Rubio’s Munich Speech: A Powerful Message Delivered With Grace and Diplomacy
Nothing is more pernicious than the enemy within, the self-doubt that erases any confidence in the principles that have made the West uniquely free and prosperous.
I listened to Marco Rubio’s speech at the Munich Security Conference with profound admiration and satisfaction. Given the predominance of leftist globalist sentiments in Western Europe, it was both rewarding and surprising to observe the standing ovation that followed the speech.
Reminiscing about the first Munich Security Conference in 1963, Rubio remarked:
At the time of that first gathering, Soviet communism was on the march. Thousands of years of Western civilization hung in the balance. At that time, victory was far from certain. But we were driven by a common purpose. We were unified not just by what we were fighting against; we were unified by what we were fighting for. And together, Europe and America prevailed and a continent was rebuilt. Our people prospered. In time, the East and West blocs were reunited. A civilization was once again made whole.
Rubio reminded the audience that the West’s victory in the Cold War had led to a dangerous misunderstanding of history’s lessons. He referred to Francis Fukuyama’s hypothesis that the post-Cold-War world had reached “the end of history” as the endpoint of humanity’s ideological evolution.
That infamous wall that had cleaved this nation into two came down, and with it an evil empire, and the East and West became one again. But the euphoria of this triumph led us to a dangerous delusion: that we had entered, quote, “the end of history;” that every nation would now be a liberal democracy; that the ties formed by trade and by commerce alone would now replace nationhood; that the rules-based global order — an overused term — would now replace the national interest; and that we would now live in a world without borders where everyone became a citizen of the world.
This was a foolish idea that ignored both human nature, and it ignored the lessons of over 5,000 years of recorded human history. And it has cost us dearly.
Rubio did not sugarcoat the pitfalls of such ideology and the resulting problems — uncontrolled migration, unsustainable welfare and green policies, and self-imposed de-industrialization, to name but a few. But throughout his oration, he emphasized the common cultural heritage and shared historical values that had defined Europe and America:
We are part of one civilization — Western civilization. We are bound to one another by the deepest bonds that nations could share, forged by centuries of shared history, Christian faith, culture, heritage, language, ancestry, and the sacrifices our forefathers made together for the common civilization to which we have fallen heir….
National security, which this conference is largely about, is not merely series of technical questions — how much we spend on defense or where, how we deploy it, these are important questions. They are. But they are not the fundamental one. The fundamental question we must answer at the outset is what exactly are we defending, because armies do not fight for abstractions. Armies fight for a people; armies fight for a nation. Armies fight for a way of life. And that is what we are defending: a great civilization that has every reason to be proud of its history, confident of its future, and aims to always be the master of its own economic and political destiny.
Rubio diagnosed the most significant impediment to future security and prosperity in the West — the cultural suicide that globalist leftist elites have been committing by constantly encouraging shame and guilt for the achievements of Western civilization.
Without cultural self-confidence, the iconic Greek victory at Marathon in 490 BC, which arguably saved Western civilization, would not have been won. When the 300 Spartans willingly sacrificed their lives in 480 BC to delay the Persian army at the mountain pass of Thermopylae, they were driven by patriotism and pride in their way of life. Imagine what would have happened if they had been brought up with a pervasive sense of guilt and shame for the flaws of their civilization. Without civilizational self-assurance, Greece would not have defeated the Persians, and Europe would not have become the bearer of Classical, and subsequently, Judeo-Christian ideals.
Nothing is more pernicious than the enemy within, the self-doubt that erases any confidence in the principles that have made the West uniquely free and prosperous. No one claims that Western civilization is perfect, but it is high time we stopped apologizing for it. We should remind ourselves, and teach our children, that Western values are not a questionable choice from the morally relativistic buffet table of multiculturalism. We should affirm the simple fact that Western values, which reflect universally beneficial ideals as expressed in the American founding documents, have not surprisingly engendered the most magnificent and extraordinary examples of human flourishing.
Rubio concluded:
Together we rebuilt a shattered continent in the wake of two devastating world wars. When we found ourselves divided once again by the Iron Curtain, the free West linked arms with the courageous dissidents struggling against tyranny in the East to defeat Soviet communism….
And I am here today to leave it clear that America is charting the path for a new century of prosperity, and that once again we want to do it together with you, … with a Europe that has the spirit of creation of liberty that sent ships out into uncharted seas and birthed our civilization; with a Europe that has the means to defend itself and the will to survive. We should be proud of what we achieved together in the last century, but now we must confront and embrace the opportunities of a new one — because yesterday is over, the future is inevitable, and our destiny together awaits.
Nora D. Clinton is a Research Scholar at the Legal Insurrection Foundation. She was born and raised in Sofia, Bulgaria. She holds a PhD in Classics and has published extensively on ancient documents on stone. In 2020, she authored the popular memoir Quarantine Reflections Across Two Worlds. Nora is a co-founder of two partner charities dedicated to academic cooperation and American values. She lives in Northern Virginia with her husband and son.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
It was an excellent speech if not a bit repetitive. It was honest. Europe has to know what it’s done to itself. So many mistakes. Trying to pretend it’s one state. Idiotic migration and multiculturalism. All the while, dissing the USA that has been its steadfast protector. Hopefully, there will be more foresight and attention given to the reality described by Rubio. Also nice that he appears to have no connection to the Fuentes crowd.
