Image 01 Image 03

‘Hamasurrection’ – Anti-Israel Rioters Assault White House, Scale Gates, Deface American Monuments

‘Hamasurrection’ – Anti-Israel Rioters Assault White House, Scale Gates, Deface American Monuments

“Are they going to the DC gulag for solitary confinement and will the FBI be raiding their homes for years while the DOJ prosecutes them endlessly? Or will they be let off like Antifa and BLM?” – Rep Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.)

Undoubtedly, the photos and videos that came out of Washington, D.C. Saturday evoked memories of 1939 for many in America especially in the Jewish community as pro-Hamas demonstrators took to the streets to call for “intifada” and accuse President Joe Biden, as Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) did Friday, of genocide because of his stated support for Israel.

As you can see from clips earlier in the day Saturday, it was a large crowd – and one that would get far more incendiary as the day wore on:

At dusk, things started turning uglier as the “mostly peaceful” rioters smeared red paint hand prints on a White House grounds entranceway and attempted to storm the White House gate, with at least one climbing over it and waving a Palestinian flag at Secret Service agents who were standing not far away. Nearby monuments in Lafayette Park were also defaced with pro-Palestinian propaganda including flags and signs with “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” on them, an anti-Semitic message also seen in the video Tlaib posted Friday:

Comparisons between this and the Capitol riots were inevitable, with some including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) wondering if the worst offenders from the pro-Hamas march would get the J6 treatment from Biden’s DOJ and FBI:

Perhaps the saddest commentary on it all came from Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas), who noted that parts of America don’t look like America right now:

As to where Joe Biden was:

Leaders lead, especially in times of crisis. Joe Biden, on the other hand, goes on vacation. Just pathetic.

— Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Some how I suspect these “terrorists” won’t be subjected to the same treatment as the Jan 6 “terrorists” 🤔

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to mailman. | November 5, 2023 at 1:06 pm

    And because of that, every single political prisoner in the DC Gulag should be pardoned and set free.

    But clearly, the Marxist Democrat Party wants everyone to know that you are a target if you don’t bow down and kiss their asses.

    But if you intend to destroy this nation, you get a pass.

    chrisboltssr in reply to mailman. | November 6, 2023 at 7:25 am

    The first terrorist didn’t need to be in scare quotes. Leftists have common cause with terrorists because they are actually terrorists, and we all know it.

    caseoftheblues in reply to mailman. | November 6, 2023 at 6:11 pm

    Yah… the pro-Hamas demonstrators who DID disrupt official government proceedings inside the Cannon building on OCT 18 were arrested for crowding… then immediately released.

Chrissy Wray is a pathetic piece of shit who won’t do anything. Any bet takers out there? Double standards everywhere!

We have this and we have examples of people walking calmly through roped barricades. One of these could qualify as an “insurrection” and it isn’t the latter.

Robert E Lee statues were safe, at least.

There’s a reply to the Wesley Hunt tweet (above):

“Apparently, it is okay to storm the Capital as long as it is in support of those who shout “Death to America”.”

    Milhouse in reply to Treguard. | November 5, 2023 at 11:16 pm

    The Jan-6-2021 riot was inside the Capitol, not the capital. Washington is the capital.

    This incident wasn’t at the Capitol, didn’t disrupt any government proceeding, and those who got inside were arrested and will surely be charged.

      CincyJan in reply to Milhouse. | November 5, 2023 at 11:46 pm

      I could have sworn the Executive Branch was a part of the government, but it certainly is not headquartered in the Capitol, so I guess this demonstration was a totally different thing from those wayward Republicans who charged the Capitol with their cell phones at the ready.

        Milhouse in reply to CincyJan. | November 6, 2023 at 5:52 am

        No official proceedings at the White House were obstructed. Therefore that charge could not be brought.

        Ditto for Rashida Tlaib’s rally at the Cannon Building. It was not at the Capitol, and did not obstruct any proceeding.

          AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 7:02 pm

          At some point, the Gestapo will even come for you. At that moment, you will realize that no one will be around to defend you for your thought crimes, when you have turned a blind eye to the injustice done to others.

