Image 01 Image 03

Breathtaking Remarks from Dem Leaders Reveal Precisely Why Party Is in the Wilderness

Breathtaking Remarks from Dem Leaders Reveal Precisely Why Party Is in the Wilderness

“People say to me all the time, ‘James, why don’t we just do like the Republicans do, just stand up and lie?'”

I’ve often wondered whether Democrats genuinely believe the rhetoric they so frequently espouse, or if they’re merely toeing the party line. That question resurfaced on Sunday morning as I read the latest comments from PBS host and New York Times columnist David Brooks, political strategist James Carville, and Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi — and found myself genuinely astounded by their tone-deafness.

Speaking to colleagues Amna Nawaz and Jonathan Capeheart during a recent edition of PBS NewsHour about President Donald Trump’s executive order to end federal funding for PBS and NPR due to their biased coverage of the news, Brooks asked an extraordinary question: “Who’s more straight down the line than we [PBS] are?” According to Brooks:

At its core, the Trump administration … think[s] progressive elites have destroyed the country, we need to take progressive elites down.

And that’s whether they’re in museums and sciences and universities, whatever. And so, in some sense, they have some case to be made that the elites have become a little more progressive. …

And I would say, if you think that PBS is biased, compared to who? Name one news organization in America — and I shouldn’t be defending us. I get paid by PBS.

[LAUGHTER]

But I’m going to do it — who’s more straight down the line than we are.

Is it MSNBC? Is it FOX? Is it CNN? Lisa Desjardins, like, one of the great journalists of our time? And so I will defend PBS, A, because I know how good we do in relative terms, but, B, because we travel around the country. We see the local affiliates where they’re not doing some ideological thing. They are the voice of their community.

Since the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s establishment by the Public Broadcasting Act of 1967, the political content on most public media channels has leaned heavily to the left. As a result, every Republican presidential administration has attempted to defund it—and, by extension, the PBS and NPR-affiliated outlets it distributes funds to.

Both PBS and NPR are indistinguishable from the legacy media in that they offer readers only one side of every story.

In the Thursday edition of his podcast, Carville essentially told guest Ryan Lizza that Democrats can’t lie like the Republicans do, because their “people” wouldn’t tolerate it.

People say to me all the time, ‘James, why don’t we just do like the Republicans do, just stand up and lie?’

Because our f***ing people wouldn’t stand for it!

If I stood up and lied, you would be the first person to say, ‘James Carville lost all credibility last night when he said X, Y and Z.’

Yeah, I can spin. I can shade. Everybody does that. They [Republicans] just look you right in the eye and lie! And then our people say, ‘We ought to lie like them!’ No, we shouldn’t! Cause they would not do that. It would not go over well.

Didn’t the Democrats look Americans in the eye for four years and tell us that former President Joe Biden was fine? It was only after he left office that left-wing journalists felt free to reveal what had been happening behind closed doors.

They also told us that Trump was an agent of Russia, that the emails and messages on Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop were all part of a Russian disinformation campaign, and that the border was secure.

Indeed, Trump often exaggerates. He’s claimed the U.S. has provided $350 billion in assistance to Ukraine when the true figure is closer to $200 billion, and he calls his decisive 2024 victory a landslide, which it was not. But to my knowledge, he has never told the American people something that was demonstrably false.

So, is Carville lying to us, or does he truly believe what he says?

And finally, during a PBS interview at the Reframe Festival in San Francisco on Friday, Pelosi noted it was up to politicians to make sure the public knows what is in their best interest.

“When somebody doesn’t get a message, it’s not because of them. It’s because of us, who are delivering the message, that we did not deliver it clearly enough. This guy comes along and says he’s going to lower prices. He hasn’t. He’s going to do this. He’s going to do that. All a smokescreen. But we have to make sure the public knows what is in their interest,” Pelosi said.

