DHS: Woman in Minneapolis Allegedly Tried to Run Over Officers, ICE Agent Shot Her
“An ICE officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots.”
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) posted on X that a woman in Minneapolis attempted to run over law enforcement with her car, leading to an ICE agent shooting her.
The woman died.
Before I go on…how about everyone just wait until an investigation happens?
Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them—an act of domestic terrorism.
An ICE officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots.
He used his training and saved his own life and that of his fellow officers.
The alleged perpetrator was hit and is deceased. The ICE officers who were hurt are expected to make full recoveries.
This is the direct consequence of constant attacks and demonization of our officers by sanctuary politicians who fuel and encourage rampant assaults on our law enforcement who are facing 1,300% increase in assaults against them and an 8,000% increase in death threats.
This is an evolving situation, and we will give the public more information as soon as it becomes available.
Today, ICE officers in Minneapolis were conducting targeted operations when rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them—an act of domestic terrorism.…
— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) January 7, 2026
Nick Sortor has a video of the supposed incident:
🚨 BREAKING: Video shows the moment a woman tried to RUN OVER ICE agents with her vehicle in Minneapolis, resulting in her being SHOT
Tim Walz calling ICE the “GESTAPO” is EXACTLY WHY this stuff happens.
SHAME on Walz and Mayor Frey. pic.twitter.com/qsTbdj1Y11
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) January 7, 2026
https://twitter.com/maxnesterak/status/2008961959731859757
Mayor Jacob Frey has wasted no time with the rhetoric before an investigation. He told ICE agents to get the f*ck out of Minnesota.
Did you watch the above video? Frey accused the DHS of spinning the story, claiming the video he watched negates the self-defense argument.
Mayor Jacob Frey just called the claim of self-defense "b*llsh*t" and said that he watched the video. He apologized to the family and said that ICE is in Minnesota to "literally kill people." This is the type of rhetoric that fuels the rage. Perhaps wait for the investigation?…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) January 7, 2026
🚨 BREAKING – MINNEAPOLIS MAYOR JACOB FREY: “To ICE, get the F*** out of our city.”
Oh, you’re so edgy bro. I’m sure ICE is going to listen to some soyboy mayor and just pack up and leave immediately.
ICE will NOT back down — despite constant attacks on them. pic.twitter.com/SvcmDJA3m0
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) January 7, 2026
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
An enemy combatant was killed by American forces. There, fix the headline.
No. This isn’t a war, it’s law enforcement. Different rules. For instance, enemy combatants aren’t criminals, and if captured alive can’t be charged with a crime. They’re waging war, which is lawful. And on the other hand no excuse is needed to shoot enemy combatants. They don’t need to be doing anything; their mere status as enemy combatants who are not positively out of the fight is enough. That’s not the case here.
I have a family member who was deliberately hit by a driver. He was out of work for a year and will suffer pain until the day he dies thanks to the driver. He had the opportunity to shoot the driver and didn’t take it. A moving vehicle is a deadly weapon, period.
I once had a job in providing protection. I wasn’t allowed to carry a firearm. I used my own car to go from site to site where I was needed. Basically, I worked in the space between the street and the entryways to homes we entered. I used to joke that the agency I worked for considered me unarmed while I was allowed to operate one of the most deadly anti-personnel weapons ever devised.
Of course it is. But the driver was not engaging in an act of war. He was a criminal, not an enemy combatant. The difference is absolutely crucial.
Have you seen the video from another angle that show the SUV hit the ICE agent who fired the shots?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrUMVtrCK_Y
Hi Milhouse, I understand what you are saying, I just disagree.
Much of what is being called “protest” is organized, funded and has a standardized doctrine.
Enemy combatant, at this time in the U.S., is not currently a firm legal definition.
I also throw out, we are a long way from western “On War” and Geneva Convention.
We are deep into unconventional warfare no matter who or how you define it.
Where’s the paper trail?
You are too quick to call your fellow citizens terrorists. We all are.
Can we call you and asshole then?
Oh, no, this woman was definitely a terrorist. Just not an enemy combatant. Had she not been threatening anyone’s life or safety, the agent would not have been entitled to shoot her, unlike enemy combatants, who can be shot simply for standing there doing nothing. And on the other hand, had she survived the shooting she would have been tried for attempted murder, whereas an enemy combatant would not have done anything wrong.
Hey Milhouse, is ‘hyperbole’ in you dictionary?
