Image 01 Image 03

Elizabeth Warren has raised $24 million, but still is not Cherokee

Elizabeth Warren has raised $24 million, but still is not Cherokee

Sympathetic reporters in the MSM are practically giddy that Elizabeth Warren’s Cherokee problem has not hurt her fundraising.

Warren’s Second Quarter haul of $8.6 million brings her total fundraising to over $24 million.  In June, as Warren’s obfuscation on the Cherokee issue was in full throttle and as she ducked a group of Cherokee women who wanted to meet with her, liberals threw $3.1 million her way.

Ironically, or perhaps predictably, Warren’s spending at a prodigious rate, so she “only” has $13.5 million left in the bank.

Did anyone expect the fact that Warren has been deceptive on her claim to be Cherokee to stop Hollywood, Emily’s List, or the titans of high tech and even Wall Street from donating very big dollars to her?  Or to stop the legion of small-time liberals around the country from throwing her a few bucks?

As pointed out here before, Warren is the number one organized progressive cause this November, above even Obama.  They are all in, and they will not let niceties about the Cherokees get in the way.

As of this moment, there is zero evidence that Warren is Cherokee, and substantial evidence that Warren is not despite having passed herself off as Native American for professional purposes at critical times in her career.

We can’t make liberal supporters of Warren listen to their own supposed consciences, but we can get the truth out there.

And there is more truth to come.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


24 Million $ to imitate a Cherokee? I think liberals have overpaid by about as much as when they paid several hundred million for imitation war hero John Kerry.

Of course Elizabeth’s supporters don’t care about her telling lies: they are progressive-liberal-Democratic-socialist. Since they deny God, they also deny truth, and believe that anything they can get away with is acceptable. They will play the “fair” card on us, but the only thing really fair, to them, is that they win. Isn’t this a dog-bites-man story?

Iron Eyes Cody (Espera Oscar de Corti, Sicilian) worked a LOT cheaper…and could act!

    FanDamnTastic, another Awopaho (without papers).

    Don’t believe my fingers typed this in prior comments (and most wouldn’t give two damns anyHOW, but, I was born and raised until early teens in Buffalo, NY (here comes the part, that all will say BULLshit!) a family last name Smith, live right next door to MY Sicilian folks place. Had 4 or 5 children. One was named Harold and guess who Harold was?

    via Wiki “He lived for a time in Buffalo, New York.

      Ragspierre in reply to JP. | July 9, 2012 at 7:46 pm

      Kuhl! My dad fell off horses for Jimmy Stewart, fenced for Tyrone Power, Errol Flynn, etc.

      He worked with Arvo Ojala, who beats Matt Dillion to the draw, but misses in the Gun Smoke opening sequence, as an inventor, leather-smith, and gun writer.

    Shakespearean actor John Todd played Tonto and he could speak Potawatomi – well, at least he could properly pronounce “Ke-mo sah-bee.”

Considering: 1) it is MA, 2) 1/2 taxpayers pay zero tax,so more goodies don’t come out of their pockets, 3) 70% of Americans have their mouth on at least one gubmint teat, more milk n cookies, please, no, I demand and 4)the Left/Dims are relentless; to make the majority of Americans dependent, defenseless, and groveling at the UN, as just another world member, for our daily bread.

The raison d’etre of affirmative action is to promote diversity, we are told, the sort of diversity thought to come from mixing people of differing origins, ethnicity, and the like. So, is anyone claiming that Warren – a woman of color – brings such diversity to the table? And if they do, may we ask exactly how, with her background, she does that? Maybe even ask her?

They are known for expressing selective indignation which frequently undermines their stated positions on many causes they represent. It’s not at all surprising that “affirmative action” policy has been exploited to benefit their cooperative and individual interests. This is simply further evidence of progressive corruption, which must be contained in order to preserve the integrity of society.

Frank Scarn | July 9, 2012 at 7:21 pm


no ethics
no morality
no problem

Democrats will support any ethically-challenged candidate, translation, any liar, so long as Big Government is advanced,

“Warren is the number one organized progressive cause this November”

It goes beyond that – she’s also the number one name liberals mention as a future presidential candidate.

    OcTEApi in reply to Aarradin. | July 9, 2012 at 8:53 pm

    I’ve got a feely that her being 100% socialist/communist has a lot to do with the lefts support.

She should give 31/32 of that money back. Or give it to her “tribe”.

So I wonder what being Chiricahua Apache in the 5th grade would have netted me? Of course, being that I was raised better, I recanted on that claim, but my crush on Michael Ansara never abated! I sooooo wanted to be an Apache!

TrooperJohnSmith | July 9, 2012 at 9:42 pm

Big Wall Street and corporate donors giving to Democrats is like preemptive protection money.

“…more truth to come.”?

C’mon, Professor, out with it.

    jakee308 in reply to Owego. | July 9, 2012 at 11:52 pm

    She must come out of the teepee and admit to her Indian (feather not dot) Princess fantasies.

Moreover, her Cherokee problem is neither a big problem, nor a small problem, it’s a character problem that she hasn’t managed to come to grips with. Democrat or Republican, she doesn’t belong in Congress. If nothing else, the 2010 and 2012 general elections are about ridding ourselves and our various governments of this very sort of person.

stevewhitemd | July 9, 2012 at 10:45 pm

Remember, the Left feels as if it owes Prof. Warren. She had long championed a “consumer protection agency”, and such a board was constituted under the Dodd-Frank bill. She was supposed to head it, but Republicans in the Senate showed a little courage (for once) and made clear that they would filibuster her. So Obama had to go with someone else.

Prof. Warren therefore was owed. Big time. She’s been supporting the party core and the core had to take care of her. What to do, what to do…

…yeah, a Senate seat. That would show those Rethuglican bastards. She’d sit among them.

And as I said before, it’s a twofer, in that they get the ‘Kennedy’ seat back from the hated Scott Brown.

So yes, all the proper thinkers will be donating to get Warren past Senator Brown. It might work, too, given the points of commenter MaDr above.

Some conservatives might not like Mr. Brown. I say to them, you’ll positively hate Ms. Warren. Get your wallets out and give. I have.

[…] is the number one organized progressive cause this November, above even […]

For Liberalism/Progressivism it is self-evident: the ends justify the means. As long as the person is pro-choice/abortion, for gay unions to be called marriage, for wealth redistribution, and for environmental wackoism, you are good enough. Morality, ethics don’t matter unless you are a Republican demon.

DavidJackSmith | July 10, 2012 at 10:55 am

How does this work again.

Elizabeth Warren claimed to be 1/32 Indian and that’s enough for the media to class her as a Native American.

George Zimmerman’s mom is 100% Hispanic but the media class him as “white”, then finally settled on “white” Hispanic.

Hey I don’t buy any of this racial shit any way, especially as “Hispanics” are originally of European caucasian descent. But THEY do.