monica will be hiding in the podium while “monica-stain” bill gives his speech so she can help him get a happy-ending finish. Hillary has been so busy helping the muslim brotherhood and other anti-American terrorists that bill is probably long overdo for another good “lewinsky.”
Two ways to go , one to elicit likes. That is keep it up Professor. Continuing Brown is a vote for Janice Rogers Brown while Lizzy is a vote against her. We need J. R. B. on the Court. . .Now for the canceling dislikes. So Lizzy is to do the warm up for Slick! Just what does that entail? Is she to “service Slick” before he goes out to lite up the crowd? I’ll bet those puckerd lips are good for more than speaking lies !
“Sometimes readers wonder if continuing to “hammer” this issue is worth it. I can’t tell you what the end result will be, but I assure you it is worth it.”
Prof, I think I know why you report every episode in the never-ending saga of Squaw Warren.
I feel she is a clear and present danger to the U. S. and is cast in the same mold as Comrade Obama. I think she is hand picked to finish what Obama started.
Keep on doing what you’re doing!
it’s not her being a lying liar so much as the fact that she STOLE from a deserving minority candidate. She received scholarships, grants, education, salary, and tenure based on her false claims!
Maybe the new administration’s Attorney General will investigate her long-term, acts of fraud and theft.
[…] himself on these applications as a foreign minority to gain a favorable admission status akin to Liz “Fauxcahontas” Warren listing “Native American” on her resume to enhance her academic […]