UN Faces ‘Imminent Collapse’ as U.S. Funding Stalls

UN Faces ‘Imminent Collapse’ as U.S. Funding Stalls

The United Nations is sounding the alarm again about an “imminent financial collapse,” but it is not hard to see why the institution is panicking. The bill is coming due, and the organization that has spent decades scolding the United States is now warning it may have to literally close up shop in New York if Washington and other deadbeat contributors do not pay.

“The crisis is deepening, threatening program delivery and risking financial collapse. And the situation will further deteriorate in the near future. I cannot overstate the urgency of the situation we now face.” 

The numbers are staggering, and they cut through the usual U.N. talking points. The General Assembly approved a $3.45 billion regular budget for 2026, and U.N. officials told the New York Times that the United States is responsible for about 95% of the money currently owed, roughly $2.2 billion, combining unpaid 2025 dues and the 2026 assessment. The U.S. also owes far more beyond the regular budget, including about $1.9 billion for active peacekeeping missions, $528 million for closed missions, and $43.6 million for tribunals.

In other words, the U.N. financial model still assumes America will keep paying, even while U.N. actors and allied governments posture as if the U.S. is just another member state to be lectured.

President Trump has responded the way a lot of Americans have wanted presidents to respond for years. The Times reported that Trump withdrew the U.S. from multiple U.N. agencies and bodies, citing mismanagement, waste, and redundancy, including pulling out of UNESCO, the World Health Organization, and the U.N. Human Rights Council. He also moved to reduce funding for peacekeeping operations, while U.N. officials said Washington indicated it would pay only about $160 million toward active peacekeeping and would not pay for tribunals.

The BBC’s reporting underscores that the U.N. understands this is not a routine cash flow squeeze. It is a credibility crisis and a structural failure.

“Either all member states honour their obligations to pay in full and on time, or member states must fundamentally overhaul our financial rules to prevent an imminent financial collapse.” 

So here is the part the U.N. does not want to say out loud. If your institution can collapse because the United States stops writing checks, then you were never a serious independent global body. You were a dependency. And after years of waste, perks, and anti-American political theater, the shock on display now is not that the money is drying up. The shock is that the U.N. ever believed the American taxpayer would keep financing an institution that so often treats America like the problem.

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.