The No-Go Zones of Europe
Virtual Islamist states fueled by hatred of the Western civilization and particularly Jews.
Increased Muslim immigration to Europe has created small areas which are essentially countries within countries which European law enforcement officials have dubbed “No-Go Zones.”
Rowan Scarborough of the Washington Times recently described what’s happening in France:
Muslims segregated from French society in growing Islamist mini-states
A backdrop to the massacre in Paris on Wednesday by self-professed al Qaeda terrorists is that city officials have increasingly ceded control of heavily Muslim neighborhoods to Islamists, block by block.
France has Europe’s largest population of Muslims, some of whom talk openly of ruling the country one day and casting aside Western legal systems for harsh, Islam-based Shariah law.
“The situation is out of control, and it is not reversible,” said Soeren Kern, an analyst at the Gatestone Institute and author of annual reports on the “Islamization of France.”
“Islam is a permanent part of France now. It is not going away,” Mr. Kern said. “I think the future looks very bleak. The problem is a lot of these younger-generation Muslims are not integrating into French society. Although they are French citizens, they don’t really have a future in French society. They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life.”
This November report from Matt Danielsson of The Daily Caller pointed out a similar problem in Sweden:
Swedish Police Release Extensive Report Detailing Control Of 55 ‘No-Go Zones’ By Muslim Criminal Gangs
Swedish police have ceded control over 55 “no-go zones” to predominately Muslim criminal gangs.
An extensive report mapping out 55 no-go zones was released Oct. 24, showing where law enforcement has all but handed control to criminal gangs.
Officers frequently face outright attacks when trying to enter the areas, which is a step up from the previous problem with attacks on mailmen, fire trucks, ambulances and similar services. Fire trucks and ambulances had to wait for police escort to enter the areas, but now the police themselves need protection.
The no-go areas heavily coincide with the map of the 186 “exclusion areas” aka. crowded, predominantly Muslim immigrant ghettos, where education is low, employment is lower and the only local business thriving is drug dealing.
William Jacobson has been following the situation in Sweden for months and has documented multiple acts of violence and anti-Semitism that are enabled by leftist coordination with Islamists, including virtual No-Go Zones like Malmö .
- “Sweden ever so quickly has gone from so-called anti-Zionism to open anti-Semitism”
- The anti-Semitic shame of Malmö, Sweden continues with attack on Rabbi
- More anti-Israel violence … in Malmö, Sweden
Steven Emerson of the Investigative Project on Terrorism recently appeared on the Sean Hannity show and said that the cultural shift has been so great that Europe is beyond the tipping point:
Emerson on Fox’s Hannity: “No Go Zones and Sharia Courts…Europe is Finished.”
Steve Emerson: When I was in Brussels a year ago when I asked the police to take me to the Islamic zone or the Islamic community area they refused. They said we don’t go there. This goes on in Belgium, this goes on in Sweden, in the Netherlands, in France, it goes on in Italy. It goes on throughout Europe. So there are no-go zones….
Sean Hannity: Do you think France can get control of their country again and take over these no-go zones, stop sharia courts? I know prayer rugs are in just about every hotel if you go to Paris, according to a friend of mine who travels there quite often. Do they have the ability now to stop this, to say no you either assimilate or you have to go?
Steve Emerson: That’s a great question. I think they’ve reached critical mass, frankly. I’ve said this before, I think Europe is finished.
Watch the entire exchange below:
Update 1-20-2015 by WAJ: A controversy has developed over whether “no-go zones” exist or if that terminology is correct. Steve Emerson in particular has come under criticism. The controversy is examined in European ‘No-Go’ Zones: Fact or Fiction? by the Gatestone Institute. The bottom line, it depends on what you mean by “no-go zone.”
[Featured Image: Anti-Israel and Anti-Semitic rioters in Paris, Summer 2014]
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
“They feel very alienated from France. This is why radical Islam is so attractive because it gives them a sense of meaning in their life.”
Then I would suggest that they leave France for a more rewarding cultural experience.
Or be forced out.
If forcing them out is the chosen option, the next question is who will do that forcing?
the FRENCH had NO PROBLEM ROUNDING UP THEIR JEWISH CITIZENS, IMPRISON THEM IN DRANCY, + HAVE THEM DEPORTED TO THE EAST FOR EXTERMINATION, WITHOUT BEING ASKED BY THE NAZIS TO DO SO. they did this then, so they should not have any problem doing this to RADICAL MUSLIM TERRORIST EXTREMISTS in their midst.
And how many people in all countries “feel alienated?” Why is it that Muslims become Jihadists when they feel left out and/or disenfranchised? Awwww, poor wittul Mooslims can have any friends. That’s ok, just get a gun and start killing everybody. then you can make it into your very own caliphate. Awwwww.
who REALLY believes that if muslim extremists got a decent paying job that they would stop their atrocities??? they will ALWAYS find another EXCUSE to kill non believers. THEY have defined who they are by their violent words + atrocities they commit.
The EU is becoming the EUC ( EU Caliphate).
Doubt me ? Check back here in 20 years.
It may be too late already.
Mass deportations are not that difficult. And the French military have the firepower to deal with armed Muslims. They only need to find the willpower to use it. No more pussyfooting. Treat enemies as enemies.
The citizenry of socialist countries are inherently weak people. Yes, they might eventually find the cojones to start pushing the Islamists out, but they will quickly back down when confronted by cultural pressure from the left, the UN, and so on.
The French have the skills and resources to disrupt and repel this invasion, but too much political correctness and too much collective thought has undermined the French spine. Once a strong, spirited people, they have grown ethically and morally weak. It is a crying shame to see such a beautiful country with such a rich culture go under.
I pray that they surprise the world by fighting back.
“Diversity” is and always has been about the destruction and take over of the dominant culture. We see it here as well. Our government has embraced it while we, the people, reject it. The question for us is how much more will we take? Will we ever stand and fight or will we just sit on our asses and wait for the next episode of American Idol?
Hardly new. Jewish tourists to France have long been warned not to wear anything that would identify them as Jewish.
And as for “check back here in 20 years”, there will probably be no here “here” in 20 years.
THIS caught my eye:
“William Jacobson has been following the situation in Sweden for months and has documented multiple acts of violence and anti-Semitism that are enabled by leftist coordination with Islamists…”
Pardon my sick and twisted sense of humor but I nearly fell out my chair in laughter over this. Deja vu sometimes has that affect on me. I cannot help but think of how low income Black communities with high crime, low employment, and low education have been places where leftists and progressives gather to incite their anti-Police protests.
But Obama he gonna get into his private stash of jack and git all of them a free junior college edumacashun featuring his own personally designed curriculum.
Black Power, Brutha! Black man made everthang and he gonna rise up and take back what his! White man don know what comin’!
Didn’t you work for the FBI about 50 yrs ago?
One way the French can pacify Muslim immigrants: Announce that Muslims who fight will be given a lard enema upon capture, then fed to hungry pigs.
Grease bullets with lard. Grease any munitions with lard. Let them know it. Then move in and start shooting. Round them up, deport them. Born in France? No matter. Send them back to where they can live without being insulted by the Western civilization around them.
It pains me to say this since I’m a student of WWII and the Holocaust. However, if these people are not removed from amongst us, they will slaughter us. Nobody could and would have said that of the Jews.
I heard a bit of Glenn Beck yesterday and he started out fretting about the rise of the “far right” and about growing hostility toward “those people” (i.e. Muslims). He strongly implied that it’s just like the Nazis all over again, and boasted that some left-leaning “expert” in France agreed with him and thanked him for making that observation.
Anyone who cannot see the massive difference between Nazi anti-Semitism and European concerns about the existential threat from Islam is an idiot and/or morally obtuse. The multiculti leftists and their Islamofacist clients have been making that grotesque comparison for as long as people have been raising alarms about the problems that arise when substantial numbers of Muslims settle within non-Muslim societies.
Sacrificing Europe to Islam is such a horrifying and morally outrageous prospect that it justifies harsh measures to prevent it. Should Spaniards have demurred to take the harsh measures needed to expel its Muslim occupiers centuries ago? Should they have been more careful to distinguish “peaceful” Muslims from “extremists”? Maybe some “nice” Muslims suffered, but was that worse than condemning all future Spaniards to permanent Islamic domination?
If Europeans want to save their culture, they need to regard every Muslim as a problem and a threat. Maybe it seems “unfair” if they’re “nice” people who just want to get on with their lives, but is it really any more unfair than condemning all non-Muslims to an Islamic future?
If the choice is between 1) letting your advanced, civilized country become another Algeria or Pakistan or Somalia or Erdogan-style Turkey, and 2) causing some unpleasantness for “moderate” Muslims if they refuse to renounce Islamic ideology — and that does essentially appear to be the choice — who can make a compelling case for 1 over 2? Who can say that the first option is more ethical?
