Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

“The big lie of the diversity, equity, and inclusion industry is that we are a systemically racist country”

“The big lie of the diversity, equity, and inclusion industry is that we are a systemically racist country”

My interview on The Daily Signal Podcast about the launch of The Equal Protection Project to fight equity discrimination: “…. In fact, we are a systemically not racist country. From the Constitution down to local ordinances, we prohibit and make unlawful discrimination on the basis of race. We need to enforce those laws.”

Thursday evening, February 23, 2023, Legal Insurrection Foundation officially launched the Equal Protection Project ( on Tucker Carlson Tonight. There has been a flurry of media activity since then, including several radio appearances by me.

I was very pleased to tape a podcast with our friend Virginia Allen at The Daily Signal podcast. Virginia has interviewed me twice before, during the 2020 times of trouble:

So I was really pleased to be invited on the podcast to talk about the Equal Protection project, Equal Protection Project Aims to Stop Acts of Racism Committed in Name of ‘Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion’


Head over to The Daily Signal to read the whole write up, here’s the intro:

“The remedy for racism never is more racism.” That’s the guiding principle behind a new initiative called the Equal Protection Project.

Through education, investigation, and litigation, the Equal Protection Project is working to expose instances of racism in America, such as a school district in Rhode Island that announced it was holding an event for non-white educators only.

“I mean, racism’s been around in various forms for a long time, but now it’s done in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion,” says Bill Jacobson, founder and publisher of

That’s a reference to the likes of Ibram X. Kendi, who in his book “How to Be an Antiracist” insists, “The only remedy to racist discrimination is antiracist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination isfuture discrimination.”

Jacobson joins “The Daily Signal Podcast” to explain how the Equal Protection Project is working to promote the “fair treatment of all persons without regard to race or ethnicity.”

Here is the audio:

(if player doesn’t load click here or here)

Partial Transcript via The Daily Signal (for full transcript, visit The Daily Signal)

Allen: Well, this is pretty exciting because today we are talking about a new project that Legal Insurrection has just rolled out with the aim of fighting equity discrimination. It’s called the Equal Protection Project. Professor, would you just take a minute to explain what exactly the mission of this project is?

Jacobson: Equal Protection Project is now Legal Insurrection Foundation’s third project. Our first one is the Legal Insurrection website, which is how most people know us. The second project, which we rolled out two years ago, is, which has interactive maps and a database of critical race training at all levels of education. But the new one we just rolled out is the Equal Protection Project, which is The mission there is really to fight what I think of as the newest form of racism.

I mean, racism’s been around in various forms for a long time, but now it’s done in the name of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Probably the best way to illustrate what we’re dealing with here is, our first project at the Equal Protection Project is legally contesting a new teacher hiring incentive program at the Providence, Rhode Island, school district, which is the largest in the state, where newly hired teachers can get student loans forgiven, but only if they are non-white. So white teachers cannot apply for that program. We’re contesting that.

That’s what I mean by the newest form of racism. There are, unfortunately, a fair number of people in the various DEI industry components who think that discriminating against white people is OK, that it’s not as bad as discriminating against non-white people. We reject that. So our mission statement is that there is no good form of racism and that the answer to either past or present racism is not more racism. That’s what our mission is, to fight against what I refer to as equity discrimination.

Allen: Was there a specific moment when you realized, “We need the Equal Protection Project”? What was that, that launch into, “Yes, this is something that we have to do”?

Jacobson: Well, a lot of it has to do with our website, which is mostly database-driven. We do have some resources, but it’s mostly a resource for people. And we get a lot of tips there. We’ve been for two years now getting tips about this sort of discrimination that’s going on throughout education, corporations, and government. We never were able to act on them. We could report on them, but we couldn’t act on them.

Then I think it was probably the Providence, Rhode Island, school district situation and said, “We’ve got to do something. If public school districts are openly and unabashedly discriminating on the basis of race and using diversity, equity, and inclusion as the justification for it, and if government officials are actually participating in it, the Providence school district has been taken over by the state of Rhode Island.”

