Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Iran Names New Long-Range Missile “Khaybar Buster” After 7th Century Muslim Massacre of Jews

Iran Names New Long-Range Missile “Khaybar Buster” After 7th Century Muslim Massacre of Jews

IRGC’s Khaybar Shekan missile “refers to an ancient Jewish oasis called Khaybar in the Arabian Peninsula’s Hijaz region that was overrun by Muslim warriors in the 7th century.”

Just days after President Joe Biden lifted sanctions on Iran’s “civilian” nuclear program in a bid to restore the Obama-era deal, the Iranian military has unveiled a long-range missile named after the Jewish oasis destroyed by Prophet Muhammad and his followers in the 7th century.

On Wednesday, Iran’s Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) presented “Kheibar Shekan,” or the destroyer of Khaybar, a reference to the massacre of the Jewish community in the Arabian Peninsula. “State TV displayed the new surface-to-surface “Kheibar Shekan” (Kheibar buster) missile, which refers to an ancient Jewish oasis called Kheibar in the Arabian Peninsula’s Hijaz region that was overrun by Muslim warriors in the 7th century,” the news agency Reuters reported.

In a 2013 article, the Jerusalem Post explained Khaybar as a reference “to the Muslim massacre of the Jews of the town of that name in northwestern Arabia in 628 CE.” The newspaper added that after “the attack, some Muslims, including Muhammad, took surviving women as wives.”

Reuters reported the latest addition to Iran’s rogue missile arsenal:

Iran unveiled a new domestically-made missile with a range of 1,450 kilometers on Wednesday, state TV reported, a day after Tehran and Washington resumed indirect talks to salvage a 2015 nuclear deal.

Iran, which has one of the biggest missile programmes in the Middle East, says its ballistic missiles have a range of up to 2,000 km (1,200 miles) and are capable of reaching its arch-foe Israel and U.S. bases in the region.

State TV displayed the new surface-to-surface “Kheibar Shekan” (Kheibar buster) missile, which refers to an ancient Jewish oasis called Kheibar in the Arabian Peninsula’s Hijaz region that was overrun by Muslim warriors in the 7th century.

“This long-range missile is domestically manufactured by the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) … It has high accuracy and is propelled by solid fuel and is capable of penetrating missile shields,” Iranian state media reported.

“Iran will continue advancing its ballistic missile programme,” Iran’s armed forces chief of staff Major General Mohammad Bagheri told a ceremony at an IRGC base where the new missile was displayed, Iranian media reported.

The barbaric events of Khaybar are still invoked at anti-Israel rallies by Muslim protestors to call for the destruction of Israel. Islamists from Berlin to Baghdad chant “Khaybar Khaybar, ya yahud, Jaish Muhammad, sa yahud,” an Arabic battle cry meaning, “Jews, remember Khaybar, the army of Muhammad is returning.”

In recent years, the slogan celebrating Muslim victory over the Jews of Khaybar is often heard at Iran-sponsored annual “Al Quds Day” marches in major Western cities. The battle cry, which calls for the Jewish genocide, was also raised at the 2014 anti-Israel rally in Miami.

The newly-unveiled Kheibar Shekan missile is capable of hitting any target inside Israel. “Israel’s closest point to Iran is some 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) away,” The Times of Israel noted.

The Mullah regime has made no secret of its intention of hitting Israel as it moves closer towards acquiring a nuclear bomb. In December, the Iranian state-linked newspaper Tehran Times published a list of possible missile targets in a military conflict. The leading Iranian English language daily displayed a map of the Jewish State dotted with markers showing Israeli towns and cities are potential missile targets.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Nice…
Thank you biden

After Muhammad’s thugs killed a widow’s father and husband, the all-knowing profit willingly accepted the widow’s poisoned meal.

The profit suffered a long, long painful death.

    Arminius in reply to ParkRidgeIL. | February 10, 2022 at 8:33 pm

    True. True. Most Muslims don’t know about this since it doesn’t exactly redound to Muhammad’s credit that after e killed the woman’s family he took her up on her offer of a nice, roasted sheep for him and his friends. They’re imams and sheikhs leave them with the vague impression that Muhammad simply got sick and died a natural death from old age. When Muslims are shown, in their own sources, that a Jewish woman killed Muhammad they refuse it believe it and insist that Muhammad couldn’t have possibly been killed by poison at Khaybar since he died two years afterwards. Unfortunately for them, their authentic sources have sahih ahadith in which Muhammad himself says he was being killed by the poisoned meat he ate at Khaybar.

