Mamdani Is an Economic Illiterate — and It’s Scary
City-owned grocery stores “will buy and sell at wholesale prices, centralize warehousing and distribution, and partner with local neighborhoods on products and sourcing.”
Of all the items on the agenda of Zohran Mamdani, the socialist candidate for New York City mayor, the proposal for government-run grocery stores received the most attention. The Uganda native vowed to:
[C]reate a network of city-owned grocery stores focused on keeping prices low, not making a profit. Without having to pay rent or property taxes, they will reduce overhead and pass on savings to shoppers. They will buy and sell at wholesale prices, centralize warehousing and distribution, and partner with local neighborhoods on products and sourcing. With New York City already spending millions of dollars to subsidize private grocery store operators (which are not even required to take SNAP/WIC!), we should redirect public money to a real “public option.”
The last line is an admission that American agricultural products are already lavishly subsidized, particularly on the federal level. And while it’s true that inflation has been eating into our incomes following the 2020 lockdowns, it’s reflected in the price tags attached to a wide range of products and services, not just food. The hike was caused by the Biden Administration’s monetary policy and the prices are now stabilizing.
Nevertheless, socialists are in the business of never letting a good crisis go to waste. Thus, Mamdani wants to undercut private enterprise by setting up government stores that supply goods at prices below market value. In a separate video, the son of a woke academic and a multi-millionaire film director admits that the end goal of his movement is seizing the means of production, setting up a centrally planned economy.
One problem with state pricing is that the merchandise still has value to the customers and that value is not expressed in the price tag affixed by a bureaucrat. The gap enables corrupt individuals to carve out space for illicit activities.
The Soviet experience illustrates that a centralized economy typically resulted in either the overproduction of goods and services — as was the case with, for instance, baked goods such as bread which was available in abundance and on the cheap, resulting in partially eaten loaves littering the streets and propaganda posters pleading with the citizenry to respect the labor of the bread makers — or, more often, shortages. The shortages were exploited by organized crime.
In the period following the death of Joseph Stalin, the underworld responded to market demands. Underground commerce was criminalized, but virtually everyone engaged in it in some manner. In The Soviet Mafia, Soviet and Russian author Arkadii Vaksberg showed how a shadow economy penetrated the entirety of Soviet life, with corruption reaching the highest levels, including the general secretary Leonid Brezhnev himself.
The most visible part of the shadow economy was its retail end — either the underground farztovscshiki or state store sales associates who, as everyone knew, were diverting most coveted goods to their cronies or selling them under the table at a profit, sometimes both. Lack of formal education or rare skill be damned, because of their position at the chocking point of distribution networks, sales associates easily accumulated more wealth and social cache than a typical engineer. The absurdity of the situation wasn’t lost on the educated classes — and was hugely demoralizing. Hard work and intelligence weren’t rewarded; willingness to live a lie and to some extent take risks were the prized qualities of late socialism.
Corruption only got more insidious further up the food chain. The British Russia expert Mark Galeotti wrote in his history of Russian mafia The Vory of how the underground economy was forged by the unholy trinity of shadowy operators, or tsekhoviki, the mafia muscle, and the government. Because the first two needed each other to operate:
Representatives from both worlds met in the southern Russia spa town of Kislovodsk in 1979, in a gathering that undoubtedly was known to the authorities and may even have been brokered by them. Although I have never seen anything to corroborate it, one retired KGB officer who served in the Fifth Chief Directorate (responsible for domestic political policing) later claimed to me that the head of his unit had actually attended this so-called “Congress” as an observer. The outcome was an agreement that, in return for a tithe of one-tenth of their earnings, the tsekhoviki would be free from interference.
Mafia penetration of economic activities is not easily remedied by free markets. When the USSR under Gorbachev and later the Russian Federation fostered capitalist enterprise, mobsters, who already had the infrastructure, were advantageously positioned to compete. What Russia and its former republics got after socialism was governments compromised by organized crime.
There is nothing distinctly Soviet or Russian about the mob filling the cavities of distorted markets, including taking advantage of price fixing. In recent memory, Hamas diverted international aid to Gaza, selling it for profit and using it as leverage to stay in power. Similarly, USAID shipments around the world have been appropriated by local chieftains and sold to the supposed beneficiaries of our largess.