So this is essentially the state of Rhode Island discriminating. We can no longer just report on it. We can no longer just document it. We need to take that next step. So I think Providence, there’s a whole multitude of race discrimination problems in the Providence school district, but that I think was the triggering moment last fall when we said, “We just can’t sit back anymore. We have to do something.” And that gave rise to Equal Protection Project and

Allen: Well, and like you say, you-all for a long time have been shining a light on these issues. You’ve been reporting on it. And that still is part of that mission that you want to be educating people just on what is happening, but you’re taking it a step further with this litigation aspect, which you’ve touched on. But talk about that a little bit more. I mean, what is ahead for you-all in relation to taking legal action and filing lawsuits?

Jacobson: Well, legal action can be a lot of different things other than filing lawsuits. Certainly that’s sometimes necessary. But I understand, having been in private practice as a litigator before I joined Cornell for 22 years, how messy that process is. But sometimes you have to do it. So it could be, we’re still going to shine a light. Sometimes publicity alone is enough to stop a practice. Sometimes it’s sending a warning letter….

We might do complaints to the U.S. Department of Education if it’s an educational institution, or the [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission], or the state attorney general—who, in most states, has enforcement authority for the anti-discrimination laws. So that’s another thing we’re going to be doing.

A lot of that wouldn’t necessarily involve a lawsuit, but sometimes you are going to get recalcitrant people who don’t want to just stop doing what they’re doing, and we will file lawsuits to the extent we can file them….

So one of the things we’re doing at the Equal Protection Project is creating a lawyer network. People will be able to go to the website. Lawyers, you’re not committing yourself to anything, and we’re not committing anything to you, but we now have a list.

So if somebody in Iowa, for argument’s sake, contacts us through the website, we would at least potentially have somebody to refer them to there. Or if we want to help somebody more directly, we would be able to get local counsel.

So we’re going to confront people lawfully. We’re going to expose them. But if all of that doesn’t stop the problem, and if a state attorney general is not willing to act and fulfill the attorney general’s responsibility, we will sue people. But that would be our last resort. But it has to be there, and so that’s one of the things we’re planning to do.

Allen: Professor Jacobson, how do you think we got to this moment in history? Because we’re seeing, obviously, this moment in history where there is this great focus on being anti-racist and on equality in all of these things. Yet we have, like you’ve mentioned, school districts that are trying to hold events that are only for people of color. How have we wound up at a moment where we need an organization like the Equal Protection Project?

Jacobson: It was both a long time coming and a short time coming. The long time coming is, you’ve seen this building over the years. A lot of people talk about critical race theory and its variations. And one of those variations is what’s called anti-racism, which is a completely misleading term the way they use it. OK? It’s Ibram Kendi’s “How to Be an Antiracist” and it advocates for current discrimination to remedy past discrimination. So it is an ideology that explicitly calls for current discrimination.

And that has become the philosophy. It started on the campuses, as a lot of things do, and now has spread to the broader culture where you have this concept that you measure group results. And if there is any difference in group results, that means it must be racism if it’s a non-white group that is not performing as well. Of course, we know that’s not true, and we could have a whole discussion on why that’s not true. But the point is, that ideology took over, that we are a systemically racist country. That emanates from critical race theory.

That led to the so-called anti-racism discrimination that has become really embedded in the diversity, equity, and inclusion industry, which is a multibillion-dollar industry. So people believe that you need to essentially have racial retribution. That you have to punish and discriminate against white people in order to remedy other problems. Of course we don’t agree with that because that violates not only the Constitution, it violates laws at the federal government way down to local ordinances like the public accommodations law.

The big lie of the diversity, equity, and inclusion industry is that we are a systemically racist country. In fact, we are a systemically not racist country. From the Constitution down to local ordinances, we prohibit and make unlawful discrimination on the basis of race. We need to enforce those laws.