    But then Salman Rushdie didn’t make up the Satanic verses, either. The early Islamic sources such as the writings of at-Tabari which are still considered authoritative today record that Surah 53 Ayat 19 – 22 originally read:

    “Have ye thought upon al-Lat and al-Uzza
    And Manat, the third, the other?
    These are the exalted cranes (intermediaries)
    Whose intercession is to be hoped for.”

    Everybody present at the Masjid al Haram in Mecca bowed down at this glorious revelation. Including the pagans, since Muhammad had just told them they could keep praying to their beloved female deities of Allah’s family. I’m not sure if al-Lat, which is female version of the word Allah (despite the protests of the Arabs that there’s no such thing, there it is) is Allah’s wife, or if she’s one of Allah’s daughters like the other two. Bottom line was the pagans were delighted that Allah through Muhammad had just gave his divine blessing to their idolatry.

    Whoopsie! What Muhammad thought was the angel Gabriel came to him and told him Satan had put those words in his mouth. He had to clean it up. Now the Surah 53: 19-22 reads:

    “Have ye thought upon al-Lat and al-Uzza
    And Manat, the third, the other?
    Are yours the males and His the females?
    That indeed were an unfair division!”

    In other words, the verses have been changed from “pray to these high flying birds who can carry your prayers to Allah” to “these goddesses are false.” First the Arabs insult Allah by saying there are deities beside him. But they make the insult worse by saying Allah’s heirs are female when the Arabs highly favor male heirs.

    I’ve never read Salman Rushdie’s book, “The Satanic Verses.” I have no idea what kind of novel follows the title. But Rushdie lives under a fatwa condemning him to death for essentially letting Joe “six pack’ Muslim in on dirty secret the Mullahs rather didn’t escape into public view.

    I elaborate on the battle, such as it was, of Khaybar below. It probably never took place, at least as described in the ahadith, but the legend still shapes the Islamic world today. Not in a good way.

      Milhouse in reply to Arminius. | February 10, 2022 at 10:58 pm

      I’ve never read Salman Rushdie’s book, “The Satanic Verses.” I have no idea what kind of novel follows the title.

      It’s worth reading. The protagonist is a patient in a mental hospital, and it’s deliberately written so that we have no way of knowing whether what he experiences is real or just his hallucinations; it can be read either way. So any Moslem uncomfortable with the “satanic verses” story can simply read those scenes as the hallucinations of a madman who’s heard this false legend and now imagines he’s gone back in time and is living through it, when all the while he’s really in bed in a straitjacket. But it can also be read straight, that this madman actually does go back in time and witness Mohammed delivering those verses and then retracting them.

They might as well name it “Holy Smokes” after General Soleimani’s last words.

Or “I just crapped my pants” which is what their new General will do right after Israel attacks.

I hope Israel hacks those missiles like they did to the centrifuges. May the missiles blow up on the launch pad and Peace be upon them.

Invitation sent.
RSVP on the way…..

would predict that the first “kheiber buster” launched against israel will also be the last

after the attack, some Muslims, including Muhammad, took surviving women as wives

That rather severely understates what Muhammad actually did.

“…some Muslims, including Muhammad, took surviving women as wives.”

No. They took the women as sex slaves. Captured women were included among all the war booty such as gold, jewels, livestock, etc. The “prophet” got 1/5 of everything, the rest was divided equally among the Muslims. They could either keep the women as their own sex sex slaves or sell them (the euphemism for sex slave used by Quran translators such as Yusuf Ali to obscure the fact they’re talking about slaves, although the Arabic is clear, is “those your right hands possess,” women you seize with your right hand and possess). What Muhammad did free his newly captured sex slave at Khaybar and marry her, but it wasn’t such a great deal for her.

“Sahih al-Bukhari » Wedlock, Marriage (Nikaah)

67 Wedlock, Marriage (Nikaah)

(14)Chapter: The manumission of a slave-girl as her Mahr

Narrated Anas bin Malik:

Allah’s Messenger manumitted Safiyya and regarded her manumission as her Mahr.

Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 5086
In-book reference : Book 67, Hadith 24
USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 7, Book 62, Hadith 23
(deprecated numbering scheme)”

Mahr is Arabic for dowry; Muslims are required to give wives a dowry. All the women captured at Khaybar were enslaved. Safiyah bint Huyayy bin Akhtaq was the 17 y.o. bride of the former headman of the Jews at Khaybar, KInana ibn al Rabi. Muhammad tortured him to get him talk as he refused to give up the location where he had hidden the settlement’s money (then had him beheaded). Another Muslim named Dihyah had already taken Safiyah as his sex slave. But when his closest friends told him how beautiful she was he had Dihyah bring Safiyah to him, and when he saw for himself how beautiful she was he ordered Dihyah to take seven other slave girls from the captured women in exchange for her.

