Image 01 Image 03

Trump Names Jeanine Pirro as Interim D.C. U.S. Attorney

Trump Names Jeanine Pirro as Interim D.C. U.S. Attorney

I wonder if Sen. Tillis will support her.

Quickest update ever!

Trump unveiled that he withdrew his nomination of Ed Martin after much pushback, including from Sen. Tom Tillis (R-NC), which likely nuked his confirmation.

Trump hopes Martin will serve in some capacity at the DOJ.

Of course, ABC News only published the negative aspects of Pirro. How about we look at what makes her qualified for the job?

Pirro is the first woman to become the Westchester County district attorney. She was elected in 1993, 1997, and 2001.

Pirro earned her way to the spotlight when she served as Westchester County’s assistant district attorney because of her push for a federal grant to establish a bureau devoted to domestic violence and moving domestic violence cases to criminal court.

After this position, Pirro won the election as a judge for the Westchester County Court in 1990.

Pirro was the first woman to serve as a judge in the county court.

Pirro also became the first woman to serve as the New York State District Attorneys Association president.

Then-Gov. George Patacki appointed Pirro to chair the New York State Commission on Domestic Violence Fatalities.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

She convicted a New York cop for shooting a black guy who was teeing off on his Father with an aluminum baseball bat


     
     6 
     
     3
    dawgfan in reply to rduke007. | May 8, 2025 at 6:32 pm

    Just read the details of that case. Pirro is terrible and shouldn’t be entrusted with a prime US Attorney job, or any other sort of prosecutoral position.


     
     0 
     
     5
    BobM in reply to rduke007. | May 8, 2025 at 10:07 pm

    Witness testimony changing is not all that uncommon – the initial “hands up, don’t shoot” riots were set up by Neal’s of the false witness testimony by a friend of the “victim” – which was contradicted both by other witness testimony AND physical evidence.

    I looked this case up – not sure I would have convicted him if I were on the jury – however the witness testimony that changed after police questioning is not neccessarily on judge (then prosecutor) Pirro – unless it was brought up at trial by the defense its entirely possible she wasn’t even aware of the changed testimony – it’s likely on the police if it was inappropriate.

    Which begs a question…. this was a NY cop, even if only a subway cop. How likely is it that other NY cops would go out of their way to frame a fellow officer? Isn’t the most common “police misconduct” situation in such a case (white officer shoots a black citizen) the police going out of their way to get the charges dropped?

    There’s a lot I don’t like about this case as reported by the press. I don’t like the “unarmed” argument when the guy shot had a baseball bat in hand and had already used it to injure the dad. OTH I don’t like it that the dad followed the guy to his car – I’d be skeptical that it was only to innocently return the guys clothing and cell phone dropped when the three family members originally pile driver him to the ground. I don’t like it that there’s no mention of the (off-duty) cop de-escalating the situation by showing a badge. I don’t like that there’s no mention of the cop giving any verbal stop command before pumping three bullets in the black guy.

    Which all means I doubt the press narrative is the entire story.


       
       0 
       
       0
      rduke007 in reply to BobM. | May 9, 2025 at 1:43 pm

      That’s the closest I’ve seen to a factual assessment of the case
      You’d have to quote large sections of transcripts to get clearer

      Self-defense (or defense of others) is narrowly construed. There are factors that can disprove any of the five elements in which case self defense fails


     
     0 
     
     0
    diver64 in reply to rduke007. | May 9, 2025 at 5:58 am

    Here is an overview for others but be aware that just like the news accounts and Al Sharpton who parachuted in for this, it is written from the point of view of one side which is the police department union. Still, the facts speak for themselves I think
    https://iapsnj.org/support-of-nypd-officer-richard-diguglielmo/


     
     0 
     
     0
    MarkS in reply to rduke007. | May 9, 2025 at 7:41 am

    Judges do not convict, juries do


 
 1 
 
 3
ThePrimordialOrderedPair | May 8, 2025 at 6:17 pm

Wow!