So what we plan to do is do our best as a nonprofit entity to help enforce laws that already embed non-racism into our system. And to push back against the people who are very powerful and very well funded, who want to take us back to the 1950s and back to the 1940s. But they want a different victim. The only difference between what’s going on now and the 1950s is which racial group is the victim. That, to us, is a societal dead end. That is not where we should be heading. We have to adopt the principle that’s in the Constitution that everybody is entitled to the equal protection of the law.

*  *  *

Allen: Now, you mentioned you’re at Cornell, and throughout your time there you’ve obviously been doing so much work, Legal Insurrection, and with launching the critical race database, and now with the Equal Protection Project. What is the response from students, from faculty and staff at Cornell to the work that you’re doing?

Jacobson: It’s hard to say because there is on every university campus, and Cornell’s no exception, a culture of fear. Surveys confirm this. So my anecdotal interactions with students and staff, less so with faculty, is that they’re afraid to speak their minds. So I get a lot of private praise, but I don’t get a lot of public praise, and that’s OK. Sometimes there’s negativity.

As you know, because I was on your show two years ago in June, there was an attempt to get me fired and a whole lot of nastiness. I rode out that wave with the help of going on your show and other shows talking about what’s happening. It’s always good not to be isolated.

So I don’t know what they really think about me. I’m an anomaly there. On the entire law school faculty I’m the only openly political conservative. I mean, there might be others who maybe think of themselves economically conservative, whatever, but they’re not out there. In the entire Cornell University, which I think has approximately 1,700 people they call faculty at different levels, I am really the only one who is politically out there.

That’s good and bad. A lot of people don’t talk to me, don’t want to be associated with me, but a lot of people do. I am the faculty adviser to almost every right-of-center student group on campus. I’d love to think it’s because I’m so wonderful, but the reality is, there’s nobody else.

I mean, I am the faculty adviser to the Cornell chapter of the Network of Enlightened Women because apparently they couldn’t find an enlightened woman on the faculty to be their faculty adviser. And that’s great.

So I in many ways relish the role that I play on campus. But I wish I wasn’t the only one. I wish I wasn’t alone out there. That’s a problem throughout higher ed. It’s a monoculture. It’s a liberal culture. And frankly, the students are probably more diversified in their viewpoints than the faculty are. The faculty is approaching 100% who are left-leaning. Some are really far-left-leaning, some are just your standard liberals. But it’s a monoculture, and it’s not getting any better. It’s getting worse.

Allen: Well, the website, for those who want to learn more about this project, it’s But, professor Jacobson, if there’s a teacher listening or someone listening from anywhere across the country and they’re thinking, “Oh my goodness. There was an instance at my school, or in my community, that kind of looked like discrimination, and I would love to get some insight on this, get some thoughts from a legal perspective,” what would be the steps that they should take?

Jacobson: I’d say it would depend upon what the nature of the problem is. If it’s a very specific employment practice problem, you probably should consult a local employment lawyer about that. We at Equal Protection Project are more looking at systemic problems, policy problems, things that affect large numbers of people. That doesn’t mean we’re not willing to look at things that are person-specific, but you’re probably best off with a local employment lawyer if you’ve been fired and you need to file a claim.

But if you know a practice in your school district, like the Providence discriminatory teacher loan forgiveness practice, we want to hear about that because that will affect a lot of people. At least in terms of what we are equipped to do, that’s what we are really looking to do. To fight the systemic racism of the equity agenda is what we are looking to do. We have a contact form at our website, and you can contact us, and we can take it from there.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Well done, Prof J!

The grift element is huge. Definitely an industry. Predatory. It misleads or coerces. That’s why it’s so destructive and why people are at each other’s throats more than ever. Greed plays such a large part. They do not care. Look at the First Family, bit to mention the snake oilers.

August 23?


America: Dude, we just had a black guy as President and the current VP is a Jamaican chick.


It’s Cultural Marxism trading class for race and gender

The tide is turning and it could turn into a landslide.


This will go a long way in undermining the DOL push into who gets to manage your retirement money, the government or the professional advisor you’ve been using for years.