Pelosi and others seem to underestimate the intelligence of the American public, as if we’re incapable of understanding our own best interests. But we don’t need to be told what to think — we have minds of our own and a clear sense of what we need.

Over the past few days, all three of these prominent and influential voices from the left made strikingly out-of-touch, misleading remarks, which may be the reason the Democratic Party currently finds itself in the wilderness.

The question remains: are they deliberately trying to mislead the public, or have years spent inside the left-wing echo chamber taken a toll on their judgment and clarity?

Readers?


Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on LinkedIn or X.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 16
inspectorudy | May 4, 2025 at 2:09 pm

Oh, I see now why I didn’t know slo Joe was going crazy! I wasn’t told by the Dems. Isn’t that what Pelosi just said? We are so dumb that unless they tell us something, we will never know it.


 
 0 
 
 6
gonzotx | May 4, 2025 at 2:09 pm

They believe whatever pays the bank


 
 0 
 
 21
Hodge | May 4, 2025 at 2:32 pm

I don’t find it surprising that, as habitual liars, they accuse the Republicans of lying… when you’ll lie about anything why wouldn’t you lie to yourself too.

As for NPR – I listened regularly perhaps 20 years ago. I was never an AM radio fan as the talk shows are too strident and the ads too frequent and abrasive. So, NPR. However, I wearied of the bias. I didn’t WANT to leave but it was too much – so I talked myself into playing what I call, “The NPR Game”.

The rules are simple: I could listen to an (any) NPR program until they hit a ‘trigger’ word or idea such as abortion, migrant, climate change, feminism, any of the Alphabet Sex phrases and so forth. When one popped up, I had to turn the radio off. . It got to be hilarious because I had trouble exceeding a minute of air play…seriously. It was so blatant that I would get passengers to play along with me. Even, and especially, people who hadn’t noticed the bias before.

It was a revelation to them.


     
     0 
     
     2
    Evil Otto in reply to Hodge. | May 5, 2025 at 5:51 am

    I did something similar, but my trigger was only climate change so I could listen longer. I rarely made it past five minutes before they would start going on about climate change regardless of the nominal subject.


     
     0 
     
     0
    JimWoo in reply to Hodge. | May 5, 2025 at 1:20 pm

    I used to do the same with WLS ABC news in Chicago when they interrupted Mark Levin. So biased it’s sickening. Now I listen over my phone and skip their “news” entirely and their ads.


 
 1 
 
 6
Dolce Far Niente | May 4, 2025 at 2:36 pm

To believe any of what the left is peddling, one must be unmoored from both reality and rationality. You must be able to hold 2 contradictory positions at one time. Your entire thought process must be subsumed by your emotions.

Do the top level parasites actually BELIEVE their narrative? I doubt it, but they cannot make public pronouncements that indicate their agnosticism of their leftist religion, or else they might lose their grip on power and money. Their followers have no issues with putting unbelievers on meat hooks, after all..


 
 0 
 
 8
Paula | May 4, 2025 at 2:41 pm

“People say to me all the time, James, why don’t we just do like the Republicans do, just stand up and lie.”

Because Democrats prefer to lie sitting down.


     
     0 
     
     2
    DSHornet in reply to Paula. | May 4, 2025 at 2:57 pm

    Are lies position sensitive? The Dimocrats don’t seem to have a limitation like that.
    .


     
     1 
     
     3
    WestRock in reply to Paula. | May 4, 2025 at 7:26 pm

    Q: How can you tell a Democrat is lying?

    A: Because their lips are moving.


     
     0 
     
     0
    diver64 in reply to Paula. | May 5, 2025 at 6:02 am

    In Carville’s defense I think he was pretty spot on in describing his own speech. Shade, slant, spin but I don’t recall him outright lying. In fact, during the campaign he was one of the only democrats actually lambasting the WH for running Biden and saying “someone better wake the #### up over there”. As for Brooks, he is exactly right in his “who is more straight down the line than we are”. They are straight down the progressive line in everything. Pelosi, I’ve never taken seriously or listened to and am not going to start listening to her drunken rants at this point. She is irrelevant.


