Image 01 Image 03

Washington Post Discovers Illegal Immigrants Don’t Need Criminal Records for Deportation

Washington Post Discovers Illegal Immigrants Don’t Need Criminal Records for Deportation

“There is pressure on ICE to arrest more people and that leads them to stop trying to go after the worst of the worst and arrest the person who is easiest to locate on any given day.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xEikmxEdI-w

The Washington Post was incensed to learn that nearly 40% of the illegal aliens detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement since President Donald Trump returned to office have no criminal records.

Moreover, the outlet’s analysis of data obtained and published by the Deportation Data Project found that the share of ICE detainees without criminal records has been steadily increasing. In July alone, more than half of those arrested by ICE had no criminal histories.

For an administration that vowed to pursue the “worst of the worst” — illegal aliens who had committed the most heinous crimes — the Post portrayed these numbers as evidence of a disturbing new low.

According to the Post, the trend comes as ICE works to meet enforcement targets set by the Trump administration.

As Julia Gelatt, an analyst at the Migration Policy Institute, sees it:

There is pressure on ICE to arrest more people and that leads them to stop trying to go after the worst of the worst and arrest the person who is easiest to locate on any given day. When Americans think of who they’d like to see ICE focus on, they think bad guys — murders and others serious criminals. They do not think about people who broke immigration laws and are otherwise law-abiding.

Additionally, the article emphasizes that many detainees “entered the country legally, for example, on a visa that has since expired.” Because overstaying a visa is a civil immigration violation rather than a criminal offense, the authors take particular issue with ICE’s increasing focus on apprehending visa overstayers.

This article is problematic on several levels. Most importantly, those who enter the U.S. illegally have already violated federal immigration law and are subject to arrest and detention by ICE. Unless and until Congress changes those laws, the Department of Homeland Security has the duty to enforce them.

As Fox News’ Bill Melugin noted on X:

Crossing the border illegally is a federal crime via 8 USC 1325.

Overstaying a visa is a civil offense.

Being unlawfully present in the U.S. is a civil offense.

But none of these semantics matter, because any of the above can result in ICE detention.

There is no requirement under US law that an alien must have a criminal record before being detained by ICE. There never has been.

ICE also does not need a judicial warrant to make arrests. (Unless they’re entering private property like a home).

All they need is reasonable suspicion that an alien is unlawfully present in the country.

Bottom line, all aliens who violate US immigration law are subject to ICE arrest and detention. This is how the law has been for decades.

Second, the Biden administration chose to ignore these laws, allowing millions of illegal and unvetted immigrants to cross our open border. Now that they’re here, Democrats have gone to extraordinary lengths to keep them here. In their view, they should not only be allowed to stay, but because America is a compassionate nation, U.S. taxpayers should be expected to provide them with food, shelter, medical care, even education — and, ultimately, a path to citizenship.

Deporting such a vast number of people was never going to be easy, nor was it ever going to be bloodless in political terms. But for the good of the nation — and the preservation of constitutional order — the Trump administration must press forward without apology or retreat. A nation unwilling to enforce its immigration laws will inevitably forfeit its sovereignty.

Third, the flip side of these numbers — that more than 60% of ICE detainees do have criminal records — is far more concerning. Until ICE took them into custody, hundreds of thousands of criminal aliens were roaming freely in communities across the country, posing a very real threat to public safety.

Finally, the Post ignores the fact that most other nations routinely detain and deport illegal aliens. Japan, for instance, treats illegal immigration as a serious criminal offense. Its government actively enforces the “Zero Illegal Residents Plan, an aggressive government package launched to eliminate undocumented residency entirely.”

According to British media outlet GB News, Australia has implemented very strict laws for undocumented migrants and asylum seekers. Under policies like “Operation Sovereign Borders,” the country enforces mandatory immigration detention, turns back unauthorized boats at sea, and utilizes offshore processing facilities rather than allowing unvetted arrivals to settle on the mainland.

Try crossing North Korea’s border without authorization, and you might get shot.

At the other end of the spectrum, years of unchecked immigration — the very approach the Post would have America emulate — have transformed the U.K., Germany, and much of Europe. Those nations are now reaping the unintended consequences of what they have sown.

Ultimately, the Post’s outrage rests on a false premise: that immigration enforcement is justified only when the person being removed has committed some additional crime. It is not. Immigration laws are laws, and a government that selectively enforces them based on political pressure or public sympathy undermines the rule of law itself. The Trump administration was elected in large part to restore order after four years of unprecedented open borders. It should not be shamed into abandoning that mandate simply because enforcing the law is difficult, unpleasant, or politically controversial.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“When Americans think of who they’d like to see ICE focus on …They do not think about people who broke immigration laws and are otherwise law-abiding.”