          On that day, I will celebrate

          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 9:05 pm

          You idiot, you are the one protesting that an injustice is not being done to our enemies.

      chrisboltssr in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 7:41 am

      January 6 wasn’t a riot. And the more people like you call it that the more actual rioters (all of which is the sole domain of the Left) get away with their behavior.

      As for people being arrested and charged, you know that isn’t going to happen.

        Milhouse in reply to chrisboltssr. | November 6, 2023 at 9:15 pm

        What the hell are you talking about? How can you deny that there was a riot at the Capitol that day? The rally that Trump addressed was not a riot. The protest outside the Capitol was not a riot. Even most of those who illegally entered the Capitol were not rioting. But it is indisputable that a riot did occur that day. People were injured, property was destroyed. There were people who didn’t just walk in through open doors but deliberately smashed their way in, and fought the police who stood in their way. It was, on a small scale, exactly like the worst of the BLM riots that we all condemned here. To deny that is a brazen lie.

        And no, I don’t know that nobody will be arrested and charged for breaking into the White House grounds; you don’t know that either. You are pulling it out of your backside. I am confident that those few people were arrested on the spot, and will face the full wrath of the law, and I think every serious person would share that confidence. The government doesn’t mess around with White House trespassers.

      Your pedantry really makes all your intelligent comments disappear into the background.

        Milhouse in reply to GWB. | November 6, 2023 at 9:30 pm

        It’s not pedantry, it’s directly responsive to the claim that this incident is comparable to the Capitol riot, and that if we don’t see the same sort of charges coming out of it that will prove that there is no justice.

        That the Capitol rioters — and even people who were merely present at the riot without themselves doing anything more than trespassing — have been treated unjustly is not in dispute here. I agree that that has happened, and that therefore the next Republican president ought to pardon most if not all of those convicted for that event, and end all prosecutions still outstanding.

        But this incident does not resemble that in any way. The only people who could be arrested are those who broke into the White House grounds, and I am confident that those have been arrested, and will be treated harshly.

      Azathoth in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 9:47 am

      Always nice to have Hamas simps letting us see just how depraved they are.

      And to reveal their illiteracy.–

      “Apparently, it is okay to storm the CapitAL as long as it is in support of those who shout “Death to America”.”

      Capital, not Capitol.

      And their ignorance of official procedures.

        Milhouse in reply to Azathoth. | November 7, 2023 at 12:15 am

        You’re the simp, and illiterate. Nobody has “stormed the capital” in the century, and nobody was charged with doing so. Plenty of people have marched on the capital, but nobody claims that’s a crime.

      caseoftheblues in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 5:56 pm

      And yet there have been multiple other riots ..,is a much closer description than protest …,that DID shut down and disrupt government proceedings that because they held different political views resulted in ZERO arrests. And what day you about J-6 rally attendees that were no where near the Capitol… attendees at a planned and permitted rally that are now getting arrested by the FBI…. Can’t wait for you to twist yourself into your sick legal defending all that is evil pretzel about that..,,as I’m sure you will

        And yet there have been multiple other riots ..,is a much closer description than protest …,that DID shut down and disrupt government proceedings that because they held different political views resulted in ZERO arrests.

        Not zero arrests. There have been many arrests and convictions, but not nearly enough. And there were many riots that were much worse than anything that happened at the Capitol. Even ones that legitimately fit the definition of insurrection, and yet very little was done about them. For this reason I believe the next Republican president ought to pardon almost all those convicted for this riot. I have never denied this. But it’s not relevant to the current discussion, which is about a protest that truly was mostly — almost entirely — peaceful, and was marred only by a small amount of violence, which will be prosecuted. The fact that the protesters are our enemies should be irrelevant to any honest person.

        And what day you about J-6 rally attendees that were no where near the Capitol… attendees at a planned and permitted rally that are now getting arrested by the FBI….

        To the best of my knowledge that is not happening. I think you are making it up. Neither of the examples trotted forth on another thread are true. Both of those people did not attend the rally, but did conspire to commit actual and serious violence — or at least that’s what the prosecution credibly alleged, which is enough to distinguish them completely from your claim. To the best of my knowledge nobody who merely attended the rally has been arrested.

      walls in reply to Milhouse. | November 7, 2023 at 10:30 am

      The Fools, Bozos, Imbeciles went balls out to investigate the Jan 6 protest – checking ALL airline tickets, ALL bank transactions, etc, of anyone near DC that day. Do you think they will investigate this WH breach with the same vigor?