Hyperbole is not applicable when we’re dealing with a crucial fundamental difference between two completely different concepts. Calling someone an “enemy combatant” isn’t just a throwaway line, it has serious legal consequences, in both directions.
Yes, it does have serious legal consequences.
But not here, with people just b-s-ing on a comment thread.
Get the stick out of your butt.
And hey, weren’t you leaving?
have o say i: Millhous is layng pout a thin line bewen enemy combatant and criminal. He dos undersand and is correc.
Were this a war situation, ICE could a will deploy unlimitd pushback, even to death, against anyone they see in civilian clothing. Not the case.
this driver wrote and signed her own death warrant. She stepped over the thin line into criminal aggression, and ended up staying on the wrong side o tht line. She has now lost in the room temperature challenge. ICE were not playing enemy combatant, they were doing their job in dealing with unlawphul invaders.
Anyone with a room temperature IQ already knows this Forest 😂😂 Sometimes do yourself a favour and don’t reply to someone’s post 🙄
True, and one difference between LE and warfare is “How are they funded?” In war, the answer is (of course) a government. In criminal action, we have to consider if there is a source paying for the criminal to act. A subpoena for the criminal’s bank records is a good place to start, looking for any unified source of funding behind multiple criminals all attempting to interfere with LE action.
FAFO
Sucks to be her. Maybe don’t show up to interfere with ongoing Federal LEO operations, disobey lawful commands to exit the vehicle, then orient the vehicle towards the Fed LEO and accelerate forward towards them…..unless you are willing accept the consequences without complaining.
The Mayor is going loony. Right after he gets done using all sorts of curse words ordering ‘ICE out of Minneapolis’ and maliciously lying about the intent and purpose of ICE in Minneapolis he asks the ‘community’ not to misbehave and give the Trump Admin a justification to escalate.
This event, the lack of effect response by Minneapolis PD to provide basic protection to Federal LEO engaged by a hostile mob and this loony Mayor deranged screeching declaring the City of Minneapolis to be in conflict/resistance to the enforcement of Federal law is moving us far closer to use of the Insurrection Act.
We’ve been close to that for a long time. It should have been used in 2000, and then we might not be having these problems now.
I suspect your and my definition of the proper use of the insurrection act differ. My own view would be to apply it to the entire State, send a couple AD Divisions supported by NG brought into Federal Service, remove the officials from power, install Stephen Miller with Plenipotentiary Powers and keep the State of MN under a decade or two of reconstruction.
Or Rubio since he seems to be running everything else.
I really want Stephen Miller so he can call for sending out the dogs ‘Smithers, loose the hounds’ like his aged Simpsons doppelganger Montgomery Burns.
No, the states aren’t in insurrection. Many people in the states are, with the states’ moral support, but the states aren’t actually doing anything wrong. The Insurrection Act is appropriate to deal with the actual insurrectionists, not with their state cheering squads.
You are arguing with yourself again. I didn’t claim that multiple States or any particular State was in a state of insurrection.
If however the President, the only person who’s opinions matter on that point, decides that MN has entered into a state of insurrection and invokes, at his sole discretion the fearsome powers under the Insurrection Act, then my preference for the response to that sad state of affairs is listed above.
No states are in actual insurrection – yet .
They are definitely moving in that direction, though.
Laws are for law-abiding citizens. Had she not interfered she would still be alive…FA/FO.
Good. Next time shoot Frey too.
It’s too bad that, in addition to thugs up and thumbs down choices, there’s not also a “?” I don’t follow what you wrote.
When that woman stepped on the gas, she chose….poorly.
She had the judgement skills usually reserved for a Sovereign Citizen.
These people didn’t hear “I told you not to touch the hot stove” often enough as children.
“I’m sure ICE is going to listen to some soyboy mayor and just pack up and leave immediately.”
And yet they have before… haven’t they?
EKO has an extremely interesting interpretation of why. According to him, every step in a carefully-planned year-long dance — including the retreats — has been staged to satisfy every legal requirement imposed by the Insurrection Act.
I don’t think this civilian shooting qualifies as a triggering event, but it’s going to happen any day now.
Give it a read, the analysis (with its parallels to how Lincoln engineered the same thing) is fascinating.
EKO has an interesting take. Perhaps a bit melodramatic but he connects the dots in a unique way.
That’s a very interesting take, but I have only one problem with it. In the April 28 executive order, the crucial paragraph, “Sanctuary jurisdictions are engaging in ‘a lawless insurrection against the supremacy of Federal law'”, is simply false, and the courts will not allow Trump to get away with it.