Similar developments happen on our soil. Between 1995 and 2002, domestic intelligence agencies conducted Operation Smokescreen, intercepting a Hizbollah fundraising operation. The terror network smuggled cigarettes from the states with low tobacco taxes into the states with high tobacco taxes, funneling profits into terrorism.
I don’t pretend to know what’s in Mamdani’s heart. Yet it’s worth a reminder, that by his own admission, Mamdani arrived at socialism via Palestinianism. In one media appearance he explained “what brought me to the DSA, and to the explicitly Socialist movement, was that it didn’t carve out an exception for Palestine.”
I don’t think the Democrat is a member of a terror network, but he expressed sympathy for them. The system he proposes to create is more than unjust and ineffective — it creates the environment in which terror organizations can flourish. It certainly would not go against Mamdani’s beliefs to create conditions for corruption and violence to flourish.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.







Comments
will the ugandi part be scrubbed or “talked away” like the accidental referecces to the *mistakes* about obams born in kenya…ya know,, by his own biographers!!??
He’s legally able to be NYC mayor so no.
but when he runs for potus
which by then will allow for non usa born to become potus
Who says?
All he needs is one low level judge to say it’s okay, lol. /jk
the same was done (as your example of the underground/criminal organizations in the ussr) in the black communities as
selling drugs was illegal but “overlooked” as to allow extra income for the poc
with the occasional interruptions by the law in making arrests for selling those drugs
the point..the same system was and is here in america
then when drugs were finally legalized
the first people to get the license to sell it legally was of course black people with the excuse being that poc were the most abused by those laws
the very laws that the cbc helped create with potus reagan after the cbc claimed it was racist of reagan to not try and stop the selling of drugs in the hood
you cant win when you try to please people who are filled with rage andd hate
be they cat ladies or victims for life…oh wait,,that too is one in the same
do you say this part to hedge ??
“I don’t think the Democrat is a member of a terror network, but he expressed sympathy for them.”
socialism is the direct link to the terror network that is communism .fascism
I am asking this respectfully b/c your spot on article illuminates the terror network and how it has come to ruling cities in america
Gonzo stop over posting on your alt account again.
What makes you say it’s Gonzo? (I’m serious… what are the tells?)
Posting style is very similar….even the formatting of the messages as if the margins aren’t right.
Beyond that, it seems to me the account was created to give gonzo another outlet that wasn’t as aligned with her rants that had become increasingly unpopular when she went over the top (and also the shitblog link sharing behavior has popped up too). This one has started to get ranty too as seen here.
As I said in the other thread.
This guy is an absolute lunatic far leftist socialist, and the only defense Democrats have when asked about the insane things he says he wants to do, boil down to, ‘Well yeah that’s crazy, but he’s not ACTUALLY going to DO IT’.
Yeah the dude is Marxist which by definition must support totalitarianism b/c you can’t ‘seize the means of production’ from the unwilling owners without force. He is almost certainly a terrorist embracing, antisemitic, race baiting goon as well.
Frankly I don’t care if the he’s elected. The majority of the NYC electorate has a choice to make and if their collective decisions lead to this loon running NYC…that’s really gonna suck…for them. The rest of us don’t have a dog in the fight and should feel zero obligation (b/c it doesn’t exist) to bail them out from their folly if they end up electing this loon as their Mayor. They are probably gonna have to experience the consequences of their error before they can possibly reform their political inclinations. Not to worry, pain is an excellent teacher.
how can you get new leadership with rcv???
its another rigged system be it dem or gop
Does ranked choice voting nonsense apply in the general or is it the d/prog primary? I was under the impression it didn’t apply in the general.
as of right now..and I stress that part,,,as of right now ,,not in the general election
but it would hardly matter as proven by this election
it still allows for the same agenda to continue to win even if the person themselves gets term limited out
More nonsense. It’s the only system that isn’t rigged, and allows the voters to express their true wishes.
He won the primary because the kind of people who vote in Dem primaries genuinely wanted him.
Now it may be that a majority the general voting population doesn’t want him, and would prefer anyone else to him. If RCV were used for the general election too then that would guarantee that he would lose. But it isn’t; the general election is first past the post, which is the system you like. And that is likely to result in him winning, unless the other candidates get together and all but one of them drops out.
so your also against one person one vote
not surprised
Again, it’s refreshing to see you being an absolute leftist Democrat without the mask.
What happened? New orders from your masters? Or just feeling there’s no point in lying anymore?
They deserve the suckage if they vote for it but we aren’t going to subsidize it.
Well we begrudgingly would for a time, but if scale expands and we reach a tipping point in terms of resource allocation, a revolution will break out to fight over who gets what pieces of the pie. This story is as old as time. I say that because I just know how the public works and we won’t fight anyone that’s blatantly wrong unless it affects our own livelihood directly.
30 percent of all New York City residents voted for Donald Trump. Do you want them to die?
“30 percent of all New York City residents voted for Donald Trump. Do you want them to die?”
Who’s going to die because of Trump’s election, dumbass?
And 30 per cent is FAR higher than the percentage of people who voted for Mamdani.
Jeeze. Are YOU dumb.
“Mamdani’s government grocery stores plan is based on an accounting error”
“So why does Mamdani use that $140 million number?
He misread the city’s webpage.
The city’s Economic Development Corporation estimates that grocery stores have invested $140 million of their own money thanks to the FRESH program. Mamdani is counting the $140 million in private spending as government spending.”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/beltway-confidential/3458307/zohran-mamdani-government-grocery-stores-plan-accounting-error/
Apparently, program would take 42 years to cost the city the $140 million that Mamdani says “the city is set to spend” on it.
Dumb birds of a feather.
Steve, JR is right in this case. No one will die because of Trump’s election. But if Mamdani is allowed to destroy NYC without the rest of the country doing anything to stop him, people are likely to die.
Healthguy and other commenters here seem to be OK with the idea that if a plurality (not even a majority) vote Mamdani in, then we can all die. Including the 30% who voted for Trump. JR was just pointing that out.
I think the correct answer to JR is that we won’t die, but we may be forced to abandon our homes and escape somewhere else and start over from scratch.
“30 percent of all New York City residents voted for Donald Trump. Do you want them to die?”
Anyone that seriously entertains/analyzes the notion should ask themselves why.
Milhouse, JR’s a complete tool and hasn’t once argued in good faith here, unlike most other commenters. So his argument is specious just based on his lack of good faith, and I take nothing he says seriously.
I do agree with you that something may very well need to be done if Mamdani gets elected and proceeds to finish destroying the “greatest American city.”
If we let him do that, then yes. People will die, starting in NYC. Where will it end? Who knows. I hope New Yorkers throw him out on his ass, but I have no belief that will happen. The will to stop these people will have to come from somewhere else.
Milhouse,
Nobody (so.far as I see) is arguing that electing this goon Mayor is a good thing nor some sort of just punishment. There’s not jack squat the rest of the Nation can do to prevent it…it’s up to the electorate of NYC to choose or reject this goon. I hope that the attention being showered on this goon’s Marxist policy preferences will serve as enough of a warning to deter his election. If not and he gets elected, no one is coming to save the voters of NYC from themselves.
Assuming he is elected Mayor what do y’all want us to do? Send in the the 10th Mountain Div supported by 18th Airborne Corps to depose him and institute a decade or two of a neo reconstruction period? That would probably work but I don’t see much political support for the idea. Outside of basic civil rights enforcement actions and criminal prosecution by DoJ what are the rest of us supposed to.do exactly? It’s a bit ironic that some of the loudest voices in support of CA and other sanctuary jurisdiction neo nullification re Fed immigration enforcement suddenly want Federal intervention (the rest of the Nation) to save NYC.
My advice to anyone in a deep blue jurisdiction with sanctuary policies, high taxes, poor/decaying services, bad public schools, rampant crime with little appetite to punish criminals has been very consistent; pack up and move. Get out ahead of the rush for the exit while there’s still some value in your property. Don’t wait, sell up and go somewhere sane. If y’all choose to stay and endure this Marxist as Mayor that’s up to y’all but I’d argue it would be a potentially disastrous decision. Don’t wait to be the last vehicle in the final convoy out of there. Go while you still can and while you can salvage something to set up elsewhere.
I don’t want them to and don’t know them but we’re all going to eventually.
Regardless, unhinged crybaby, I didn’t call to kill anyone anywhere in my post or “want them to die”.
I just pointed out that a bloody revolution will, in fact, happen, as evidenced by history when you FAFO on resources. If resources become scarce enough and a corrupt central power seizes the means of both production and distribution, then there will be a sizable contingent that becomes angry and desperate enough for violent rebellion and a roughly equal sizable contingent that supports the central power out of either fear or respect.
We’ve seen this with Mao, Stalin, and other smaller dictators.
As the obtuse Milhouse seems apt to point out, NOWHERE in my post did I say that I was okay with killing people you “dirty rotten liar”.
I simply pointed out what history has told us about totalitarianism and the revolutions that spawn it. JR took it out of context and for some insane reason, Mr. Logic thought that was a ringing endorsement worth running on.
Healthguy, neither JR nor anyone else ever claimed or implied that you were okay with killing people. JR simply pointed out that you seemed to be happy at the prospect of people NY finding out the consequences of electing Mamdani the hard way. JR thinks this is likely to result in widespread deaths, and asked whether you were OK with the 30% who voted for Trump to die together with all the other NYers. He did not imply that you wanted to kill them, just that you were OK with them dying.
But that’s not likely to happen; what is likely to happen is that sane NYers may have to flee with our lives, leaving behind our homes and other fixed property.
Pain was not an excellent teacher in Chicago, with Mayor Lightfoot, and it appears that Mayor DeBlasio was not either in NY City.
If you look at the history of totalitarianism and communism, you can see that it has to get really bad before change occurs. Here, so long as commies get control over only local jurisdictions, the amount of harm they can do is limited by the buffer of having the vast majority of the country not participating in the delusion. Communism can self-correct (meaning “go away”) because the mechanisms that allow peaceful transfer of power (away from communism) still exist. God help us if they get control of the levers of the federal government in such a way that opposition is quashed.
Not a high enough level of pain nor yet reaching the strongest supporters of these neo Marxists.. In particular the pain must reach the coalition of public sector unions, race baiting goons, grievance grifters, trust fund charlatans that put them in office. When these folks ‘run out of other people’s money to spend’ and their own financial interests collapse then things may change.
The inevitable outcome of government control of the food supply is that the food supply will fail. Do we parachute food in for the starving residents, or do they have to resort to hunting “long pig”.
“That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves. If we are directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we will soon want for bread.”
Thomas Jefferson
This quote may be apocryphal. If anyone knows that it is, please sing out. If not, it’s quite the visionary statement.
The first half is apocryphal. Thoreau attributed it to Jefferson, but it’s not found in any of his writings.
The second half is genuine. In his Autobiography Jefferson wrote: “Were we directed from Washington when to sow and when to reap, we should soon want bread.”
The first half is the opening sentence to Thoreau’s “Civil Disobedience,” but he doesn’t attribute it to Jefferson or anybody else.
The inevitable outcome of government control of the food supply is that the food supply will fail. Do we parachute food in for the starving residents, or do they have to resort to hunting “long pig”.
We blow the bridges, tunnels and tracks and let them feast on ‘the greater good’.
The left goes for direct action. The right considers perverse side effects first.
Since the problems that respond well to direct action have already been solved, what’s left is problems that respond perversely to direction action.
So the right is mostly correct in any new situation.
See “playing chess with a pigeon.”
Is he an economic illiterate or does he know exactly what he is doing?
Either is scary. He is power hungry and should be kept away from all levers of power, but apparently NYC wants their own Che Guevara.
He knows what he’s doing.
He is a leftist. Economic illiteracy is a requirement.
Leftists seek power, and ONLY power because they believe that, if they have enough power, they can tell all of reality how to be.
Can he actually carry on a conversation without cocking his head to the right? It’s like a dog I used to have. I realize this shallow idiot is just following the choreography but it’s a little irritating.