      I know the answer to that question, and if you are honest with yourself, you do as well.

The Cheka won’t do anything about this. They’re too busy spying on Catholics, parents’ rights groups, and pro-lifers.

The GOP 2024 ads are writing themselves.

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to MTED. | November 5, 2023 at 1:08 pm

    But it still won’t get them elected. There are 2,000 more mules waiting to collect mail in ballots and those ready to vote in their stead.

Democrat operatives..

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to Whitewall. | November 5, 2023 at 1:10 pm

    Complicit Republicans.

    Most Republicans Senators and Representatives are shutting themselves as our country try is being destroyed.

    They are so afraid to lose their graft and bribes from China, Global Corporations, and NGOs who have a vested interest in destroying the Constitution.

    guyjones in reply to Whitewall. | November 6, 2023 at 10:37 am

    I refer fairly refer to these reprobates as “Dhimmi-crats.” Gleeful and contemptible apologists for, and, enablers of, Islamofascism and Muslim supremacism/terrorism.

Should be easy to find some of them, as they left their fingerprints with the red paint hand prints. Not too smart.

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to slagothar. | November 5, 2023 at 1:14 pm

    I bet that FBLie will start reviewing every cell phone signal for anyone who was on or near the White House and begin to arrest them.

    I bet that Bank of Amerikka, Chase, Wells Fargo, and every other global financial institution will quickly provide documentation of anyone who used their credit cards in the vicinity of DC.

    Uh huh. I bet.

    gonzotx in reply to slagothar. | November 5, 2023 at 3:45 pm

    Don’t make me laugh, as if

If these were constitutional conservatives, at this point, they’d have shot them in the street. And Wolf Blitzer would cheer.

Stolen elections have consequences.

AF_Chief_Master_Sgt | November 5, 2023 at 1:04 pm

President Trump was accused of being a coward when a crowd erupted outside the White House, and the SS decided to move him to a safe haven within.

Joe Buythem isn’t in the White House enough to even understand what happened. So is Joe fingers in vaginas Buythem a coward, or does he get a pass because he can’t be bothered doing his f’in job?

BLM and Antifa are pikers when compared to Islam.

Conservative Beaner | November 5, 2023 at 2:05 pm

If you think things are bad now, wait till the bombs go off. Of course the FBI and CIA will be too busy cracking down on you and Wray will be brought in to testify why he didn’t stop it.

His reply will be “it’s under investigation”.

Muslims terrorists have hijacked the dem party.

Biden blames white supremists ??

Biden vacations, in bliss, when he should have been home to see it firsthand.

Back in the day, we called that a “target rich environment”. Too bad there aren’t any in the DC area with the spine to enforce the law.

We probably are Bette off with Biden on “vacation “

He should stay on vacay till he’s there permanently

caseoftheblues | November 5, 2023 at 3:57 pm

Ok legal types… are there any …. ANY repercussions or legal actions that can be taken in response to what will be ZERO actions taken against these people verses the treatment given to EVERYONE who was at the J-6 event. The government is now arresting people who were nowhere near the Capital but just attending a planned and permitted rally… and then there is THIS….where no one will get so much as a jaywalking ticket

    AF_Chief_Master_Sgt in reply to caseoftheblues. | November 5, 2023 at 4:28 pm

    Of course there is recourse. But it won’t be used.

    Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland run the FBLie and the Department of Just Us.

    It’s a BIG club, if which we don’t belong.

    Supporters of Murder are invited.

    The government is now arresting people who were nowhere near the Capital but just attending a planned and permitted rally…

    Assuming you mean the Capitol, who has been arrested who was not inside the Capitol grounds?

    Most of these people were outside the White House, where they had every legal right to be; those who got inside have been arrested and will surely be charged.

      CincyJan in reply to Milhouse. | November 5, 2023 at 11:42 pm

      As you must know, Enrique Tarrio, leader of the Proud Boys, was sentenced to 22 years for seditious conspiracy, althoufgh he was not in DC on J6. Per CNN, the judge decried Tarrio’s revolutionary zeal – and then segued to the Founders. Who were one and all revolutionary zealots.

