Pro-Hamas “Globalize The Intifada” Group Publishes NYC Target Map Of Enemies
““Each of the locations on this map reflects the location of an office of an enemy of both the Palestinian people and colonized people all over the world. Today and beyond, these locations will be sites for popular mobilization in defense of our people.”
Another day, another call for domestic terrorism by Hamas supporters, so of course, the feds won’t take it seriously until something happens and people actually die. Even then, they’ll find a way to blame Americans’ “Islamaphobia.”
The latest call for murderous acts of violence on American soil comes from a pro-Hamas group who posted an antisemitic map of New York City that has been marked with various “targets” for violence. These targets include news outlets, assorted businesses, and even landmarks.
Pro-Palestinian group shares ‘reprehensible’ antisemitic map of NYC targets on social media — including the Post’s newsroom https://t.co/O0rzc8q7yj pic.twitter.com/lPpCOUesWb
— New York Post Metro (@nypmetro) November 17, 2023
And you think that your “peaceful protesters” don’t have similar maps for 🇨🇦 @JustinTrudeau ?
Pro-Palestinian group shares 'reprehensible' antisemitic map of NYC targets on social media — including the Post's newsroom https://t.co/OAmBo7pRUJ
— Vivian Bercovici (@VivianBercovici) November 18, 2023
A pro-Palestinian activist group shared a frightening map of New York City newsrooms, businesses and landmark buildings — and called for “direct action” to “globalize intifada.”
In addition to news buildings, Within Our Lifetime, which describes itself as a Palestinian-led community organization, called for followers to target the offices of technology companies
“Each of the locations on this map reflects the location of an office of an enemy of both the Palestinian people and colonized people all over the world. Today and beyond, these locations will be sites for popular mobilization in defense of our people,” the sickening Wednesday night post read.
“May this map serve as a call for every struggle to act in their own interest. As we do so, we uplift one another’s struggles and free Palestine from the river to the sea,” it continued, repeating the Palestine Liberation Organization mantra adopted by Hamas that calls for the eradication of Israel.
The controversial post has since been deleted.
A pro-Palestinian group posted a picture of multiple locations around New York City it alleges are associated with the “genocide” in Gaza.
The group, Within Our Lifetime, posted the map which was later deleted, with a headline of “From Palestine to NYC. Globalize the Intifada,” according to the New York Post. The map stated that the locations were considered zones “of direct action.”
. . . . The group describes itself as a “Palestinian-led community organization” with 121,000 followers on Instagram.
New York City political leaders commented on the map, saying it calls for violence against Jewish individuals.
“Coded calls for violence against Jews are proliferating on social media,” Rep. Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y. wrote on X.
Mark Levine, Manhattan borough president, said the organization’s actions are “dangerous and reprehensible.”
Needless to say, people have thoughts.
Today's "pro-Palestinian" movement seems to borrow most of its "tactics" from 1930s-era Germany.
Go figure. https://t.co/55TAhFHClx
— Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer) November 17, 2023
I don’t want to hear another word about j6 protestors.. Pro Palestinian group releases map of nyc targets… https://t.co/t9mEWJF8Ex
— Dorothy Chancey 🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DAchanc1953) November 17, 2023
Arrest everyone in this group, charge them with terrorism. | Pro-Palestinian group posts NYC map of locations 'tied' to 'Genocide' in Gaza: 'Globalize the Intifada'https://t.co/tWZcVpmQUH
— Dan Gainor (@dangainor) November 17, 2023
But remember, folks, they absolutely do NOT hate Jews, they just have issues with Israel's policies …https://t.co/dtCB5SJg1l
— One of several Jeff Goldmans (@TheJeffGoldman) November 17, 2023
So, @FBI @DHSgov what are your plans for this one? Direct threats & calls for violent terrorism by Hamas supporters in NYC? Pro-Palestinian group posts NYC map of locations 'tied' to 'Genocide' in Gaza: 'Globalize the Intifada'https://t.co/1MfJN1dPAo
— Jeremiah 31:36-37 (@BarryCCampbell) November 17, 2023
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
When they carry a sign stating that Palestinians must be free do they mean they should be ruled be a Palestinian thug like Arafat? That’s not really free!
No, they mean Palistinians should be free to attack Israel and not suffer any consequences.
They mean free of Jews.
From Manhattan to the Sea, Palestine will be free.
Don’t count on the FBI or DHS or any other federal agency to help out. They will be too busy looking for “White Supremacist” and MAGA terrorists
This harkens back to your classic arab global terrorism of the 1970s, when arabs were going nuts and trying to blow airplanes out of the sky all over, shooting up airports wherever they could. This is where the modern conception of “terrorism” really came from.
Of course, nothing will happen to these dirtbags. The aliens among them will not even be deported (though they should – along with anyone related to them) and the Americans in the group will not be tried for treason, though they should.
The absolute worst of humanity is thriving and growing within American society and it is a fatal disease.
Oh, how offended at me some of my larval snowflake friends have been of late, when I mention such things.
Doesn’t this kind of threat call for an all out war on these people? I have been certain for a long time that America is at risk from these arrogant cretions. Israel missed the risk, we have advance warning. It has come sooner than I thought it would.