Of course he is illiterate. It’s all for show. This guy is no revolutionary, either. He would probably wet his pants when the first punch was thrown. But he sure sounds good and looks snazzy.
Another tough guy here. You talk the talk about throwing the first punch, but you don’t walk the walk. He may wet his pants, but you would probably s_t your pants.
You’re the making pretend tough guy sounds in response to a simple remark about a public figure who is a fraud. Walked more walked than you know about loser!
Shut up, loser.
Everyone here, including the female posters, can kick your can.
Take a hike, hose nozzle.
Says the invisible, anonymous JR, exposing himself as a hypcrite, if he hasn’t done so already.
I’d wager there are some tough hombres commenting here, seeing that many are ex-military (as am I). Personally, I’m not tough. I’m just not afraid of anything. Except bigfoot. A bigfoot would scare the crap out of me. Seriously.
I have relatively big feet, Size 14 shoes, Does that count?
Where does it say OS26 throws the punch?
OldSchool didn’t say that at all, of course.
JR’s just being his typical idiotic self.
As usual.
I’m shocked.
You drag this comment or one like it out whenever you think you can–
Another tough guy here. You talk the talk about throwing the first punch, but you don’t walk the walk. He may wet his pants, but you would probably s_t your pants.
But you ALWAYS do it in response to people saying what this comment says –that someone is a posturing hypocrite– about politicians you favor.
Do you understand?
You’re saying oldschooltwentysix walks the walk but doesn’t talk the talk in response to him saying that Mandani walks the walk but doesn’t talk the talk.
He was saying that he was going to hit anyone–or that anyone should be hit.
He was making, effectively, the point you repeatedly try and fail to make because you apply it incorrectly.
I covered the plan for city-run grocery stores earlier today. See “Trump on … Mamdani,” where I discuss markup versus profit margin. The latter is generally much lower than the former. This is part of micro economics or “theory of the firm.” Clearly Mamdani doesn’t understand the grocery business. Like most socialists and communists he lives in a universe of slogans. The online grocery store, peapod ran into trouble because they had little experience in the grocery business. Peapod was one of the very early startups. Software guys with no experience in the grocery business.
A New York City run chain of grocery stores will require subsidies, so New Yorkers will end up paying for their food thru increased taxes which are already too high. Get set for massive movements of people and capital out of NYC. The very rich are very mobile. So is capital.
This goes along with my question asked in other articles: How much more in business leases will not be renewed if he is elected?
“City-owned grocery stores “will buy and sell at wholesale prices”
I had this same charitable dream myself… when I was nine.
It didn’t take me but two minutes to understand my father’s explanation that I had to eat too, and I had no money… despite having an entire grocery store “of my own” I could poach “free food” from when I was hungry. I had already paid to buy that food, which no one now would ever remunerate me for, and I still had empty pockets.
How old is Mamdani?
There are in fact several groceries in NYC that operate at no profit, and only cover their costs. Prices at these stores are naturally lower than at comparable for-profit stores, but not by all that much. That’s because groceries’ profit margin is quite low.
so when nyc was told, in 1975, by potus ford and he said drop dead to the bk freewheeling spending every things free leftists in nyc
how did they recover???
well of course
fed capitulation
and so imadman KNOWS that he will be bailed out
and then once again lefty gets to claim victory
gets to claim that their system works
that the threat of violence works
in 1975 you can bet the poc were once again showing that they know how to get what they want and it wont then and it wont in the future be through a
newly found love of being educated
affirmaction has assured that there is no need for academics when you can riot your way to success
OR AS RECENTLY PROVEN
BY HAVING COLLEGES PAY THEIR STUDENT ATHLETES when the “payment” was suppose to be that education …uh merit based education
the blmplo hamas way of life will continue to gain strength in these easy targets known as blue cities
the once in a lifetime (?) trump agenda that is pushing back against the fdr agenda that has only grown stronger ( and weakened america) continues to pit american against american with its love and support of the welfare state
how do you get THAT genie back in the bottle?
you dont. I wont say cant..but you dont..without a physical push back against the left
“Mamdani Is an Economic Illiterate”
And so is most of NYC.