The president can’t just say something is an insurrection when it clearly isn’t. That’s interpreting the constitution, which City of Flores reaffirms is exclusively the province of the judicial branch.
There is definitely an insurrection going on, no question about that, and if Trump really is setting his ducks in a row in order to invoke it then more power to him. I completely support that. But it’s not the jurisdictions that are in insurrection. They are standing on their firmly established constitutional rights.
Could presidents in the 1840s and 1850s have declared northern states in insurrection for exercising their right, affirmed in Prigg v Pennsylvania, to refuse to assist slave-catchers, and to forbid all their officials from doing so?! Could Fillmore really have sent troops into Vermont, as he threatened to do but never did?! I don’t think so. I think under the Supreme Court’s consistent rulings for the past 200 years, sanctuary jurisdictions are completely within their rights. Those parts of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 that violated the Anti-Commandeering doctrine were unconstitutional and unenforceable, and so would be any law Congress might make (as far as I know it hasn’t) against sanctuary jurisdictions.
That doesn’t change the fact that there are actual insurrections going on, people who are acting in coordination in direct defiance of federal authority, and thus in rebellion against the United States. Trump would be completely correct in calling out the troops to deal with them.
The only surprise is that Frey didn’t do his tweet in Somali. FAFO, boys and girls. A sure way to not get shot dead is to not try and run over armed ICE Agents performing Federal Law Enforcement operations.
Good. A dead traitor
Is the only good kind
This is EXACTLY what the left wanted.
And make no mistake, just like the Mafia, the left will take care of their good little soldier.
Whatever family they have will sue the state, and Walz will order them to ‘settle’ for millions.
The state?! What has the state got to do with it?
Absolutely nothing. But they’ll sue the state and the Democrats running the state will ‘settle’ anyway to pay off their good little martyr.
Remember the state is run by Tim Walz and the AG is Keith Ellison.
LOL….oh no, this is what the left wanted. Actually, I think this is what the Soro/BLM/Antifia backers wanted, but I think they are going to get something more than they suspected.
In the bigger picture, they want to cover up all the bigger fraud they are doing. I think it is a desperate move at this point. Unlike BLM, this is not a BLM moment. Illegals are part of the inter city Black problem to their safety. Not sure they really have the BLM on this one. 80/20 Baby.
I suppose, just on general principles, but really how much of an investigation is needed? How different is this from any time a policeman anywhere shoots in self-defense and defense of others? They have guns for a reason, after all. And really, is it in any way implausible that she was doing exactly what she looked like she was doing?
Even if it turns out that she was just oblivious, didn’t notice the officers, and pulled out of her parking spot because she was going somewhere, they aren’t mind readers and weren’t to know that. And even so, if she was in fact about to hit them then her intent doesn’t matter.
Oh, I dunno. How about where the officer was in relation to the car? Whether the car was aimed at the officer? Whether the officer was actually in danger?
If a citizen had shot the women instead of an officer, there would be an investigation Police and government agents should not be exempt from the same scrutiny in a shooting as an ordinary citizen.
You are assuming the officer shot in self defense and in the defense of others.
What could we do to insure that was the case?
Hmmmmm…..hey……let’s have an investigation!! (You know the type of investigation you are against.)
Let’s have an investigation to show the cop actually shot in self defense. That way the narrative of the mayor and others can be shown to be false.
I recommend you read Dial 911 and Die
Why should any of that matter?
“Lt” Byrd shot Ashlee Babbit for absolutely no reason, and instead of being prosecuted, he was promoted, and his wife is suckling the government teat for millions of dollars.
It’s about time that those on the left get unalived for just being a garden variety cunt.
Oh, sure, do your due diligence, but that’s what it is. The presumption should be that the officer was correct, just as it is when an individual does this. “If a citizen had shot the woman instead of an officer, there would be an investigation”, but the presumption would be in their favor.
At any time an officer shoots someone, they are pulled off of duty until an investigation because the presumption is not in their favor. At best, there is no presumption either war.
However, a self defense claim is an affirmative defense. It must be proven, The presumption is not in the favor of the shooter.
In self-defense cases the defendant’s burden is only to produce some evidence from which a jury can find self-defense. Once he’s done that the burden is on the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt that it was not self-defense.
In the case of my family member who was run down and run over, the DA told me if he’d taken the shot, they would never charge him. Too many witnesses saw what happened. As it is, the scumbag went to prison as a serious violent felon under NM law.