Then he gave Safiyah a choice. She could either remain a slave or if she married him he’d set her free. She made the latter choice. When his friends asked him what he had given her as her dowry, mahr, he said herself.

So what have we learned, boys and girls? Ignorant or mendacious Muslims will tell you that Muhammad abolished slavery. He never did. He bought, sold, and traded slaves (as we see in this sahih hadith) his entire life. So did his successors. He sometimes manumitted slaves, and advised doing so to atone for some sin or bad deed, but only Muslim slaves were to be manumitted. He sometimes re-enslaved slaves he believed were wrongly freed, such as when a Muslim manumitted a slave on his death bed when he had no other property to leave his heirs. Slavery, specifically sex slavery, is divinely ordained by Allah as one of the good things in life, a pleasure he has authorized for Muslims.

So when ISIS took captive women as sex slaves they weren’t being “un-Islamic.” There is nothing more Islamic than following their prophet’s example.

He tortured Safiyah’s husband until he was almost dead to get the settlement’s treasury, then had him beheaded. But it wouldn’t have mattered as far as taking Safiyah as a sex slave.

“(4:24) And also forbidden to you are all married women (muhsanat) except those women whom your right hands have come to possess (as a result of war). ”

Raping your sex slave isn’t adultery because non-Islamic marriages don’t count. And the words in parens aren’t in the Quran, so you can rape your slave whether you captured her or bought her.

And then Muhammad royally screwed over Safiyah by not giving her a dowry. A Muslim can divorce a woman just by saying so three times. A Muslim is obligated to give his wife back her dowry and not kick her to the curb destitute. But that’s exactly the position Muhammad put Safiya in.

But not only do we get these wonderful moral lessons from “Habibi Allah,” Allah’s beloved and the most perfect man to ever live, a blessing to all creation, we get this heart warming chant in which Muslims recall Khaybar as a threat to slaughter Jews.

“Khaybar, Khaybar ya yahud, jaish Muhammad sa ya’ud.” Khaybar, khaybar, o Jew (meaning “remember Khaybar, Jew”), the army of Muhammad is returning.

Here’s that heartwarming chant being shouted in Times Square.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSqTyzBXhno&t=33s

Well, heartwarming for Reps Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. Rashida is on record saying that the Holocaust gives her a warm feeling but her excuses make no sense other than if the actual genocide gives her a warm fuzzy. No doubt, late at night, if you wander past her congressional offices you’ll hear her staff chanting it softly inside.

The interesting thing about Khaybar is that Mensa member Muhammad was offered a nice meal cooked by a Jewish woman at Khaybar. There are multiple sahih ahadith attesting to this. She roasted a sheep and served it to Muhammad and his companions. It was poisoned. How stupid do you have to be to let a woman cook dinner for you after killing every male member of her family and most of the people in her village. The funny thing is that his companions could taste the poison but ate it anyway thinking that if there was something wrong with it their prophet would know. Suddenly Muhammad dropped his leg of mutton and told them to stop eating the mutton and told everyone that it had “informed him it was poisoned.” The ahadith, all sahih, then contradict each other as to whether he had the woman executed or not.

Muhammad was in agony for the next two years as the poison was apparently caustic and caused internal injuries. His companions could see the discoloration in his mouth. Muhammad himself said it was the poison at Khaybar that killed him. Also in sahih ahadith Muhammad complained it felt like his aorta was being severed. Doubly interesting, Allah (if you believe the Quran is the uncreated word of Allah as Muslims must) said in Surah 69 Ayat 44-46 that if Muhammad was a false prophet then Allah would have grabbed him by the right hand and severed his aorta.

But in the two years Muhammad was slowly dying in agony from the poison he consumed at Khaybar Muhammad never designated a successor. Muslims have been fighting each other ever since, from literally the moment he died, and it ultimately led to the Sunni-Shia split. If Muslims had an official sport it would be takfir (Islamic excommunication) for being the wrong kind of Muslims.

How sweet! At Khaybar Muhammad was killed by a Jew. Not just any Jew. A Jewish woman. How embarrassing that must be for Muhammad; he let her get the better of him. And they’re too busy killing each other ever since to take over the world. Indeed, remember Khaybar.

Iran must be destroyed now.

” The leading Iranian English language daily displayed a map of the Jewish State dotted with markers showing Israeli towns and cities are potential missile targets.”

It’s time for Israel to reciprocate.

Target list:
Tehran
Qom
Every military and paramilitary (Republican Guard) installation
Every nuclear site

If they want martyrdom, give it to them – good and hard.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode