Twitter is at it again. Apparently, they “science” better than actual scientists who study heart health and the possible heart-related risks associated with the WuFlu vaccines.
Self-inflated Twitter brats are now censoring reports on an as yet not peer-reviewed paper presented at the recent American Heart Association (AHA) meeting.
People are getting banned by Twitter (and YouTube) for sharing the link to this AHA abstract. The concluding quote on the abstract appears to be causing the most angst by the “scientists” at Twitter:
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Warnings and concerns about thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other heart issues seemingly linked to the vaccines came to prominence when mountain biker Kyle Warner shared his career-ending experience with post-vaccine pericarditis, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).
Additionally, the FDA issued a warning about heart problems connected to the vaccines, and the Centers for Disease Control have an entire page devoted to the issue.
But Twitter gate-keepers of all things sciencey know better than victims, the FDA, and the CDC.
On Thursday, Twitter applied a warning label to a post of a study abstract from the American Heart Association website AHA Journals that expresses concern over mRNA vaccines and heart disease.. . . . A link to the abstract was posted on Twitter on Thursday by Marina Medvin, a trial attorney and opinion columnist. The post was flagged by Twitter’s system for screening and disclaiming content perceived as harmful.When attempting to open the link, one is redirected to another Twitter page with the warning: “this link may be unsafe.”Previously, this warning system was only used in the case of spam, malware risks, and other deceptive means of soliciting clicks or information. However, its scope has been expanded to include “violent and misleading content that could lead to real world harm” and “certain categories of content that, if posted directly on Twitter, are a violation of the Twitter rules.”
Needless to say, people have thoughts:
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY