Image 01 Image 03

J.D. Vance Announces Suspension of $1.3 Billion in Medicaid Payments to California

J.D. Vance Announces Suspension of $1.3 Billion in Medicaid Payments to California

There will also be a nationwide six-month moratorium on all new Medicare enrollments by providers of hospice and home care.

Vice President J.D. Vance certainly has been busy as America’s “Fraud Czar.”

Medicaid fraud in California is rampant, and as my colleague Mary Chastain noted in March, Vance’s anti-fraud task force suspended 70 hospice and home health care businesses in Los Angeles.

The move came shortly after investigations by CBS News and Nick Shirley revealed a fraud scheme in California involving hospices.

Vance’s task has then suspended over 400 more.

Now the Vice President has announced on Wednesday that the Trump administration is withholding $1.3 billion in Medicaid payments to California and is threatening to suspend federal funding to all states if they don’t aggressively prosecute fraud in their Medicaid programs.

“There are California taxpayers and American taxpayers who are being defrauded because California isn’t taking its program seriously, but also you have people who have been prescribed medications that they don’t even need. They’ve had drugs put into their bodies that they don’t need because fraudsters have actually encouraged false prescriptions and false administration of medications,” Vance said at the White House.

The move is similar to the one the administration took in February suspending Medicaid payments to Minnesota.

Vance said that the administration is also notifying all 50 states that it could freeze funding to their Medicaid Fraud Control Units “if they do not aggressively prosecute Medicaid fraud.” The units, which exist in each state, investigate and prosecute Medicaid provider fraud. “We are going to turn off the money that goes to these anti-fraud units,” he said, if they fail to do their job.

Dr. Mehmet Oz, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, reviewed his shocking discovery regarding hospices in the state.

Oz called out what he said was widespread fraud in hospice services and similar in-home care programs nationally — and particularly in the Los Angeles region — and announced a six-month moratorium on new Medicare enrollment for hospices and home health agencies.

“A third of all these programs in the entire country are in Los Angeles. Ask yourself, how is that possible? It’s not,” Oz said. “They’re not that many people dying in Los Angeles. We’re not talking about California, just Los Angeles.”

He said he and others in the administration determined that “at least half of the hospices, in the entire area around Los Angeles, are fraudulent,” and had shut down 800 of them that last year had “charged the federal taxpayer $1.4 billion,” which “will no longer be paid.” That is a major increase from the 450 providers the administration said it had suspended as of last month.

As an especially important reminder, my colleague Mary Chastain noted that California Gov. Gavin Newsom knew about the scale of the fraud for years. House Oversight Committee Republicans shared their findings about Newsom’s administration.

Your administration has been aware of credible reports of hospice fraud for at least four years. According to a March 29, 2022 report from the California State Auditor, Los Angeles County, the state’s most populous county, has experienced a 1,500 percent increase in registered hospice providers since 2010.5

This increase, which totals more than 2,800 providers in the State, is more than six times the national average of hospice agencies relative to Los Angeles County’s senior population. This is greater than the number of hospice providers in 36 states combined and 33 times greater than the entire state of Florida.

Additionally, Oz’s agency announced a nationwide six-month moratorium on all new Medicare enrollments by hospice and home care providers.

“Today we’re shutting the door on fraud — preventing new bad actors from entering Medicare while we aggressively identify, investigate, and remove those already exploiting them,” he said in a statement.

Existing hospice and home health care providers will continue to operate as usual. But CMS said it will “intensify targeted investigations, deploy advanced data analytics, and accelerate the removal” of providers in the category that are suspected of fraudulent activity.

Such a freeze is not unprecedented, said Tricia Neumann, a senior vice president and executive director for the program on Medicare policy at the health care research nonprofit KFF. She said President Bill Clinton’s Democratic administration also imposed a temporary moratorium on home health agencies.

The scale of California’s Medicaid and hospice fraud is no longer a “policy concern” but a full-blown indictment of years of political indifference, and the aggressive response led by Vance and backed by Oz signals that the era of looking the other way is over.

When a single metropolitan area can host a third of the nation’s hospice providers, many of which are allegedly fraudulent, it’s an epic failure of governance.

By shutting off the federal funding spigot that has been flooding California and other states, Vance is forcing a long-overdue reckoning. If state leaders won’t police their own programs, the current administration in Washington clearly will.

Hopefully, taxpayers will begin to see that accountability is more than just a campaign slogan….just in time for the midterms.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 5
gonzotx | May 14, 2026 at 1:50 pm

Or is in all 50 states

I’m so tired of hearing Medicare needs more funding because it will go bankrupt by 2030

November Medicare will go bankrupt because of fraud


     
     0 
     
     0
    ztakddot in reply to gonzotx. | May 14, 2026 at 3:27 pm

    This is Medicaid not Medicare. They’re different.


       
       0 
       
       0
      diver64 in reply to ztakddot. | May 15, 2026 at 5:52 am

      Oz’s agency announced a nationwide six-month moratorium on all new Medicare enrollments by hospice and home care providers.

      The story mentions problems in both programs.


     
     0 
     
     0
    CommoChief in reply to gonzotx. | May 14, 2026 at 3:37 pm

    So you’re a no on new/additional funding for Medicare trust fund to stave off the roughly 10-12% shortfall in Part A coverage? Part B (physician services) and D (Rx) are both funded from a combo of general revenue and premiums and part C plans are opt in advantage plans paid by beneficiaries so the depletion of the Medicare trust fund really only hits Part A when it occurs in 2033.


     
     0 
     
     0
    destroycommunism in reply to gonzotx. | May 14, 2026 at 4:01 pm

    correct

    the government programs promote the fraudster b/c they all know that its a major industry that employees government people which of course jsut gies another layer of deception under the guise of “help” and sympathy”

    where are the donors to the politicians and why are they not giving directly totake care of the people they claim they want to help?