Yeah, that.
All out, *transparent*, and declared, delegating authority and support to locally controlled armed civil defense. The organic Kibbutz protection teams were spectacularly effective, last month. Start by spinning up similar teams at each place on that map.
While we’re at it declare the goal out loud, and something that satisfies The Powell Doctrine, or The Haig Doctrine Powell mostly cribbed from (since mostly memory holed, it seems.)
It won’t happen, of course. The point of “defense” is opaque slush funds, n loose Authoritah to invoke on anyone inconvenient. Declaring the goal limits what they can do and spend on … and they might fail.
Worse, they’d have to talk about “What’s the goal here?” Citizens safe to do what they will — neither harmed nor afraid; neither compelled nor constrained — is a terribly constraining goal for any Authoritah. Might distract them from banning furnaces.
One of the leaders of “Within Our Lifetime” lives in the UK.
@DaveAtherton20 recently wrote something about the terrorist.
Bill Kristol on twitter:
“The new ‘America First’ Right is steadily overcoming its legacy Reaganite affinity for Israel, and embracing the antisemitism of the old ‘America First’ Right.”
This is the man that ran the Hamilton68 twitter shadow group censorship campaign against innocent Americans. And people still respect him.
Bill Kristol is a self promoting fool. He has never seen a ship he wouldn’t jump for his own benefit.
I guess I am biased in favor of Jews and Israel & MAGA, I do nor see a bias against Jews except by RINOs. Their opinion does not matter and they should be driven from the party.
So, just organizing another 9/11 style attack in plain view? A bold strategy.
These terrorists should be arrested
If they are terrorists’ and they look cross-eyed—not arrested, something more appropriate.
There’s nothing to arrest them for. Despite the hyperbolic rhetoric in the Post article and in the tweets embedded here, there is nothing in the original post that constitutes an actual threat or incitement.
It calls for “direct action”, but that is at worst a “coded call” as Richie Torres calls it; and even outright calls for violence, unless they meet the strict definition of incitement, are mere advocacy and thus protected speech.
A threat must be literally that; “I will kill you” is a threat, but “someone ought to kill you”, or “one day someone is likely to kill you” is not. And even “I will kill you” is only a threat if it’s said in a way that a reasonable person would conclude that the person saying it seriously intends to do it, and is capable of doing so. This doesn’t even come close.
Incitement is only speech that is both (1) intended and (2) likely to (3) immediately cause its audience to commit a crime. It’s not impossible to do that in writing, but it’s very difficult. Again, this doesn’t even come close.
And without an actual crime, they cannot be deported even if they’re not US citizens.
Stipulating that you are correct here, that merely means that the words do not matter, at all. All that matters is if a reasonable person would conclude that the communicative intent is to convey that they will attack and a reasonable person believes that they will.
BS.
Aliens are here only at our pleasure. No alien has any right to be in America. We can throw any alien out at any time for any reason, or even for no reason. It’s our country, not theirs. The Constitution is written for US and only for us.
“Reasonable people” died at the Nova music festival held meters from the border with Hamas.
Respect the threat and act upon it.
The words certainly matter, because without the words there is no threat. In addition to the words, the threat must be one that a reasonable person would understand to be meant seriously and to be capable of being carried out. If there’s any way that a reasonable person would understand it to be hyperbole or to mean something nonviolent that’s the way a court must take it. In this instance all they’re calling for is “action”, which normally means things like demonstrations, which are legal. There’s nothing that can be called a threat.
That is not true AT ALL. The constitution protects every single person who is within the reach of US jurisdiction, whether citizen or alien, and whether here legally or not.
The freedom of speech is universal. It applies to all humans, everywhere in the world, not just in the US, and certainly not just US citizens. Aliens who are outside US jurisdiction have it too, it’s just that the US constitution doesn’t protect them. But the moment they come under US jurisdiction by setting foot in the USA it protects them too. So no, an alien cannot be deported for expressing his view, no matter how vile it is. This is fundamental, bedrock law and there is no dispute about it.
Ok please explain the contrast of your interpretation of 1A protections for aliens with the far different current CT interpretation of 2A protections for aliens using current precedent re aliens. No speculation about what a CT may or may not do in the wake of Bruen.
That is, literally, INSANE.
The Constitution states very clearly in its pre-amble,
“preserve the Blessings of Liberty TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY“.
not “to the whole friggin world”.
Sheesh.
ThePrimordialOrderedPair wrote:
That is, literally, INSANE.
The Constitution states very clearly in its pre-amble,
“preserve the Blessings of Liberty TO OURSELVES AND OUR POSTERITY“.
not “to the whole friggin world”.
Often I hear 2A defenders argue that the bill of rights does not grant us freedom to bear arms, rather, it just documents rights given us by the Creator – “God-given rights”. If that position is applied to the 2A, shouldn’t it also be applied to the 1A? If God given – and the whole world was created by God – then isn’t the right to free speech, et al, global, not just American?
Reply to MrE:
It is not a question of whether you have a certain G-d-given right but whether the United States government has the responsibility to insure that right for you.
