Image 01 Image 03

FBI Investigating Cocaine Found at White House, DC Pipe Bombing, and Dobbs Leak

FBI Investigating Cocaine Found at White House, DC Pipe Bombing, and Dobbs Leak

I’m honestly most interested in who leaked the SCOTUS Dobbs decision.

FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino provided an update on the agency’s activities, including reopening a few pressing cases that seemed to disappear during former President Joe Biden’s administration.

Interesting:

-Shortly after swearing in, the Director [Kash Patel] and I evaluated a number of cases of potential public corruption that, understandably, have garnered public interest. We made the decision to either re-open, or push additional resources and investigative attention, to these cases. These cases are the DC pipe bombing investigation, the cocaine discovery at the prior administration’s White House, and the leak of the Supreme Court Dobbs case. I receive requested briefings on these cases weekly and we are making progress. If you have any investigative tips on these matters that may assist us then please contact the FBI.

Cocaine

On June 30, officials discovered an “unknown item” in the West Wing, forcing an immediate evacuation.

Testing identified the substance as cocaine.

The story kept changing, making everyone even more suspicious about the culprit because we all know about Hunter Biden’s problems.

The first reports stated the agents found it in the library, which could mean the residential part. Then they said they found it in a place visited by guests and staff.

One official told CBS News the agents found the cocaine “near an entrance where visitors taking tours are directed to leave their phones.”

One official told CBS News the agents found the cocaine “near an entrance where visitors taking tours are directed to leave their phones.”

How do they mix up those entrances?

Then law enforcement said they likely wouldn’t find the culprit.

Later that week the White House changed the location again. This time officials found it near the Situation Room, which is way more secure than the residential area and visitor entrances.

The story evolved more regarding the Biden family’s whereabouts.

Biden’s press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre insisted the Biden family stayed at Camp David that weekend: “As you know — and the media outlets reported this — the Biden family was not here. They were not here. They were at Camp David. They were not here Friday. They were not here Saturday. They were not here Sunday. They were not even here Monday. They came back on Tuesday. So to ask that question is actually incredibly irresponsible. And — and I’ll just leave it there.”

Except one pool report stated Jill Biden, Baby Beau, and Hunter Biden left the White House that Friday.

At the time, Bongino, a former Secret Service agent, reminded everyone that the White House is one of the most secure places on the planet. Only family members bypass the security checkpoint.

The Secret Service ended its investigation on July 13.

Pipe Bombs

Everyone lost their minds over the Capitol Hill riot…but not the pipe bombs found in front of the DNC and RNC on January 5, 2021.

In 2023, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) demanded answers from then-FBI Director Christopher Wray over the investigation.

Massie told Wray that FBI Assistant Director Steven D’Antuono allegedly said during an “interview some of the phone data that could have helped authorities track down who was responsible for the pipe bomb was ‘corrupted’ and ‘unusable.’”

Wray wouldn’t answer if the FBI interviewed the man who alerted authorities about the bombs:

WRAY: “Well, again, I don’t want to speculate about specific individuals. I will tell you that we have done thousands of interviews, reviewed something like 40,000 video files of which this is one, assessed 500 something tips —”
MASSIE: “Have you interviewed that person?“
WRAY: “We — we have conducted all logical investigative steps and interviewed all logical individuals at this point.“
MASSIE: “Then you need 900 days — you need to tell us what you found, because we’re finding stuff you haven’t released into the public.”

Wray evaded the questions using the age-old excuse: “cannot comment on an ongoing investigation.”

On January 2, 2025, Massie and Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-GA) released a damning report on the bombing, including the FBI’s investigation.

Dobbs Leak

In May 2022, a few months before SCOTUS revealed its ruling, someone leaked Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion revealing the Court (finally) overturned Roe v. Wade.

The leak led to pro-abortion people losing their minds, vandalizing pregnancy centers, threatening Alito, defacing Catholic churches, etc.

Honestly, I’m appalled Politico published it. Yeah, it’s one of the most significant decisions in our history, but still.

Professor Jacobson said he’s never seen a SCOTUS opinion leak before. No one even leaked the Obamacare decision.

According to Jonathan Turley, an expert in Constitutional law, SCOTUS has always remained above politicsuntil that leak:

JONATHAN TURLEY: What is clear is that what occurred with this leak was an unspeakably unethical act, and it is unfortunately a sign of our times. We’re living in an age of rage where nothing seems inviolate anymore, no principles seems sacred, and it makes some of us feel almost naive. Even though this is a city that floats on a rolling sea of leaks, the court was always an island of integrity, and most of us didn’t think this day would come. And I’m not too sure why. Maybe it’s because we let hope triumph over experience.

But the court has a long tradition that it would not yield to politics. It would not yield to dirty tricks. Somebody shattered that tradition, and the investigation that will now ensue is going to shatter the culture of the court. It’s going to take a lot to get to the bottom of this. Yes, it’s a small institution. It’s a small number of people that are likely involved. But whoever did this likely took steps to hide their tracks.

The last paragraph is important because the investigation went nowhere.

Chief Justice John Roberts put the Supreme Court Marshal in charge of the investigation, not seasoned and trained investigators like the FBI.

In January 2023, a report said SCOTUS narrowed the suspects, but nothing emerged. Many of the law clerks sought legal counsel (if you’re a law clerk at SCOTUS and didn’t seek legal counsel, then you shouldn’t be in law. ALWAYS ASK FOR LEGAL COUNSEL!)

The questions were simple and broad, which means the investigators got nowhere.

A few weeks later? SCOTUS announced it could not determine the source of the leak.

SCOTUS eventually brought in experts, but Roberts should have done that from the beginning. I bet the leaker discarded a ton of evidence.

Unless…one of the justices did it. *shrug*

[Featured Image via YouTube]

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

The Dobbs leak is the most important, the rest soap opera

Let’s get some Jan 6 arrests of the BS artists that destroyed so many lives

Mostly the 3, Bondi, Patel and Bongino have been embarrassingly incompetent

Loved the Patel and Danny , over the top BS, statement that Epstein didn’t kill himself, “I’ve seen all the evidence “, complete 180 of previous comments by the 2 pre present job status

And totally unacceptable and unbelievable

Clowns

    xleatherneck in reply to gonzotx. | May 27, 2025 at 8:04 am

    They’ll never find out, with certainty, who leaked the Dobbs decision without the approval and consent of Chief Justice Roberts…

    …And that is never going to happen

      Joe-dallas in reply to xleatherneck. | May 27, 2025 at 8:07 am

      Agreed – mostly likely will never find out absent a whistleblower.
      Though the likely person was either sotomayor or one of her clerks

        leoamery in reply to Joe-dallas. | May 27, 2025 at 9:00 am

        No, think it more likely it was Breyer, or a Breyer clerk. Breyer was within two months of leaving the Court when the draft leaked. What could they do to him? Even if the leak failed to change the opinion, the leaker would be a gigantic hero to the Left, and could rake in bucks at full speed.

      gonzotx in reply to xleatherneck. | May 27, 2025 at 8:57 am

      He leaked it

      CaptTee in reply to xleatherneck. | May 28, 2025 at 11:17 pm

      If I were investigating the Dobbs leak, I would say to Justice Roberts, “I assume it was leaked with your approval or consent. Do you have any evidence to the contrary?”
      In fact, I’d privately put that to all the Justice’s that dissented in the decision.

    Olinser in reply to gonzotx. | May 27, 2025 at 3:14 pm

    I’m willing to give Patel and Bongino some more time.

    Bondi destroyed every shred of her credibility with that idiotic ‘Epstein binder’ stunt.

      henrybowman in reply to Olinser. | May 27, 2025 at 7:16 pm

      Bondi’s MAGA credentials were implausible even before her nomination.
      When it comes to liberty, I’m a big believer in the Sieve of L. Neil Smith: “Should you believe anything politicians say who claim they stand for freedom, but drag their feet and make excuses about repealing limits on your right to own and carry weapons?” Bondi fails this test disgracefully. And even since her appointment, when it comes to administration gun policies, she has missed deadlines, formed purposely unrepresentative review boards, continues to pursue Biden-era anti-gun lawsuits, and has not given gun owners one, single positive improvement since taking her position.
      I’m quite pleased with some of Trump’s picks, but he’ll never get the AG slot right.

    Dr.Dave in reply to gonzotx. | May 27, 2025 at 4:08 pm

    Let’s have them manufacture evidence to satisfy you or perhaps you have the evidence?

      henrybowman in reply to Dr.Dave. | May 27, 2025 at 7:21 pm

      He’s seen new evidence that changed his mind and demolished all the arguments he’s been making publicly on his channel ever since the incident happened. Total 180°. Seen Jesus on a piece of toast.
      But he can’t let YOU know what that evidence is. He can’t even tell you WHY it’s best that he not let you know.
      That’s an older political con than Nigerian Princes, I say it’s spinach, and I say the hell with it.

    henrybowman in reply to gonzotx. | May 27, 2025 at 6:42 pm

    Soap opera is important in politics.
    It’s how you make the public associate your adversary with villainy.

