RESTRICT Act is Not About TikTok: ‘It Gives the Government Authority Over All Forms of Communication Domestic or Abroad’

RESTRICT Act is Not About TikTok: ‘It Gives the Government Authority Over All Forms of Communication Domestic or Abroad’

When will people ever learn that if you give the government a centimeter, they will go a million miles?

The Biden administration told ByteDance to sell TikTok to a U.S. owner. If it doesn’t, then America will ban TikTok on everything.

Oh, Congress quickly jumped on those threats!

The Senate boasts that the Restricting the Emergence of Security Threats that Risk Information and Communications Technology (“RESTRICT”) Act targets China’s TikTok.

Then why doesn’t the bill name TikTok?

That’s because it includes all forms of communication, mainly technology from China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, and Venezuela.

“The RESTRICT Act comprehensively addresses the ongoing threat posed by technology from foreign adversaries by better empowering the Department of Commerce to review, prevent, and mitigate ICT transactions that pose undue risk, protecting the US supply chain now and into the future,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), the bill’s sponsor, wrote in a press release.

All in the name of national security. It’s another freaking Patriot Act. It’s an act that gives the executive branch way too much power. The bill allows the Secretary of Commerce to review and prohibit certain transactions between persons in the United States and foreign adversaries, and for other purposes.”

The bill identifies other “relevant executive department and agency heads” who will have a role: Secretaries of Treasury, State, Defense, and Homeland Security, attorney general, U.S. trade representative, director of National Intelligence, administrator of general services, and FCC chairman.

Those names are important because the Secretary of Commerce will work with those people to “take action to identify, deter, disrupt, prevent, prohibit, investigate, or otherwise mitigate, including by negotiating, entering into, or imposing, and enforcing any mitigation measure to address any risk arising from any covered transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.”

By any person. Anyone.

This might be the worst piece of tyrannical legislation I’ve ever seen. Forget the Squad, who are just big talkers—Senate Democrats are the most horrible, ghoulish totalitarians in politics. For Thune, Romney and Capito to throw in with them isn’t surprising, but it’s still… https://t.co/Vp5TN7qJOk

— David Reaboi, Late Republic Nonsense (@davereaboi) March 28, 2023

The RESTRICT Act is not limited to just TikTok. It gives the government authority over all forms of communication domestic or abroad and grants powers to “enforce any mitigation measure to address any risk” to national security now and in any “potential future transaction” pic.twitter.com/0mFNEKLUqU

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 26, 2023

So what happens if you are designated a national security threat? What can they access of yours to confirm it? Everything.
Notice the preemptive attack on quantum encryption in there, too. pic.twitter.com/rXMY8v8lOI

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 26, 2023

It also allows the Director of National Intelligence and Secretary of Commerce the authority to universally designate new “Foreign Adversaries” without notifying congress and a 15 day window to notify the president. It also requires a joint resolution of Congress to overturn. pic.twitter.com/ieVwPO0Ls6

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 26, 2023

If you recall from before, “Foreign Individuals” can now also be US citizens that are deemed a national security threat. Once designated, the bill grants authority to enforce any action deemed necessary to mitigate the threat, with no due process and few limits on punishments. pic.twitter.com/8IreN90m88

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 26, 2023

After the federal government has detained you without due process to mitigate the “immediate threat” you pose, what kind of punishments await you in court? $1,000,000 fine, 20 years in prison and forfeiture of everything you own. pic.twitter.com/072BG6POTk

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 26, 2023

This act also grants unlimited hiring power to positions of enforcement, unlimited funds with little or no review and immunity to FOIA. pic.twitter.com/TTtfIvdIEZ

— Mises Caucus (@LPMisesCaucus) March 26, 2023

Where does it stop? If you want to protect national security, why not ban American companies from manufacturing there? Why does the government allow all our stuff to be made in China? But it’s not like the companies would move to America since we have too much red tape and bureaucracy. They’ll move to other Asian countries.

But overall, it’s all about censoring the American public. It’ll turn us into those countries the bill mentions because those countries force citizens to hear only what the government wants them to hear.

Tucker Carlson tore apart the bill:

CARLSON: “That’s weird. Can you see that is going on? Chien runs tiktok and China knows if you want a productive society extending beyond next week. You teach your kids about hard work and creativity and personal responsibility. Respect for authority. If you want to destroy a society, you funnel a ton of garbage to kids about gender ideas and twerking. That’s what tiktok is doing here. There are videos of teachers boasting about getting kids. I had students not just with sexuality and gender identity. These reasons are why I think it is important to be out and loud and proud.”

Tucker agrees with AOC:

CARLSON: “In reality if you are opposed tiktok, as we are, this bill isn’t about banning tiktok it is never about what they say it is. Instead, this bill would give terrifying new powers to the federal government to punish American citizens and regulate how they communicate with one another. For example, the bill would regulate, certain transactions between persons in the United States and foreign addversaries. What is that and who decides the subject of commerce and DNI not the Congress decide what foreign adversaries are. That should trip a switch in your brain. Transactions would include, quote, any acquisition importation, transfer, deal nothing our use of any information and communication technology, product or service; ongoing activities or hosting service that is broad.”

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.