 
 0 
 
 4
oden | May 4, 2025 at 2:48 pm

The Democrats, and their allies frequently violate the old dictum: “Don’t get high on your own supply,” which supposedly originated from the 1983 movie “Scarface.” Literally this dictum targeted drug dealers as a warning not to get addicted to what you peddle. The Democrats have lied so much they have come to believe their own bullshit. Remember Pelosi denying inflation? Then telling us it was temporary and finally “inflation is good.”


 
 0 
 
 7
rhhardin | May 4, 2025 at 2:50 pm

Democrats are after women’s votes, which come from creating estrogen clouds. Obama was the standard bearer in this.


     
     0 
     
     0
    henrybowman in reply to rhhardin. | May 4, 2025 at 5:36 pm

    Works great, right up until THEY get punished for complaining about a guy swinging his junk in their locker room, or a judge asks them for evidence that they’re really a woman.


     
     0 
     
     1
    diver64 in reply to rhhardin. | May 5, 2025 at 6:04 am

    How do you explain their “dark woke” turn? Swearing, ranting, insulting and in your face calls for violence. How is that going to get the suburban womens vote? It will get the blue hair they/them crowd but you can’t win elections with .001% of the electorate.

Dems are able to openly peddle their narratives-of-the-month because they own media, Hollywood, academia, newsrooms, the former Pope, etc. . . They have the confidence of someone who knows they are not going to be called out. I agree that the attitudes expressed by the PBS guests is pathetic and simultaneously arrogant. But Republicans do not appear to have the focus required to take advantage of their short ownership of both Houses to make a lasting impact. They would rather see SCOTUS do all of the heavy lifting.

I hope they never figure it out. Let’s not help them. We’ll all be better off.


 
 0 
 
 2
CommoChief | May 4, 2025 at 3:59 pm

IMO the leftists have a hierarchy for their propaganda narrative beyond a simplistic puppeteer pulling the strings of the puppets. They’ve successfully burrowed into and used the institutions, particularly academia and mass media, to indoctrinate the folks who WANT to believe their BS. These folks don’t stray away from the wokiesta hive and seek alternative opinions or evidence that might undermine their faith. We can see the results at work whenever they are.forced to debate; they have little to no skill in presenting an argument v someone with another viewpoint to convince. Instead they offer their lefty liturgy and begin ad hominem attacks on those who remain unconvinced.


 
 0 
 
 1
Paula | May 4, 2025 at 4:19 pm

“Breathtaking remarks from Nancy Pelosi”

It could’ve been made while she was drinking vodka—since it takes your breath away.


 
 1 
 
 1
ztakddot | May 4, 2025 at 5:19 pm

Unbelievable, Hard to know where to start.

All politicians lie to a greater or lesser extent. I’m talking out and our lies and not just a little exaggeration.

Democrats lie all the time. They didn’t used to be this way, but they are now. This is incontrovertible.

The Clintons, Obama, Biden, Gore, Kerry, Walz are fabulists. (Harris is just stupid). The democrats in congress are chronic liars, or are stupid, or both.
I actually think Clinton made it fashionable for democrats to lie. Prior to him you had certain democrats who were chronic liars (Biden, Gore), but many weren’t.

The democratic base have either swallowed the lies and believe them 1000% or are too stupid to know otherwise.

All media is biased and it has always been biased. There used to be a better balance in the print media. That has disappeared.

PBS/NPR might actually me more of a straight shooter than most media. It doesn’t matter. They are still biased. All their stories are biased. They are obligated by their taking of tax money to recognize their bias and go out of their way to show other views. They don’t. They’ve failed and no longer should receive our tax dollars.