The ability to make an affirmative self defense claim is done in a hearing and motion outside any jury. If the judge doesn’t find the evidence initially not the jury, the defense cannot be presented at trial.
But the fact of the matter is that even your own statement of a “defendant’s burden is only to produce some evidence from which a jury can find self-defense,” shows that your initial statement of there is a presumption that the shot was taken in self defense is not true.
An affirmative defense of self defense must meet the burden of the preponderance of the evidence.
If the defendant wants to assert “self defense,” the presumption is not given to them. They have to prove that claim.
In one of the videos over on another news site, you could see that the person (woman?) in the car had their window down and was having an exchange with an ICE officer. They then punched the pedal, the rear wheels spun just a little, and started forward when another ICE officer, whom she was headed at, shot the driver.
I did a neuter on the sex/gender of the person because it could be a man cosplaying as a woman; those types seem to be particularly aggressive.
UK site has picture inside care and a video of the “the women killed” wife saying they have a 6 year old in school and are new to the area. LGBTQ stuff in car. ICE agent was supposedly in another incident where someone tired to run him over a few weeks ago.
Lot of boxes going to be checked on this one.
she was parked perpendicular to the road, indicating that she was trying to block the ICE Agents
Trying to block them doesn’t get her shot. Trying to kill them does.
We know she was not oblivious. She was there as part of an activist operation to impede ICE. Did she see the officer in front of her wheels or was she just panicking and trying to flee, is a legitimate question.
What this incident shows is the cost of impeding ICE can be more than spending a few nights in jail. I’m not surprised the perp was an AWFL, though. Emotionally driven activists tend to go all out, regardless of the consequences.
It’s not just ICE, or federal law enforcement or immigration related issues. Every cop in the United States (with the possible exception of Barney Fife – single bullet in the front pocket and all) will shoot you dead with the full support of government if you use a vehicle as a weapon against them.
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
They are hoping for more people to come to protest
Maybe 150 right now but paid protesters are being bused in.
I hope there are more videos of this incident. I believe she was probably driving right at that one federal agent but the angle of the video is inconclusive to me. Maybe I am missing something so I’ll watch it another dozen times.
If you’re unsure then so was he. Ultimately it doesn’t matter what she was doing, but what she appeared to be doing.
You know that the left will track down that ICE officer and kill him. It’s not fair as he was defending himself, but he is a dead man walking.
Maybe Musk or Ellison can give him a nice sum of money to go live in Hungary.
You can actually see her sideswipe the officer.
I don’t see that but I am not questioning that it happened. Just saying a video from another angle would be useful. You know people are going to say she was 5 feet away from hitting anyone.
Even being “5 feet away from anyone” doesn’t mean she wasn’t attempting to hit an officer. Someone who shoots and misses has still shot and can be shot.
And even though because she couldn’t use the vehicle again (i.e., couldn’t “fire a second shot”), LEOs can shoot a fleeing felon who had used a deadly weapon (in their presence) in an unlawful attempt to injure or kill someone.
Dave, that isn’t quite correct. It’s not a technical question of her having used a weapon, the question is whether she’s dangerous.
The common law Fleeing Felon doctrine said that anyone (not just a policeman) could kill any felon who was fleeing and couldn’t be captured any other way. In Tennessee v Garner (I think) the Supreme Court said that this rule was premised on all felons being dangerous, but nowadays there are many felonies that are not violent, and thus many felons who pose no danger to the public, so the rule can’t apply to them. So the court said the police must make an assessment of whether letting this particular felon escape would put the public in danger, and shoot only if it would.
So that’s the criterion.
By the way, it seems to me that this precedent ought to be cited in the cases currently going on about non-violent felons’ second amendment rights. I haven’t seen anyone mention it in that context, and I’m surprised by that. If I actually knew anyone involved in that litigation I would bring it up with them, because I think it’s absolutely on point. If the fourth amendment applies to non-dangerous felons, then so should the second.
In some states, motorists are required to give cyclists four feet of space when passing the bike. It’s the least we can do to give pedestrians and police five feet of space.
The liars don’t want you to see this video that shows the vehicle hitting the ICE officer who was in front of the vehicle (not the one by the driver’s door).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrUMVtrCK_Y
There are a couple of “new” videos. Some are blurry but the third one down on this link (under the name “The Facts Dude”) is conclusive to me and damning to any other narrative that the woman not only aimed at the officer, but accelerated toward him.
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2026/01/07/minneapolis-protester-tried-to-ram-ice-agents-shot-dead-n3810590
To me. this is the “death” of the idea that the agent acted irresponsibly or anything (no pun intended.)