        Milhouse in reply to CincyJan. | November 6, 2023 at 6:06 am

        And? What is your point? He was not convicted for what happened at the Capitol. He was convicted for conspiring to commit violence at the Capitol. Are you claiming that that is not a serious crime?! Or are you disputing the evidence against him? How is his not having been present where the crime took place relevant? Do you claim that in all cases of criminal conspiracies, the conspirators who don’t personally travel to where the crime is to take place should not be prosecuted?

        This is not a case of someone innocently and peacefully trespassing because the door was open. And this is certainly not a case of “arresting people who were nowhere near the Capital but just attending a planned and permitted rally”, which is the claim we are discussing.

          CincyJan in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 3:17 pm

          Reviewing your various answers to comments, I think you’re missing the forest for the trees. You are arguing details that do not actually matter to the majority and which, actually, can’t be known without in-depth study. That is a lot like saying mind your own business; if there is something to see, we’ll tell you what it is.

          The overall impression from J6 is that ordinary Americans have been railroaded by a rougue justice system. I have read that laws passed post-9/11 to prosecute terrorists have been used against the J6 defendents. Who were ordinary people. Frankly, I don’t care whether the Proud Boys or whoever conspired to commit violence if they didn’t actually commit it. I could plan any number of bank robberies with my friends, but we if we don’t commit them, then “conspiracy” sounds like a thought crime.

          Most people react to the comparison of how J6 defendants have been treated – hunted down like vermin, kept in solitary confinement, imprisoned for years – and obviously violent protests like the BLM riots around the country, or the pro-Palestinian one recently – with participants facing few if any repercussions.

          In my whole life, I’ve never known the American government, executive or legislative, to so thoroughly ignore the feelings of the public. Makes one wonder about that one man, one vote thing. A real democracy, even a representative one, coudn’t ignore the reaction of 74 million voters.

          My opinion is that the election was indeed stolen (see Time Magazine’s helpful cover story of February 4, 2021, The Secret History Of The Shadow Campaign That Saved The 2020 Election), and that the J6 “insurrection” was political theater instigated. by Nancy Pelosi to silence dissent. That wasn’t my belief on J7. I didn’t come to the last part of that opinion until fairly recently. Something is rotten in the state of Denmark, so to speak.,

          Milhouse in reply to CincyJan. | November 6, 2023 at 10:43 pm

          Reviewing your various answers to comments, I think you’re missing the forest for the trees. You are arguing details that do not actually matter to the majority

          If they don’t matter to the majority then the majority are dishonest rogues who have no moral right to complain about anything or to criticize anyone.

          The discussion here is about a specific event, that people are claiming was sufficiently like the Capitol riot that its participants ought to be treated the same way. And that is simply not the case. As bad as this incident was, the Capitol riot was far worse, just as, as bad as the Capitol riot was, many BLM riots were incomparably worse. Treating these participants as badly as those swept up in the Capitol riot witch-hunt would be just as unjust as their treatment has been.

          The overall impression from J6 is that ordinary Americans have been railroaded by a rougue justice system.

          This is true. The treatment of the “Jan 6” prisoners has been a disgrace. Even those who are actually guilty of something have been overcharged and overpunished, and I think the next Republican president ought to pardon almost all of them. I also think Trump ought to have pardoned them before he left office, before they could even be arrested.

          I could plan any number of bank robberies with my friends, but we if we don’t commit them, then “conspiracy” sounds like a thought crime.

          Sorry, that’s not how the law has ever been. Conspiracy was a crime under the common law. If you and another person agree that you are going to rob a bank, and one of you does something to further that plan, even if that act is itself lawful, such as buying ski masks or renting a getaway car, you’re all already guilty of a crime. (Under the common law not even an act is required; nowadays statutes generally add such a requirement.) If the robbery goes ahead then you’re all guilty of that too.

          Thought crimes consist entirely of believing the wrong things. You can believe it’s right and proper to rob banks; you can even preach your belief in the public square, but the moment you agree with someone else to act on that belief (and one of you does something about it) it’s no longer a thought crime.

          Most people react to the comparison of how J6 defendants have been treated – hunted down like vermin, kept in solitary confinement, imprisoned for years – and obviously violent protests like the BLM riots around the country, or the pro-Palestinian one recently – with participants facing few if any repercussions.