I am rapidly approaching the point where, as frightening as it sounds, I could support an “Adam Selene” solution…

From “The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress” by Robert Heinlein:

[Lunar Colony civilians have staged a successful revolution against an oppressive Earth-imposed Authority, in the course of which a number of Authority-employed agents provocateur were uncovered]

“Let me mention those fink spies out of order.
. . .
So Adam Selene announced that these persons had been employed by Juan Alvarez, late Security Chief for former Authority, as undercover spies–and gave names and addresses. Adam did not suggest that anything be done.
One man remained on dodge for seven months by changing warrens and name. Then early in ’77 his body was found outside Novylen’s lock. But most of them lasted no more than hours.”


     
     0 
     
     0
    vinnymeyer in reply to Rusty Bill. | May 4, 2025 at 5:37 pm

    Bill, you made my day. My favorite author, my first exposure to sci-fi was Stranger in a Strange Land.


       
       0 
       
       1
      henrybowman in reply to vinnymeyer. | May 4, 2025 at 5:41 pm

      I do believe mine was Podkayne of Mars. I was very, very young. Only later did I understand how much of it went over my head.


         
         0 
         
         0
        Milhouse in reply to henrybowman. | May 5, 2025 at 12:35 am

        Somewhere in Podkayne is a remark that the kind of thorough-going capitalist society that they find on Venus can be the best of all societies, or the worst, or something like that. Podkayne gave the positive side of such a society; the negative side is given by the first half of Cat.

        In my opinion the first half of Cat ranks equal with the best of RAH’s juvies from the ’50s. The end of Part 1, with the viewpoint character dying in the corridor, was the perfect place to end the story. Instead RAH wrote Part 2, when he unexpectedly wakes up in a hospital bed, and from there on the book stinks. A good editor would have published Part 1 and thrown Part 2 away.

      “Space Cadet”

      Dahlquist! Martin! Rivera! Wheeler!

      “I answer for him.”


         
         1 
         
         1
        ztakddot in reply to Rusty Bill. | May 4, 2025 at 5:51 pm

        Also

        “Citizen of the Galaxy” I think it was called.


           
           0 
           
           0
          ztakddot in reply to ztakddot. | May 4, 2025 at 9:03 pm

          Someone apparently didn’t like the book (looking at the down click)


           
           0 
           
           0
          Milhouse in reply to ztakddot. | May 5, 2025 at 9:36 am

          Someone probably thinks someone who describes himself as a “citizen of the galaxy” is probably a (((rootless cosmopolitan))), AKA a (((globalist))).


           
           0 
           
           0
          ztakddot in reply to ztakddot. | May 5, 2025 at 3:23 pm

          That’s possible. The protagonist in the book starts off as a slave. Then aids a spy. Brought up as a trader. Joins the military. Finally discovers his inheritance as an industrialist. Essentially he becomes a globalists defender of much but not all of the status quo.

          However the downclicker is my own personal stalker and is just doing their thing. Making the reply was just me doing my thing.

          As for the book it is a little childish but I think it was written for 12 year old boys in the 50s so it can be forgiven and some elements of it are interesting.


     
     1 
     
     1
    ztakddot in reply to Rusty Bill. | May 4, 2025 at 5:50 pm

    Starship Troopers!!!!


 
 0 
 
 1
Tom Orrow | May 4, 2025 at 5:36 pm

” … are they [lying], or have years spent inside the left-wing echo chamber taken a toll on their judgment and clarity?”

Both. I rarely contact my Democrat officials, because I disagree with 99% of their positions, and if I do contact them, I get a form letter BS reply. But I did recently contact them all, state and federal, just to let them know that my silence doesn’t mean agreement.

I also noticed that one Democrat official in this Democrat state had not been beating the TDS drum, so I sent that person an approving note.

“Pelosi and others seem to underestimate the intelligence of the American public.” IMO Pelosi and others have estimated the intelligence correctly, or the popular vote would have been 55/45 for Trump. I know some very intelligent liberals. They are imperious to facts. As to the lies … don’t forget how many times “the border is secure” was peddled, where there was much more video evidence that it was not than there was of Biden’s condition.


 
 0 
 
 0
guyjones | May 4, 2025 at 6:35 pm

The vile, stupid and evil Dhimmi-crats’ narcissism lies at the core of their cluelessness and lack of self-awareness.

These imbeciles believe themselves to allegedly be perennially infallible, sagacious and oh-so virtuous.

To their deluded minds, there is never any reason to criticize a Dhimmi-crat apparatchik, or, a Dhimmi-crat policy, ever.


 
 0 
 
 3
smooth | May 4, 2025 at 6:53 pm

Carville is left over relic from the 90s clinton era. Maybe he could be considered surrogate for hillary now? But no real influence.


 
 6 
 
 0
tjv1156 | May 5, 2025 at 10:12 am

Carville was half right. No democrat could get away with blatantly and serial lying like Trump but neither could most Republicans. Imagine if Ron Desantis said tariff revenue could replace the income tax. He’d be laughed off the stage. But the BLOB says it the cult just shrugs their shoulders. When he gets caught red- handed in a lie (eg – the ms13 on the knuckles) he just denies or doubles down. The consummate con man.


 
 0 
 
 0
destroycommunism | May 5, 2025 at 10:13 am

its not about bias

its about american tax payers funding business,,of any sort,,no matter the true or perceived morality

american taxpayers stand up and shout


 
 0 
 
 0
J.N. | May 5, 2025 at 1:15 pm

Years ago, when I was young and naive I was listening to Fresh Air with Terri Gross, and some little twit who ended all her sentences with an upward lilt like a question, made a statement starting with “and you know Ronald Reagan, who was the worst president in history, – blah, blah, etc. Terri then said (I swear) “uh huh, uh huh”, followed by some inane blather. I thought did she just let that fly by without saying why don’t you explain why Reagan was so awful. No, she accepted it as fact and proceeded along as if that crazy opinion was a given. I quit listening to them pretty much that day.


 
 0 
 
 0
Hairless Joe | May 5, 2025 at 2:09 pm

They do not see their positions or statements as counterfactual; facts don’t enter into it. Leftist politics is, literally, their religion and as such it is faith-based. The internal contradictions and occasional confounding encounters with reality are dismissed as irrelevant. Their identification with the “progressive” agenda is an emotional commitment, central to their self-image and reason for living. It is futile to argue with them; you might as well try to get a committed Christian to admit that there is no evidence that, for example, the Resurrection ever happened. They have to be restrained legally and institutionally from executing on their agenda because they are not, and cannot be, susceptible to reason. The emotional cost to do so would be too great for them.


 
 2 
 
 0
Danny | May 5, 2025 at 2:31 pm

The reason the Democrats are out of power is Bidenflation happened followed by Trump constantly promising to tackle inflation and even with that the margin was Trump by 1.68%

The trade war is the danger to Trump not the left, and it is self inflicted and the American People do not like it for good reason

https://www.macrotrends.net/2583/industrial-production-historical-chart


     
     0 
     
     0
    JG in reply to Danny. | May 5, 2025 at 2:51 pm

    I believe that Trump won due to Biden was brain dead before the 2020 election allowing for the failures happening during the Biden Admin. It is not clear who ran things during the 4 years of the Biden Admin but there were a combination of bad things that happened to the country. The media did not report most of it but people knew what was happening and wanted change.

    Trump won and the Republicans won in both the House and Senate. The Judicial Lawfare happening will need to stop for the country to recover from Biden Admin’s mess. I believe this will force the Democrats into a worse position in 2026 midterms.


 
 3 
 
 0
tjv1156 | May 5, 2025 at 3:35 pm

Let me get my MAGA dictionary out:….
LAWFARE: A process whereby the judicial system attempts to hold ‘ THE BLOB” accountable for all his frauds, sexual assaults ,libels , and various felonies,

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.