When you get “money for nothing” SNAP cards from Uncle Sugar long enough, you lose all sense of cause and effect. That’s the Heartbreak of Socialism.
Huh?
The city forgoes the rent and property taxes that would have been collected, so it’s all being paid by the taxpayers anyway. It just doesn’t show up on the one accounting sheet as an expense – though it turns up on other accounting sheets as missing revenue.
I love how some idiots (many of the same idiots as Mohran Jihadi) like to say that some business owner “doesn’t have to pay rent” when he owns the property. There is always rent – either rent being collected or rent not being collected, but it is all rent cost, the same.
of course, Barky and the dems made all these same arguments when they were shoving national socialized health insurance/care down our throats, claiming that government runs everything better because they don’t have to make a profit, don’t pay people huge salaries, don’t have to advertise, … But Barky went and even offered DMVs and post offices as examples of the beauty and wisdom of government run business!! … But they illegally shoved BarkyCare through, anyway, and Benedict Roberts saved the whole un-Constitutional sh*tpile for them.
“claiming that government runs everything better because they … don’t pay people huge salaries”
As we all know, and DOGE proved, government pays people huge salaries for (at best) doing nothing, or (at worse) squandering even more of your money to grifters.
Mohran Jihadi is another one of these politicians who has never run or done anything in his life but thinks that he should run the biggest collection of assets around. It’s amazing that anyone would accept such idiocy – but we do all the time with politicians. Totally unaccomplished – in ANYTHING – with no talents in anything and no skills and no actual resume vying to be in charge of “the largest company” around and dictating people’s lives and decisions (illegally) on top of it all.
Also, what is with these dem politicians lying about themselves? Komrade Kamala grew up in Canada – went to school there all the way through high school and first year or two of college, but never mentioned one word about Canada (though talking incessantly about how she “grew up in a middle class …”). Barky made little mention of spending his formative years growing up in Jakarta, Indonesia. Sandy Ocasio changed her name and pretends to be a “girl from the Bronx”, when she grew up in the nice quiet suburb of Yorktown Heights. Mohran Jihadi, here, skips over his parents having big bucks, growing up more privileged than 99% of whites in America, and having his rich parents fund his destructive childish ventures so that he doesn’t have to actually try to work at a job. And Warren Wilhelm changed his name to Bill De Blasio and became a whole new “person”.
Are there any dems who are honest about themselves … or even just use their actual names, or must they all have stage names?
De Blasio changing his name had nothing to do with politics. Lots of people change their names, for various reasons. Gerald Ford was born Leslie King, and only formally changed his name as a young adult. Bill Clinton was born Bill Blythe, and changed his name as a teenager. Jared Polis was born Jared Schutz. And of course many women change their names on marriage.
LOL. The women marrying has nothing to do with what I wrote and you well know that – or you should, at least.
You point out 2 more dems – so just add them to the list. LOL.
As to Gerald Ford …if you were named Leslie you might want to change that, too.
And … no, lots of people don’t change their names. Outside of a woman marrying or someone being adopted or someone converting to islam it is highly unusual for someone to change his name.
And then there is the lying about their backgrounds that you decided to ignore and pretend was never mentioned. Maybe you want to try and convince people that “lots of people lie about their background” so much as to claim they grew up in places that they didn’t? Was that fodder for your next response?
Sometimes you write the most idiotic comments. And for what reason?
You complained about De Blasio changing his name, as if he had done it for politics. That’s just not true. He did it for personal reasons, exactly like all the other examples. Why is women changing their name at marriage different? It’s a personal choice, exactly like De Blasio’s, and had nothing to do with a desire to lie about oneself.
Are you retarded? Seriously, are you a complete retard?
Why is the TRADITION of women changing their name (to make a family name) different from phonies who change their names to fool the public about one thing or another??
LOL.
So, to the genius Milhouse, there’s no difference between a woman marrying and taking her husband’s last name (since that will be the family name and name of her children) and Sandy Ocasio deciding to rebrand herself as Alexandra Ocasio Cortez and claim that she grew up in the Bronx, or Barry Soetoro changing the name he went by to Barack Hussein Obama and forgetting that he grew up in Jakarta, indonesia as a muslim kid. Yeah … no difference at all, there, says the brilliant Milhouse.