And Larry Fink’s Blackrock has already been facing the heat as they, Vanguard, State Street and other pro-ESG advocates were busted over the inferior returns of ESG investing and not complying to the ESG mandates they were imposing on others.

The House will soon be voting on rescinding Biden’s ESG rule and it looks like it will pass the Senate too. We’ll see if the Senate has the stones to challenge the veto.

Heading into an election year where woke has quickly turned into poison at the ballot box, chances are good that this could turn into a rout. I hope they include a provision getting the DOL out of the business of 401ks too. It is becoming a serious impediment for us independent advisors who have been managing clients’ retirement money. Soon-to-be retirees are being “counseled” on the way out and a big part of it is to encourage retirees to abandon their current advisors for privileged “specialists” who are allowed to hold “seminars”. What a racket.

The government is determined to take control of your money everywhere.

How confusing and inconsistent. The big lie is that we are a racist country, and the remedy for racism is not more racism. The latter part of the sentence contradicts the former. It concedes that the problem is racism.. This is the conservative problem- genteel appeasement when confronting the rabid left. A cowed and conciliatory attitude ensures defeat. An empty, ill-thought slogan does nothing.

This is a simple question to Professor Jacobson who deserves a great shout ouit for all of his efforts in fighting this scourge -do you think that there is a substantial element of anti Semitism in the DEI industry?

    BierceAmbrose in reply to Steven Brizel. | March 1, 2023 at 3:20 pm

    Anti Semitism seems to be Like water, but not in that cool Bruce Lee way. It also seems to be a fixed quantity — contra other varieties of raaaaaaa-cism which seem to lack for supply.

The bigger lie of DEI is that it moves the country in the direction of less racism. Quite the contrary, DEI moves the country in the direction of more racism.

If DEI were dishonest grift exaggerating the problem of American racism but actually stomping out the last vestiges of racism, it wouldn’t be such a problem and it might even be a net positive. But it’s grift which takes WHAT HAD BEEN dying embers of racism and adds fuel.

    Dimsdale in reply to ecreegan. | March 1, 2023 at 6:44 am

    It is programs like “affirmative action,” “diversity” and “equity” etc. that are actually creating the systemic racism they pretend to reject. “Biden’s” recent legislation is injecting/reinforcing systemic racism into our society. There is no good racism.

    It has gone beyond irony and extended to absurdity, a clown theater of racists pretending not to be racists.

    Said it before, and I will say it again; equality eschews racism, while “equity” requires it.

Painful Reality | February 28, 2023 at 10:04 am

The U.S. is a systemically racist country. Any nation that provides, on government policy, preferences to any race is bartering in racism.
The only part of this topic that is twisted is that fact that whites are the ones being suppressed. Quotas, Affirmative Action, and EVERY aspect of DEI is designed to propagate that racism against whites with specific emphasis on white males.
As long as there is a political and financial incentive to continue the division of the races it will continue.

If the left was truly looking for equity for all they would look at what has happened to Disney. They went woke and their bottom line plummeted. Their nonsense theory of a racist nation that must be punished is not sitting well with the “Racists”. To use an old analogy, the pendulum is starting to swing back and it is going to hit a lot of people in the head. Good job professor!

Hey professor, you are indeed the only Cornell faculty member that is “out there” publicly fighting the woke DEI Racists, but I know at least two other Cornell (tenured) Professors who do not hide their disgust for the current far-left monoculture on campus. Give them some credit too. Certainly there are others behind the curtain who need to find some backbone, and your example is strong evidence that coming into the sunshine does not mean the end of their careers.

Notice how Diversity, Inclusion, and Equity comes out as DIE. We might use that, instead of the sanitized propaganda version of DEI, in opposition to the DEI crowd.
Because the DEI crowd does want to kill The American Republic.
And turn it into a Stalinist country.

Well, if we let the Democrat socialists succeed in their quest for racism, at least they will finally build border walls, but in this case, it will be to keep people in the country instead of out.

Will the ChiComs build our Uyghur style reeducation camps, or will it be “made in the (former) U.S.A.?”