    Few people could tell you who John Walker, Jr. was.
    But everyone remembers who shot JR and who b*** Bill Clinton.

    diver64 in reply to gonzotx. | May 28, 2025 at 5:27 am

    None of the 3 are soap opera. Coke in the WH is a massive security breach and Bongino was all over it having insight as a former Secret Service Agent in the WH. The pipe bomb was an even worse security failure as Harris drove right by it and was in the building the bomb was sitting in front of. The Court leak I’m less concerned about although it does defy the decorum of the court.

    None of the 3 you mentioned are embarrassingly incompetent. As you put it. They have only been on the job a few months and it will take some time to get the rot out of the agencies or have you missed how hard the deep state and district court judges are fighting everything?

MoeHowardwasright | May 27, 2025 at 8:06 am

The cocaine case will go nowhere. Maybe some hand slaps for Secret Service personnel. Dobbs case will prove interesting. Many have opined about Judge Roberts office as being the source of the leak. If anything comes of the leak investigation it will prove very embarrassing to the Chief Justice. Could this investigation be a strategic shot across the bow of the Chief Justice?

While the FBI is turning over rocks, how about investigating the botched Hunter laptop “investigation”. Some how after having possession of the laptop for at least 9 months, the FBI seems to have suppressed the knowledge that the laptop was not “Russian disinformation”.

    MAJack in reply to Arnoldn. | May 27, 2025 at 12:34 pm

    James Comer: talks a good game. Action? Not so much.

    diver64 in reply to Arnoldn. | May 28, 2025 at 5:28 am

    The investigation into the laptop was not “botched”. It was intentionally stonewalled and slow walked by the DOJ to protect Hunter and Joe’s election.

“ Later that week the White House changed the location again. This time officials found it near the Situation Room, which is way more secure than the residential area and visitor entrances…”

It was Mrs Harris in the Situation Room with a rolled up Benjamin.

I knew my training at the Clue Institute would eventually come in handy.

I’m honestly most interested in who leaked the SCOTUS Dobbs decision.

The “wise” Latinx. There is a reason Roberts has buried this. He knows.

    diver64 in reply to NotCoach. | May 28, 2025 at 5:30 am

    I bet they all do and the “wise latina” most likely bragged about it knowing Roberts was not going to do anything.

LeftWingLock | May 27, 2025 at 10:14 am

Record to date:

Investigations 734
Indictments 3
Convictions 0

They should go back and investigate the Jan 5 shooting of Babbit and why it was the investigation was almost immediately black washed.

These are just distractions to get us to forget about Patel/Bongino doing nothing to investigate Comey’s call to assassinate Trump or Butler, PA.

    Ghostrider in reply to MarkS. | May 27, 2025 at 4:18 pm

    How do you know that?

    Milhouse in reply to MarkS. | May 27, 2025 at 9:48 pm

    There’s nothing to investigate with Comey. Even if he had meant “kill Trump” (which he didn’t), it would be completely legal, and protected speech. The law is crystal clear on this; it is unconstitutional for the government to do anything to punish someone for calling for the president’s assassination. A government unit can’t even fire an employee for saying it. That is settled, black-letter law, about which there can be no dispute. See, e.g., Rankin v McPherson.

        Milhouse in reply to henrybowman. | May 28, 2025 at 4:57 pm

        No, they didn’t. The man in question did not merely advocate 0bama’s murder, or speculate about it, he made an actual, credible threat to kill him. He admitted that it was a threat.

        Advocating the president’s murder, like advocating absolutely anything else, is protected speech. There is no exception for the president.

      diver64 in reply to Milhouse. | May 28, 2025 at 5:15 am

      Wrong.

        Milhouse in reply to diver64. | May 28, 2025 at 5:00 pm

        No, you are wrong, as literally anyone who knows anything about the first amendment will tell you. There is no dispute about this. Look at Rankin; there’s not even any discussion about whether her speech was protected, but only about whether her employer was required to keep employing her, and the decision was that yes, it did have to, even though she was on probation and could have been fired for almost any other reason.

