Swiss Voters Say No to Population Cap Despite Growing Concerns Over Mass Immigration
Swiss citizen replying to Ursula von der Leyen’s trite remarks: “F*** off you old goblin, the Swiss don’t like you! We don’t want to be part of your EU Mafia.”
On Sunday, Swiss voters rejected a proposal to cap population in the Alpine nation at 10 million until 2050. Its current population is 9.1 million.
The final results showed that 45.21% of voters supported the measure while 54.79% were opposed. Turnout for the referendum, “No to a 10 million Switzerland!,” was 58.86%.
The Guardian reported that “Switzerland’s population has grown far faster than that of surrounding EU states, rising by 23% since the free movement agreement came into effect in 2002.”
The proposal was introduced by the right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP), and “aim[ed] to limit the permanent-resident population, which includes both foreign nationals and Swiss citizens, to below 10 million,” according to The Wall Street Journal.
Switzerland, final results:
No to Switzerland of 10 Million (Initiative)
Support: 45.21%
Oppose: 54.79%Turnout: 58.86%
NB: This vote also requires double-majority (People & Cantons (Regions)) to pass.
➤ https://t.co/bwwWi5iFIX#CHvote #Abst26 #Votazioni #Votaziuns pic.twitter.com/eo9rQgOtSt
— Europe Elects (@EuropeElects) June 14, 2026
The Journal reported:
Since 2000, the number of foreign-born residents has jumped from around one in five to one in three — the second-highest level among rich countries next to tiny Luxembourg, and compared with one in six in the U.S. That represents an enormous demographic shift for a small, mountainous country.
If the measure had passed, the government would have been forced to act once the population reached 9.5 million. It would necessarily have had to “to restrict family reunifications for resident immigrants and new asylum claims.” The Journal noted that if the population reached 10 million, “Bern would be constitutionally required to tear up its free-movement agreement with the European Union, risking access to a market that absorbs over half of Swiss exports.”
That the referendum made it to the ballot and garnered such significant support reflects the growing concern over mass migration in the Central European nation, a concern increasingly shared by voters worldwide.
Naturally, members of the global elite, which have championed mass migration, were delighted by the outcome. European Commission President and Angela Merkel protégé Ursula von der Leyen noted on X, “The Swiss people have spoken. The EU and Switzerland share deep ties and a strong partnership. We will continue working together to modernise and deepen our cooperation, for the benefit of our citizens and businesses.”
Good discussion with @ParmelinG.
We take note of the outcome of today’s vote in Switzerland.
The Swiss people have spoken.
The EU and Switzerland share deep ties and a strong partnership.
We will continue working together to modernise and deepen our cooperation, for the…
— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) June 14, 2026
Replying to von der Leyen, one X user pointed out that nearly half of voters supported the initiative. He advised, “Perhaps Brussels should listen more carefully instead of acting as if the debate is settled. Ignoring these voices is what has fueled growing support for change across Europe.”
Another user was far more direct:
Fuck off you old goblin, the swiss don’t like you ! We don’t want to be part of your EU Mafia.
— Dr. Sweets🇨🇭🇮🇱 (@streetmgkgva) June 14, 2026
Over the past two decades, unchecked mass migration in Europe has caused many problems. In addition to housing shortages and rising prices, the influx of migrants, most of whom are unskilled, has placed a heavy burden on both local and national governments as they’ve struggled to accommodate their financial, medical, and even educational needs.
For many Europeans, the overriding concern is public safety. The flood of largely unvetted migrants has been accompanied by a rise in serious crime. The alleged attempted beheading of a local man in Belfast last week by a Sudanese migrant brought those fears into sharp focus last week. The shocking nature of the attack proved to be a bridge too far for many residents, triggering a series of violent protests.
The referendum may have failed, but the underlying issue is not going away. When more than 45% of Swiss voters support a constitutional measure to curb population growth, it is a sign that concerns about immigration have moved well beyond the political margins. From housing shortages and strained public services to rising crime and social tensions, many Europeans believe their leaders have been unwilling to acknowledge the costs of mass migration. Sunday’s vote may have preserved the status quo for now, but it also served as a reminder that the debate is far from settled.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
I understand it. Curbing migration is necessary as are deportations. A population cap implies drastic measures that the Swedes, and others I suspect, aren’t ready accept.
And besides, we all know who would be the first to go under this population cap. Canada is already paving the way with unprecedented use of euthanasia for people with seasonal depression and other minor ailments. Even if they reached the “final solution,” why would these globalist shrews use it on the invading population instead of the “entitled” natives?
In all, I think it was a smart move. But this problem needs an actionable solution to preserve Swedes, not give the government the authority to kill them
*Swiss
Moronic. Add the Swiss to the Euro’s that have lost their ever F’g mind.
Just say no to Muslims. Of course they couldn’t phrase the referendum like that. Pity.
This.
Wouldn’t dare let the voters “limit immigrants” so they voted to “limit families” and then declared victory when it failed.
The Euros (and not just them) seem unwilling to learn from their own, relatively recent history with Muslim invaders.
Leave a Comment