‘Abort God’: Radical Pro-Abortion Group Jane’s Revenge Attacked Ohio Pregnancy Center
HerChoice executive Rochelle Sikora said: “Saturday morning on April 15th, an individual claiming to be part of ‘Jane’s Revenge’ used spray paint to deface the east wall of HerChoice.”
Jane’s Revenge is a radical pro-abortion group.
It’s also obviously filled with few smart people because a group member attacked and defaced the HerChoice pregnancy center in Bowling Green, OH.
The graffiti says “fake clinic” and “fund abortion” along with “abort God.”
Ohio pro-life pregnancy center attacked by radical 'Jane's Revenge' group: 'Abort God' https://t.co/J4VAXuak3z
— Fox News (@FoxNews) April 17, 2023
Except…from what I can tell…HerChoice is not affiliated with a religion. In fact, it sounds like the pregnancy center will speak to a pregnant woman about anything. It doesn’t refer women for abortions, though:
Looking for a safe, non-judgmental space to sort through your thoughts and explore your options? Our compassionate Client Advocates can provide you with information about abortion* procedures and risks, adoption, and parenting. Completely confidential. Completely free.
*Please note that HerChoice does not provide or refer for abortion services.
The clinic offers women free ultrasounds and pregnancy tests. Men and females can get free STI testsb and birth and parenting classes. It also supplies parents with “supplies for infants and toddlers.”
HerChoice executive Rochelle Sikora spoke to Fox News:
Rochelle Sikora, the executive director of HerChoice, told Fox News Digital that early “Saturday morning on April 15th, an individual claiming to be part of ‘Jane’s Revenge’ used spray paint to deface the east wall of HerChoice.”
“This vile attack is part of a nationwide movement to intimidate, threaten, and terrorize pregnancy centers,” Sikora said. “These tactics are not only anti-American, they are based on misconceptions, misinformation, and outright lies.”
“Pregnancy centers offer free medical services, educational resources, material assistance, and support to mothers, fathers, and families in need, especially those facing unexpected pregnancies,” she continued. “Through the network of pregnancy centers across Ohio, families have access to over $15.1 million worth of services and materials.”
Sikora said “HerChoice specifically provides pregnancy testing, ultrasounds, limited STI testing, birth and parenting classes, and material assistance to those in need” and that their “love for women in the community will not wane in the face of these threats.”
“In fact, our resolve to serve is only strengthened,” Sikora said. “For those looking to help us respond to this vandalism with love and compassion, we invite you to join our mission to love, serve, and equip anyone facing a pregnancy decision with Christ-centered resources and support that empower them to pursue life for themselves and their unborn child.”
After someone leaked Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, Jane’s Revenge declared “open season” on pregnancy centers.
Then Jane’s Revenge announced a “Night of Rage” if SCOTUS made it official.
In September 2022, Jane’s Revenge claimed its members participated in “at least 18 arson and vandalism attacks on crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) and other faith-based organizations throughout the U.S. since the May 2 leak of the Supreme Court draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. Wade.”
It wasn’t until January the DOJ charged two members of Jane’s Revenge for allegedly defacing pregnancy centers in Florida.
The DOJ then indicted two more people in connection with the attacks on Florida pregnancy centers.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
It doesn’t matter that this particular clinic doesn’t seem to be religiously affiliated. The people of Jane’s Revenge have correctly identified their cause as being at war with God.
I say we should take them at their word on that.
I’ve read the book and know how this war against God ends
Uhm, I think you meant attacked.
It’s the new religion war declared by the Leftists.
But how do you abort something you think is already dead?
Way to debate your side LOSERS. Why is it you jokers are always the ones that say we can’t off a confessed killer but we can murder a baby?
When I was a teen , early 20’s, in many ways I was morally so naive , one could say bankrupt, I had no idea what a 6-12 week old baby was, I actually thought it was literally a clump of cells
I think every woman seeking an abortion needs to have an ultra sound, every single one…
When I teach an overview that includes the Carnegie stages, the kids are always a bit astonished. Apparently, social media algos really push the clump of cells thing.
We’re all clumps of cells. That’s how biology works.
To be fair, Nietzsche’s “God is dead” was not a report on God but saying that God no longer works for us. Other explanations displace it.
Abort God just means stuff it, directed at what is perceived to be a dogmatist position.
The expression of hostility is juvenile though.
Maybe if this Jane chick dropped a few pounds, dressed pretty, and did something with her hair, she could find a good man to honor and obey, and wouldn’t need all this revenging.
Obey is a loaded word but yeah. You have now or had in the past an employer whom you chose to work for and could choose to walk on for a better one; just like divorce. That employer, which you chose, had certain expectations of you.
You probably had to do things during that employment which you didn’t like but you did them anyway b/c you did what we all do; submit to the leadership of that employer. It never made sense to me why women would do that but would object to submitting to the leadership of their husband.
Nah, that’s apples and oranges
Ask an Iranian woman who wants to take her hijab off
Or a Saudi woman that wants to drive…
Iranian and Saudi women and those women living in many other far more traditional societies are very much in a different place than Western women in general or the USA in particular. That’s why I addressed it to your work experience, a woman living in the USA and not them.
Bottom line is if you have no problems at work following the leadership of your boss then it seems curious why you would object to the leadership of your husband.
Because a husband is not a boss.
How about because marriage is an equal partnership, not a master-servant relationship. In an equal partnership one partner does not obey the other; they reach decisions together or not at all.
Yet a decision must ultimately be made so at the end of the day someone your 50/50 partnership must cede to the wishes of the other.