Of course, the woman is being portrayed as a saint:
The woman killed by ICE today was a poet. She won the 2020 Academy of American Poets, University & College Poetry Prize at Old Dominion University. This was her bio:
“Renée Macklin is from Colorado Springs, Colorado and is studying Creative Writing at ODU.
Her poetry has been published in Metrosphere and Coronado Literary Review, and she currently co-hosts a podcast with her husband, comedian Tim Macklin. When she is not writing, reading, or talking about writing, she has movie marathons and makes messy art with her daughter and two sons.”
and
” The woman shot and killed by an ICE agent in Minneapolis on Wednesday, Jan. 7, was identified by her mother as 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good.
Donna Ganger told the Minnesota Star Tribune that her daughter lived in the Twin Cities with her partner. In a joint statement, several Minneapolis Councilmembers confirmed she lived in the city.
Ganger said the family was notified of the death late Wednesday morning.
“That’s so stupid” that she was killed, Ganger said, after learning some of the circumstances from a reporter. “She was probably terrified.”
Ganger said her daughter is “not part of anything like that at all,” referring to protesters challenging ICE agents.
“Renee was one of the kindest people I’ve ever known,” she said. “She was extremely compassionate. She’s taken care of people all her life. She was loving, forgiving and affectionate. She was an amazing human being.””
The problem is that despite her mother’s protestations, she was “a part of that” and tried to run over an agent.
Parents, are often the last to know the true nature of their children. I’m sure this mother will spend the rest of her life pretending her daughter was a victim but the fact is, her daughter’s actions dictated the end result.
What is even stranger is that there seems to be evidence that the woman’s wife was outside her SUV filming the interaction between the woman, an ICE agent talking with her at the door / window and the ICE agent in front of the vehicle.
The claim the woman was scared seems to go away when you think that this was more than likely a set up to “get” the agents – to have them scatter and look like fools – and to show people what they can do against ICE.
This incident reeks of a plan gone bad and now a woman is dead because she and her wife wanted support people that are breaking the law and was willing to commit violence to do it.
Absolutely love Congressmen Gill
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/01/watch-gop-rep-brandon-gill-busts-receipts-during/
Tim Walz is thanking his lucky stars for this. It at least get his sins off the front page…for now.
The video shows an ICE officer who could have been hit by her mirror or the front of her car, and another ICE officer might have been in front of that one.
Aside. A few years ago, an analysis found that people with bumper stickers of any kind on their cars were more likely to commit “road rage” than those without bumper stickers. That SUV had at least 2 bumper stickers.
Let me guess, One said
Clinton-Kane
and the other said
Coexist
There are like 10 stickers on the car. Other footage shows ice agent really jumping out of the way. I actually think he was hit. Trump said he was taken to the hospital.
Interesting, there is a women filming the whole thing on the passenger side of the car. She is following the Ice agent as he goes in front of the car. She is seen chasing after the vehicle when it crashes. I think it is the same person who is cry on the curb saying it was her wife.
They were trying to set up the agents by filming arresting her “wife” and I think it backfired. Her wife panicked and hit the accelerator.
So you are saying “I am the Stig” in the back window and “God Bless Our Troops: Especially the Snipers” on the bumper is a bad thing? Oh, and I just added a GavinB to the side window for those in the know.
Trump needs to declare martial law, disperse the agitators arresting those that refuse to leave, and keep it in effect until all the illegals are rounded up and deported. Do it in every city that protests the removal of illegals.
Martial law does not exist in the USA, unless the courts are not functioning. As soon as a court opens its doors for business, martial law in that county is automatically invalid.
The demonrat/socialists are trying to provoke federal officers into these types of shootings. They are trying to create the conditions that result in a civil war. They want to make it look like the “nazi” regime currently in the White House is causing all this and the minions paid by Soros and Neville Singh have a reason to start shooting back and hurling Molotov cocktails and setting up IED’s. They are using the tactics of the “color revolutions”. The only way to stop it is to bring in the National Guard or regular Army/Marines to protect federal officers doing their job. Arresting and deporting illegal aliens is not an abhorrent use of federal policing. It is Constitutional and lawful.
If they want a civil war, the left should be reminded that the right controls the executive branch, (officially) Congress, effectively the Supreme Court, the military, the majority of states, as well as the food and energy supply. And its followers are better armed. A civil war would be bloody but there is no doubt who would come out on top.