          This is completely true. It’s a terrible scandal. But we still have to be honest about it, and not trot it out in cases that are not at all comparable, just because our opponents are caught doing something wrong. Not all wrongs are alike.

          My opinion is that the election was indeed stolen (see Time Magazine’s helpful cover story of February 4, 2021, The Secret History Of The Shadow Campaign That Saved The 2020 Election),

          Here’s another example of imprecise thinking leading you astray. I agree that it’s entirely possible, even likely, that the election was stolen. But that particular story is not an example of that theft, and doesn’t support the narrative of that theft. Which is why they were so open about it. That story, if I recall it correctly, is about a plot the Democrats had for massive riots in case they lost the election, and how it was successfully suppressed while the count was happening, in case they ended up winning, which they did. It’s also, if I recall correctly, about an effort to prepare the public in advance for what ostensibly did end up happening, i.e. Trump being ahead on same-day votes but behind on overall votes. There’s nothing at all wrong with that, if that’s all it was. Those involved in the actual stealing, if it was indeed stolen, are not bragging about it in public.

          Milhouse in reply to CincyJan. | November 6, 2023 at 11:24 pm

          I forgot to address this bit:

          I have read that laws passed post-9/11 to prosecute terrorists have been used against the J6 defendents. Who were ordinary people.

          If the crime fits, then it shouldn’t matter whom it was passed for. If Congress made a certain thing a crime, and someone genuinely did that exact thing, then it’s not inappropriate to prosecute it, even if the congress that passed it would never have wanted it applied to that person. Otherwise you end up arguing that since old gun-control laws were only ever intended to be enforced against black people, they should not be enforceable against white people. (Of course in most such cases, the correct answer is not to enforce them against anybody. But that’s not the argument you’re making.)

          What is truly wrong is that they’ve trotted out a law passed after the Enron scandal, and intended to be used against such defendants. “Obstructing an official proceeding” was intended to mean destroying documents that you know Congress wants to see. It was not intended to apply to loud protests that cause Congress to adjourn. That is scandalous, and the left having introduced this new interpretation of the law should now have it applied against their people, the next time they disrupt a sitting of congress or one of its committees, as they have done numerous times (just for one example out of many, at the Kavanaugh hearings). Send them to the slammer for that, until they agitate to repeal the law, or to pass a clarification that it doesn’t apply to such cases, and they compensate those against whom they improperly used it.

      henrybowman in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 3:02 am

      Ed Vallejo was convicted of seditious conspiracy and sentenced to be imprisoned for three years even though he never even set foot in the District of Columbia.

        Milhouse in reply to henrybowman. | November 6, 2023 at 6:30 am

        So what? How does that support the claim that “The government is now arresting people who were nowhere near the Capital but just attending a planned and permitted rally”?

        He was convicted of participating in an armed strike force that was waiting outside DC ready to attack as soon as it got the order. The only reason it did not participate in the actual violence is because the order never came. How is that not a criminal conspiracy? What difference does it make whether they crossed the district line? It sounds to me like something Antifa would do.

        How can you compare it to people who did nothing wrong, and merely peacefully protested as was their right? How can you even compare it to people who committed petty trespassing and have been hit with grotesquely unjust sentences? And how can you compare it to anyone involved in this Hamas protest?

        The Capitol riot was a mostly peaceful protest that got out of hand. But it seems that a small number of people did not come to protest but planned in advance to commit violence. Those individuals are not innocent.

        Unless the plan for that strike force was for it to be called in only if there was Antifa violence. In that case it would be justified defense of self and others. But I don’t see anyone claiming that.

          CincyJan in reply to Milhouse. | November 6, 2023 at 11:26 pm

          There is no Reply button to your answer to me of 11/6 at 10:43 pm, but I wanted to thank you for your thoughtful reply. Although I don’t agree with all your points, we do indeed have common ground on some important ones. Thank you.

Freinds don’t arrest friends, it’s all good.

Round ’em all up; military transports. Egypt and Jordan don’t want ’em … deposit ’em in Yemen. No shoes. No cell phones. Nothing but a shirt and pair of pants. … They will thus be “Free”, unencumbered by the “evils” of the “great satan”.