Molon Labe!
Nora, a word of appreciation for your writing. I genuinely enjoy your posts. Please keep it up!
Indeed. Any time I see that Nora has written another article, I always find the time to read and appreciate it.
I do love me some Rubio, but I remember him being for amnesty
And I’m not sure how he fell for that
Only game in town at the time. Then Scott Brown won “The Kennedy Seat” and the Grahamnesty Gang of Eight collapsed as the Dems realized they didn’t have a filibuster-proof majority to push it through
Regretfully, one speech will not change a mindset; and Europe, west of what were once the Soviet bloc countries, cannot undo the damage it has wrought on itself by allowing immigration from Islamic countries.
I fear you are right
And we, as in nyc, are not far behind
You cannot save a people who do not want to be saved.
This was the same message VP Vance delivered last year at the same annual conference. That the EU/NATO Nations gotta be willing to defend themselves v over reliance on USA, they gotta get back to Western Civilization basics of free speech instead of the UK and others hounding Citizens for Facebook posts about child rape gangs that ‘offend migrants’, to stop trying to outlaw populist political parties, stop mooching off the benevolence of the US.
Same themes, same demands but delivered in a more diplomatic tone, which is appropriate given Rubio as Sec State is our chief diplomat.
One wonders if the Germans were smirking again….
I think the mindset is slowly changing. The real question is if it is too late.
Compare the the slobbering coverage of Democrats and I think we see who the media desperately wants to win in 2028 🙄
Newsom and AOC are just road crashes who, if they had a once of self awareness wouldn’t be putting themselves within an inch of the international spotlight trying to get themselves in the running for 28.
The left really does need better roll models.
a wise man once said, “if they could, they would.”
But they can’t so they don’t.
Given the candidates they have been running, I don’t think they ever will.
Their people are clowns.
They are not even smart enough to be wrong. Watching either of them talk is a shocking experience – who falls for this foolishness?
“Newsom and AOC are just road crashes”
Today’s real-life joke: AOC complaining about Venezuela, that the USA can do anything it likes “below the equator” and there’s never any consequences. People had to remind her that Venezuela is entirely above the equator…
I finally was able to sit down and listen to Marco’s speech and it was a powerhouse. He is a fantastic speaker and I was in awe with his eloquence and knowledge. He is not just reading from a script — he has clearly become a true statesman for the United States.
I always liked Marco, and I never understood the anger people felt when he made some mistakes a young senator. Or, the anger some people still hold as if they can never make a mistake or learn and develop.
We are blessed. In a few years we will have to choose between JD and Marco for our next Republican candidate (or a joint ticket!) and it is a sad state of affairs that the best the democratic party can offer is AOC or Newsom. Their vacuousness stands in sharp contrast to either Marco or JD.
Agreed. The content of the Rubio speech is the same as Vance delivered last year. The tone was different but the effective message was the same.
The interesting part is which folks are praising Rubio v ‘clutching pearls’ last year over the speech Vance gave. Suddenly the legacy/corporate media and d/prog surrogates are all a flutter in praise of Rubio which to your point about ’28 seems to indicate their preference for Rubio over Vance at least at this point.
We mus be careful here. The media has a bad habit of pushing the GOP candidate that they believe will be the easiest to defeat… They will do so again, in spite of two major backfires (2016, 2024).
Exactly my point. The corporate media shilling for the globalist establishment seems pretty much opposed to Vance and to prefer Rubio as a ‘lesser evil’ if given a choice.
The d/prog despise/fear Vance b/c Vance is a disruptive force threatening to overturn the globalist establishment order in favor of center/right populist policies. He is the ‘bad cop’ to Trump’s ‘good cop’ in that he has less willingness to make deals/compromise that Trump does. The establishment and their surrogates will use every dirty trick, mud slinging in the hope to block him or hobble his candidacy. They’ve even managed to get some folks on the right, mostly neocons and supporters of entangling alliances that Washington warned of, to argue against him b/c he wants ‘America First’ as a reality v a slogan.
The standing ovation he received prompted Hillary to backpedal on her stance on open borders and unfettered immigration. Nope, she doesn’t believe that for a nanosecond.
I’ll take Rubio, All the gravitas without the antisemitic Carlson baggage.
the real question is
vance or rubio..who will bow out first..if at all for 2028 potus run??
The phrase ‘Judeo-Christian’ irks the hell out of me. This nation was founded on Christian ideals. There was nothing Judeo about it. It wasn’t even in the lexicon until 1821. Apparently many Jews find the term offensive as well so how about we agree to stop using it. TY.
Christian ideals based on Jewish origins, especially the part about freedom and self-emancipation. The Founders knew it, too.
I’m just here to point out your broad ignorance. I will leave it to others to fill in the specifics.
Without Judaism there is no Christianity.
Jesus lived as a Jewish man
Much of Europe has become an “Insider Threat”