Image 01 Image 03

U. New Mexico Asks Pro-Life Student Group to Pay Over $8,000 in Security Fees Ahead of Event

U. New Mexico Asks Pro-Life Student Group to Pay Over $8,000 in Security Fees Ahead of Event

“This isn’t the first time this school has attempted to stop a pro-life event on campus.”

This is nothing more than a way to discourage conservative student groups from holding events.

The College Fix reports:

Pro-life group ordered to pay $8,140 in security fees by University of New Mexico

The University of New Mexico asked Students for Life of America to cough up $8,140 in security fees ahead of President Kristan Hawkins’ April 24 speech called “Lies Pro-Choicers Believe.”

Students for Life of America recently released the security invoice from the campus police department. “Yes, you read that correctly – UNM is asking a student organization for nearly $10,000 for a speaking event,” Olivia Garza wrote. “And even though Hawkins’ security team notified the university that they will be working during the event, UNM has refused to remove the excessive, required fees.”

SFLA sent the university a legal demand letter, according to its blog post.

The pro-life organization reported that last year the UNM affiliate ran into trouble as well.

“This isn’t the first time this school has attempted to stop a pro-life event on campus. In the 2022 fall semester, UNM’s Police Department attempted to shut down another Students for Life UNM’s speaking event just days before it was scheduled ‘due to the subject matter’ of the event,” Garza wrote. “The police department was allegedly unable to provide enough resources for the event so the students were forced to take the event off-campus — does that sound like viewpoint discrimination to anyone else?”

The security tax has drawn the attention of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which also sent a letter to the university. The free speech group reminded UNM how the university had to reverse course in 2017 when it tried to levy a similar security fee on Milo Yiannopoulos.

The letter cited court precedent that barred the use of “excessive fees” based on the possibility of “expected protests or controversy.”

“Accordingly, when UNM applies its security fees policy to a student group, it must adhere to narrowly drawn, viewpoint- and content-neutral, and otherwise reasonable standards that guard against viewpoint discrimination,” FIRE wrote. “Allowing the subjectively determined controversial nature of Students for Life UNM’s invited speakers to form the basis for exorbitant fees effectuates a heckler’s veto, allowing the anticipated audience reaction to price speakers out of the marketplace of ideas.”


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Fire or someone should do a funding for the security.
But it should be a lot more so that additional security can be hired.
They should insist that if they pay, that ALL University rules be adhered to or a full refund plus they would guarantee to reschedule the event.
The University would allow outside sworn Law Enforcement to be hired. If violence occurs they would be EXPECTED to use force, beginning with Tasers.
All violent protestors would be expelled or the University would be liable for the emotional damages of protestors (financially.)
If I gotta pay, I want guarantees that I get my money’s worth.

How about requiring the same amount for ~every~ speaker at the university? No exceptions, regardless of who’s speaking, including by members of the university administration—who are apparently grinding their own axes. That would assure no viewpoint diversity discrimination.

And it has to be auditably non-refundable. Ever. No credits for unused funds, no debt forgiveness. One-way street.

Ought to put the kibosh on this nonsense right quick.

Capitalist-Dad | April 19, 2023 at 10:41 am

Security is the new alternate spelling of censorship. I’ll bet it’s only a concern (and charge) for those with conservative messages.