Image 01 Image 03

Muslim Leaders Hold An #AbandonBiden Conference in Chicago

Muslim Leaders Hold An #AbandonBiden Conference in Chicago

“And they say some of their support comes from Democratic Party insiders and elected officials who have offered their backing behind the scenes, but are avoiding ‘front-facing roles’ . . . ”

The last time we checked in on Muslim leaders’ #AbandonBiden campaign, they were bumbling along, shouting their displeasure with Biden’s apparently disappointing failure to visibly cheer on Hamas terrorists and their barbaric and inhuman attacks on peaceful Israeli citizens.

This failure to celebrate mass rapes, torture, baby beheading, genital mutilation, and the unrestrained slaughter of innocent women, children, and the elderly has festered for Muslim leaders, apparently, so they decided to hold a meeting in Chicago to get themselves organized to ensure that Biden loses in 2024.

I’m very okay, of course, with Biden losing next year. I am less good with the whole premise of this “movement.” Pushing U.S. policy to become anti-Israel is a huge problem; pushing it to become pro-Hamas and pro-jihad is a disaster of the first order. But here we are.

The Chicago Sun-Times reports (archive link):

Muslim community leaders from across the country will rally in Chicago Saturday, calling for voters to drop their support for President Joe Biden because of his administration’s refusal to call for a cease-fire in Gaza as the civilian death toll in the Israel-Hamas war climbs.

Since October, organizers of the #AbandonBiden campaign have been canvassing in swing states against the incumbent’s 2024 reelection bid. They’ll expand their message to target voters in all 50 states during a news conference at the Hilton Garden Inn at McCormick Place, urging voters of all faiths to “abandon him because he’s abandoned us” as Palestinian deaths mount, according to organizer Hassan Abdel Salam.

“Chicago really is the center of Muslim America,” said Salam, a sociology professor at the University of Minnesota. “We’ve found a lot of reception in actively campaigning against Biden for violating a key promise of the Democratic Party: that we would respect life domestically and abroad, and that all lives matter.”

. . . . Salam and Hussein say hundreds of supporters are advancing the political effort in battleground states, including Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Michigan, where narrow Democratic majorities elevated Biden to the White House.

And they say some of their support comes from Democratic Party insiders and elected officials who have offered their backing behind the scenes, but are avoiding “front-facing roles” in the effort ahead of what’s widely expected to be a Biden rematch with former Republican President Donald Trump.

“The Muslim community in the U.S. as a whole may be small, but it is well-connected,” Hussein said. “We helped vote him in, and we’ve been betrayed in such a significant way that we must help vote him out.”

Salam emphasized that they don’t support Trump or any of the Republican candidates in the primary field — but “four years of any Republican is not comparable to a single day in Gaza.”

You can read the #AbandonBiden press release here (archive link).

Meanwhile, #HamasRapists is trending on Twitter (X).

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“Chicago really is the center of Muslim America,” said Salam, a sociology professor at the University of Minnesota. “We’ve found a lot of reception in actively campaigning against Biden for violating a key promise of the Democratic Party: that we would respect life domestically and abroad, and that all lives matter.”

What an idiot, it’s not ALL Muslims life’s matter

It’s ALL Black Lives Matter

Going to be a hellacious Democratic Convention, make 1968 look like kindergartners

Is there a translation for that German tweet?

I don’t do twister

    Google translate has it as: “Who started the deck war and doesn’t want to stop now.” I’m guessing he means that Hamas started the war and don’t like how it’s going now that they have to fight actual soldiers and not little babies and girls and old people.

    Vijeta speaks/reads German, I’ll ask him what it means and get back to you.

      Thanks

      Response to –

      “Who started the dirty war and doesn’t want to stop now.”

      #HamasTerrorists #HamasRapists #HamasislSIS

      To this guy:

      “It is unbearable that the government in Germany is blind and deaf to the atrocities committed by the Israeli army in #Gaza . Bombs weighing up to 900 kg were dropped 500 times on areas declared safe.”

      (sources include CNN and New York Times).

      21,000 Palestinians were killed, including 10,000 children. Entire areas are destroyed and uninhabitable. This no longer has anything to do with self-defense for #Israel .

      All of this is possible because it leaves the USA with warnings and the EU looks the other way – especially Germany – and weapons continue to be delivered to Israel without conditions.

      German foreign policy with its double standards is rightly becoming unbelievable in growing parts of the world

        randian in reply to Tiki. | December 31, 2023 at 5:26 am

        If 21,000 Pallys, including 10,000 children, have been killed where are the pictures? It shouldn’t be hard to document that kind of mass slaughter. That nobody has is telling.