Speak for yourself!


     
     0 
     
     18
    fscarn in reply to irv. | September 1, 2026 at 6:14 pm

    “have no criminal records”

    The instant they entered without authority they became a criminal.

    I have the same attitude towards the illegals as I do towards the UN

    GET ‘EM OUTTA HERE!

    https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTyzIYI1jZu6b-SLJqjv0fLYy-_qfRKPBxrrXcJZU8LKA&s=10

    Those Birchers have been so right on so many issues.


     
     0 
     
     13
    CommoChief in reply to irv. | September 1, 2026 at 7:35 pm

    Focus on illegal aliens with additional crimes FIRST? Sure.

    The problem with WAPA and other goofy amnesty advocates is that they refuse to focus their ire about this 40% without additional crimes and why most of them are getting scooped up by ICE. SANCTUARY policies in blue jurisdictions. If ICE could go into local jails and State prisons after being telephoned by local/State LEO that ‘we got this illegal y’all got a detainer for down here, when do y’all think you’ll pick them up here in our nice safe secure facility’?

    Do that and less ICE roaming the streets and going to homes/businesses to find the ONE guy they want but discovering several more illegal aliens present at arrest. Don’t expect to see the goofy amnesty advocates and other bleeding hearts to admit that the Sanctuary policies they champion are doing more to boost the arrest and removal of illegal aliens than any other factor.

    Once we find/remove the so called ‘criminal illegals’ (which is a bogus term of art) then we’re gonna go get the reminder. Every last one must go. That’s how its gotta be. Anything less is an unsanctioned, backdoor amnesty. Frankly I’d like to see far more workplace inspections and jamming up employers of illegal aliens who’ve been undercutting their honest, law abiding competition who plays by the rules but may not be able to compete with lower wages paid to illegal aliens.


       
       0 
       
       11
      Sanddog in reply to CommoChief. | September 1, 2026 at 11:16 pm

      But if you happen to run across illegal aliens who don’t have criminal warrants, that’s not a get out of deportation free card. If you don’t want to get swept up, go back home. If you’re strutting around like you have a right to be here, they’re going to find you eventually.


         
         0 
         
         4
        CommoChief in reply to Sanddog. | September 2, 2026 at 9:24 am

        Oh absolutely. Whenever ICE is looking for Joe and finds him but also discovers illegal aliens Bill and Bob then all three gotta go home. Nobody gets a pass once discovered. No amnesty, no willful blindness. Especially important to jam up the employers and others who assist/facilitate or otherwise unlawfully enable illegal aliens to remain in the USA.

        Every illegal alien should be in a perpetual state of fear of being discovered, reported to ICE, detained and deported. Every interaction with any gov’t agency (or entity that receives govt funding) at every level should strike fear in them from a traffic stop to registering their kid for school or signing in at a hospital.


     
     0 
     
     4
    Spike3 in reply to irv. | September 1, 2026 at 8:51 pm

    F the WaPoo. Get them all out. Order of expulsion is irrelevant.


     
     0 
     
     8
    henrybowman in reply to irv. | September 1, 2026 at 10:34 pm

    That was my #1 red flag in this article.
    The Washington Post is now telling me what I think. How white of them.


 
 0 
 
 7
ztakddot | September 1, 2026 at 5:45 pm

Yeah so. Who cares WP twats. Cry more. They are here illegally now. That’s all that matters. Kick their illegal asses out permanently.

Q: If I manage to sneak over the fence I’m home free?

A: Not really.


 
 0 
 
 14
irishgladiator63 | September 1, 2026 at 5:57 pm

You would have thought the “illegal” part of “illegal alien” would have tipped off the Washington Post.


     
     0 
     
     7
    CommoChief in reply to irishgladiator63. | September 1, 2026 at 7:46 pm

    As Sonny Bono stated when asked what he thought about illegal immigration ‘well, it’s illegal’. When a long deceased Sony Bono displays a better fundamental grasp of the essential aspects of the topic than the chattering class at the WAPO …it’s time for some serious self reflection by the chattering class. Bezos should definitely consider putting in a MAGA oriented/adjacent ombudsmen in place to review/approve prior to publication to stop the Cray Cray.


 
 0 
 
 13
tiger66 | September 1, 2026 at 5:58 pm

Do not forget, boys and girls, that a large percentage (probably a majority) of the illegals are getting some kind of direct or indirect government assistance … which they are NOT entitled to.