Leadership isn’t about giving orders; that’s tyranny. It’s what a toddler throwing a tantrum does. Instead leadership is as much about service as it is about making decisions.
If the partners can’t agree then no decision is made, and the status quo ante remains in effect. That’s how any partnership works. If the House and senate can’t agree, nothing happens.
That seems like failure waiting to happen for both a business partnership and a marriage partnership if no decision can be reached b/c the two 50% partners refuse to compromise in order to get things done. Perhaps that’s why modern marriages often end in divorce.
Obey classically is from Latin obedire, oboedire “obey, be subject, serve; pay attention to, give ear,” and is about hearing and attending to.
The original Latin precedes the modern semantic drift. The classical religious perspective is that men and women are equal in rights and complementary in Nature.
Surely you have heard of wedding vows
Abort God? We did. Maybe He said, go ahead have it your way and we’re living with it everyday.
“In September 2022, Jane’s Revenge claimed its members participated in “at least 18 arson and vandalism attacks on crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) and other faith-based organizations”
How about RICO here?
RICO is just a fancy conspiracy law. Plain conspiracy law does the same job. If you can prove a conspiracy you don’t need RICO. And if you can’t prove a conspiracy you can’t use RICO. So the only reason it’s ever used is because it makes the prosecutor look good.
The FIB has no night shift
0 CommoChief in reply to gonzotx. | April 17, 2023 at 7:39 pm
Again, apppes and oranges
Doesn’t matter where I live
I ain’t in the obeying my husband business
I’m in a partnership
I work for a boss who PAYS me and I follow rules but I don’t “obey” them. If there is something I don’t agree with I can choose to not do it , speak to management, or quit
My husband can ask me to do something and I may or may not do it.
You got some penacostal , Islamic ideas of marriage there..
You should probably go back and actually READ Ephesians 5
Because it has instructions for husbands in there that the feminist loons love to pretend don’t exist
You can chose to ‘quit’ your husband; aka divorce. Many women do so; about 3/4 ish of divorces are filed by women. The overwhelming majority of which are ‘no fault’ or ‘irreconcilable differences’.
My views are actually very simple; the two spouses work together to form plans for their partnership but there is a need at some point to end the discussion, make a decision and implement it. A SR partner is required or one spouse must cede ground to the other. If not then in case of a stalemate no decision can ever be reached.
That’s why I use the word leadership v obey. It’s far more nuanced than the sort of image you seem to be implying where Billy Bob is ordering his wife around in an aggressive manner.
Your take on this is sad. In my many years of marital experience, my spouse and I have worked through difficult issues by discussing and researching together. Then, the spouse who has knowledge and/or experience with that particular issue would take the lead on how we should handle it.
Never once (in 25+ years of marriage) has my husband said, “I have listened to you but I am the husband so you must defer to my decision.” And, why would he? He and I entered into a life partnership, and we are most effective as partners when we respect each other’s strengths.
Obviously what you describe is the ideal and I congratulate you and your spouse on achieving it. What about when an impose is reached and both partners disagree? Say you both agree that your child’s current school is bad; low performing, dangerous but each insist upon a different alternative?
You want private school X, your spouse wants private school Y. Both of you have equivalent knowledge and expertise about the issue. Now what? Do you defer making a decision until you come to agreement in which case your child remains in a low performing, dangerous school?
That is the sort of issue and circumstance that families face more than occasionally throughout a marriage. Dithering and more discussion won’t solve the problem that your child confronts.
That is when you ask for another option to consider in your discussions, such as asking the child his/her opinions of the two schools.
Gonna pass on the idea to bring in the child as a mediator or final arbiter of household decisions. When an impose is reached then one party must chose to give in to the other. Could be the wife making the final call in a modern marriage, probably the husband doing so in a traditional marriage.
In a traditional marriage the ultimate decision at such an event was/is, after reasoned discussion and polite debate in the hands of the husband. The responsibility for the outcomes of that decision would then rest upon his shoulders.
Today many self proclaimed ‘traditional’ people actually live a far more modern life, including within their marriage, than they wish to acknowledge. I have no issue with folks who choose a more modern marriage but I do have one with folks who claim to be traditional but don’t behave accordingly.
I am certainly not suggesting that the husband should should rule with an iron fist or rule at all really. He should be earning and demonstrating every day that is worthy of his Wife being willing to trust him to make the hard call when necessary. When he isn’t capable of earning that level of trust and respect via his actions every day then that’s the wrong guy to become involved with, IMO.
Even if it were necessary to give one partner a casting vote, why would it always be the husband?
Why wouldn’t it be? Conversely why wouldn’t it be the wife if that’s what hey want? I am absolutely fine with the Wife being the decider in a modern marriage v a traditional marriage if that’s what both spouses agree to. Though I would imagine other aspects of that sort of modern marriage would be nontraditional as well. Again I don’t really object to how people decide to live their lives.
I do object to inconsistency in discussions about traditional masculine and feminine roles within a marriage when some claim to be traditional and are anything but. I don’t place you into that category as you haven’t claimed to be in a traditional marriage.
Wow. I cannot believe I actually agree with gonzo on something!!!
Did the individual who committed this crime get caught? This article seems to imply that, but doesn’t say it explicitly (unless I missed it). The pregnancy center’s president references “an individual” (versus multiple people) but no other details are offered.
If the individual was caught, please state the person’s name and the case status.
There is no such implication. It’s obvious from looking at the writing that it was done by one person; but it’s certainly possible that they had accomplices, and nothing in the article implies that they didn’t.
Mixed case writing. Either 2 writers or one schizophrenic writer?