It would also be short. Probably wouldn’t even need to set the DVR.
very sad that he had to waste tax funding on ammo
It was easier to extract Maduro from a heavily fortified compound in Venezuela that an illegal from the streets of Minneapolis.
A recent SCOTUS decision has changed the Use of Deadly Force…..
https://youtu.be/W8M1pwWXL30?si=KbEAFVF_2ip0oKTt
Barnes v Felix hasn’t really changed things. Most circuits were already being reasonable about this; the decision only affects those circuits that weren’t. And while in Barnes the totality of the circumstances works against the officer, in this case it works for him. The “moment of threat” doctrine might have minimized the threat to the agents, but the total circumstances include the history of ICE agents being attacked in just this manner, so it increases the threat.
Which of the following would Democrats wholeheartedly give support:
1. A savage narco terrorist dictator who killed thousands of his own people
2. A Federal agent trying protect himself while carrying out his official duties
Unlike 2020, the response to this Communist uprising must be ruthless and bloody. Deadly force is the only thing these Communist scum understand.
that is a fact
they have proven it with their decades longs approach to incivility and with their 2020 summer of takeovers of america
This.
A Dhimmi-crat “holy warrior” terrorist fanatic was killed attempting an attack on federal LEO’s. End of story. Good riddance to this evil trash.
Sadly, there are innumerable terrorists among the Dhimmi-crat base, just like the deceased.
kill more of them, keep killing them until they are all gone or they learn to crawl back under their rocks and forever STFU
Unlike George Floyd, this is a Federal Issue, not state.
but unarmed ashlie babbits murder by crazed leo was deemed patriotic ( my word,,their sentiment) by congressional elites
I was just going to mention that yesterday was the anniversary of her murder. The dems all declared that was a good shoot.
not according to msm tim walz etc
she was trying to turn her car around and an ICE agent was in front of the car pointing the weapon at her
She was trying to turn around, and the ICE agent was in front of her car, and he pulled out a gun and put it right in — like, his midriff was on her bumper — and he reached across the hood of the car and shot her in the face like three, four times,” the witness said.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/article/minneapolis-ice-shooting-woman-dies-after-federal-agent-opens-fire-on-her-vehicle-amid-immigration-crackdown-185933759.html
From what I heard earlier and maybe someone can correct me but this was an ICE raid that protesters were at?
Maybe someone can explain to me how these protesters know where this ICE raid was going to be at?
Is this organic?
Are these people told where to go?
It wasn’t an ICE raid, they were following the ICE car and blocking it.
They do this crap in a ton of liberal cities, they literally just sit outside the ICE facility and follow the ICE vehicles blaring their horns and screaming on loudspeakers and trying to block the ICE cars.
Break out the caramel popcorn. This will be a massive event because it “can’t go away.” My SWAG is that the woman was a paid agitator (or a clueless NPC) and thus a paper trail will be built up regarding her phone, car movements, bank accounts, etc. No chance of selling it as wrong place, wrong time. She was there “to interfere” with a federal LEO operation. They send in AWFLs to do this just lkike drug dealers use children to control the optics. Walz is blathering but he has nothing here, and the further he pushes it (fingers crossed) the deeper it will get for him. The smart people are already building distance between themselves and this incident, which of course means that the resources to counter it are vaporizing as well.
Someone pointed out the vehicle had Missouri tags. Personally I can’t see it clearly enough.
AWFLs have been the driving force behind the Democratic party for the last 10 years, and their influence right now is the greatest ever. They are extremely eager participants in leftist activism. They are driven by emotion, but people often know things emotionally that they can’t explain intellectually. The Feminists are correct in that Trumpism represents an existential threat to everything they fought for from the 1960s onward. At its core, feminism is all about women having the good life with a high paying DEI job without any husband or obligation to produce children. It necessarily implies globalism, since population growth is necessary for economic growth, and if native women won’t make babies, they must be imported. Unlimited migration is logically implied by feminism. Nationalism (of which MAGA Trumpism is a variant), implies exactly the opposite. Women must eventually be forced by incentive structures to marry and have far more children than replacement, which means feminism must go into the ash heap of History. These AWFLs have TDS, but TDS is not actually irrational – it just seems to be.
She was there “to interfere” with a federal LEO operation.
Indeed, this was admitted to by her “wife”, the woman in the plaid coat seen outside the vehicle taking phone video of the whole scene of disruption (you can see the “wife” in Sorter’s tweet above).
Also note, the license plate on the car is from Missouri.