People choose stage names for a reason – and it is not related to woman taking married names in any way, whatsoever. It’s amazing that I have to explain this to you. Put down the pipe, lady. It’s rotting your brain.
You’ve got a real hide to call other people retarded, when you’re the one babbling like you need to be in a straitjacket.
What possible difference does it make that something is a “tradition”? It’s still a name change, for reasons that have nothing to do with politics. Exactly the same as De Blasio, Ford, Clinton, and Polis. You cannot draw a meaningful distinction between any of them, or between them and every married woman who changes her name.
None of them “change their names to fool the public”. None of them. You’re the one who threw De Blasio in for no reason but your own pig-headedness and bile.
Nor did AOC or 0bama “change their names to fool the public”. They’re both using their real names, which they’ve had since birth.
Oh, and 0bama grew up in Hawaii, not Jakarta. He spent four years in Jakarta, that’s all. And he did not grow up as a Moslem either. He attended a Catholic school and a secular public school. And then went back to Hawaii.
Milhouse is trying to be transparent now, trying to openly be a leftist Democrat –but he’s been obfuscating and demoralizing for so long that it’s hard to stop spewing lies.
Give him a break. Encourage him to come out of his leftist closet.
Go back to Hell you slandering piece of filth.
Go back to Hell you slandering piece of filth.
What is the slander, Democrat?
Did you or did you not say that you were a registered Democrat?
And then give the rationale you endlessly try to make palatable –that “in some places the election is decided in the primary, so to be heard you have to register as a Democrat’.
You said a similar thing here recently. regarding voting in primaries.
Was your voice heard in the primaries, Milhouse? It probably was as I suspect you joined the chorus for Mamdani.
Will you be voting for Sliwa in the general? Or will the need ‘to have your voice heard’ lead you to voting for someone in your party,, the Democrats.
I do not slander you, Democrat. I use your words against you.
JD Vance has entered the chat…?
This guy is an idiot. Has ever held a real job? You know like a summer job selling ice cream, been a store clerk, had a paper route, been a “bartender”.
Hey I’m not looking for administrative experience but NYC has a 116B budget, Can this guy count beyond 20?
He may be able to count to 23, or maybe just 21, although it’s questionable.
I wonder how many will get this.
So the store employees are unionized city employees and everything is heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Will lose a tremendous amount of money.
And he’s going to “source” locally. From where in NYC does he think he can secure commercial quantities of any foodstuffs? Where does he think food comes from?
Why do people even want to source food locally? I really don’t understand it. What’s so great about local food? How does travel harm food?
In theory it is ‘cleaner’. No significant travel time = no need for preserving/freezing. It’s fresher from farm to table. You would also ‘know’ it comes from Farmer Frank down the road v who knows where. You’d also potentially have more knowledge about Farmer Frank’s practices so if he says it is organic but you saw him spraying round-up on his field you could make a switch to Farmer John who really does use ‘organic’ methods.
Pretty common in rural areas to have folks get together with local farms/ranches to contract for delivery of produce. Each week you get a mix of whatever vegetables and fruits are in season. Many folks buy a 1/4 or 1/2 ‘cow’ and a hog. It gets delivered butchered to your specifications, wrapped for freezing. That plus a deer or two will feed a family for a year.
Well, it comes from the thought that stuff that is ‘closer’ is ‘fresher’. Which, of course, isn’t necessarily true, but at least it has SOME vague grounding in reality that if its coming from closer it should take less time to get to you.
I’m thinking he can just globalize the intifada on grocery stores you know blow up Stop N Shop and all those evil corporate price hikers. That will get his base energized, they love violence.
Zohan is a Marxist Muslim and a Dem. Dems lie and lie always. Being a Marxist he has no real clue to a working western economy. Anything he says or plans cannot be believed because he: 1) does not know how things work properly, 2) does not want it to work properly, 3) will lie to get elected. and 4) destroy NYC to make it into a Marxist Muslim society.