Image 01 Image 03

Air Force Turncoat: Former Major Arrested, Charged for Allegedly Training Chinese Fighter Pilots

Air Force Turncoat: Former Major Arrested, Charged for Allegedly Training Chinese Fighter Pilots

Brown’s calculated choice to turn decades of elite U.S. training into a weapon in the hands of the People’s Liberation Army’s military is a direct betrayal of his oath and of every airman.

A former U.S. Air Force officer and instructor pilot has been arrested and charged with unlawfully providing “defense services” to Chinese military pilots, specifically combat aircraft training.

In a press release Wednesday, the DOJ said 65-year-old Gerald Eddie Brown Jr. had been arrested in Jeffersonville, Ind., that day. The department said Brown, a former Air Force officer and pilot, had been charged “for providing and conspiring to provide defense services to Chinese military pilots without authorization, in violation of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA).”

“The United States Air Force trained Major Brown to be an elite fighter pilot and entrusted him with the defense of our Nation. He now stands charged with training Chinese military pilots,” Assistant Attorney General for National Security John Eisenberg said in the Wednesday DOJ release.

“When U.S. persons — whether military or civilian — provide training to a foreign military, that activity is illegal unless they have a license from the State Department. The National Security Division will use all tools at its disposal to protect our military advantages and hold to account those who would violate the AECA.”

Brown left active duty in the Air Force in 1996 with the rank of Major. During his service, he led sensitive units responsible for nuclear weapons delivery, flew combat missions, and trained other pilots both in flight and in simulators on various fighter and attack aircraft.

“As an Air Force Officer, Brown took an oath to defend our Nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic,” U.S. Attorney Jeanine Ferris Pirro for the District of Columbia said in a statement. “He broke that oath and betrayed the country, jeopardizing the safety of our servicemembers and allies.

“We will hold Brown, and anyone conspiring against our Nation, accountable for their actions,” she continued. “The Department of Justice and my prosecutors are steadfast in our commitment to use every lawful tool available to keep American military expertise where it belongs – here in America.”

Brown began training Chinese pilots in the summer of 2023 and is accused of completely flouting the restrictions of the Arms Export Control Act.

In August 2023, Brown allegedly used a co-conspirator to negotiate with a Chinese national who previously pleaded guilty to conspiring to hack into the computer networks of major U.S. defense contractors and to steal sensitive military and export-controlled data.

Brown allegedly traveled to China in December 2023 to begin training PRC military pilots. Officials said Brown spent three hours answering questions about the U.S. Air Force on his first day there.

He remained in China until traveling back to the United States this month.

This development is very troubling, as Brown had extensive experience in the operations and capabilities of a number of our fighter jets: the F-4 “Phantom II,” F-15 “Eagle,” F-16 “Fighting Falcon,” and the A-10 “Thunderbolt II” (Warthog).

The F-4 Phantom II is a fast, two‑seat fighter and bomber that could carry many kinds of weapons and was heavily used in past wars like Vietnam. The F-15 Eagle was built primarily to dominate the skies, with powerful engines, advanced radar, and an excellent track record in air combat. The F-16 Fighting Falcon is a lighter, highly agile fighter that can handle both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions and has been widely used and exported.

The A-10 Thunderbolt II, often called the “Warthog,” is slower but extremely tough and designed to fly low and protect troops on the ground, especially by attacking tanks and armored vehicles with its large gun. The F-35 Lightning II is a newer stealth jet that combines advanced sensors, low visibility to radar, and the ability to perform many mission types, from striking ground targets to high‑tech air combat.

Together, these aircraft show the range of missions Brown was involved in, from air combat and bombing to close support of ground forces and modern stealth operations.

Brown’s alleged choice to turn decades of elite U.S. training into a weapon in the hands of the People’s Liberation Army’s military would be a direct betrayal of his oath and of every airman if it proves to be true.

After commanding sensitive nuclear weapons delivery units, leading combat missions, and instructing on front‑line fighters on compact tactics, he would have known exactly how valuable and dangerous his knowledge would be in Chinese hands.

For this kind of willful, prolonged collaboration with a foreign adversary’s military, the law allows for crushing civil penalties and, more importantly, criminal punishment of up to 20 years in prison and fines up to 1 million dollars per violation of the Arms Export Control Act…and those penalties should be pursued to their fullest extent if he is, indeed, guilty of the heinous betrayal.

Anything less than the maximum lawful sentence in the wake of a guilty verdict would signal to every would‑be traitor that selling out American warfighters and allies is a calculated risk instead of a life‑destroying choice. Ultimately, it would cheapen the oaths, sacrifices, and operational security that could keep U.S. pilots alive in the next real air war.

And if a more severe and permanent consequence is an option, I would be all for it if these charges prove true.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 18
ztakddot | February 26, 2026 at 9:15 am

Prison is insufficient. He should be executed,


 
 0 
 
 0
ztakddot | February 26, 2026 at 9:16 am

I also noticed after 24 years he only reached the rank of Major, Unless he was an enlisted man first that isn’t good I would think. Most officers who leave the service after 20 have at least made light colonel,

Curious what those with military experience think.

    It’s likely he hit an “up-or-out” wall – get promoted next cycle or retire, no choice. Being a major at 24 indicates that he had been passed over for promotion at least once, maybe twice, before. The apparent fact that he was an instructor pilot indicates that his issues were personal/political, not technical/skill related. The only over-20 major I ever knew had been enlisted for six years before going ROTC and getting his commission.

    ex-USAF E-6 Rusty Bill

    As a Major, he would have had to retire at 22. That he went to 24 indicates that he was given a “Continuation” to 24. I knew some Majors that went to 20 years. There was generally a “reason” that they were not considered fit for higher command responsibilities. In the mid 90s there was a pilot shortage and if he was a “good stick” he was retained. This guy came on Active Duty the same year I did.

    I am speaking from the POV of having 12 years Active Duty, not being promoted to Major on Active Duty and then serving 14 years in the Active Reserves being promoted to Lt Col.


       
       0 
       
       0
      GWB in reply to BillB52. | February 26, 2026 at 12:26 pm

      How do you know he came on active duty the same year you did? The news articles say he retired at 24 years in 1996, but he’s only 65. Are you thinking he only left active duty service in 1996 and went to the ANG or Reserve? Because it’s really weird none of the articles linked above use words that would indicate that.

      And this bugs me because I’m close enough in age that the math is easy for me to do and come up with “somethin’ ain’t right.”

        I got his retirement year wrong. When I first read this last night on Fox, I thought it said 1998 which would put him two years before me as I went on AD in 1974. If he is 75 years old that would fit the time line for non-prior enlisted. I will stand by what else I said. There were lots of pilots that left following Desert Storm.


           
           0 
           
           0
          GWB in reply to BillB52. | February 26, 2026 at 6:14 pm

          Sorry if that came across belligerently. But they say he is 65, which means he couldn’t have even enlisted until ~1978, and 1982 would be the earliest if went in as an officer. The discrepancy bothers me because it’s bad reporting somewhere.


       
       0 
       
       0
      diver64 in reply to BillB52. | February 27, 2026 at 6:55 am

      Something isn’t adding up with the numbers in the article. If he is 65 now then the earliest he could have joined would be 1978 at 17 yrs old and he wouldn’t have been commissioned as an officer. If he served, say, 2 years and the Air Force was super impressed he could be a “90 Day Wonder” and get his commission at 20 in 1981. That means he would have made Major in 15 years Which doesn’t sound that bad to me. If he retired in 1996 he would have 18 years in. I don’t think you can retire with 18yrs?
      Are my numbers right?


     
     0 
     
     0
    GWB in reply to ztakddot. | February 26, 2026 at 12:27 pm

    There is something NOT being said in all of the articles, because it’s impossible to have the numbers being bandied about without being somewhere in the military well past 1996.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Commiefornia Refugee in reply to ztakddot. | February 26, 2026 at 8:16 pm

    My former FIL retired as an O-4 (Lt. Comm.) from the Navy after 20 years. He transferred from line to support staff (logistics) in the late 1960s. Fast movers tended to be promoted more readily, and they were potential ship captains or pilots.

Two traitors in the news:

1. Eileen Gu, a freestyle skier born in San Francisco, utilized the American sports infrastructure for over a decade before switching her sporting allegiance to China.

2. Gerald Eddie Brown, a US fighter pilot, was trained by the U.S. over 24 years to be an elite fighter pilot switched allegiance to China.


     
     0 
     
     6
    Paula in reply to Paula. | February 26, 2026 at 9:33 am

    The parallels between Eileen Gu and Major Gerald Brown highlight a major point of friction in the news today: the “export” of elite American training—whether it’s on a halfpipe or in a cockpit.


     
     0 
     
     1
    ChrisPeters in reply to Paula. | February 26, 2026 at 10:28 am

    During World War II, there was Tokyo Rose. Gu could be nicknamed Beijing Eileen.


     
     5 
     
     0
    moonmoth in reply to Paula. | February 26, 2026 at 6:29 pm

    3. Jonathan Pollard, the traitor to America but hero to Israel.


     
     1 
     
     0
    diver64 in reply to Paula. | February 27, 2026 at 6:59 am

    Eileen Gu is a dual citizen. There are many living in the US that choose to play for Canada for example. I served with several dual citizens that lived in Canada joining our military because it was much better than theirs according to them. It’s not uncommon and I don’t see how these are related. What secret information is Gu, a skier, passing on to China?