That would be great.

I don’t know about that case mentioned by rduke but I generally like Pirro’s view.


 
 3 
 
 8
TargaGTS | May 8, 2025 at 6:20 pm

Hasn’t practiced law in over 20-years. Never practiced federal law of any kind, isn’t even admitted to the federal bar. These are serious times. They require serious, experienced people who have a track record….in THIS century.


 
 0 
 
 0
TargaGTS | May 8, 2025 at 6:43 pm

She’s been appointed ‘interim’ USA.

https://x.com/KatiePavlich/status/1920608342025662966

It will be interesting to see if this is challenged in court. Trump’s own criminal defense team made the argument that the special counsel wasn’t constitutionally permissible because he came from outside government. They were likely correct. Interim USA appointments usually are awarded to prosecutors already inside the government for this reason.


     
     1 
     
     1
    TargaGTS in reply to TargaGTS. | May 8, 2025 at 6:54 pm

    Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 is the controlling statutory law. Reading quickly through it, it’s hard to see how her ‘interim’ appointment is….legal.


       
       0 
       
       4
      Milhouse in reply to TargaGTS. | May 8, 2025 at 10:09 pm

      No, the controlling statute in this case is 28 USC 546:
      (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is vacant.

      The Vacancies Act relates to “acting” appointments.


       
       0 
       
       3
      Milhouse in reply to TargaGTS. | May 8, 2025 at 10:12 pm

      For what it’s worth, if there’s a conflict between 5 USC 3345, passed in 1998, and 28 USC 546, passed in 2007, the later one prevails.


     
     0 
     
     1
    artichoke in reply to TargaGTS. | May 8, 2025 at 11:12 pm

    So as interim, does that mean she’s not on track for full confirmation to the permanent job? And can she serve as interim for the next 3 1/2 years?


       
       0 
       
       6
      Milhouse in reply to artichoke. | May 9, 2025 at 2:49 am

      No, she can only serve for 120 days, or until there’s a confirmation (either hers or someone else’s), whichever comes first.

      That’s why Martin had to go. His 120 days were almost up.


 
 0 
 
 18
buck61 | May 8, 2025 at 7:42 pm

Looks like a middle finger pick to Tillis, McConnell, Murkowski and Collins to me


 
 0 
 
 15
inspectorudy | May 8, 2025 at 9:28 pm

This is classic Trump. He is trolling the weak-minded as can be seen on this site.


 
 0 
 
 10
henrybowman | May 9, 2025 at 5:51 am

It’s Trump saying, “Shoulda taken my first offer, chumps.” Pure Art of The Deal.


 
 0 
 
 10
MoeHowardwasright | May 9, 2025 at 8:22 am

The rinos just learned a hard lesson about FAFO. They’re in the FO stage right now. Judge Pirro will pick up Ed Martin’s cases and run them even harder. She has a real axe to grind with a lot of demonrats. I for one am going to enjoy the fireworks.


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | May 9, 2025 at 11:05 am

this all will only work if

we get the same maga at the local levels and stop the lefts continued takeover of middle america and with the help of rinos

and

2028 brings us another pro maga agenda


 
 3 
 
 0
tjv1156 | May 9, 2025 at 2:58 pm

Oh look- another MAGA slag with no self respect gets a big job based on her main qualification. Knobslobbering a fat blob who tried to rape
a woman in a dressing room and smashed a pornstar while his wife was pregnant. She must be so proud of herself!


     
     0 
     
     1
    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to tjv1156. | May 9, 2025 at 4:46 pm

    You just jealous you didn’t get the “D”.


     
     0 
     
     0
    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to tjv1156. | May 9, 2025 at 4:59 pm

    Your rant: “tried to rape
    a woman in a dressing room.”