Just sayin’


     
     0 
     
     2
    Rufus in reply to tiger66. | September 2, 2026 at 8:48 am

    And….many work under the table for cash, so they are NOT paying income, disability and work comp taxes like the rest of us. So they are technically stealing.

No doubt the WaPo is crying that Milo Yiannopoulos was deported and yearns for him to come back.


 
 0 
 
 15
DaveGinOly | September 1, 2026 at 6:08 pm

This is not how I remember events. I remember the administration saying it would “first go after illegal aliens with criminal histories,” not that they would exclusively deport same. The media chose to reframe this so that they could complain as the administration turned towards the “innocent” illegals. But this charade is disingenuous because the media complained also about the arrest of the criminals. The fact is they didn’t want the administration to enforce the law at all.


 
 0 
 
 13
janitor | September 1, 2026 at 6:44 pm

Excellent article. Two additional points:
.
(1) If “sanctuary” jurisdictions turned over arrested illegal aliens, the percentage of “criminal” deportees would go up,
.
(2) We do not have anywhere close to complete information on “criminal records” in foreign countries, let alone activities that would be crimes in the U.S. but would not have been prosecuted in the foreign country.


 
 0 
 
 7
2smartforlibs | September 1, 2026 at 7:15 pm

Deportables enter the country violating title 8. That my friends is the law of the land.


 
 0 
 
 8
Ironclaw | September 1, 2026 at 7:31 pm

A distinction without a difference, they’re all criminals. They all need to go. I Don’t Care What order they go in


 
 0 
 
 3
BierceAmbrose | September 1, 2026 at 8:27 pm

Apparently Amazon needs cheap delivery dribers.


 
 0 
 
 9
Aarradin | September 1, 2026 at 9:30 pm

Translation: ICE has arrested 500,000 illegal aliens and 300,000 of them had criminal records for violent felonies.

Tell me again how illegal aliens supposedly commit fewer crimes than US citizens.

500 ppp down
45,000,000 to go

It’s very simple: Get your illegal ass out of my country. Young, old, been here an hour, been here 50 years. Out. Go.

The WaPo is in essence suggesting that we arrest burglars and leave the petty thieves alone.

How did otherwise educated people become so dumb?


 
 0 
 
 3
Direwolf | September 2, 2026 at 9:06 am

The “no criminal record” canard simply means the illegal alien has not yet been arrested and prosecuted for entering the U.S. illegally, and only accounts for crimes on our soil, not crimes committed in their countries of origin. Like all leftist duck-speak, it’s meaningless in the legal context of immigration enforcement.

I am going to pose an inconvenient question.

Over the last couple of days, we’ve heard the allegations of a whistleblower that Letitia James in New York has been diverting resources from pursuing and prosecuting serious criminals in order to concentrate digging up dirt regarding President Trump and anyone whom she considers an ally of President Trump. Leaving aside whether the allegations are true or are as extensive as seem to be asserted, the rejoinder is, or will be, “Well, if they’ve committed crimes then the state is perfectly justified in going after them.” A lot of us naturally recoil from that and say, “Not at the expense of stuff that by any rational measure has to be a higher priority.”

Well, now move it to the illegal immigrant context. Suppose that you have a nanny or housekeeper who has been with your family for quite a few years, and one day ICE turns up at your door to arrest her and deport her because she’s actually here illegally. Intellectually, you probably would concede that ICE has every right to do that and on one plane even from a policy and political standpoint you would agree that it is the correct outcome, but you almost certainly would feel viscerally that somebody at ICE has made a very bad choice to prioritize the low-hanging fruit of people who have been here, yes, illegally, for a long time but have contributed in at least some way the benefit of our society, over getting more people like the Maryland gang-banger out of the country and maybe sending Senator Van Hole-in-the-Head with him.

I think that if we are being honest to ourselves, there really are three categories here that should be treated differently but are not treated differently under the laws as they exist. Really bad people: get them out no matter how long they have been here, no matter what family or social roots or connections they have, no matter that they have no connections with the country to which they are being deported. I.e., it’s a more convenient way of getting them off the street than trying them for the crimes. Individuals who snuck in or overstayed tourist visas and may be becoming a burden on public resources, but are not guilty of any other infraction even as serious as jaywalking: also out, but not at the expense of diverting resources from catching and deporting the first category, and with some discretionary consideration for whether that would leave children who are US citizens here unsupervised. Individuals who are supporting themselves by doing the kind of work that it is difficult to find US citizens willing to do at a reasonable price, whether that involves cleaning, child care or seasonal labor: there’s a good political case to be made that as long as they are not taking jobs that citizens would otherwise do, it is reasonable to overlook their presence, at least in the case of those who have formed family or social ties and as long as a citizen is prepared to “sponsor” them.


