Image 01 Image 03

American Automakers Back Away from Biden-Harris EV Goals

American Automakers Back Away from Biden-Harris EV Goals

European automakers are seeing “slower than anticipated uptake of EVs across Europe.”

As Vice President Kamala Harris is poised to become the 2024 Democratic Party’s presidential candidate, it is important to note that she is tied to the Biden-⁠Harris Electric Vehicle Charging Action Plan of 2021.

The ambitious goal of that plan is to make half of all new vehicles electric by 2030. However, American consumers are slamming the brakes on purchasing electric vehicles (EVs), and the market seems to be running out of fuel.

Part of the reason for the rejection is that the infrastructure and technology are just not where they need to be to support the operation and maintenance of so many EVs, because those green energy dreams are running into real world issues.

The complementary infrastructure for EVs is much less developed than the infrastructure for gas vehicles, which was built for over a century. As a result, many people are less willing to purchase EVs, concerned about the limited number of charging stations nationwide.

To address this problem, the Biden-Harris Administration announced a $7.5 billion investment in EV infrastructure, including the construction of 500,000 chargers by 2030. Yet, as of May 2024, only 8 federal charging stations had been built out of a national total of 65,000 charging stations.

In contrast, there are almost 200,000 gas stations in the U.S. The slow rollout of the Biden-Harris initiative, combined with Donald Trump’s opposition to what he terms “the green new scam”, may further discourage potential EV buyers and cast doubt on the government’s ability or willingness to follow through on its EV promises.

In addition to the relatively low total number of EV charging stations, there is a vast regional disparity. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, EV charging locations are clustered on the East and West coasts and in bigger cities, leaving the vast rural areas underserved and making EVs less viable for people living outside of major urban areas.

Making national plans on niche market desires is senseless. Corporations that answer to shareholders and automakers who want to make profits are beginning to adjust their market plans based on cold, hard facts.

General Motors is now slowing its plans for all-electric vehicles by delaying a second U.S. electric truck plant and the Buick brand’s first EV.

The six-month delay in retooling the electric truck plant in Michigan, until mid-2026, also means GM will not achieve a prior target of having North American production capacity of 1 million EVs by 2025.

We are committed to growing responsibly and profitably,” GM CEO Mary Barra told investors Tuesday during the company’s second-quarter earnings call.

Barra’s comments come a week after she raised concerns about GM hitting its North American EV production capacity target.

Barra did not provide updated timing on Buick’s first EV, which was expected in 2024. The entire Buick brand has targeted being fully electric by 2030, as part of GM’s plans to exclusively offer consumer EVs by 2035.

Meanwhile, Ford Motor is expanding production of its large Super Duty trucks to a Canadian plant that was previously set to be converted into an EV hub. I sense the motive is related to profits, which seem to come from the large trucks.

“Super Duty is a vital tool for businesses and people around the world and, even with our Kentucky Truck Plant and Ohio Assembly Plant running flat out, we can’t meet the demand,” Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a release. “This move benefits our customers and supercharges our Ford Pro commercial business.”

As a reminder, Ford reports it is taking a massive loss for each EV it sells.

But it isn’t only this country that is seeing the decline in interest for EV ownership. The fuel is beginning to run out in the green utopia that is Europe.

Fiat will reintroduce a petrol-engined 500 city car in the next two years due to a lack of demand for electric vehicles, particularly among older drivers, its CEO has said.

Olivier Francois confirmed the new petrol 500 Ibrida will arrive in early 2026 due to a slower than anticipated uptake of EVs across Europe, according to Autocar.

However, he confirmed it will be the final version of the retro small car to have an internal combustion engine with the EU set to outlaw new petrol and diesel vehicle sales from 2035.

One last note about Harris and the focus on EV’s that has been the hallmark of the administration. In her time as Attorney General of California, she targeted the fossil fuel industry.

Before her tenure as the Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris previously served as a U.S. Senator representing California and was also the state’s attorney general. She took a staunch stance against fossil fuels and other drivers of climate change in both positions.

During her time as California AG from 2011 to 2017, Harris’ office investigated oil giant Exxon Mobil (XOM) over its handling of knowledge about fossil fuels’ impact on climate change and whether its public statements broke securities laws and other environmental protections.

As a reminder, an important scientific paper from Norwegian statisticians who looked at a massive amount of historical data came to a conclusion that indicates the carbon dioxide (CO2) can’t be clearly connected to any global temperature change:

[T]he results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations. In other words, our analysis indicates that with the current level of knowledge, it seems impossible to determine how much of the temperature increase is due to emissions of CO2.

Forcing environmental morality on decisions that should be based on science, technology, and real market forces has been the hallmark of the Biden-Harris team from day one. I am looking forward to how our “press” scrubs all this failure.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 9
Dimsdale | July 28, 2024 at 6:14 pm

Let the market decide. Toyota has its 1:6:90 rule, which clearly and logically demonstrates that hybrids are the way to go. EVs have a limited market.

Naturally, light weights like Gavin Noisome are declaring the ICE vehicle dead and mandating a full turnover to EVs.

Pure genius. /sarc

The feel good plans of the leftists are never thought through: the outcomes are too easy to predict if you have a brain, which the left seems to lack, despite all their claims of being “intellectual.”


