Ex-Judge Hannah Dugan Avoids Prison for Helping Illegal Alien Evade ICE
Judge: “It’s a marked deviation from an otherwise law-abiding life.”
Former Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan won’t face any prison time for her conviction of obstructing federal immigration officials.
In April 2025, the FBI arrested Dugan after video caught her directing agents away from a suspect, an illegal alien, whom they wanted to arrest. Her help allowed him to evade arrest temporarily.
A jury convicted Dugan in December 2025.
At today’s sentencing, U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman imposed a $5,000 fine on Dugan.
“I think this is a situation where an otherwise good person, upset by immigration policies in this country, made a bad decision in the moment,” Adelman said, according to The Associated Press.
“This is a person who has done a lot of good for our community,” added Adelman.
Prosecutors pushed for a serious sentence, telling the court, “the average sentence for obstruction cases is 16 months.” The crime “calls for 15 to 21 months behind bars.”
Adelman didn’t think Dugan deserved prison time:
Adelman then spoke, saying he doesn’t believe prison is necessary. He noted that Dugan lost her job, now has a felony conviction and experienced threats that forced her to move and stop attending community events.
“This is a few minutes of conduct for someone who has dedicated her life to public service,” the judge said. “It’s a marked deviation from an otherwise law-abiding life.”
He also noted that Dugan’s actions didn’t stop the ICE agents from arresting the defendant outside the courthouse.
Dugan said:
“My acts that day were consistent with the expressed administrative and community concerns for our state courthouse. My judicial acts were not done with any malicious intent,” Dugan said.
She also told the court: “I’ve been cast as both a scofflaw and a hero. I am neither. I am a public servant who was just trying to do my job.”
Dugan said that during her nine years as a judge, she tried to uphold justice, the law and the Constitution while maintaining decorum and safety in her courtroom.
“For nine years as a judge I have strived to do my best to uphold justice, to uphold our laws and constitution, to have a courtroom of decorum and safety,” Dugan said. “I worked hard to uphold these duties every day and I had those same intentions on that day.”
Yeah, okay.
[Featured image via YouTube]
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Why have laws at all??
The communists are destroying the judiciary just like they do everything else. Dugan showed zero remorse about what she did, yet skates with a 5K fine. Professional athletes get 5 times that amount for unsportsmanlike conduct.
She’ll be rewarded with a tenured position at a law school or non-profit next.
Another terminally liberal white female professional that puts precious nons over law abiding American citizens. How many of us has she thrown the book at? How many may she still?
Professor, do laws and guilty verdicts apply only to certain people, like Republicans? Is it now safe to conclude that judges are actually above the law?
I wonder how many police officers got ““This is a few minutes of conduct for someone who has dedicated her life to public service,” the judge said. “It’s a marked deviation from an otherwise law-abiding life.”” from a judge?
It’s a good thing that she’s not longer a judge.
Both of these government employees (Ms. Dugan, the former judge, and Ms. Aldeman, a current judge), appear to believe that their opinions are more important than the law.
“She was a judge with the correct political beliefs, so she gets a lessor punishment” is not consistent with American principles.
An Officer of the Court should not be treated more lenient and excused for crimes that would land the rest of the population in jail.
Britian isn’t the only country at risk of a multi-tier legal system.
How far are we from vigilantism … and how hard is it going to be to stop it once it starts
The trial judge in this case was appointed by Clinton and is in her late 80″s (born in 1939.)
She was in the Wisconsin senate for 20 years.
Trial judge is just taking care a fellow party member.
That’s “his”, “he”.
The Judiciary protecting their own as fellow members flout not just the will of the people but the rule of law combined with Judges more supportive of ideological, emotion based arguments than legal precedent is fast eroding confidence in/respect for the Judiciary at all levels. When the day comes that ordinary Citizens and Executive Branch officials alike choose to become as cavalier towards Judicial ‘orders’ as many believe the Judiciary is towards the will of the People …no whining, no pearl clutching sermons, no rending of garments. Sooner or later the casual arrogance of the Judiciary is gonna get reflected back if they don’t swiftly develop some humility and appreciate that their ‘orders’ depend on the willingness of the public to accept them instead rejecting them.
The judiciary is supposed to be held to a higher standard. But professional political courtesy was extended. In the long run, doing what she did is now the gold standard for all such offences penalty wise. Her sacrifice was not in vain.
A travesty. A sitting judge commits a felony inside a courthouse, but who cares? What a great example of how the legal system should not work. Justice requires, at minimum, loss of her law license. Even a small sentence of 10 days would have been appropriate, though 30 days seems more right.
“It’s a marked deviation from someone who had a duty to know better, and who, while occupying a position of public trust, violated the public’s trust.”
There. Fixed it for the trial judge.
Thanks for the tip. Next time I am facing a prison sentence, I will help an illegal alien escape.
A judge giving another judge that breaks the law a pass is indicative of the rot in leadership. If judges demand respect then examples should be made to foster that respect.
“the average sentence for obstruction cases is 16 months.” The crime “calls for 15 to 21 months behind bars.”
Except when it’s (D)ifferent.
This is the type of person of whom an example should be made – someone with a duty and a responsibility to know the law, and who failed in that duty by abusing the public’s trust. It would have sent the message, “See, even judges will get clobbered.” But no, the unwashed masses, with no duty other than having (a generally untutored) respect for the law, are the ones who get hung out to dry. This is precisely the opposite of the way it should work. Persons in offices of public trust (and on the public teat) should know that they risk being punished to the fullest extent of the law when they act in direct contravention to it, while having obligations that dictate their behavior should be above reproach.
Still waiting for any Democrat to suffer consequences.
If i rob a bank, can i get a similar punishment? I mean, it would be.. how did the judge put it? Oh, yeah, “It’s a marked deviation from an otherwise law-abiding life.”
After being completely shocked over his previously makes-sense rulings, lefty judge Adelman finally comes through, flying his well known colors.
In his handling of the trial, he knew he would be able to help Dugan with a last-minute el foldo.
Leave a Comment