     
     0 
     
     1
    DaveGinOly in reply to RRRR. | September 2, 2026 at 1:09 pm

    Your question has already been answered. Entering the country without permission is a crime. Persons known to have done this are criminals. The law requires that they be turned out of the country. Congress has allocated funds to enforce their legislation. End of story.

    If there are economic factors to consider, Congress should have attended to those factors when it wrote the legislation, or, having considered those factors, it dismissed them.

    FYI, you fail to note the distortions to our economy that are caused by the presence of large numbers of illegal aliens and you ignored the real economic impact those aliens have on both citizens and aliens here legally.


     
     0 
     
     0
    CommoChief in reply to RRRR. | September 2, 2026 at 9:29 pm

    Heck no. Every illegal alien must go. No backdoor amnesty.

    Ima provide some uncomfortable perspective; the Trump 2.0 deportation effort is for many of us far too lenient. We are frankly disgusted with the slow pace of removals and find it far to indulgent of wokiesta feelings.

    What comes AFTER this phase, which is the nice/good cop phase, is gonna be very draconian. It’s gonna look like the famous photos of the raid to retrieve Elian Gonzalez with fully kitted out agents busting down doors with submachine guns in kinetic operations everywhere. No safe zones, zero tolerance, arrests any and everywhere no matter where or what the circumstances.

    Some illegal is thought to be at his kid’s soccer game at the elementary school? Great, send a dozen agents to sort it out and find him. Some illegal alien visiting his also illegal Mom in the cancer ward at the hospital? Cool, its a twofer send them both home. Some Teacher, Nurse or DR decides to be a lefty martyr and intervene to prevent the detention? Oh well they can have fun in Federal detention …assuming of course they didn’t suffer catastrophic injury at the hands of the agents on scene and got their head kicked in while being subdued.

    The bottom line here that many of us demand is that the goal is zero illegal aliens living in the USA. Period. How that goal is achieved is far less important than reaching it. If y’all don’t want to see tactics that some may find ‘excessive’ then please do everything in your power to prevent the employment tactics that would make Pinochet blush from becoming necessary to accomplish the goal of zero illegal aliens living in the USA.


     
     0 
     
     0
    jstrm in reply to RRRR. | September 5, 2026 at 5:16 pm

    Regarding illegal aliens with USA born children; that alien has choices 1. Take your kids with you.
    2. Leave the kids with a friend or relative who is a USA citizen or Legal Permanent Resident. Or
    3.. Allow children’s services to take them and place them in foster care or placed for adoption.
    These are the same option that a USA-citizen, who is arrested, convicted or sent to prison and who has USA citizen children.. should the illegal alien have greater privileges than USA CITIZENS? Same should apply to so called “dreamers” illegal aliens who entered the USA illegally as a child. Do we know who or where they are? They are still here illegally. They were abandoned by their parents. Do they get special privileges USA Citizen do not. At age 18?they should be subject to deportation or to apply for LPR Status. If under 18 they have the option of reuniting with parents in home country subject to dna testing to verify relationships. If parents can not be identified and located, those children are subject to foster care or adoption by citizens or LPRs. USA citizen/tax payers are still stuck supporting them until age 18 or older. I’m 1st generation of legal immigrants. They were required to have an immigrant visa. Pass a medical exam and have a financial sponsorship. No government benefits were provided. My grandmother was sent back because she was diagnosed with “pink eye”, a contagious virus. Joe Biden’s illegal aliens did not have to meet any of these requirements, becoming a burden on the state. But I do have a serious gripe with the USA Department of Justice for failing to enforce federal law related to deported aliens. If they return after deportation the first time, they are subject to criminal prosecution and upon conviction, up to five years in prison. I believe a second offense upon conviction it is up to 10 years in prison. If that law was enforced, it would discourage at least some illegal entries and probably incarcerate some criminal aliens before they can commit more crimes in the USA. ICE needs to also target employers of illegal aliens. If potential employment is removed, additional illegal entry will be discouraged.

My last job was working in the federal court system in the District of Oregon. I watched an illegal alien plead guilty to re-entering the country illegally. During the sentencing the judge asked the prosecutor for the illegals prior criminal history. That illegal had entered our country 12 times in the past. This was in 2019. Consider the taxpayers cost to arrest and deport this one individual illegal. Madness.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.