    Fact: He was charged and found liable for sexual abuse. Not rape. Check with your Negroid friend on the View about what “Rape, Rape” is.

    The charge was questionable at best because at the time this alleged act took place, Trump was probably one of the most recognizable people in the world. There is no way he could have gone into a department store, randomly choose one of the ugliest most pathetic looking women on the planet, took her into a dressing room and slipped her the big Orange “D.”

    The ugly, hideous whore of a creature couldn’t state what day the alleged act took place, falsely stated the clothes she was wearing (which were proven not to have existed at the time), waited until years after the alleged act took place, and had to get New York to open the books for a year so the scag could file the claim and the fat black “Persecutor” could drag Trump into court.

    That’s a BIG straw to grasp onto when you are drowning yourself in lies.

    Oh, and regarding the bicycle “porn whore.” She stated that she didn’t even have sex with Trump.

    He was, thank you, quite capable of dipping his big Orange D into any woman ready to spread her thighs wide enough to take it.

    But you do you.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Chuck Skinner in reply to tjv1156. | May 9, 2025 at 5:14 pm

    Sorry Prof., but he deserves this and I am ENTIRELY through with his BULLSHIT.

    Oh look, it’s tjv1156, aka the stupid leftist troll who will believe anything that the Lying, (former) Main-Stream-Morons will spoon-feed him to fill his head full of mush instead of brains.

    Think for ONE second, you lying, leftist troll. Donald Trump going ANYWHERE in the 90s was BIG NEWS. Do you REALLY think, for even ONE second, that he could have gone to the pitiful store where that ugly skank worked, WITHOUT being seen and commented on? SOMEBODY would have remembered him and SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE A PICTURE OF HIM THERE.

    You know WHY that lying, ugly skank couldn’t pin it down to a day, or even a month, or a season, or even a FUCKING PARTICULAR YEAR, and NO ONE ELSE could even corroborate her SAYING something about it, EVER?? BECAUSE THEN IT WOULD BE ABLE TO BE CHECKED AND DISPROVED, YOU FUCKING ASSHAT. I ~~ASSURE~~ you, there is a schedule or calendar entry SOMEWHERE of EVERYWHERE Donald Trump went, spoke to, or interacted with during daytime hours in the 1990s to late 1990s, and then with the advent of Outlook 2000, it likely became a digital record calendar by one of his secretaries JUST TO KEEP HIM ON SCHEDULE. Are you REALLY so stupidly blind to a hit-job that you CAN’T see that her pinning it down to a date, or even a MONTH would have made her RIDICULOUS claim easily disprovable??

    As for IF he had ANY intimate contact with Stephanie A. Gregory Clifford, I don’t know, but SHE denied it for years, and HE has ALWAYS denied it. So there was a NDA? SO WHAT? Those happen between people ALL THE TIME. Except SHE thought she could be cute, and OUT EARN her liquidated damages AND be a hero to the “Progressive Feminist Cause.” It didn’t work out well for her. You should read her divorce paperwork. Guess what? I DID BEFORE IT WAS SEALED BY THE COURT because I used to PRACTICE in KAUFMAN COUNTY, TEXAS. The references to the NONDISCLOSURE lawsuit as a CONFIRMED DEBT of the Marital Estate: Disastrous to her future income stream.

    So fuck you tjv1156. Take it elsewhere you jackass leftist troll.

    /end berating stupid leftist troll rant


 
 0 
 
 1
4fun | May 9, 2025 at 2:59 pm

Trump unveiled that he withdrew his nomination of Ed Martin after much pushback, including from Sen. Tom Tillis (R-NC), which likely nuked his confirmation.
————————–
So tillis is saying not all defendants should be legally represented? What kind of “legislator” is that buhthead?


 
 0 
 
 2
Dr.Dave | May 9, 2025 at 3:31 pm

Tillis is my rep. I have emailed him on various occasions and after receiving his canned responses have determined he IS A DEMOCRAT.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.