Image 01 Image 03

Search

"Dean William Treanor cleared me on the technicality that I wasn’t an employee when I tweeted, but the [DEI Office] implicitly repealed Georgetown’s Speech and Expression Policy and set me up for discipline the next time I transgress progressive orthodoxy. Instead of participating in that slow-motion firing, I’m resigning."

Not surprisingly, Georgetown's Dean William Treanor took the cowardly way out. Rather than owning up to Georgetown's error, Treanor ended the punishment based on a finding that because the tweet took place pre-employment, it was not properly the subject of discipline. Treanor repeated the absurd claim that the tweet could be construed "to disparage any Black woman the President might nominate," and Treanor left open the issue that had the tweet taken place during employment, it could have been the subject of discipline. This is a winning day for Ilya Shapiro, but it is another losing day for freedom of expression on campuses. 

Responding to Georgetown Law cancel culture: "I stand with Ilya on the paramount importance of color-blindness.  And that same principle should apply ... [to] receiving an appointment to the highest court in the land.... And so, if Ilya Shapiro is deserving of cancellation, then you should go ahead and cancel me too."

There seems to be a pre-existing unhappiness at Georgetown Law that erupted with Shapiro's tweets the spark. "One student floated the idea of defunding the Center for the Constitution.... Another pressed Treanor on why the Center existed at all, given the originalist views of its director, Randy Barnett.“

"Georgetown’s embarrassing capitulation [to the "online outrage"] is antithetical to the tenets of liberal education.... Dean William Treanor has made the wrong decision in authorizing this witch hunt, and every day that it continues is an affront to free speech and fairness at Georgetown," wrote the Foundation for Individual Rights In Education in a statement responding to the suspension.