        Not that, mind you, the Pallys would be bothered by the deaths of 21,000 infidels of any creed.

        artichoke in reply to Tiki. | December 31, 2023 at 5:36 pm

        It has everything to do with the self-defense of Israel. Hamas and the Palestinians have shown they can never be trusted. Self defense involves removing the threat. Doesn’t have to mean killing, if they would move somewhere else instead, far from Israel.

      I just heard back from Vijeta, and he had this to say:

      The top tweet is poorly worded.

      It literally says: “Who started the dirty war and now doesn’t want to stop.” [?]

      The word “Dreckskrieg” (dirty-war) doesn’t exist.

      It loosely means:” Who started the bloody war and now doesn’t want it to end?”

      Due to the tags railing against Hamas and the images of Hamas’ atrocities, my guess is that it’s still poorly worded and that Hamas does want it to end . . . now that they are fighting real soldiers and not swarming on unarmed citizens like barbaric rapist rabid animals. Or maybe that they don’t want it to end because they want it to go global “globalize the intifada,” etc.

      Responding to my confusion, Vijeta added: “The sentence makes little sense. But I think he is trying to say something like
      ‘Who started this war and now wants it to end?’.” Which is pretty much what I figured, but it is an odd sentence.

    gonzotx in reply to gonzotx. | December 30, 2023 at 8:15 pm

    Twister lol, actually as a kid I did!

    Did a search asking for the phrase to be translated into English.
    Who started the dirty war and doesn’t want to stop now.

Muzzies sitting out next election?

I have contended all along that Muslims are kind of dull, in part because of close inbreeding.

Yeah, sure they are.
Regular Trump voters they will become

    alaskabob in reply to Skip. | December 30, 2023 at 9:11 pm

    Trump is correct that Biden will not be in the election. The Muslims are pushing for some other Dem than FJB. There are more Muslims than Jews, but I would think that there is more money flowing to the DNC from Jews…. although a back door of money flowing back from Ukraine and other foreign areas may be far more.

    guyjones in reply to Skip. | December 30, 2023 at 10:44 pm

    They will found their own Islamist/sharia party — don’t put it past them. It’s not as far-fetched a notion as some might think — not with a substantial portion of Gen Z’ers believing that bin Laden was a hero, and, that Hamas is an allegedly heroic “liberation” and “anti-colonialist” outfit.

    There are a sufficient number of useful idiot, non-Muslim Dhimmi-crats who will gleefully support an Islamist party, in the U.S.

My Internet Archive user upload of the sponsorship list of the first organized Pro-Palestinian rally in Washington DC was censored (unindexed) and renditioned to archive.org’s “Deemphasized collections” penal colony.

The heading “From the River to the Sea” possibly triggered Internet Archive’s artificial intelligence censorship police bot. That phrase is now widely banned across the Internet.

The list contains 250 donors. It’s in the form of screenshots of the flyer produced by the organizers of the rally. I linked the download screenshots page hoping to skirt the ban. Or if you have an account, simply login.

https://archive.org/download/from-the-river-to-the-sea

Leading donors include;

International ANSWER.
Palestinian Youth Movement.
American Muslim Alliance.
US Campaign for Palestinian Rights.
U.S. Palestinian Network.
National Students for Justice in Palestine.
The People’s Forum.
Palestinian Feminist Collective.
Al-Awda: The Palestinian Right to Return Coalition.

And two more unintelligible group symbols.

Muslim supremacists and Islamofascists in the U.S. should found their own Islamist Party, already. At least then, they would be openly dropping the utterly contrived and fallacious pretense/veil/charade of their supposed moderacy and respect for secular, democratic norms and Enlightenment values.

The appalling and abject failure of supposedly “moderate” Muslims in the U.S. to vociferously and unequivocally condemn Hamas’s genocidal murders and sadistic atrocities is telling and reveals that the ideology of “Submission’s” intrinsic supremacism, totalitarianism, belligerence against Jews, Christians, Hindus and other non-Muslims, and other assorted pathologies remain alive and well in Islamic ideology and theological teachings/doctrine, as practiced in the U.S.

Not sure why all media folks (to include this article) seem to be okay with the murder of the non-elderly men on October 7th. Only the murdering of the women, children and elderly are deserving of any mention if you go off what’s written.

    Good point. Thank you.

    randian in reply to Chewbacca. | December 31, 2023 at 5:37 am

    That’s pretty standard in Western media. Working-age men’s lives are only important to the extent they benefit those who are important. Basically, women, and to a lesser extent, children. As they are now dead and are of no further benefit they are not worth mentioning. The murder of the elderly gets mentioned only because women were murdered too.

Chicago is not the center of Muslim leadership. Dearborn, MI is.

They hate Christians and Jews, by law of their Holy text, the Koran.

Erronius

Funny thing is that the Democrats never say anything. Their mouths are too busy fellating said Muslims.

