Report: DOJ Issues Subpoenas to Philadelphia DA Krasner
The move comes a month after U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond Jr. requested a federal probe into Krasner and a supervisor over their handling of a murder case.
The Department of Justice has issued subpoenas to Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner’s office, according to Fox News.
The move comes a month after U.S. District Judge Paul S. Diamond Jr. requested a federal probe into Krasner, who was backed by George Soros, and a supervisor over their handling of a murder case.
Diamond said the men might have obstructed justice and possibly committed other crimes:
- False statements
- False declarations made under oath
- Perjury
- Conspiracy
“Finally, I have also found that Mr. Krasner and Stiegler worked together to try to convince the Four to urge the Court to accept a false narrative,” wrote Diamond. “This might amount to criminal conspiracy.”
The issue centers around Krasner’s Conviction Integrity Unit over a case regarding Dennis Johnson wanting to overturn his 2009 second-degree murder conviction.
Diamond disqualified and recommended a criminal investigation into Krasner and Matthew Stiegler, Chief of the DA’s Office’s Conviction Integrity Unit.
Krasner stated he “respectfully and vigorously” disagreed with Diamond’s decision.
MASSIVE: George Soros-backed Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner is officially under federal investigation by the Trump DOJ after grand jury subpoenas were issued to his office, according to Fox News.
The subpoenas were reportedly issued following a September referral… pic.twitter.com/mrf9Uwk9sC
— RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) October 20, 2026
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
More and more I’m coming to appreciate how China handles corrupt officials. They execute them. Very appropriate.
Anyone in government should be held to a higher standard because they are granted so much power over the citizenry. Abuse that power – suffer the consequences which should be greater,
Corruption in the CCP is endemic. The ones who get executed for “corruption” are those who spoke a little too much truth to power, or are just seen as political threats to the current leadership. See Xi’s purges of several senior PLA officers late last year, with “corruption” as the convenient excuse.
I believe her point was that we take the opposite position – persons in position of authority, power, and public trust are rarely held to account personally for their failures, maladministration, or their breaking of their trust. There must be more personal accountability – fines, prison, or (minimally) removal from office or job position. Too often they receive a slap on the wrist, and monetary damages (when they are assessed) are almost always paid by the taxpayer.
Krasner is the worst of the bought and paid for Red Democrat DAs.
I am confused. Why does a DA need a “Conviction Integrity Unit?”
Shouldn’t all their conviction be all about integrity?
It’s to investigate past convictions, and see whether they hold up. There have been times in the past when prosecutors were as lax with the truth as Krasner is, but in the opposite direction. When they lied to convict innocent people, rather than to acquit guilty ones. So it makes sense to have a unit looking into such cases and trying to gain some measure of justice for those who were falsely convicted.
The trouble is that Krasner has been using it for the opposite purpose, to falsely make up irregularities in the convictions of guilty people, so that he can then “settle” with them and consent to overturn their convictions.
So, these review committees, studies, monitoring orgs, etc can be just another bite at spinning the apple.
This is my shocked face.
One wonders: do they become.less corrrupt if the daises ae high enough? More cameras, maybe?
Krasner is a Soros puppet. Soros backs local DA races in order to get his preferred candidate elected. It’s all about putting criminals back on the street to sow chaos across America. Soros and all his entities need to be tossed aside. Soros and his son need to be investigated for instigation of an insurrection. That is exactly what it is. As well as his Secretary of State candidates that go on to put non-citizens on the voter rolls. You can’t hate that part time nazi enough.
This could be great news if it goes anywhere.
It won’t.
I know many people who read this comment will think it is senseless, but I wish to use this article as an example of a recently popular way of writing and speaking that seems to ignore the centuries-long rules of language that allow people to communicate clearly with each other. When Ms Chastain writes “Dennis Johnson wanting”, why does she omit the “‘s” after “Dennis Johnson”? Whose “wanting” is she referring to? It is his, Dennis Johnson’s, wanting. So, on the next occasion, Ms Chastain, please write “Dennis Johnson’s wanting”.
Leave a Comment