 
 0 
 
 2
LeftWingLock | July 28, 2024 at 6:24 pm

Indict the CEOs for treason. If you are not with the State, then you are against the State


 
 0 
 
 4
Hodge | July 28, 2024 at 6:43 pm

BMW has essentially halted EV development

https://lagradaonline.com/en/bmw-goodbye-electric-cars-hydrogen/

As has Mercedes

https://www.electrive.com/2024/05/13/mercedes-stopped-work-on-the-mb-ea-large-ev-technology-platform/

Hertz has sold off 20,000 Teslas
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tesla-cars-used-hertz-discount-ev-fleet/

And on a Tangential note- Insurance premiums on EV’s are soaring – this article says by as much as 72%


 
 1 
 
 2
Hodge | July 28, 2024 at 6:45 pm

This “missing link”

Understanding the surge in insurance costs for electric vehicles (EVs) has caught the attention of both consumers and industry experts. This dramatic increase in Electric Car Insurance Costs Soaring by 72%, stems from several critical factors, primarily revolving around the intricate repair struggles associated with these technologically advanced vehicles.

https://choosemycar.com/resources/news/electric-car-insurance-surge


     
     0 
     
     1
    JohnSmith100 in reply to Hodge. | July 29, 2024 at 11:39 am

    Sorry, was hovering to click on reply, distracted and ended up with a down vote.

    I think fires are also a big factor in increasing insurance. A lot of these fires are from water damage which leads to hydrogen fires followed by cascading cell failure. Also, fire departments are making these fires worse by pouring water on them. Those fires should be put out with Tri Class powder. And that will take a special truck mounted extinguisher.


       
       0 
       
       0
      drednicolson in reply to JohnSmith100. | July 29, 2024 at 4:10 pm

      Most small-town volunteer fire departments with hand-me-down equipment quite simply are not equipped to properly fight Li-Ion battery fires.


         
         0 
         
         0
        JohnSmith100 in reply to drednicolson. | July 29, 2024 at 5:51 pm

        The equipment is not anything exotic, a one ton pickup with a blower to propel the powder. It would have other uses. like not spreading a flammable liquid floating on the water they are spraying.


 
 0 
 
 5
nordic prince | July 28, 2024 at 6:55 pm

The only thing green about “green” energy are the greenbacks flowing into the bank accounts of these flimflam artists.


 
 0 
 
 3
McGehee 🇺🇲 Trump 2024 | July 28, 2024 at 8:19 pm

Rule of Thumb: If a Democratic administration is pushing it, it’s a scam.


 
 1 
 
 7
AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | July 28, 2024 at 8:19 pm

The car manufacturers should have said no from Day 1. But the lure of easy government money turned them into prostitutes.

Shocking! Because centralized control of the economy has always worked so well in the past. Retards.


 
 0 
 
 6
E Howard Hunt | July 29, 2024 at 6:26 am

More people should read the WSJ. Holman Jenkins has written, for over a decade, that even if climate change is man made and the touted models completely accurate, the adoption of electric vehicles would make no appreciable difference. This is not even arguable. Think about what that means about our decision makers and the intelligence of the general public in our expansive democracy!


 
 0 
 
 4
MAJack | July 29, 2024 at 9:17 am

Yet Porsche just launched the new Macan, their biggest seller, as an EV only, no more gas models. MORONS.

The article refers to 500,000 chargers.

I perceive that a charger is just one unit that can only charge one car at a time.

The article also says there are 200,000 gas stations.

Each station has many pumps.

For example, a Buc-ees has 120 pumps. https://www.thedrive.com/news/worlds-largest-gas-station-is-a-new-buc-ees-with-120-pumps

I wonder how many cars can be filled up at the same time with gas/diesel.

Even if you could prove man-made CO2 is responsible for rising temps, no one has ever shown why a modestly warmer earth is a bad thing. There has been no increase in the frequency or severity of hurricanes, floods, drought, wildfires, or severe weather of any kind. No island nation has been swept away by rising oceans. The Antarctic ice sheet is at or near record levels.

Nothing bad has happened due to a modestly warmer earth. Despite repeated warnings of doom and gloom not a single one of their dire predictions have ever come true. Why should we believe their new dire predictions? We shouldn’t.

    There is no need to surrender on half the argument so you can fight on the other half. Global warming *caused by humans* is a tiny little blip on the planet’s overall thermal trajectory, which is “We are still coming out of an ice age with some global hiccups.” The most realistic estimates of human contribution to the general trend is about a quarter of the margin of error, so tiny that if we totally eliminated our contribution by spending hundreds of trillions of dollars, it would make the globe the same temp in 100 years that without the effort, it would reach in 99.

    Then you can move into the argument that natural warming since we were last under a hundred feet of glacial ice has been more good than bad.


 
 0 
 
 0
henrybowman | July 29, 2024 at 3:09 pm

“Thank you Francis. @MarkHamill @JeriLRyan @Lesdoggg @MiaFarrow @davidhogg111”
David Hogg???
This guy is madly collecting dick points like it’s a Tide Pod Challenge.
What does he plan to do with them? Trade them in for swirlies?

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.