       
       0 
       
       0
      johnny dollar in reply to diver64. | February 27, 2026 at 9:25 am

      So, if Jesse Owens had decided to compete for the Nazis, you would have been okay with that?
      The point is that playing for Canada and playing for a Communist dictatorship, currently trying to destroy the United States by covert means, are two completely different scenarios.


     
     0 
     
     0
    gmac124 in reply to Paula. | February 27, 2026 at 11:15 am

    Hundreds of olympic athletes are trained in the US. Just look at any decent college track and field team. Their will be athletes from all over the world that will be competing for their home country.

Brown should be brought back on Active Duty and punished under the UCMJ as I am sure that his actions violated some part of it. And it is not double jeopardy to be tried in both Civilian courts and Courts Martial for generally the same offence.


     
     0 
     
     0
    GWB in reply to BillB52. | February 26, 2026 at 12:22 pm

    Unless he passed along classified information, I’m not sure he violated any UCMJ. Maybe you could argue one or two of the general ones. But if he did (and he’s actually retired) I concur wholeheartedly.

He is just following the Seditious Six and Kelly’s advice. I’m sure his lawyer will run to a liberal judge and claim it’s his freedom of speech and association.

Word of the day: “Victimhood”

1. Eileen Gu: frames herself as a victim of “geopolitical tension,” claiming she just wants to “unify” through sports while pocketing $14 million from Beijing.

2. Major Brown: argues he is a victim of “vague regulations” rather than a traitor, despite the Justice Department alleging he sold F-35 secrets for cash.

3. Clintons: argue they are victims of “vast right wing conspiracy”. The Clinton strategy: Deny the encounter, discredit the source, and claim political persecution.

Major Brown sounds like a solid blue voter. Probably a strong supporter of Sen. Mark Kelly.

December 2023
He remained in China until traveling back to the United States this month.
Ummm, that would be more than 2 years. Without a return to the US? Isn’t that in violation of travel rules for Americans? Don’t they have to return to the USA every 6 months?

Or is that only something we insist on visitors to the US doing?

Or am I just wrong?


     
     0 
     
     1
    Paula in reply to GWB. | February 26, 2026 at 1:56 pm

    People’s Republic of China rule #9 grants waiver to foreign citizens betraying their country to stay in China for as long it takes.


     
     0 
     
     0
    Milhouse in reply to GWB. | February 26, 2026 at 7:09 pm

    What travel rules? Do you mean Chinese rules? The US of course has no rules for Americans traveling abroad. How could it?


     
     0 
     
     0
    diver64 in reply to GWB. | February 27, 2026 at 7:03 am

    No. You can live abroad as long as you like if the host country allows it and still remain an American Citizen. A friend of my wife has been in Spain and Ireland over a year at this point with her husband and kids. Many Americans retire abroad. Portugal, Panama and Costa Rica are popular destinations.

the F-4 “Phantom II,” F-15 “Eagle,” F-16 “Fighting Falcon,” and the A-10 “Thunderbolt II” (Warthog).
And none of those are frontline anymore, except in specialty roles. The Chinese know everything there is to know about all of those, I’m guessing. (We had static displays of all of those at the Air Force Academy before the major even left the service.)

The F-35 Lightning II is a newer stealth jet
The F-35 wasn’t mentioned in that list at all. And none of the articles linked mention it. Was he somehow providing information on that? Major Brown was certainly never involved in any way (while active duty) with the F-35. Why was that information in the post?

I just noticed the Hill article says Brown is 65yo, had a 24-year career, AND left the service in 1996. That is impossible. He would have had to start in the AF in 1972, when he was 11yo. If he continued on in the NG or something, he could have a 24 year career, but not if he actually left the service in 1996 – it should say “left active duty.” The JustTheNews article words it that way, but NO mention is made of where he went after that. The linked WDRB article says he retired after 24 years in 1996. Oof.

fighters on compact tactics
Editor on the floor, please!

Lastly… I think I have met that guy on active duty. Maybe not. But it’s possible. /shudder/

    The airplanes fit the period up to 1996. What I read is that he was a simulator instructor in the F-35.

    As you said, for Brown to have retired after 24 years in 1996, he would have had to join at 11 years old. Even if he were prior enlisted, he could not have retired until around 2002 if he is 65. I think that his age is 75.


 
 0 
 
 1
Subotai Bahadur | February 26, 2026 at 3:00 pm

Purely as a historical oddity I seem to remember an old English sentence for treason that begins; “Hung by the neck and cut down while yet living . . .” , and goes on in terms that neither this publication nor our current society would find acceptable. Mind you, I would.

Subotai Bahadur

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.