Anyone spot the fed- glowie – plants who tried to incite this into a riot?

oh- wait- they only send those to proud boy events anymore.

I’m not a lawyer by any means. But, speaking of J6 defendants, I think their attorneys screwed them by admitting fault, that the protest was indeed an insurrection, and then mounting a defense from there. Uh??? US trials are built on an adversarial basis. Once you admit guilt in being there, what kind of defense can you possiby present??? I didn’t understand any of it! The latest judgment I saw was for six years. I can’t bvelieve a judge could keep a straight face announcing that sentense. And, no, I don’t think these baby murderers supporters will see a day in jail. These are the DOJ peeps.

Steven Brizel | November 6, 2023 at 5:58 am

How many were arrested for defacing federal property and breaking band entering federal property?

thalesofmiletus | November 6, 2023 at 8:35 am

When Islam sends its people, they’re not sending the best.

I am still baffled by the fact that those scaling the fence weren’t simply shot.
This sort of weakness in the face of real danger (not someone lifting a podium) is why our gov’t will fall (and much of the country with it).

    Milhouse in reply to GWB. | November 7, 2023 at 12:21 am

    I don’t think you can justify shooting someone for that, not when you can arrest them at the bottom in perfect safety. It might be different if it were a whole mob doing it.

How many of these scumbags were arrested. I’ll bet none!

Capitalist-Dad | November 6, 2023 at 11:45 am

Scale White House gates? The last time an unarmed woman crashed her car through the WH fence she was shot to death by multiple Secret Service agents. Looks like leftist filth get a pass.

    Not comparable at all.

    For one thing, she wasn’t unarmed. She was armed with a car.

    For another, they had no opportunity to arrest her safely.

    At about 2:12 p.m., an Infiniti G37 driven by Carey allegedly struck one of the White House barriers at the intersection of 15th St. NW and Pennsylvania Avenue NW.[18] At 2:13 p.m. she drove into a restricted White House checkpoint at 15th and E Streets NW, without authorization and without stopping. When an off-duty U.S. Secret Service officer placed himself and a metal bike rack in her path to block her exit, she struck the bike rack and the off-duty Secret Service officer who was standing behind it with her car, knocking both the bike rack and the officer onto the ground.[19] Secret Service attempted to arrest the suspect but she continued to drive the car evasively, colliding with one officer who fell on the hood of the car and rolled off.[20][21] Carey then drove 40–80 mph down Pennsylvania Avenue, weaving through traffic and ignoring red lights. Police gave chase east on Pennsylvania Avenue for a dozen blocks. The chase then proceeded south on 1st St. NW/SW between Peace Circle and Garfield Circle.[19]

    At Garfield Circle, uniformed and plain-clothes Secret Service officers attempted to box the car in with at least five marked vehicles and one unmarked cruiser, on United States Capitol grounds, on the sidewalk on the east side of the circle. Four uniformed and two plainclothes officers proceeded to surround the car on foot with guns drawn, shouting orders. Carey eluded the box-in by backing into the Secret Service cruiser behind her and driving away, striking a Secret Service officer in the process. The suspect proceeded north at high speed, circling Peace Circle twice and then proceeding east on Constitution Avenue. She got as far as the northeast corner of the Capitol grounds, in the vicinity of the Hart Senate Office Building and came upon U.S Capitol Police Truck Interdiction Point at 2nd St and Maryland Ave NE with raised barriers blocking her path.[22] She then made a sharp left and crossed over the median and struck an unmarked police officer’s vehicle that had stopped in front of the Hart Senate Office Building. After ignoring multiple police commands, she revved her engine in reverse at a U.S. Capitol Police Officer who was approaching the vehicle from behind.[22] As the officer ran towards the median to avoid being struck by Carey’s vehicle, he and another officer from the U.S. Secret Service started firing. The two officers fired nine rounds each at the vehicle. The vehicle crashed into the kiosk and came to a rest. She was unconscious and did not get out of the vehicle. No officers fired after the vehicle crashed. It was at that time that officers discovered there was a young child in the vehicle, and they safely removed the child from the vehicle.[22]

    I guarantee, any leftist who does the same thing will be treated the same way.