Glenn beck is an absolute idiot.
Kicking Muslims out of your country is more akin to kicking Nazis out of your country than it is “becoming like Nazis.”
Europeans will NEVER see that.
“…just like the Nazis all over again…”
Beck’s sense of the atmosphere is right on. It’s just that he attributes the fascist attitudes to the wrong group. Anybody with half a brain can see that the Muslims are the Nazis in this.
Pig-grease the very sidewalks encircling each of their ‘hoods, the door knobs and light posts. Aerosolize vats of it with automated sprayers and spray it into the very air they breathe if they try to set foot outside their ‘hood.
These pigs are already in ghettos, so they can be surrounded and the culling can start. It will not end before much more violence and it is them or us.
So we learn open borders will destroy western civilization, but Obama refuses to execute our law, obstructing and/or prosecuting any trying to restrict the open third world flow. How much of central LA is essentially a no go zone? Does the census count essentially give these illegals their own US Representatives?
Canada and Europe teach us that government controlled health care means lower quality and wait lists, so Democrats push it through against the will of the people, with help from Justice Roberts.
We subsidize the world’s health care via funding of big pharma research, via paying top dollar for drugs that are half price in Canada, for example.
We subsidize defense for the world via funding most of the military, as well as developing much of the technology.
We subsidize foreign oil by all the restrictions on our own energy.
We subsidize China by letting them steal our technology (and manipulate their currency).
We need to reward good western alliances, not subsidize and submit to our enemies. Foreign and domestic subsidies/submissiveness give us an impending debt bomb, maybe the biggest WMD of all, if Iran doesn’t nuke us first.
But the globalists don’t want a coalition of the strong and the free. It seems the globalists are actively controlling western governments, acting against the will and interest of the traditional citizenry.
Flooding a country with (mostly illegal) immigrants is one of the globalists’ tactics. Electing another Bush or Clinton will not address the problems, but rather exacerbate them. Our liberty and sovereignty is at stake.
Time for a District 9 in France.
A “no go zone” for the police should be a “will go zone” for the military. Machine guns, artillery, flame throwers, whatever it takes to clean out the rats nests. No mercy. None.
Prediction: First ‘no-go’ zone in the US *based on Muslim population* will be just WSW of Detroit.
There is more to fear in one terrorist than to celebrate in 99 well-adjusted immigrants. –THEODORE DALRYMPLE
Source: http://www.city-journal.org/2015/eon0109td.html
Simple solution: Cordon off any “No-Go” zones, make them “No-Come-No-Go” zones, and shoot anyone who tries to cross the barrier. Nobody in, nobody out. Period. Cut the water/sewer and electrical lines, too.
They want their own micro-state, separate from their “host” country? Fine. We’ll see how long they last with no imports, no exports, no immigration, and any and all “border” crossings treated as an “invasion of sovereign territory”.
They don’t “feel alienated”, they alienate themselves from the dirty infidel.
If the number of Muslims rises every year, then only a deliberate act will make it stop.
Any deliberate act (such as “You can’t build any more mosques”) will be seen as “Nazi-like,” and make the public gasp in horror. (Forget the fact that it’s actually more like KICKING THE NAZIS OUT than it is “becoming like Nazis.”)
They are doomed to have their percentage of Muslims rise every year until it’s at the fateful 51%, wherein the native culture is dead.
They started something they can’t stop.
Why are these No Go Zones allowed? Political correctness or abject fear?
PC. the FRENCH should have learned from WW 2 that APPEASEMNT TO EXTREMISTS DOES NOT WORK!! a host country can only preserve their SOVEREIGNTY if the same laws apply to ALL.
FEAR.
It’s funny to listen to Europeans go on and on about how “sensitive” they are to “other cultures.” And how evil “Islamophobia” is…
…and then you hit them with the question “Really? Why did you move out of your neighborhood?”
Watch them squirm as they try to come up with some answer.
All these no-go zones have happened because Muzzies move in and the native population flees and abandons that part of town.
Cowards all.
Seems there can always an ugly side to social trends and those created by left-leaning groups are never properly balanced but always overweighted to the emotional side. So once again Political Correctness has made a mess of things. It’s continually proven that PC’s flip side is bullying. And it’s amazing that what were once culturally intelligent countries continuously bend to the bullies. Sounds more like domestic violence in the extreme.