The job of the UNited States government is only to act in the interests of the United States and United States citizens. Sure, a Somali has a G-d_given right to free speech but the US government has neither the responsibility nor obligation to protect or defend that right. That is what the Somali’s government is for.
By the same token, no alien has any right to be in America. An alien is here only so long as we allow him to be here. He can have all the G-d-given free speech he wants … in his own country, protected and defended by his own government. We do not have to allow him to stay here. That is not a right of his.
Think of this more in terms of a private property analogy – you have the right to free speech on American territory, but you have no right to free speech on private property of others. If you say something the owner doesn’t like he can throw you off his property. That is not a violation of your G-d-given right to free speech. You have no right to be on his property. That is his G-d-given private property rights, which, I would mention, is the right from which almost all individual liberties emanate. You can go have all the free speech you want on your own property or on public property.
If somebody comes on my property and says “I’m going to kill you”, he’s going to get blown out of his socks unless he gets me first. He has the right to speak freely, but he also has the obligation to deal with the consequences.
“That is, literally, INSANE.
The Constitution states very clearly in its pre-amble…”
Wrong source.
The Declaration of Independence is the philosophy of America, its mission statement. It states quite clearly that ALL MEN are created equal, and they are ALL endowed by their Creator with certain rights. If some other country doesn’t honor its citizens’ freedom of speech or right to a trial, we don’t consider it proper that they have decided not to “give” them those rights, we consider them human rights violators.
The Constitution is the USA’s operating document. It applies only to those people under the jurisdiction of the USA only because we don’t have jurisdiction elsewhere.
Any right that belongs only to citizens (such as the “right to vote”) are artificial rights (not natural rights) that are indeed “given” by a government. (Current government law pretends that the right to keep and bear arms is one of these, although it clearly is not.) For a non-citizen, a visa that allows him to be in the country is most certainly one of those.
So a non-citizen has the “human right” to speak his mind on political issues. The government has the power to revoke a visa “privilege” if his conduct becomes too troublesome. The revocation is not a punishment for the speech, just a possible consequence. (Courts have concluded that the sudden and additional revocation of a human right 40 years ex post facto to a misdemeanor conviction is perfectly proper because it is “not a punishment” — see US v. Emerson — so nothing keeps them from using the same argument for a visa.)
“And without an actual crime, they cannot be deported even if they’re not US citizens.”
It seems that America needs to address stuff which should be illegal.
Hey, Gabby! Gabby Giffords! Pay attention!
This is what actual “targeting your enemies” looks like!
How far back do we go on colonization? 2,000 years? It was Jewish land before the Arabs and Muslims colonized it.
The whole idea that colonization is some terrible crime is stupid and was invented the day before yesterday. It’s a neo-Marxist doctrine that has rushed in to fill the vacuum when genuine religious doctrines were chased out of the public sphere.
But yes, the Jews are the indigenous people of Judaea, and the very name “Palestine” is an imperialist tool of genocide, since Hadrian imposed it with the explicit intention that it would cause the Jews to lose their national identity. It didn’t work. And the people who now claim to be “Palestinians” can’t even pronounce it!
You are correct about the colonization BS.
But that’s no argument. Jews cannot pronounce the word “Jews”, or “Jerusalem”, as there is no “J” phoneme in Hebrew.
It’s all neither here nor there, just an interesting tidbit.
The point about the “Palestinian” label is that it was what Jews born in Israel, during the mandate, used to call be called. Movies like “Exodus” featured that. The arabs glommed onto the “Palestinian” label in 1964 with the creation of the PLO, while Judea and Samaria were under Jordanian rule. Arabs are always stealing other people’s stuff …
Modern Hebrew has the J sound, and there are many words that use it. All Israelis pronounce it easily.
In any event, the English word “Judea” is merely an archaic transliteration of “Yehuda”, so it’s not relevant if a Jew can’t pronounce it. But “Palestine” does not derive from “Filastin”; it’s exactly the opposite. “Filastin” is the result of Arabs trying to transliterate “Palestine” into their language and failing. Which proves that they can’t be real “Palestinians”.
That’s stupid. It’s not part of “modern Hebrew”. It’s a sort of slang. It’s not part of the Hebrew alphabet. And modern Israelis all speak English. So what?
The word “Jew” and “Jerusalem” existed long before the slang letter for “j” was introduced (along with the slang for “ch”, too. Neither are part of Hebrew.
Your babble about the “p” and “f” sound in arabic is stupid. Hebrew has the many of the same issues with “p” and “f”.
“Palestinian … during the mandate,”
The mandate, you say? It would be just cruel to point that out to the folks so full of outragey outrage. Meaner, still to reply to demands for a “Palestinian” homeland with “There is one: it’s called Jordan, these days. Pretty big place.”
Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:
2And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shalt be a blessing:
3And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
Gen 12.3
this is why I support Israel..
they are G_D’s chosen people
and it is only because of Jesus’s
death and resurrection am I allowed to be grafted onto the vine.
Well, if the govt is prevented from stifling them directly, certainly a little nudge-nudge, wink-wink to the “platforms” involved would be in order.
You’d think The Authoritah would be pissed off. “You can’t threaten our people; that’s our job.”