 
 0 
 
 3
MarkS | May 14, 2026 at 2:42 pm

That will last until some Federal judge says he can’t,…or about a day

I’ve been on this train for a while now: The federal government should not be in the business of funding health care. Full stop.

How much of the astronomical bankrupting costs of health care are the result of all this seemingly bottomless cesspool of rampant fraud? Or government grotesquely distorting markets with mandates, ‘oversite’, and if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?

The federal government should not be in the business of funding health care. Full stop.

And, apparently, it shouldn’t be in the business of regulating health care because it suxx at that, too!


     
     1 
     
     3
    ztakddot in reply to LB1901. | May 14, 2026 at 3:30 pm

    I don’t know how old you are but I was against Medicare and SS for much of my life much to the chagrin of my father. I changed my view when I was old enough to collect after being forced to pay in for most of my entire life. Frankly I paid and now I want what I was promised.


       
       0 
       
       0
      CommoChief in reply to ztakddot. | May 14, 2026 at 3:52 pm

      To be very clear, nothing was promised to you in any binding manner and SCOTUS has held that repeatedly. Are both SSA retirement and Medicare ‘bum deals’? Yes. Did we have a choice? Kinda yes but mostly no…..we could have found employment with one of the several jurisdictions that rejected inclusion under Social Security but that is a bit impractical. We’re all stuck with crappy systems and in 2033 the SSA retirement system will have paid out every dollar it has ever received. From then current SSA tax revenue is projected to cover about 75% ish of benefits…. so a roughly 25% ish cut is coming, fair or unfair its coming. Likewise the Medicare trust fund runs dry in ’33 and Part A coverage will be reduced by 10-12%. Like it or lump it. If we wanted to avoid those we should have agreed to reforms in the early ’00s to spread the pain among generational cohorts and especially between the then current beneficiaries and the working age/tax paying population ….but the opposition of AARP among others derailed those efforts and we’re stuck with a significant haircut.


         
         0 
         
         2
        henrybowman in reply to CommoChief. | May 14, 2026 at 4:09 pm

        AARP, for those who don’t know, is for all intents and purposes an arm of the Democrat Party. They get all the memos, and obediently parrot all the talking points.
        AMAC, the “conservative alternative,” is equally an arm of the Republican Party. (It shows up frequently in my “send WinRed your money” stream of text spam, which is now approaching 75-100 messages every day, making my text service entirely unusable for my own business use).


         
         0 
         
         1
        ztakddot in reply to CommoChief. | May 14, 2026 at 8:53 pm

        Congressman and Senators are cowards which is why it was never reformed.


       
       0 
       
       1
      destroycommunism in reply to ztakddot. | May 14, 2026 at 4:04 pm

      thats exactly how they want it

      the principles remain the same

      gives us our own money back and we will invest it etc etc

      they want us to be reliant on them….

      I was against it but now Im for it..

      no,, you are for being treated like an adult and not have another member of society take away from you

      military
      courts
      treasury

      thats it for government


       
       0 
       
       1
      Olinser in reply to ztakddot. | May 14, 2026 at 4:34 pm

      My opinion on SS has not changed.

      It is a horrifically terrible, poorly implemented idea and it should have ended decades ago.

      But if we are going to remove it, then I am going to get back EVERY PENNY that I paid into it when they end it.

      And spare me the budget BS about SS. When they’ve eliminated the rampant fraud and waste, MAYBE we can talk about cuts to SS.


         
         0 
         
         0
        CommoChief in reply to Olinser. | May 14, 2026 at 6:59 pm

        Good luck with getting back your SSA contributions by convincing Congress to take action today/tomorrow they should have taken 25 years + ago when it would have been bless painful. About 85% of current retirees get back every dime and then some within 5 years and the remainder within 10 years other than the tip/top of the highest earning 1%. Had we taken action with intergenerational compromise and every generational cohort taking some pain and shared sacrifice we would have solved it. Gen X and younger ain’t gonna be willing to pay increased taxes to support Boomer/Silent Gen retiree cohort who have been totally unwilling to accept shared sacrifice. Gen X tolerates Boomers but younger generations….actively dislike y’all at best.

        My well intentioned/non professional financial advice would be to make your retirement plan on a nest case scenario of a 25% cut and worst case of a flat universal benefit unrelated to your contributions of something close to the current median benefit payment of roughly $1,750 per month. That’s what most of Gen X and younger have done, treated SSA retirement as a pleasant surprise if we actually receive anything close to what the annual statement proclaims.


       
       0 
       
       0
      diver64 in reply to ztakddot. | May 15, 2026 at 5:53 am

      I will be in support of ending SS if I get the money I put in plus the average stock market gains as if I put the money into a retirement account. Until then, I want my god damn money the government took from me.


     
     0 
     
     3
    henrybowman in reply to LB1901. | May 14, 2026 at 4:04 pm

    “The federal government should not be in the business of funding health care. Full stop.”
    Health care, education, and public media… just for a START.
    After those, we can start reforming retirement. FDR had no damn business.


     
     0 
     
     1
    gibbie in reply to LB1901. | May 14, 2026 at 4:15 pm

    It’s human nature that large piles of money attract the wrong sort. Federal funding for anything creates large piles of money. Therefore, the federal government shouldn’t fund anything, including itself. QED.

The claim that this is evidence of :years of political indifference is giving the people involved too much credit. That “indifference” was bought and paid for. When are the people who “were indifferent” (Including Newsom) going to be indicted???????

“If they do not, if they do not aggressively prosecute Medicaid fraud, we are going to turn off the money that goes to these anti-fraud units.”

… while this may reduce fraud by the “anti-fraud units”, it feeds into actual Medicaid fraud.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.