          Dean Robinson in reply to Milhouse. | May 31, 2025 at 10:11 am

          Why do you keep saying things that can be shown to be false in a couple of minutes with any search engine? Are you stupid, or do you assume we are stupid, or are you impaired in some way? Threatening the president of the United States is a class D felony under United States Code Title 18, Section 871. It is punishable by up to 5 years in prison, a maximum fine of $250,000, a $100 special assessment, and up to 3 years of supervised release.

        Dean Robinson in reply to diver64. | May 31, 2025 at 10:17 am

        He doesn’t seem to care that his lies can be easily fact checked. Very odd, since he is quite literate and rational in many other respects.

The very fact that they ‘closed’ the WH coke investigation demonstrates that they knew exactly whose it was and they considered the appearance of incompetence to confirming it was Hunter’s. Who, by the way, would have been in violation of his parole if they had confirmed it was his. If it were ANYBODY else, they would have publicly announced it.

The pipe bombing was a false flag and the FBI was in on it, we all know it.

Roberts knew EXACTLY who leaked the Dobbs decision. By its very nature, only a small handful of people had access to it in the first place. When he demanded that the SC security do the ‘investigation’, it was obvious it was a coverup by him. They couldn’t issue subpoenas and couldn’t make arrests. The microsecond he did that, everybody agreed he was covering it up, which would require him to know (or strongly suspect) who leaked it and protect them.

    Ghostrider in reply to Olinser. | May 27, 2025 at 4:21 pm

    Wouldn’t it be intriguing if the investigation into the Dobb’s leak led to Chief Justice Roberts’ immediate resignation?

      MarkS in reply to Ghostrider. | May 27, 2025 at 4:36 pm

      we should be so lucky!

      Aarradin in reply to Ghostrider. | May 27, 2025 at 10:01 pm

      Given that Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and especially Barrett have proven themselves worse that Roberts, I’m not sure that Roberts resigning and Trump getting to pick his replacement would result in an improvement.

      Hopefully, Trump 2.0 has better advisors on Judicial nominees than his previous incarnation did.

        henrybowman in reply to Aarradin. | May 28, 2025 at 4:59 am

        Who gets to pick the Chief Justice? It might be worth it just to see Thomas get the big La-Z-Boy.

destroycommunism | May 27, 2025 at 3:51 pm

if hillary is still free there is no justice

henrybowman | May 27, 2025 at 6:33 pm

“…because we all know about Hunter Biden’s problems hobbies.”

George Burns: I don’t have a drinking problem. I drink. I get drunk. I fall down, no problem.

The leaders of DOJ appear to have promised highly, and in terms of delivering what the public would like to see, results have not occurred.

If you are in a leadership position, you promise positively but you under promise and then then you overdeliver. That’s a successful approach and we are not seeing that in this department.
For Trump to succeed and SCOTUS to get on board that approach should be what is implemented going forward. The public does not understand how long it takes to get something through our judicial system. Therefore under promise, overachieve.

AND GET SOMEONE in front of a grand jury, trial and no excuses for punishment deserved. Once this is done, I believe others will talk or fall.

Dobbs leak: The Chief Justice prohibited the investigators from even considering that the leaker might be a Justice.

As I recall, the Justices weren’t even interviewed.

FBI never investigated. SCOTUS was allowed to “investigate” itself. Something it doesn’t have the resources or experience to do properly, even without the restrictions above.

I’ve always assumed the leaker was either Kagan or Sotomayor. Maybe both. If FBI, now, can prove that either or both were responsible, I’d expect they’d be forced to resign.

I’m surprised at people calling the DOJ and especially Bondi a failure after they have been on the job for a grand total of 4 months. The Epstein thing was interesting but not a failure. Bondi pledged to release the files then saw all the child porn they contained and had to withdraw that so they could be thoroughly reviewed to protect the ID of child victims.

I’m not surprised Bongino pushed for these 3 things to be investigated. He was on them from the start with his podcast platform and radio show. That pipe bomb is the one I’m most interested in as Harris supposedly drove right by it and was in the DNC building while it sat outside but no one knew the bomb was there? That, unlike the other 2, could have been catastrophic if the bomb was real.

Dean Robinson | May 31, 2025 at 10:30 am

Common thread here is that we keep asking the institutions responsible for these crimes to cooperate or investigate themselves, and then do nothing when they fail to adequately do so. Accountability is required, and until that gets enforced this is all no more than political theater to placate the masses.