If they go ahead with this, next thing you know, Dems will be accusing Trump of “palling around with terrorists” or of being the Moslems’ new best friend, or some such nonsense, because he would be the objective beneficiary of their anti-Biden campaign. They’d be calling on him to eject their support, and to openly call on them not to vote for him. I really hope he’s not so stupid as to do that.

In my opinion the correct response from him should be “I welcome all support from anyone, no matter what their motives are, but they should just understand that their supporting me will not cause any change in my policies; I still stand 100% with Israel and support its military campaign. If they understand that and are willing to support me anyway, I’ll be happy to accept it”.

I liked how Ron Paul replied when some unsavory people donated to his campaign, and there were widespread calls for him to return the donations. He said, effectively, “are you nuts? If these people were stupid enough to give me their money, why would I want to give it back to them? I’ll put it to good use, and if they’re unhappy with my policies that’s their tough luck.”

How about “#A-Biden Brandon”? Tthe use of “a” generally means “not.”)
Remember the words of Elias Canetti, author of “Crowds and Power,” a Bulgarian Jew who in 1980 received the Nobel Prize for Literature: “Islam – A Religion of War.” It began as such and continues as such. Always was, and always will be.

This is all a show.

They will vote Dem in droves

——-

As for Gaza, they certainly do not behave like they’re losing — they fire rockets daily or almost daily every day in to Israel.

They will not discuss hostage release.

They have not called for any humanitarian pauses of

daily raping of hostages

daily attacks on shipping in Red Sea

daily attacks by hezbollah

I’d say the obvious conclusion is that from their point of view, they are winning.

I’d say from their point of view they probably feel like they can hold out for months if not years, and meanwhile they are chipping away at their enemies.

I’d say that from their point of view they e been clear perfectly clear since 1979 and before: Death to America the great satan.

And just because people like Tucker Carlson or Col Doug MacGregor or Tom Friedman or Blinken Sullivan et. al. do not want to acknowledge the unpleasant reality of what, objectively, is proceeding apace……… doesn’t mean that it’s not happening.

    gonzotx in reply to BL771. | December 31, 2023 at 6:48 am

    I agree, like I’ve said previously or on other posts, it doesn’t add up to what we think is happening.

    They have an end game and it’s all going as planned

Suburban Farm Guy | December 31, 2023 at 8:43 am

Democrats. Can’t say enough bad things about them. Here they are using *one* of their *invincible* minority grievance groups like props, puppets, rallying them, showcasing them, from behind the scenes. They figure they can use Muslims and just throw them away when their purpose is served. It’s practically treason. Look to Europe, to history, to see how this game works out, this strengthening of islamics to use as tools against the body politic. Predictable, utterly.

Democrats. UnAmerican as the day is long

Is islam incompatible with western style democracy? Do the tenets of islam demand authoritarianism?

    Valerie in reply to smooth. | December 31, 2023 at 10:29 am

    There is an important dialog we don’t get to hear, about whether Islam is compatible with civilization.

    Makkah Declaration (2005)

    http://www.gawaher.com/topic/22891-the-makkah-declaration-of-the-oic-summit-conference/

    Ten-Year Program of Action

    While we affirm, in this regard, that terrorism in all its forms and manifestations is a global phenomenon that is not confined to any particular religion, race, color, or country, and that can in no way be justified or rationalized, we are determined — with Almighty Allah’s help and grace — to develop our national laws and legislations to criminalize every single terrorist practice and every other practice leading to the financing or instigation of terrorism. Similarly, we are also called upon to redouble and orchestrate international efforts to combat terrorism, including the establishment of an International Counter-Terrorism Center as endorsed by the Riyadh International Conference on Combating Terrorism.

    Pope Benedict asked this question during his Regensburg address (2006), and also asked whether the West would hear the answer.

    https://www.cureus.com/articles/203723-viral-respiratory-epidemic-modeling-of-societal-segregation-based-on-vaccination-status#!/

    The real mullahs hit it out of the park.

    https://www.acommonword.com

    In 2015, 70,000 Muslim clerics condemned terrorism — “These are not Muslims.”

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/70000-clerics-issue-fatwa-against-terrorism-15-lakh-Muslims-support-it/articleshow/50100656.cms

    70,000 clerics issue fatwa against terrorism, 15 lakh Muslims support it

    The surrounding Muslim countries, with the notable exception of Iran, have begun a peace process called “The Abraham Accords”. (2020)

    https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Abraham-Accords-signed-FINAL-15-Sept-2020-508-1.pdf

    And a fatwa was issued against Hamas in March 2023 for their war crimes.

    https://fatwacouncil.org/en/

    The Islamic Fatwa Council (IFC) is the first global governing judicial body specializing in deducing Fatwas from indisputable and moderate Islamic references, and is a representative legal body of all sects of Islam.

    The Islamic Fatwa Council (IFC) has ruled on the conduct of Hamas (Ḥarakat al-Muqāwamah al-ʾIslāmiyyah), charging the Islamist entity with violating the laws of the Holy Quran and teachings of the Noble Prophet Mohammad (Peace be Upon Him).

    https://fatwacouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/English-Version-1.pdf

      DSHornet in reply to Valerie. | December 31, 2023 at 7:04 pm

      I vaguely remember that. It caused a slight stir at the time but don’t recall hearing much about it since. You said it: We’re hearing little or nothing about it now, maybe because the savages killed them all. Savages do that, y’know.
      .

      Milhouse in reply to Valerie. | December 31, 2023 at 11:53 pm

      Your link to the Makkah Declaration of 2005 doesn’t work. But the OIC and the MWL (which issued the 2019 declaration) are both Saudi government organs that don’t speak for Moslems generally.

      What makes you think the “A Common Word” authors are “the real mullahs”? How much of a following do they have?

      “70,000 clerics issue fatwa against terrorism, 15 lakh Muslims support it”

      So 1.5 million Moslems allegedly supported this fatwa. Which means almost 2 billion did not.

      The Islamic Fatwa Council (IFC) is an extremely fringe organization that does not speak for almost any actual Moslems.

      smooth in reply to Valerie. | January 1, 2024 at 10:32 am

      Yeah no you are attempting to re-frame my questions.

      Once again my questions are: Is islam incompatible with western style democracy? Do the tenets of islam demand authoritarianism?

      Very disingenuous of you to ignore my questions, and to try to redefine western style democracies with the word “civilization”, which is ambiguous and can mean anything you want it to mean. Transparent muzzie propaganda response.

So muzzies sitting out to tip the election to Trump. But Joe Lieberman entering as the “No Labels” 3rd party candidate to split the Republican vote and tip it to Biden.

Seems they both agree Biden is currently more reliable for Israel than Trump would be. Am I reading this wrong?

    I think so, yes. I think Trump does truly support Israel, maybe more than any other president in recent memory (ahem, Obama and Biden). Trump is the one who moved the American embassy to Jerusalem and was responsible for the Abraham Accords. I have a lot of problems with Trump, but his support for Israel is not one of them.

    I don’t see a viable third party candidate who can take votes from Trump (this would be someone who would vote for Trump if it were only Biden as the other choice, not people who can be tempted to vote for him because no one can who won’t already). The only one who had a shot was Joe Manchin, and he screwed the pooch by being playing by Schumer and voting for the Green New Deal with some promise of something later. What a maroon. Complete political life killer there.

      I agree Trump was very good for Israel in his first term, certainly, historically so. But Trump’s been saying some strange things lately, like building the FBI a fabulous new HQ in DC. The same FBI that’s been after him and that has gone after the J6 people.

      While Biden may say this or that, but the fact is that the carrier battle groups are sitting there in the middle east and Iran hasn’t gone far out of line. Immediately after 10/7, they started moving there and haven’t left. Biden has also been a very strong friend to Israel, and to say the Muslims are disappointed would be a vast understatement. So the hypothesis is not impossible based on those facts.

      And then those facts at the top of my post. I am trying to make sense of them. Can you?

        Trump is a showman, a phony carnival barker, a caped magician spewing words that make no sense so that only his followers can “get” him. Kind of like Charles Manson babbling about Helter Skelter. Obama did the same thing; the whole, I’m a clean palette, paint me as you most wish thing is a tried and true tactic of sociopaths.

        Trump has no principles, no ethics, no morality. The only reason he was a good president was that the Democrats failed to take advantage of his ego, pride, and narcissism. They rebuked his offerings of peace (let Hillary heal) and let’s destroy the Second Amendment, so he just did the other thing. Not because he believes in it but because it was the thing the people who rejected his advances didn’t want. He’s an over-grown stompy-footed child. And if Democrats figure that out, they have another willing puppet to do their bidding.

    Milhouse in reply to artichoke. | December 31, 2023 at 11:59 pm

    I can’t see Lieberman taking any votes that would otherwise have gone to Trump.

      artichoke in reply to Milhouse. | January 1, 2024 at 1:05 am

      I won’t underestimate Joe Lieberman. He lost the Dem primary for Senate after serving several terms, so I assumed that was the end of him in the Senate. But he ran as a WRITE-IN, not even on the ballot, and won his final term in the Senate. That’s as I remember it, but I wasn’t living in the area at the time. Wikipedia describes it slightly differently but not much:

      “During his Senate re-election bid in 2006, Lieberman lost the Democratic primary election but won re-election in the general election as a third party candidate under the Connecticut for Lieberman party label. Never a member of that party, he remained a registered Democrat while he ran.[3]”

      I have no idea how he did it, at any rate. Never heard of someone else doing that sort of thing at that level.

retiredcantbefired | January 1, 2024 at 12:25 pm

Didn’t Lisa Murkowski pull off something similar?